Offshore
Photo
โ Dimitry Nakhla | Babylon Capitalยฎ
3 months ago I stated:
โToday at $239.00๐ต $CRM appears to be worthwhile consideration for investmentโ
Since then, $CRM shares gained +42% โ
As I suggested in the post attached below๐๐ฝ
โAs you can see, weโd have to assume >24x earnings for $CRM to have double digit CAGR potential (a multiple justified by its growth rate & moat)
Today at $239.00๐ต $CRM appears to be worthwhile consideration for investment especially when you assess the trajectory of the companyโs FCF & Net Income margins (steadily trending higher with further room to expand)โ
#stocks #investing
tweet
3 months ago I stated:
โToday at $239.00๐ต $CRM appears to be worthwhile consideration for investmentโ
Since then, $CRM shares gained +42% โ
As I suggested in the post attached below๐๐ฝ
โAs you can see, weโd have to assume >24x earnings for $CRM to have double digit CAGR potential (a multiple justified by its growth rate & moat)
Today at $239.00๐ต $CRM appears to be worthwhile consideration for investment especially when you assess the trajectory of the companyโs FCF & Net Income margins (steadily trending higher with further room to expand)โ
#stocks #investing
A sober valuation analysis on $CRM ๐ง๐ฝโโ๏ธ
โขNTM P/E Ratio: 23.79x
โข3-Year Mean: 36.36x
โขNTM FCF Yield: 5.00%
โข3-Year Mean: 3.85%
As you can see, $CRM appears to be trading below fair value
Going forward, investors can expect to receive ~52% MORE in earnings per share & ~30% MORE in FCF per share๐ง ***
Before we get into valuation, letโs take a look at why $CRM is a good business
BALANCE SHEETโ
โขCash & Equivalents: $17.67B
โขLong-Term Debt: $8.43B
$CRM has an excellent balance sheet, an A+ S&P Credit Rating & 413x FFO Interest Coverage Ratio
RETURN ON CAPITAL๐
โข2020: 1.2%
โข2021: 0.9%
โข2022: 0.8%
โข2023: 2.5%
โข2024: 8.2%
โขLTM: 9.0%
RETURN ON EQUITY๐
โข2020: 0.5%
โข2021: 10.8%
โข2022: 2.9%
โข2023: 0.4%
โข2024: 7.0%
โขLTM: 9.3%
$CRM return metrics are ok, although more recently trending in the right direction
REVENUESโ
โข2014: $4.07B
โข2024: $34.86B
โขCAGR: 23.95%
FREE CASH FLOWโ
โข2014: $576.36M
โข2024: $9.49B
โขCAGR: 32.34%
NORMALIZED EPSโ
โข2014: $0.35
โข2024: $8.22
โขCAGR: 37.11%
SHARE BUYBACKSโ
โข2014 Shares Outstanding: 597.61M
โขLTM Shares Outstanding: 971.50M
By increasing its shares outstanding ~63%, $CRM diluted its EPS by ~38% (assuming 0 growth)
