Offshore
Video
Quiver Quantitative
We’ve been writing code to track politicians’ portfolios.
Here’s an update: https://t.co/EsqF9VX7yU
tweet
We’ve been writing code to track politicians’ portfolios.
Here’s an update: https://t.co/EsqF9VX7yU
tweet
Offshore
Photo
Dimitry Nakhla | Babylon Capital®
A quality valuation analysis on $CNI 🧘🏽♂️
•NTM P/E Ratio: 18.02x
•10-Year Mean: 19.89x
•NTM FCF Yield: 3.86%
•10-Year Mean: 3.51%
As you can see, $CNI appears to be trading slightly below fair value
Going forward, investors can receive ~10% MORE in earnings per share & ~10% MORE in FCF per share 🧠***
Before we get into valuation, let’s take a look at why $CNI is a good business
BALANCE SHEET🆗
•Cash & Short-Term Inv: $201.88M
•Long-Term Debt: $13.76B
$CNI has an ok balance sheet, an A- S&P Credit Rating, & 8.29x FFO Interest Coverage Ratio
RETURN ON CAPITAL🆗
•2020: 14.7%
•2021: 13.4%
•2022: 15.6%
•2023: 14.4%
•LTM: 13.7%
RETURN ON EQUITY✅
•2020: 18.8%
•2021: 23.1%
•2022: 23.2%
•2023: 27.1%
•LTM: 27.6%
$CNI has decent return metrics, highlighting the financial efficiency of the business
REVENUES❌
•2013: $9.95B
•2023: $12.70B
•CAGR: 2.47%
FREE CASH FLOW🆗
•2013: $1.48B
•2023: $2.85B
•CAGR: 6.77%
NORMALIZED EPS🆗
•2013: $2.74
•2023: $5.41
•CAGR: 7.03%
SHARE BUYBACKS✅
•2013 Shares Outstanding: 846.10M
•LTM Shares Outstanding: 639.08M
By reducing its shares outstanding 24.4%, $CNI increased its EPS by 32% (assuming 0 growth)
MARGINS✅
•LTM Gross Margins: 55.1%
•LTM Operating Margins: 40.6%
•LTM Net Income Margins: 31.7%
***NOW TO VALUATION 🧠
As stated above, investors can expect to receive ~10% MORE in EPS & ~10% MORE in FCF per share
Using Benjamin Graham’s 2G rule of thumb, $CNI has to grow earnings at a 9.01% CAGR over the next several years to justify its valuation
Today, analysts anticipate 2025 - 2027 EPS growth over the next few years to be less than the (18.49%) required growth rate:
2025E: $5.76 (12.7% YoY) *FY Dec
2026E: $6.45 (12.2% YoY)
2027E $7.20 (10.4% YoY)
$CNI has a great track record of meeting analyst estimates ~2 years out, but let’s assume $CNI ends 2027 with $7.20 in EPS & see its CAGR potential assuming different multiples
20x P/E: $144.00💵 … ~14.7% CAGR
19x P/E: $136.80💵 … ~12.8% CAGR
18x P/E: $129.60💵 … ~10.9% CAGR
17x P/E: $122.40💵 … ~8.0% CAGR
As you can see, $CNI appears to have double-digit return potential if we assume >18x earnings, a level slightly below its 10-year average multiple of 19.89x
However, this assumption doesn’t leave us with too much margin of safety considering $CNI can be cyclical at times and trade for ~16x during economic slowdowns
Also, given its modest growth rates & heavy capital expenditures, investors primarily concerned with total return potential will likely do better elsewhere
$CNI is a decent deal today at $101💵 for those primarily concerned with owning a low-volatility name with reliable dividend income & growth
I’ll be more interested in accumulating $CNI if it trades closer to $90💵 or at ~16.25x NTM estimates (~10% below today’s price) where I can reasonably assume ~13% CAGR while relying on a 17x multiple … I’d consider $90💵 extremely attractive (given today’s information & expectations)
#stocks #investing
___
𝐃𝐈𝐒𝐂𝐋𝐎𝐒𝐔𝐑𝐄‼️: 𝐓𝐡𝐢𝐬 𝐢𝐬 𝐍𝐎𝐓 𝐈𝐧𝐯𝐞𝐬𝐭𝐦𝐞𝐧𝐭 𝐀𝐝𝐯𝐢𝐜𝐞. 𝐁𝐚𝐛𝐲𝐥𝐨𝐧 𝐂𝐚𝐩𝐢𝐭𝐚𝐥® 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐢𝐭𝐬 𝐫𝐞𝐩𝐫𝐞𝐬𝐞𝐧𝐭𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐯𝐞𝐬 𝐦𝐚𝐲 𝐡𝐚𝐯𝐞 𝐩𝐨𝐬𝐢𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧𝐬 𝐢𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐬𝐞𝐜𝐮𝐫𝐢𝐭𝐢𝐞𝐬 𝐝𝐢𝐬𝐜𝐮𝐬𝐬𝐞𝐝 𝐢𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐢𝐬 𝐭𝐰𝐞𝐞𝐭.
𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐢𝐧𝐟𝐨𝐫𝐦𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐜𝐨𝐧𝐭𝐚𝐢𝐧𝐞𝐝 𝐢𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐢𝐬 𝐭𝐰𝐞𝐞𝐭 𝐢𝐬 𝐢𝐧𝐭𝐞𝐧𝐝𝐞𝐝 𝐟𝐨𝐫 𝐢𝐧𝐟𝐨𝐫𝐦𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧𝐚𝐥 𝐩𝐮𝐫𝐩𝐨𝐬𝐞𝐬 𝐨𝐧𝐥𝐲 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐬𝐡𝐨𝐮𝐥𝐝 𝐧𝐨𝐭 𝐛𝐞 𝐜𝐨𝐧𝐬𝐭𝐫𝐮𝐞𝐝 𝐚𝐬 𝐢𝐧𝐯𝐞𝐬𝐭𝐦𝐞𝐧𝐭 𝐚𝐝𝐯𝐢𝐜𝐞 𝐭𝐨 𝐦𝐞𝐞𝐭 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐬𝐩𝐞𝐜𝐢𝐟𝐢𝐜 𝐧𝐞𝐞𝐝𝐬 𝐨𝐟 𝐚𝐧𝐲 𝐢𝐧𝐝𝐢𝐯𝐢𝐝𝐮𝐚𝐥 𝐨𝐫 𝐬𝐢𝐭𝐮𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧. 𝐏𝐚𝐬𝐭 𝐩𝐞𝐫𝐟𝐨𝐫𝐦𝐚𝐧𝐜𝐞 𝐢𝐬 𝐧𝐨 𝐠𝐮𝐚𝐫𝐚𝐧𝐭𝐞𝐞 𝐨𝐟 𝐟𝐮𝐭𝐮𝐫𝐞 𝐫𝐞𝐬𝐮𝐥𝐭𝐬.
𝐈𝐧𝐟𝐨𝐫𝐦𝐚𝐭𝐢�[...]
A quality valuation analysis on $CNI 🧘🏽♂️
•NTM P/E Ratio: 18.02x
•10-Year Mean: 19.89x
•NTM FCF Yield: 3.86%
•10-Year Mean: 3.51%
As you can see, $CNI appears to be trading slightly below fair value
Going forward, investors can receive ~10% MORE in earnings per share & ~10% MORE in FCF per share 🧠***
Before we get into valuation, let’s take a look at why $CNI is a good business
BALANCE SHEET🆗
•Cash & Short-Term Inv: $201.88M
•Long-Term Debt: $13.76B
$CNI has an ok balance sheet, an A- S&P Credit Rating, & 8.29x FFO Interest Coverage Ratio
RETURN ON CAPITAL🆗
•2020: 14.7%
•2021: 13.4%
•2022: 15.6%
•2023: 14.4%
•LTM: 13.7%
RETURN ON EQUITY✅
•2020: 18.8%
•2021: 23.1%
•2022: 23.2%
•2023: 27.1%
•LTM: 27.6%
$CNI has decent return metrics, highlighting the financial efficiency of the business
REVENUES❌
•2013: $9.95B
•2023: $12.70B
•CAGR: 2.47%
FREE CASH FLOW🆗
•2013: $1.48B
•2023: $2.85B
•CAGR: 6.77%
NORMALIZED EPS🆗
•2013: $2.74
•2023: $5.41
•CAGR: 7.03%
SHARE BUYBACKS✅
•2013 Shares Outstanding: 846.10M
•LTM Shares Outstanding: 639.08M
By reducing its shares outstanding 24.4%, $CNI increased its EPS by 32% (assuming 0 growth)
MARGINS✅
•LTM Gross Margins: 55.1%
•LTM Operating Margins: 40.6%
•LTM Net Income Margins: 31.7%
***NOW TO VALUATION 🧠
As stated above, investors can expect to receive ~10% MORE in EPS & ~10% MORE in FCF per share
Using Benjamin Graham’s 2G rule of thumb, $CNI has to grow earnings at a 9.01% CAGR over the next several years to justify its valuation
Today, analysts anticipate 2025 - 2027 EPS growth over the next few years to be less than the (18.49%) required growth rate:
2025E: $5.76 (12.7% YoY) *FY Dec
2026E: $6.45 (12.2% YoY)
