Offshore
Photo
โ Stock Analysis Compilation
Baron Health Care Fund on Insmed Incorporated $INSM US
Thesis: Insmed Incorporated is expected to generate over $8 billion in peak sales from its lead drugs, including Brensocatib, which shows promise for treating non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis.
(Extract from their Q4 letter)
tweet
Baron Health Care Fund on Insmed Incorporated $INSM US
Thesis: Insmed Incorporated is expected to generate over $8 billion in peak sales from its lead drugs, including Brensocatib, which shows promise for treating non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis.
(Extract from their Q4 letter)
tweet
โ Investing visuals
I donโt get the $GRAB fuzz.
Let me tell you a story, based on firsthand experiences from my girlfriend. A must-read for anyone interested in $GRAB ๐
1 -- $UBER vs. $GRAB: The Rise of $GRAB ๐
My girlfriend loves traveling and spent time in Indonesia in 2016. Back then, $UBER dominated the market.
Fast forward to 2023 -- she visited again, and $GRAB had taken over. Hereโs why she found it compelling:
โSuper easy to use, it was basically everywhere with high availability.โ
โThey had a lot of scooters, which is the main form of transport there. $UBER didnโt have that.โ
โIt was crazy cheap, so everyone was using it back then.โ
Sounds great for $GRAB, right?
2 -- But hold onโฆ ๐ค
So I asked: โWhat if $UBER returned with the same offerings at lower costs?โ
Her response:
โI would just pick $UBER, easy choice. But they should have high availability as well.โ
She also added: โIf $UBER wants a strong foothold, they should incentivize the drivers.โ
Interesting right? Let's dive in a little deeper.
3 -- Did you know... ๐ก
That $UBER actually holds a 27.5% stake in $GRAB? So what happened here?
$UBER played the game masterfully.
When $GRAB started gaining market share (2015โ2017), $UBER shifted strategy. Instead of fighting to win at all costs, they focused on expanding their global dominance.
The result?
โข $UBER contained $GRAB within its Asia bubble
โข Meanwhile, $UBER expanded globally
Fast forward to today:
โข $UBER is the dominant global player
โข $GRAB is still stuck in its Asia bubble
And the best part? If $GRAB wins in Asia, $UBER wins too, thanks to its 27.5% stake.
4 -- The Investor POV ๐
When I invest, I look for sustainable competitive advantages. Something that truly differentiates a business.
With $GRAB, I donโt see what sets it apart besides pricing. Thatโs the core of its growth story.
Letโs talk numbers:
โข $UBER: $6.9B LTM free cash flow
โข $GRAB: $0.5B LTM free cash flow
If $UBER wanted to crush $GRAB by undercutting prices, incentivizing drivers, and ensuring high scooter availability, what could $GRAB do to stop them?
Of course, they wonโt - given their 27.5% stake - but if they wanted to, they absolutely could.
$GRAB feels very fragile, not to mention the limited global expansion options. $UBER already has a dominant global presence. How will $GRAB ever compete on a larger scale?
4 -- Conclusion (TL;DR) ๐ง
$GRAB might do well in Asia, but that's solely because $UBER ALLOWS them to.
The question is: What makes you think $GRAB can actually compete with $UBER, especially given their global dominance and scale? Why would you prefer $GRAB over $UBER?
I havenโt found the answer to that (yet).
tweet
I donโt get the $GRAB fuzz.
Let me tell you a story, based on firsthand experiences from my girlfriend. A must-read for anyone interested in $GRAB ๐
1 -- $UBER vs. $GRAB: The Rise of $GRAB ๐
My girlfriend loves traveling and spent time in Indonesia in 2016. Back then, $UBER dominated the market.
Fast forward to 2023 -- she visited again, and $GRAB had taken over. Hereโs why she found it compelling:
โSuper easy to use, it was basically everywhere with high availability.โ
โThey had a lot of scooters, which is the main form of transport there. $UBER didnโt have that.โ
โIt was crazy cheap, so everyone was using it back then.โ
Sounds great for $GRAB, right?