MARGINSโ
โขLTM Gross Margins: 76.0%
โขLTM Operating Margins: 18.4%
โขLTM Net Income Margins: 15.3%
***NOW TO VALUATION ๐ง
As stated above, investors can expect to receive ~52% MORE in EPS & ~30% MORE FCF per share
Using Benjamin Grahamโs 2G rule of thumb, $CRM has to grow earnings at an 11.90% CAGR over the next several years to justify its valuation
Today, analysts anticipate 2025 - 2027 EPS growth over the next few years to be slightly more than the (11.90%) required growth rate:
2025E: $9.90 (20.5% YoY) *FY Jan
2026E: $11.01 (11.2% YoY)
2027E: $12.58 (14.2% YoY)
$CRM has an excellent track record of meeting analyst estimates ~2 years out, so letโs assume $CRM ends 2027 with $12.58 in EPS & see its CAGR potential assuming different multiples
25x P/E: $314.50๐ต โฆ ~12.3% CAGR
24x P/E: $301.92๐ต โฆ ~10.5% CAGR
23x P/E: $289.34๐ต โฆ ~8.6% CAGR
As you can see, weโd have to assume >24x earnings for $CRM to have double digit CAGR potential (a multiple justified by its growth rate & moat)
Today at $239.00๐ต $CRM appears to be worthwhile consideration for investment especially when you assess the trajectory of the companyโs FCF & Net Income margins (steadily trending higher with further room to expand)
To ensure some margin of safety, if thereโs further weakness, it could be wise to piece into the position, for example:
Initiating ~50% of the position at ~$239๐ต & adding a second tranche at ~$200๐ต or at ~20x NTM earnings
#stocks #investing
___
๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐โผ๏ธ: ๐๐ก๐ข๐ฌ ๐ข๐ฌ ๐๐๐ ๐๐ง๐ฏ๐๐ฌ๐ญ๐ฆ๐๐ง๐ญ ๐๐๐ฏ๐ข๐๐. ๐๐๐๐ฒ๐ฅ๐จ๐ง ๐๐๐ฉ๐ข๐ญ๐๐ฅยฎ ๐๐ง๐ ๐ข๐ญ๐ฌ ๐ซ๐๐ฉ๐ซ๐๐ฌ๐๐ง๐ญ๐๐ญ๐ข๐ฏ๐๐ฌ ๐ฆ๐๐ฒ ๐ก๐๐ฏ๐ ๐ฉ๐จ๐ฌ๐ข๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง๐ฌ ๐ข๐ง ๐ญ๐ก๐ ๐ฌ๐๐๐ฎ๐ซ๐ข๐ญ๐ข๐๐ฌ ๐๐ข๐ฌ๐๐ฎ๐ฌ๐ฌ๐๐ ๐ข๐ง ๐ญ๐ก๐ข๐ฌ ๐ญ๐ฐ๐๐๐ญ.
๐๐ก๐ ๐ข๐ง๐๐จ๐ซ๐ฆ๐๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง ๐๐จ๐ง๐ญ๐๐ข๐ง๐๐ ๐ข๐ง ๐ญ๐ก๐ข๐ฌ ๐ญ๐ฐ๐๐๐ญ ๐ข๐ฌ ๐ข๐ง๐ญ๐๐ง๐๐๐ ๐๐จ๐ซ ๐ข๐ง๐๐จ๐ซ๐ฆ๐๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง๐๐ฅ ๐ฉ๐ฎ๐ซ๐ฉ๐จ๐ฌ๐๐ฌ ๐จ๐ง๐ฅ๐ฒ ๐๐ง๐ ๐ฌ๐ก๐จ๐ฎ๐ฅ๐ ๐ง๐จ๐ญ ๐๐ ๐๐จ๐ง๐ฌ๐ญ๐ซ๐ฎ๐๐ ๐๐ฌ ๐ข๐ง๐ฏ๐๐ฌ๐ญ๐ฆ๐๐ง๐ญ ๐๐๐ฏ๐ข๐๐ ๐ญ๐จ ๐ฆ๐๐๐ญ ๐ญ๐ก๐ ๐ฌ๐ฉ๐๐๐ข๐๐ข๐ ๐ง๐๐๐๐ฌ ๐จ๐ ๐๐ง๐ฒ ๐ข๐ง๐๐ข๐ฏ๐ข๐๐ฎ๐๐ฅ ๐จ๐ซ ๐ฌ๐ข๐ญ๐ฎ๐๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง. ๐๐๐ฌ๐ญ ๐ฉ๐๐ซ๐๐จ๐ซ๐ฆ๐๐ง๐๐ ๐ข๐ฌ ๐ง๐จ ๐ ๐ฎ๐๐ซ๐๐ง๐ญ๐๐ ๐จ๐ ๐๐ฎ๐ญ๐ฎ๐ซ๐ ๐ซ๐๐ฌ๐ฎ๐ฅ๐ญ๐ฌ.
