Offshore
Photo
Dimitry Nakhla | Babylon Capital®
RT @DimitryNakhla: Attention investors ‼️ — I am SURE this post will sharpen your investing mindset and skills. Take a couple minutes to read it in full - it'll be a game-changer for your investment journey.
Yesterday I shared a poll asking if you thought $BMY was undervalued or a value trap, given its 17.32% FCF Yield.
Before I share my opinion, I believe it’s CRITICAL to emphasize the importance of being selective when building a portfolio.
Imagine you were the manager of a fútbol club (in this case Liverpool FC 😉) and you have to choose your Starting XI.
Would you add $BMY? .. More on this later.
You can see my Starting XI in the photo below.
It’s a club of exceptional businesses that have wide moats, pristine balance sheets, excellent returns on invested capital and quality revenues & earnings.
$BMY on the other hand doesn’t really fit in this club as it fails to meet these standards.
Another way to demonstrate this is if you were building a fútbol club & you could choose ANY footballer, I’m sure your club may look something like this:
Cristiano Ronaldo, Lionel Messi, Kylian Mbappe, Vinicius Jr, Jude Bellingham, Alison Becker, Virgil Van Dyke, David Alaba, Kyle Walker, Trent Alexander Arnold, & Ilkay Gundogan.
INVESTING IS NO DIFFERENT.
You have the opportunity to build a SUPERTEAM of quality businesses & nobody is forcing you to buy “subpar players” for your club.
As Warren Buffett even said:
“I could improve your ultimate financial welfare by giving you a ticket with only 20 slots in it so that you had 20 punches—representing all the investments that you got to make in a lifetime.”
The mistake MANY investors make is NOT being SELECTIVE enough.
Why add a subpar player to your squad when you could buy Ronaldo?
You’ll become a better investor and enhance your financial welfare by focusing on buying the world’s BEST & MOST QUALITY business when they trade at a fair or better valuation. This should be your focus.
Do not let the daily noise of the market sway you into buying a subpar company just because it trades for a low multiple.
So this brings us to $BMY.
Although $BMY may “appear” undervalued due to its low multiple & high FCF Yield, it could be a value trap and does not belong in my “superteam” of companies.
In short, it lacks many of the qualities I mentioned for the other businesses & has a poor history of performance.
Just have a look at the long-term growth of $BMY Revenues, EPS, & Balance Sheet and you’ll be very unimpressed.
Sure, $BMY may “have moments of excellence” (as any footballer may have in the occasional game) with nice rallies off its lows, but this doesn’t make $BMY a consistent performer for my club.
Yes, it’s important to consider the future when investing (which isn’t even bright for $BMY at the moment). However, it doesn’t mean we should forget about the poor performances $BMY has had over the last 15 years.
I wouldn’t want to count on a player who’s been performing poorly over 15 seasons and hope that this player will finally show me moments of consistent brilliance for the next 5 seasons.
Also, we should to be wise and consider the opportunity cost of owning subpar businesses over excellent businesses over the years.
I am sure there are many investors who have owned $BMY for the last ~5 years in hopes that $BMY would eventually see it supposed “value” realized.
Meanwhile, the same investors would have been better off, owning more shares of companies like $V $MA $GOOG $META $ASML $LRCX $NVDA $MSFT $CRM $VRTX $TMO $AAPL etc.
This was my Achilles Heel when I first started my investment journey in 2016. I was TOO focused on valuation & lower multiples rather than QUALITY & growth at a reasonable price.
So when you’re[...]
RT @DimitryNakhla: Attention investors ‼️ — I am SURE this post will sharpen your investing mindset and skills. Take a couple minutes to read it in full - it'll be a game-changer for your investment journey.
Yesterday I shared a poll asking if you thought $BMY was undervalued or a value trap, given its 17.32% FCF Yield.
Before I share my opinion, I believe it’s CRITICAL to emphasize the importance of being selective when building a portfolio.
Imagine you were the manager of a fútbol club (in this case Liverpool FC 😉) and you have to choose your Starting XI.
Would you add $BMY? .. More on this later.
You can see my Starting XI in the photo below.
It’s a club of exceptional businesses that have wide moats, pristine balance sheets, excellent returns on invested capital and quality revenues & earnings.
$BMY on the other hand doesn’t really fit in this club as it fails to meet these standards.
Another way to demonstrate this is if you were building a fútbol club & you could choose ANY footballer, I’m sure your club may look something like this:
Cristiano Ronaldo, Lionel Messi, Kylian Mbappe, Vinicius Jr, Jude Bellingham, Alison Becker, Virgil Van Dyke, David Alaba, Kyle Walker, Trent Alexander Arnold, & Ilkay Gundogan.
INVESTING IS NO DIFFERENT.
You have the opportunity to build a SUPERTEAM of quality businesses & nobody is forcing you to buy “subpar players” for your club.
As Warren Buffett even said:
“I could improve your ultimate financial welfare by giving you a ticket with only 20 slots in it so that you had 20 punches—representing all the investments that you got to make in a lifetime.”
The mistake MANY investors make is NOT being SELECTIVE enough.
Why add a subpar player to your squad when you could buy Ronaldo?
You’ll become a better investor and enhance your financial welfare by focusing on buying the world’s BEST & MOST QUALITY business when they trade at a fair or better valuation. This should be your focus.
Do not let the daily noise of the market sway you into buying a subpar company just because it trades for a low multiple.
So this brings us to $BMY.
Although $BMY may “appear” undervalued due to its low multiple & high FCF Yield, it could be a value trap and does not belong in my “superteam” of companies.
In short, it lacks many of the qualities I mentioned for the other businesses & has a poor history of performance.
Just have a look at the long-term growth of $BMY Revenues, EPS, & Balance Sheet and you’ll be very unimpressed.