2 -- But hold onโฆ ๐ค
So I asked: โWhat if $UBER returned with the same offerings at lower costs?โ
Her response:
โI would just pick $UBER, easy choice. But they should have high availability as well.โ
She also added: โIf $UBER wants a strong foothold, they should incentivize the drivers.โ
Interesting right? Let's dive in a little deeper.
3 -- Did you know... ๐ก
That $UBER actually holds a 27.5% stake in $GRAB? So what happened here?
$UBER played the game masterfully.
When $GRAB started gaining market share (2015โ2017), $UBER shifted strategy. Instead of fighting to win at all costs, they focused on expanding their global dominance.
The result?
โข $UBER contained $GRAB within its Asia bubble
โข Meanwhile, $UBER expanded globally
Fast forward to today:
โข $UBER is the dominant global player
โข $GRAB is still stuck in its Asia bubble
And the best part? If $GRAB wins in Asia, $UBER wins too, thanks to its 27.5% stake.
4 -- The Investor POV ๐
When I invest, I look for sustainable competitive advantages. Something that truly differentiates a business.
With $GRAB, I donโt see what sets it apart besides pricing. Thatโs the core of its growth story.
Letโs talk numbers:
โข $UBER: $6.9B LTM free cash flow
โข $GRAB: $0.5B LTM free cash flow
If $UBER wanted to crush $GRAB by undercutting prices, incentivizing drivers, and ensuring high scooter availability, what could $GRAB do to stop them?
Of course, they wonโt - given their 27.5% stake - but if they wanted to, they absolutely could.
$GRAB feels very fragile, not to mention the limited global expansion options. $UBER already has a dominant global presence. How will $GRAB ever compete on a larger scale?
4 -- Conclusion (TL;DR) ๐ง
$GRAB might do well in Asia, but that's solely because $UBER ALLOWS them to.
The question is: What makes you think $GRAB can actually compete with $UBER, especially given their global dominance and scale? Why would you prefer $GRAB over $UBER?
I havenโt found the answer to that (yet).
tweet
โ Dimitry Nakhla | Babylon Capitalยฎ
RT @DimitryNakhla: 10 Stocks Where FCF CAGR is Similar or Greater than Stock Price CAGR in the Past 5 Years ๐ธ
๐ MSCI Inc $MSCI
โขFCF CAGR: 16.2%
โขStock CAGR: 12.2%
๐งฌ Novo Nordisk $NVO
โขFCF CAGR: 21.4%
โขStock CAGR: 19.7%
๐ S&P Global $SPGI
โขFCF CAGR: 17.2%
โขStock CAGR: 11.9%
๐ฑ๏ธ Alphabet $GOOG $GOOGL
โขFCF CAGR: 18.6%
โขStock CAGR: 19.7%
๐๏ธ Intuit $INTU
โขFCF CAGR: 16.4%
โขStock CAGR: 14.1%
๐ Manhattan Associates $MANH
โขFCF CAGR: 16.8%
โขStock CAGR: 18.9%
๐ต Mastercard $MA