๐๐ง๐๐จ๐ซ๐ฆ๐๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง ๐๐จ๐ง๐ญ๐๐ข๐ง๐๐ ๐ข๐ง ๐ญ๐ก๐ข๐ฌ ๐ญ๐ฐ๐๐๐ญ ๐ก๐๐ฌ ๐๐๐๐ง ๐จ๐๐ญ๐๐ข๐ง๐๐ ๐๐ซ๐จ๐ฆ ๐ฌ๐จ๐ฎ๐ซ๐๐๐ฌ ๐๐๐ฅ๐ข๐๐ฏ๐๐ ๐ญ๐จ ๐๐ ๐ซ๐๐ฅ๐ข๐๐๐ฅ๐, ๐๐ฎ๐ญ ๐ข๐ฌ ๐ง๐จ๐ญ ๐ ๐ฎ๐๐ซ๐๐ง๐ญ๐๐๐ ๐๐ฌ ๐ญ๐จ ๐๐จ๐ฆ๐ฉ๐ฅ๐๐ญ๐๐ง๐๐ฌ๐ฌ ๐จ๐ซ ๐๐๐๐ฎ๐ซ๐๐๐ฒ. - Dimitry Nakhla | Babylon Capitalยฎtweet
โ Dimitry Nakhla | Babylon Capitalยฎ
RT @Invest_Smart_18: @DimitryNakhla Easily the most under followed account in the #investing #stocks space out here. Such high quality analysis. Great job and sincere thank you
tweet
RT @Invest_Smart_18: @DimitryNakhla Easily the most under followed account in the #investing #stocks space out here. Such high quality analysis. Great job and sincere thank you
tweet
Offshore
Photo
โ Quiver Quantitative
We posted this report on a politicians' purchase of DT Midstream stock back in June.
$DTM has now risen 62% since the trade was made. https://t.co/vreUXKtU9M
tweet
We posted this report on a politicians' purchase of DT Midstream stock back in June.
$DTM has now risen 62% since the trade was made. https://t.co/vreUXKtU9M
tweet
Offshore
Photo
โ Investing visuals
Is Palantir $PLTR in a bubble? ๐ค
Letโs look at the facts, as there is quite some debate going on about this on X๐
Valuation โ๏ธ
โข Trades at 39x enterprise value/next-twelve-months revenue: 89% higher than the next-highest software company, Samsara, at 20.6x
โข Price-to-sales ratio (forward): 40.3x, vs. a 3-year average of 14.5x
โข Price-to-free-cash-flow (forward): 125x, vs. a 3-year average of 68x
Quick conclusion ๐
All metrics are highly elevated. Does this mean $PLTR is overvalued? Not necessarily. Letโs examine the fundamentals:
โข Revenue growth has accelerated to 30%
โข Net retention increased to 118% (best-in-class)
โข Rule of 40 score: 68 (elite)
โข Total customers up +39%
โข Very strong balance sheet
My Take ๐
$PLTR is a stellar business with strong execution, positioning itself as the go-to data & AI platform. But to justify its valuation, expectations are sky-high. Here are two potential scenarios:
Scenario 1 โ The NVIDIA $NVDA Play ๐
$PLTR fundamentals catch up to its valuation, similar to $NVDA's story. If $PLTR delivers, todayโs price might be justified.
Scenario 2 โ The Cloudflare $NET Play ๐
Expectations are too high. Even with strong execution, $PLTR may struggle to meet them. This can possibly lead to a significant stock drop similar to Cloudflare in 2022 which declined -80% after a massive run of +500%
--Which scenario do you think will play out?--
tweet
Is Palantir $PLTR in a bubble? ๐ค
Letโs look at the facts, as there is quite some debate going on about this on X๐
Valuation โ๏ธ
โข Trades at 39x enterprise value/next-twelve-months revenue: 89% higher than the next-highest software company, Samsara, at 20.6x
โข Price-to-sales ratio (forward): 40.3x, vs. a 3-year average of 14.5x
โข Price-to-free-cash-flow (forward): 125x, vs. a 3-year average of 68x
Quick conclusion ๐
All metrics are highly elevated. Does this mean $PLTR is overvalued? Not necessarily. Letโs examine the fundamentals:
โข Revenue growth has accelerated to 30%
โข Net retention increased to 118% (best-in-class)
โข Rule of 40 score: 68 (elite)
โข Total customers up +39%
โข Very strong balance sheet
My Take ๐
$PLTR is a stellar business with strong execution, positioning itself as the go-to data & AI platform. But to justify its valuation, expectations are sky-high. Here are two potential scenarios:
Scenario 1 โ The NVIDIA $NVDA Play ๐
$PLTR fundamentals catch up to its valuation, similar to $NVDA's story. If $PLTR delivers, todayโs price might be justified.