2027E $7.20 (10.4% YoY)
$CNI has a great track record of meeting analyst estimates ~2 years out, but let’s assume $CNI ends 2027 with $7.20 in EPS & see its CAGR potential assuming different multiples
20x P/E: $144.00💵 … ~14.7% CAGR
19x P/E: $136.80💵 … ~12.8% CAGR
18x P/E: $129.60💵 … ~10.9% CAGR
17x P/E: $122.40💵 … ~8.0% CAGR
As you can see, $CNI appears to have double-digit return potential if we assume >18x earnings, a level slightly below its 10-year average multiple of 19.89x
However, this assumption doesn’t leave us with too much margin of safety considering $CNI can be cyclical at times and trade for ~16x during economic slowdowns
Also, given its modest growth rates & heavy capital expenditures, investors primarily concerned with total return potential will likely do better elsewhere
$CNI is a decent deal today at $101💵 for those primarily concerned with owning a low-volatility name with reliable dividend income & growth
I’ll be more interested in accumulating $CNI if it trades closer to $90💵 or at ~16.25x NTM estimates (~10% below today’s price) where I can reasonably assume ~13% CAGR while relying on a 17x multiple … I’d consider $90💵 extremely attractive (given today’s information & expectations)
#stocks #investing
___
𝐃𝐈𝐒𝐂𝐋𝐎𝐒𝐔𝐑𝐄‼️: 𝐓𝐡𝐢𝐬 𝐢𝐬 𝐍𝐎𝐓 𝐈𝐧𝐯𝐞𝐬𝐭𝐦𝐞𝐧𝐭 𝐀𝐝𝐯𝐢𝐜𝐞. 𝐁𝐚𝐛𝐲𝐥𝐨𝐧 𝐂𝐚𝐩𝐢𝐭𝐚𝐥® 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐢𝐭𝐬 𝐫𝐞𝐩𝐫𝐞𝐬𝐞𝐧𝐭𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐯𝐞𝐬 𝐦𝐚𝐲 𝐡𝐚𝐯𝐞 𝐩𝐨𝐬𝐢𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧𝐬 𝐢𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐬𝐞𝐜𝐮𝐫𝐢𝐭𝐢𝐞𝐬 𝐝𝐢𝐬𝐜𝐮𝐬𝐬𝐞𝐝 𝐢𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐢𝐬 𝐭𝐰𝐞𝐞𝐭.
𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐢𝐧𝐟𝐨𝐫𝐦𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐜𝐨𝐧𝐭𝐚𝐢𝐧𝐞𝐝 𝐢𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐢𝐬 𝐭𝐰𝐞𝐞𝐭 𝐢𝐬 𝐢𝐧𝐭𝐞𝐧𝐝𝐞𝐝 𝐟𝐨𝐫 𝐢𝐧𝐟𝐨𝐫𝐦𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧𝐚𝐥 𝐩𝐮𝐫𝐩𝐨𝐬𝐞𝐬 𝐨𝐧𝐥𝐲 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐬𝐡𝐨𝐮𝐥𝐝 𝐧𝐨𝐭 𝐛𝐞 𝐜𝐨𝐧𝐬𝐭𝐫𝐮𝐞𝐝 𝐚𝐬 𝐢𝐧𝐯𝐞𝐬𝐭𝐦𝐞𝐧𝐭 𝐚𝐝𝐯𝐢𝐜𝐞 𝐭𝐨 𝐦𝐞𝐞𝐭 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐬𝐩𝐞𝐜𝐢𝐟𝐢𝐜 𝐧𝐞𝐞𝐝𝐬 𝐨𝐟 𝐚𝐧𝐲 𝐢𝐧𝐝𝐢𝐯𝐢𝐝𝐮𝐚𝐥 𝐨𝐫 𝐬𝐢𝐭𝐮𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧. 𝐏𝐚𝐬𝐭 𝐩𝐞𝐫𝐟𝐨𝐫𝐦𝐚𝐧𝐜𝐞 𝐢𝐬 𝐧𝐨 𝐠𝐮𝐚𝐫𝐚𝐧𝐭𝐞𝐞 𝐨𝐟 𝐟𝐮𝐭𝐮𝐫𝐞 𝐫𝐞𝐬𝐮𝐥𝐭𝐬.
𝐈𝐧𝐟𝐨𝐫𝐦𝐚𝐭𝐢�[...]