โขFCF CAGR: 19.4%
โขStock CAGR: 10.6%
๐ Copart $CPRT
โขFCF CAGR: 28.7%
โขStock CAGR: 18.1%
๐ฆ Intercontinental Exchange $ICE
โขFCF CAGR: 10.1%
โขStock CAGR: 11.5%
๐ฒ Applied Materials $AMAT
โขFCF CAGR: 21.7%
โขStock CAGR: 20.4%
tweet
RT @DimitryNakhla: 10 Stocks Where FCF CAGR is Similar or Greater than Stock Price CAGR in the Past 5 Years ๐ธ
๐ MSCI Inc $MSCI
โขFCF CAGR: 16.2%
โขStock CAGR: 12.2%
๐งฌ Novo Nordisk $NVO
โขFCF CAGR: 21.4%
โขStock CAGR: 19.7%
๐ S&P Global $SPGI
โขFCF CAGR: 17.2%
โขStock CAGR: 11.9%
๐ฑ๏ธ Alphabet $GOOG $GOOGL
โขFCF CAGR: 18.6%
โขStock CAGR: 19.7%
๐๏ธ Intuit $INTU
โขFCF CAGR: 16.4%
โขStock CAGR: 14.1%
๐ Manhattan Associates $MANH
โขFCF CAGR: 16.8%
โขStock CAGR: 18.9%
๐ต Mastercard $MA
โขFCF CAGR: 19.4%
โขStock CAGR: 10.6%
๐ Copart $CPRT
โขFCF CAGR: 28.7%
โขStock CAGR: 18.1%
๐ฆ Intercontinental Exchange $ICE
โขFCF CAGR: 10.1%
โขStock CAGR: 11.5%
๐ฒ Applied Materials $AMAT
โขFCF CAGR: 21.7%
โขStock CAGR: 20.4%
tweet
Offshore
Video
โ Finding Compounders
Warren Buffett on inflation proof businesses
These are the types of businesses you want to own in an inflationary environment https://t.co/te92C4V1L5
tweet
Warren Buffett on inflation proof businesses
These are the types of businesses you want to own in an inflationary environment https://t.co/te92C4V1L5
tweet
Offshore
Photo
โ Dimitry Nakhla | Babylon Capitalยฎ
RT @DimitryNakhla: A quality valuation analysis on $INTU ๐ง๐ฝโโ๏ธ
โขNTM P/E Ratio: 29.70x
โข10-Year Mean: 33.57x
โขNTM FCF Yield: 3.49%
โข10-Year Mean: 3.68%
As you can see, $INTU appears to be trading somewhere below fair value & near fair value
Going forward, investors can receive ~12% MORE in earnings per share & ~5% LESS in FCF per share ๐ง ***
Before we get into valuation, letโs take a look at why $INTU is a good business
BALANCE SHEETโ
โขCash & Short-Term Inv: $3.36B
โขLong-Term Debt: $5.63B
$INTU has a strong balance sheet, an A- S&P Credit Rating & 22x FFO Interest Coverage
RETURN ON CAPITALโ
โข2019: 43.9%
โข2020: 25.2%
โข2021: 19.7%
โข2022: 10.7%
โข2023: 13.1%
โข2024: 15.4%
RETURN ON EQUITYโ
โข2019: 47.4%
โข2020: 41.2%
โข2021: 27.5%
โข2022: 15.7%
โข2023: 14.1%
โข2024: 16.6%
$INTU has strong return metrics, highlighting the financial efficiency of the business
REVENUESโ
โข2014: $4.24B
โข2024: $16.29B
โขCAGR: 14.40%
FREE CASH FLOWโ
โข2014: $1.34B
โข2024: $4.69B
โขCAGR: 13.34%
NORMALIZED EPSโ
โข2014: $3.49
โข2024: $16.94
โขCAGR: 17.11%
PAID DIVIDENDSโ
โข2014: $0.76
โข2024: $3.60
โขCAGR: 16.82%
SHARE BUYBACKS๐