Scenario 2 โ The Cloudflare $NET Play ๐
Expectations are too high. Even with strong execution, $PLTR may struggle to meet them. This can possibly lead to a significant stock drop similar to Cloudflare in 2022 which declined -80% after a massive run of +500%
--Which scenario do you think will play out?--
tweet
Offshore
Photo
โ Stock Analysis Compilation
Alta Fox on REV Group $REVG US
Thesis: With significant EBITDA growth potential and an under-levered balance sheet, REVGโs aggressive share repurchase strategy and low valuation make it a highly attractive industrial small-cap investment
(Extract from their Q3 letter) https://t.co/g26lXg8Pj9
tweet
Alta Fox on REV Group $REVG US
Thesis: With significant EBITDA growth potential and an under-levered balance sheet, REVGโs aggressive share repurchase strategy and low valuation make it a highly attractive industrial small-cap investment
(Extract from their Q3 letter) https://t.co/g26lXg8Pj9
tweet
Offshore
Photo
โ Quiver Quantitative
Election season is over.
Congressional stock trading is back in session.
We've had a busy week: https://t.co/ROVcS5i3Md
tweet
Election season is over.
Congressional stock trading is back in session.
We've had a busy week: https://t.co/ROVcS5i3Md
tweet
Offshore
Video
โ Startup Archive
Palmer Luckey on the three companies he considered starting after Oculus
After selling Oculus to Facebook for $2 billion when he was 21 years old, Palmer Luckey was fired for his political views.
He then said to himself:
โOkay, I have to do something that proves they shouldnโt have fired me, that I am smart, and that I am not a one-hit wonder because being a one-hit wonder would be so depressing.โ
Palmer considered three ideas for his second company:
1. Working in the national security space (this became Anduril). He saw that cost-plus contracting was a broken contract structure that led to massive cost overruns and misaligned incentives. Palmer explains, โI think that I could start a company that does a lot the things companies like Lockheed and Raytheon and Northrop are bad at doing that Iโm good at doing.โ
2. A non-profit private prison company. โI think private prisons are very bad. I think they lead to terrible outcomes. Theyโre a lobbying machine where all the money that is generated largely goes back into lobbying government officials for stricter sentences on the people who are the cheapest to incarcerate. So not the terrorists. Not the murderers. Itโs the nonviolent offendersโฆ Those are the ones that private prisons want to house because theyโre not going to kill peopleโฆ And thatโs how you end up with all these mandatory minimum sentencing laws for crimes that donโt matter in my opinion.โ After realizing that lobbying wasnโt going to work to solve this problem because thereโs too much money in it, Palmer considered starting a non-profit private prison that doesnโt get paid until released prisoners have been out five years without going back. โIf they go back, I donโt get paid. It means Iโm taking on the risk, and it means my incentives are going to be very aligned with getting people out of prison and not having them come back, whereas current prisons are the opposite. I decided against that because I realized it was not actually a skill set that I had. Iโm a technology guyโฆ The legal issues with doing this state by state are very tough.โ
3. Petroleum-based food products. โI think the only way to solve obesity in America is to allow anybody to eat as much as they want of anything with no self control or changes to their physical activity whatsoever. It has to be the Holy Grail or weโre all just going to keep dying of obesity and related problems. And if youโre a food scientist, you generally make things out of foodstuffs, and I think thatโs a big mistake. If youโre a chemical or material engineer and you want to make something with a certain texture or property, you start with long-chain hydrocarbonsโoil. Itโs the perfect building block for everything.. So if you could make synthetic foods out of petroleum derivatives, you could make foods that have largely the same characteristics as real foods but with zero calories because your bodyโs not going to process them. So I started building paraffin cheese and paraffin cheese totally works. It has no calories. It tastes mostly like cheese. And I think that you could get it to be better than cheese on some time scale because itโs actually easier to adjust it and play with it and iterate on it than with cultured dairy products. Anyway, I decided against that because it turns out the FDA completely bans this idea. Itโs completely illegal.โ
Ultimately Palmer decided on working in the national security space because building Anduril better fit his strengths as a technologist.