Offshore
Dimitry Nakhla | Babylon Capital® A quality valuation analysis on $CNI 🧘🏽♂️ •NTM P/E Ratio: 18.02x •10-Year Mean: 19.89x •NTM FCF Yield: 3.86% •10-Year Mean: 3.51% As you can see, $CNI appears to be trading slightly below fair value Going forward,…
�𝐧 𝐜𝐨𝐧𝐭𝐚𝐢𝐧𝐞𝐝 𝐢𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐢𝐬 𝐭𝐰𝐞𝐞𝐭 𝐡𝐚𝐬 𝐛𝐞𝐞𝐧 𝐨𝐛𝐭𝐚𝐢𝐧𝐞𝐝 𝐟𝐫𝐨𝐦 𝐬𝐨𝐮𝐫𝐜𝐞𝐬 𝐛𝐞𝐥𝐢𝐞𝐯𝐞𝐝 𝐭𝐨 𝐛𝐞 𝐫𝐞𝐥𝐢𝐚𝐛𝐥𝐞, 𝐛𝐮𝐭 𝐢𝐬 𝐧𝐨𝐭 𝐠𝐮𝐚𝐫𝐚𝐧𝐭𝐞𝐞𝐝 𝐚𝐬 𝐭𝐨 𝐜𝐨𝐦𝐩𝐥𝐞𝐭𝐞𝐧𝐞𝐬𝐬 𝐨𝐫 𝐚𝐜𝐜𝐮𝐫𝐚𝐜𝐲.
tweet
tweet
Offshore
Photo
Stock Analysis Compilation
Analysis of BlueBird Corporation $BLBD US - 2024 Darden at Virginia Investing Challenge (2nd Place)
Thesis: BlueBird is positioned for growth through its leadership in alternative powertrains and expanding EV adoption in the school bus market
(Extract from the Graham Doddsville Fall 2024 Issue)
tweet
Analysis of BlueBird Corporation $BLBD US - 2024 Darden at Virginia Investing Challenge (2nd Place)
Thesis: BlueBird is positioned for growth through its leadership in alternative powertrains and expanding EV adoption in the school bus market
(Extract from the Graham Doddsville Fall 2024 Issue)
tweet
Offshore
Video
App Economy Insights
📊 Earnings season visualized.
200+ companies covered.
Grab the December report.👇
https://t.co/APdjYK7vr3 https://t.co/uZ7IUa7Nd7
tweet
📊 Earnings season visualized.
200+ companies covered.
Grab the December report.👇
https://t.co/APdjYK7vr3 https://t.co/uZ7IUa7Nd7
tweet
Offshore
Video
Startup Archive
Basecamp founder Jason Fried: Customers don’t care about your features and technology
Jason recounts how when he was selling shoes growing up in Illinois, representatives of the major shoe brands would arm salespeople with facts about all of the fancy new technology (e.g. the difference between the Nike Air versus the Zoom Air, the Goodyear rubber outsole and the midsole, etc.).
However, when Jason told customers about these technologies, they didn’t care.
When you actually watched customers buy shoes, they really only cared about a few key things: What does it look like? Is it comfortable? Can I afford it?
Jason saw the same thing selling tennis rackets.
He’d tell customers about all the latest technology and the difference between graphite versus fiberglass or natural gut string versus synthetic. Nobody cared. They’d look at a tennis racket and ask him if it came in other colors.
Jason has observed the same pattern across website and software:
“Companies are obsessed with features and the technologies because that’s what they do all day. But they don’t actually watch people buy stuff. When you watch people buy stuff, they just want the simple stuff. They want the stuff that solves their problems and just works. They like the way it looks. They like the way it feels. It’s comfortable. It’s affordable. That’s what people want…. Yet companies keep talking about the specs, the technology, and the features.”
Jason advises founders to really listen to what your customers are saying and watch how they buy your product:
“You’ll find out that they just need a few things done really, really well. And that is really, I think, the secret to all this stuff. It’s figuring out the basics. Nailing the basics.”
tweet
Basecamp founder Jason Fried: Customers don’t care about your features and technology
Jason recounts how when he was selling shoes growing up in Illinois, representatives of the major shoe brands would arm salespeople with facts about all of the fancy new technology (e.g. the difference between the Nike Air versus the Zoom Air, the Goodyear rubber outsole and the midsole, etc.).
However, when Jason told customers about these technologies, they didn’t care.
When you actually watched customers buy shoes, they really only cared about a few key things: What does it look like? Is it comfortable? Can I afford it?
Jason saw the same thing selling tennis rackets.
He’d tell customers about all the latest technology and the difference between graphite versus fiberglass or natural gut string versus synthetic. Nobody cared. They’d look at a tennis racket and ask him if it came in other colors.
Jason has observed the same pattern across website and software:
“Companies are obsessed with features and the technologies because that’s what they do all day. But they don’t actually watch people buy stuff. When you watch people buy stuff, they just want the simple stuff. They want the stuff that solves their problems and just works. They like the way it looks. They like the way it feels. It’s comfortable. It’s affordable. That’s what people want…. Yet companies keep talking about the specs, the technology, and the features.”
Jason advises founders to really listen to what your customers are saying and watch how they buy your product:
“You’ll find out that they just need a few things done really, really well. And that is really, I think, the secret to all this stuff. It’s figuring out the basics. Nailing the basics.”
tweet