โข2014 Shares Outstanding: 291.00M
โขLTM Shares Outstanding: 284.00M
By reducing its shares outstanding ~2.4%, $INTU increased its EPS by ~2.5% (assuming 0 growth)
MARGINSโ
โขLTM Gross Margins: 79.6%
โขLTM Operating Margins: 23.1%
โขLTM Net Income Margins: 17.6%
***NOW TO VALUATION ๐ง
As stated above, investors can expect to receive ~12% MORE in EPS & ~5% LESS in FCF per share
Using Benjamin Grahamโs 2G rule of thumb, $INTU has to grow earnings at a 14.85% CAGR over the next several years to justify its valuation
Today, analysts anticipate 2025 - 2027 EPS growth over the next few years to be slightly less than the (14.85%) required growth rate:
2025E: $19.29 (13.9% YoY) *FY Jul
2026E: $22.08 (14.4% YoY)
2027E: $25.14 (13.9% YoY)
$INTU has a great track record of meeting analyst estimates ~2 years out, but letโs assume $INTU ends 2027 with $25.14 in EPS & see its CAGR potential assuming different multiples:
32x P/E: $804.48๐ต โฆ ~14.3% CAGR
31x P/E: $779.34๐ต โฆ ~12.9% CAGR
30x P/E: $754.20๐ต โฆ ~11.4% CAGR
29x P/E: $729.06๐ต โฆ ~9.9% CAGR
28x P/E: $703.92๐ต โฆ ~8.3% CAGR
While itโs certainly reasonable for $INTU to trade for 32x, I wouldnโt want to rely on that assumption as it doesnโt leave us with a substantial margin of safety
Yet, given its quality, moat, predictability, & growth rate, I am comfortable relying on 29x - 31x multiple, making $INTU a good purchase today at $585๐ต
I consider $INTU a strong purchase with a substantial margin of safety closer to $545๐ต, or ~27.60x NTM earnings (~6% below todays price)
Given todayโs estimates, at $545๐ต I can reasonably expect ~10% CAGR while assuming an attractive & conservative 27x multiple
___
๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐โผ๏ธ: ๐๐ก๐ข๐ฌ ๐ข๐ฌ ๐๐๐ ๐๐ง๐ฏ๐๐ฌ๐ญ๐ฆ๐๐ง๐ญ ๐๐๐ฏ๐ข๐๐. ๐๐๐๐ฒ๐ฅ๐จ๐ง ๐๐๐ฉ๐ข๐ญ๐๐ฅยฎ ๐๐ง๐ ๐ข๐ญ๐ฌ ๐ซ๐๐ฉ๐ซ๐๐ฌ๐๐ง๐ญ๐๐ญ๐ข๐ฏ๐๐ฌ ๐ฆ๐๐ฒ ๐ก๐๐ฏ๐ ๐ฉ๐จ๐ฌ๐ข๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง๐ฌ ๐ข๐ง ๐ญ๐ก๐ ๐ฌ๐๐๐ฎ๐ซ๐ข๐ญ๐ข๐๐ฌ ๐๐ข๐ฌ๐๐ฎ๐ฌ๐ฌ๐๐ ๐ข๐ง ๐ญ๐ก๐ข๐ฌ ๐ญ๐ฐ๐๐๐ญ.
๐๐ก๐ ๐ข๐ง๐๐จ๐ซ๐ฆ๐๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง ๐๐จ๐ง๐ญ๐๐ข๐ง๐๐ ๐ข๐ง ๐ญ๐ก๐ข๐ฌ ๐ญ๐ฐ๐๐๐ญ ๐ข๐ฌ ๐ข๐ง๐ญ๐๐ง๐๐๐ ๐๐จ๐ซ ๐ข๐ง๐๐จ๐ซ๐ฆ๐๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง๐๐ฅ ๐ฉ๐ฎ๐ซ๐ฉ๐จ๐ฌ๐๐ฌ ๐จ๐ง๐ฅ๐ฒ ๐๐ง๐ ๐ฌ๐ก๐จ๐ฎ๐ฅ๐ ๐ง๐จ๐ญ ๐๐ ๐๐จ๐ง๐ฌ๐ญ๐ซ๐ฎ๐๐ ๐๐ฌ ๐ข๐ง๐ฏ๐๐ฌ๐ญ๐ฆ๐๐ง๐ญ ๐๐๐ฏ๐ข๐๐ ๐ญ๐จ ๐ฆ๐๐๐ญ ๐ญ๐ก๐ ๐ฌ๐ฉ๐๐๐ข๐๐ข๐ ๐ง๐๐๐๐ฌ ๐จ๐ ๐๐ง๐ฒ ๐ข๐ง๐๐ข๐ฏ๐ข๐๐ฎ๐๐ฅ ๐จ๐ซ ๐ฌ๐ข๐ญ๐ฎ๐๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง. ๐๐๐ฌ๐ญ ๐ฉ๐๐ซ๐๐จ๐ซ๐ฆ๐๐ง๐๐ ๐ข๐ฌ ๐ง๐จ ๐ ๐ฎ๐๐ซ๐๐ง๐ญ๐๐ ๐จ๐ ๐๐ฎ๐ญ๐ฎ๐ซ๐ ๐ซ๐๐ฌ๐ฎ๐ฅ๐ญ๐ฌ.