Sure, $BMY may “have moments of excellence” (as any footballer may have in the occasional game) with nice rallies off its lows, but this doesn’t make $BMY a consistent performer for my club.
Yes, it’s important to consider the future when investing (which isn’t even bright for $BMY at the moment). However, it doesn’t mean we should forget about the poor performances $BMY has had over the last 15 years.
I wouldn’t want to count on a player who’s been performing poorly over 15 seasons and hope that this player will finally show me moments of consistent brilliance for the next 5 seasons.
Also, we should to be wise and consider the opportunity cost of owning subpar businesses over excellent businesses over the years.
I am sure there are many investors who have owned $BMY for the last ~5 years in hopes that $BMY would eventually see it supposed “value” realized.
Meanwhile, the same investors would have been better off, owning more shares of companies like $V $MA $GOOG $META $ASML $LRCX $NVDA $MSFT $CRM $VRTX $TMO $AAPL etc.
This was my Achilles Heel when I first started my investment journey in 2016. I was TOO focused on valuation & lower multiples rather than QUALITY & growth at a reasonable price.
So when you’re[...]
Offshore
Dimitry Nakhla | Babylon Capital® RT @DimitryNakhla: Attention investors ‼️ — I am SURE this post will sharpen your investing mindset and skills. Take a couple minutes to read it in full - it'll be a game-changer for your investment journey. Yesterday I…
building your club of equities, don’t buy a bench player in place of Lionel Messi or Cristiano Ronaldo. You’d just be downgrading your team & winning less.
If you made it this far, hope this helped!
Feel free to share your starting XI 😉
#stocks #investing
tweet
If you made it this far, hope this helped!
Feel free to share your starting XI 😉
#stocks #investing
$BMY currently trades for a 17.32% FCF Yield, doubling its 10-year average FCF Yield of 8.46%
Is $BMY a value trap or is it undervalued?
I will share my thoughts on $BMY once the poll is complete 👇🏽
#stocks #investing
- Value Trap 📉
- Undervalued 📈 - Dimitry Nakhla | Babylon Capital®tweet
Offshore
Photo
Wall St Engine
$UBER and Momenta has inked a deal to roll out Robotaxis in international markets starting in Europe in early 2026. The cars will include safety operators on board, but the goal is clear: Uber’s looking to scale autonomous rides globally by combining its platform with Momenta’s AV tech.
tweet
$UBER and Momenta has inked a deal to roll out Robotaxis in international markets starting in Europe in early 2026. The cars will include safety operators on board, but the goal is clear: Uber’s looking to scale autonomous rides globally by combining its platform with Momenta’s AV tech.
tweet
Wall St Engine
RT @wallstengine: Japan’s 🇯🇵 Finance Minister Kato says the country’s massive U.S. 🇺🇸 Treasury holdings are on the table as leverage in trade negotiations, but adds that whether they’ll actually play that card is a separate decision.
tweet
RT @wallstengine: Japan’s 🇯🇵 Finance Minister Kato says the country’s massive U.S. 🇺🇸 Treasury holdings are on the table as leverage in trade negotiations, but adds that whether they’ll actually play that card is a separate decision.
tweet
Offshore
Photo
Wall St Engine
Amazon $AMZN just added to its NYC footprint with the purchase of 522 Fifth Ave, a 23-story tower near Grand Central. No price disclosed. Comes as demand grows for office space near transit hubs. It’s Amazon’s second big Midtown move since the $1B Lord & Taylor buy in 2020. https://t.co/GIlInm0HxK
tweet
Amazon $AMZN just added to its NYC footprint with the purchase of 522 Fifth Ave, a 23-story tower near Grand Central. No price disclosed. Comes as demand grows for office space near transit hubs. It’s Amazon’s second big Midtown move since the $1B Lord & Taylor buy in 2020. https://t.co/GIlInm0HxK
tweet
Offshore
Photo
Wall St Engine
$AAPL TEAMS UP WITH ANTHROPIC TO BRING AI TO XCODE
Apple is working with Anthropic to build a new AI coding tool inside Xcode, using Claude Sonnet to help engineers write, edit, and test code. Internally called “vibe-coding,” the platform could roll out to third-party developers if tests go well. Apple’s shifting its AI approach after delays with its own Swift Assist tool, showing it's more open to partnerships to catch up in the generative AI race. As one Apple exec put it, “We are pleased with the progress we’re making,” but this move shows Apple knows it still has ground to cover.
Source: Bloomberg
tweet
$AAPL TEAMS UP WITH ANTHROPIC TO BRING AI TO XCODE
Apple is working with Anthropic to build a new AI coding tool inside Xcode, using Claude Sonnet to help engineers write, edit, and test code. Internally called “vibe-coding,” the platform could roll out to third-party developers if tests go well. Apple’s shifting its AI approach after delays with its own Swift Assist tool, showing it's more open to partnerships to catch up in the generative AI race. As one Apple exec put it, “We are pleased with the progress we’re making,” but this move shows Apple knows it still has ground to cover.
Source: Bloomberg
tweet
Offshore
Photo
Quiver Quantitative
JUST IN: Speaker Mike Johnson has said that he's open to conversations about banning congressional stock trading. https://t.co/OHYQAvbD7H
tweet
JUST IN: Speaker Mike Johnson has said that he's open to conversations about banning congressional stock trading. https://t.co/OHYQAvbD7H
tweet
Offshore
Photo
Wall St Engine
Polymarket odds for Fed moves:
May: 99% chance of no change
June: 63% chance of no change
July: 45% chance of no change https://t.co/kYGYOdQ1ZS
tweet
Polymarket odds for Fed moves:
May: 99% chance of no change
June: 63% chance of no change
July: 45% chance of no change https://t.co/kYGYOdQ1ZS
tweet