๐๐ง๐๐จ๐ซ๐ฆ๐๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง ๐๐จ๐ง๐ญ๐๐ข๐ง๐๐ ๐ข๐ง ๐ญ๐ก๐ข๐ฌ ๐ญ๐ฐ๐๐๐ญ ๐ก๐๐ฌ ๐๐๐๐ง ๐จ๐๐ญ๐๐ข๐ง๐๐ ๐๐ซ๐จ๐ฆ ๐ฌ๐จ๐ฎ๐ซ๐๐๐ฌ ๐๐๐ฅ๐ข๐๐ฏ๐๐ ๐ญ๐จ ๐๐ ๐ซ๐๐ฅ๐ข๐๐๐ฅ๐, ๐๐ฎ๐ญ ๐ข๐ฌ ๐ง[...]
RT @DimitryNakhla: A quality valuation analysis on $INTU ๐ง๐ฝโโ๏ธ
โขNTM P/E Ratio: 29.70x
โข10-Year Mean: 33.57x
โขNTM FCF Yield: 3.49%
โข10-Year Mean: 3.68%
As you can see, $INTU appears to be trading somewhere below fair value & near fair value
Going forward, investors can receive ~12% MORE in earnings per share & ~5% LESS in FCF per share ๐ง ***
Before we get into valuation, letโs take a look at why $INTU is a good business
BALANCE SHEETโ
โขCash & Short-Term Inv: $3.36B
โขLong-Term Debt: $5.63B
$INTU has a strong balance sheet, an A- S&P Credit Rating & 22x FFO Interest Coverage
RETURN ON CAPITALโ
โข2019: 43.9%
โข2020: 25.2%
โข2021: 19.7%
โข2022: 10.7%
โข2023: 13.1%
โข2024: 15.4%
RETURN ON EQUITYโ
โข2019: 47.4%
โข2020: 41.2%
โข2021: 27.5%
โข2022: 15.7%
โข2023: 14.1%
โข2024: 16.6%
$INTU has strong return metrics, highlighting the financial efficiency of the business
REVENUESโ
โข2014: $4.24B
โข2024: $16.29B
โขCAGR: 14.40%
FREE CASH FLOWโ
โข2014: $1.34B
โข2024: $4.69B
โขCAGR: 13.34%
NORMALIZED EPSโ
โข2014: $3.49
โข2024: $16.94
โขCAGR: 17.11%
PAID DIVIDENDSโ
โข2014: $0.76
โข2024: $3.60
โขCAGR: 16.82%
SHARE BUYBACKS๐
โข2014 Shares Outstanding: 291.00M
โขLTM Shares Outstanding: 284.00M
By reducing its shares outstanding ~2.4%, $INTU increased its EPS by ~2.5% (assuming 0 growth)
MARGINSโ
โขLTM Gross Margins: 79.6%
โขLTM Operating Margins: 23.1%
โขLTM Net Income Margins: 17.6%
***NOW TO VALUATION ๐ง
As stated above, investors can expect to receive ~12% MORE in EPS & ~5% LESS in FCF per share
Using Benjamin Grahamโs 2G rule of thumb, $INTU has to grow earnings at a 14.85% CAGR over the next several years to justify its valuation
Today, analysts anticipate 2025 - 2027 EPS growth over the next few years to be slightly less than the (14.85%) required growth rate:
2025E: $19.29 (13.9% YoY) *FY Jul
2026E: $22.08 (14.4% YoY)
2027E: $25.14 (13.9% YoY)
$INTU has a great track record of meeting analyst estimates ~2 years out, but letโs assume $INTU ends 2027 with $25.14 in EPS & see its CAGR potential assuming different multiples:
32x P/E: $804.48๐ต โฆ ~14.3% CAGR
31x P/E: $779.34๐ต โฆ ~12.9% CAGR
30x P/E: $754.20๐ต โฆ ~11.4% CAGR
29x P/E: $729.06๐ต โฆ ~9.9% CAGR
28x P/E: $703.92๐ต โฆ ~8.3% CAGR
While itโs certainly reasonable for $INTU to trade for 32x, I wouldnโt want to rely on that assumption as it doesnโt leave us with a substantial margin of safety
Yet, given its quality, moat, predictability, & growth rate, I am comfortable relying on 29x - 31x multiple, making $INTU a good purchase today at $585๐ต
I consider $INTU a strong purchase with a substantial margin of safety closer to $545๐ต, or ~27.60x NTM earnings (~6% below todays price)
Given todayโs estimates, at $545๐ต I can reasonably expect ~10% CAGR while assuming an attractive & conservative 27x multiple
___
๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐โผ๏ธ: ๐๐ก๐ข๐ฌ ๐ข๐ฌ ๐๐๐ ๐๐ง๐ฏ๐๐ฌ๐ญ๐ฆ๐๐ง๐ญ ๐๐๐ฏ๐ข๐๐. ๐๐๐๐ฒ๐ฅ๐จ๐ง ๐๐๐ฉ๐ข๐ญ๐๐ฅยฎ ๐๐ง๐ ๐ข๐ญ๐ฌ ๐ซ๐๐ฉ๐ซ๐๐ฌ๐๐ง๐ญ๐๐ญ๐ข๐ฏ๐๐ฌ ๐ฆ๐๐ฒ ๐ก๐๐ฏ๐ ๐ฉ๐จ๐ฌ๐ข๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง๐ฌ ๐ข๐ง ๐ญ๐ก๐ ๐ฌ๐๐๐ฎ๐ซ๐ข๐ญ๐ข๐๐ฌ ๐๐ข๐ฌ๐๐ฎ๐ฌ๐ฌ๐๐ ๐ข๐ง ๐ญ๐ก๐ข๐ฌ ๐ญ๐ฐ๐๐๐ญ.
๐๐ก๐ ๐ข๐ง๐๐จ๐ซ๐ฆ๐๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง ๐๐จ๐ง๐ญ๐๐ข๐ง๐๐ ๐ข๐ง ๐ญ๐ก๐ข๐ฌ ๐ญ๐ฐ๐๐๐ญ ๐ข๐ฌ ๐ข๐ง๐ญ๐๐ง๐๐๐ ๐๐จ๐ซ ๐ข๐ง๐๐จ๐ซ๐ฆ๐๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง๐๐ฅ ๐ฉ๐ฎ๐ซ๐ฉ๐จ๐ฌ๐๐ฌ ๐จ๐ง๐ฅ๐ฒ ๐๐ง๐ ๐ฌ๐ก๐จ๐ฎ๐ฅ๐ ๐ง๐จ๐ญ ๐๐ ๐๐จ๐ง๐ฌ๐ญ๐ซ๐ฎ๐๐ ๐๐ฌ ๐ข๐ง๐ฏ๐๐ฌ๐ญ๐ฆ๐๐ง๐ญ ๐๐๐ฏ๐ข๐๐ ๐ญ๐จ ๐ฆ๐๐๐ญ ๐ญ๐ก๐ ๐ฌ๐ฉ๐๐๐ข๐๐ข๐ ๐ง๐๐๐๐ฌ ๐จ๐ ๐๐ง๐ฒ ๐ข๐ง๐๐ข๐ฏ๐ข๐๐ฎ๐๐ฅ ๐จ๐ซ ๐ฌ๐ข๐ญ๐ฎ๐๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง. ๐๐๐ฌ๐ญ ๐ฉ๐๐ซ๐๐จ๐ซ๐ฆ๐๐ง๐๐ ๐ข๐ฌ ๐ง๐จ ๐ ๐ฎ๐๐ซ๐๐ง๐ญ๐๐ ๐จ๐ ๐๐ฎ๐ญ๐ฎ๐ซ๐ ๐ซ๐๐ฌ๐ฎ๐ฅ๐ญ๐ฌ.
๐๐ง๐๐จ๐ซ๐ฆ๐๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง ๐๐จ๐ง๐ญ๐๐ข๐ง๐๐ ๐ข๐ง ๐ญ๐ก๐ข๐ฌ ๐ญ๐ฐ๐๐๐ญ ๐ก๐๐ฌ ๐๐๐๐ง ๐จ๐๐ญ๐๐ข๐ง๐๐ ๐๐ซ๐จ๐ฆ ๐ฌ๐จ๐ฎ๐ซ๐๐๐ฌ ๐๐๐ฅ๐ข๐๐ฏ๐๐ ๐ญ๐จ ๐๐ ๐ซ๐๐ฅ๐ข๐๐๐ฅ๐, ๐๐ฎ๐ญ ๐ข๐ฌ ๐ง[...]
Offshore
โ Dimitry Nakhla | Babylon Capitalยฎ RT @DimitryNakhla: A quality valuation analysis on $INTU ๐ง๐ฝโโ๏ธ โขNTM P/E Ratio: 29.70x โข10-Year Mean: 33.57x โขNTM FCF Yield: 3.49% โข10-Year Mean: 3.68% As you can see, $INTU appears to be trading somewhere below fair valueโฆ
๐จ๐ญ ๐ ๐ฎ๐๐ซ๐๐ง๐ญ๐๐๐ ๐๐ฌ ๐ญ๐จ ๐๐จ๐ฆ๐ฉ๐ฅ๐๐ญ๐๐ง๐๐ฌ๐ฌ ๐จ๐ซ ๐๐๐๐ฎ๐ซ๐๐๐ฒ.
tweet
tweet
Offshore
Video
โ Startup Archive
RT @twistartups: Palmer thinks hardcore hobbyists make the best employees, because they'd already be obsessing about the subject and the product. Do you agree? Is it possible to get really good at your job if you didn't already LOVE that field to begin with? https://t.co/UoXWbd21ML
tweet
RT @twistartups: Palmer thinks hardcore hobbyists make the best employees, because they'd already be obsessing about the subject and the product. Do you agree? Is it possible to get really good at your job if you didn't already LOVE that field to begin with? https://t.co/UoXWbd21ML
Palmer Luckey on what he looks for when hiring people at Anduril
โThe most important advice that I can give people is to work on projects that you care about. Donโt look to school โ whether itโs college or the state-mandated educational system. Donโt look to them to tell you, โHereโs what electronics projects you should be working on.โโ
Thereโs two reasons Palmer gives aspiring young innovators this advice:
โSchools are often years (sometimes decades) behind what industry and hobbyists are actually doing.โ
โWhen youโre working on something that youโre only doing for yourself, youโre going to make way better decisions in what you teach yourself and how you do things.โ
In fact, this is also what he looks for when hiring people at Anduril:
โWhen I hire people at Anduril, I look for people who have done projects that were outside of what their work paid them to do or what their school made them do because that means theyโre the type of person who is willing to work on things with their own money and their own time because they want to bring something to this world that wouldnโt have existed otherwise.โ
Palmer continues:
โThatโs what drive you to learn the most. Thatโs what drives you to have the right attitude around all this stuff.โ
Video source: @ShawnRyan762 (2025) - Startup Archivetweet
Offshore
Photo
โ Ahmad Jivraj
Some great podcast episodes listed here
tweet
Some great podcast episodes listed here
Iโm a little late but time for some of my favorite podcasts from 2024. Starting it off was my favorite pod of the year. The @ShaneAParrish interview with Chris Davis. Loved this one. https://t.co/bJyqGkhFxV - Small Cap Value Opportunitiestweet