Video source: @IMA_Network (2021)
tweet
Palmer Luckey on the three companies he considered starting after Oculus
After selling Oculus to Facebook for $2 billion when he was 21 years old, Palmer Luckey was fired for his political views.
He then said to himself:
โOkay, I have to do something that proves they shouldnโt have fired me, that I am smart, and that I am not a one-hit wonder because being a one-hit wonder would be so depressing.โ
Palmer considered three ideas for his second company:
1. Working in the national security space (this became Anduril). He saw that cost-plus contracting was a broken contract structure that led to massive cost overruns and misaligned incentives. Palmer explains, โI think that I could start a company that does a lot the things companies like Lockheed and Raytheon and Northrop are bad at doing that Iโm good at doing.โ
2. A non-profit private prison company. โI think private prisons are very bad. I think they lead to terrible outcomes. Theyโre a lobbying machine where all the money that is generated largely goes back into lobbying government officials for stricter sentences on the people who are the cheapest to incarcerate. So not the terrorists. Not the murderers. Itโs the nonviolent offendersโฆ Those are the ones that private prisons want to house because theyโre not going to kill peopleโฆ And thatโs how you end up with all these mandatory minimum sentencing laws for crimes that donโt matter in my opinion.โ After realizing that lobbying wasnโt going to work to solve this problem because thereโs too much money in it, Palmer considered starting a non-profit private prison that doesnโt get paid until released prisoners have been out five years without going back. โIf they go back, I donโt get paid. It means Iโm taking on the risk, and it means my incentives are going to be very aligned with getting people out of prison and not having them come back, whereas current prisons are the opposite. I decided against that because I realized it was not actually a skill set that I had. Iโm a technology guyโฆ The legal issues with doing this state by state are very tough.โ
3. Petroleum-based food products. โI think the only way to solve obesity in America is to allow anybody to eat as much as they want of anything with no self control or changes to their physical activity whatsoever. It has to be the Holy Grail or weโre all just going to keep dying of obesity and related problems. And if youโre a food scientist, you generally make things out of foodstuffs, and I think thatโs a big mistake. If youโre a chemical or material engineer and you want to make something with a certain texture or property, you start with long-chain hydrocarbonsโoil. Itโs the perfect building block for everything.. So if you could make synthetic foods out of petroleum derivatives, you could make foods that have largely the same characteristics as real foods but with zero calories because your bodyโs not going to process them. So I started building paraffin cheese and paraffin cheese totally works. It has no calories. It tastes mostly like cheese. And I think that you could get it to be better than cheese on some time scale because itโs actually easier to adjust it and play with it and iterate on it than with cultured dairy products. Anyway, I decided against that because it turns out the FDA completely bans this idea. Itโs completely illegal.โ
Ultimately Palmer decided on working in the national security space because building Anduril better fit his strengths as a technologist.
Video source: @IMA_Network (2021)
tweet
Offshore
Photo
โ Quiver Quantitative
We released "Trump Donors" and "Kamala Donors" portfolios on Autopilot at the start of this month.
Here's how some of the companies in each portfolio have done so far:
TRUMP
Tesla, $TSLA: +38%
Trump Media, $DJT: -7%
Palantir, $PLTR: +46%
Schwab, $SCHW: +8%
Home Depot, $HD: +4%
HARRIS:
Netflix, $NFLX: +6%
Microsoft, $MSFT: +2%
Apple, $AAPL: +0%
Palantir, $PLTR: +46%
Google, $GOOGL: +5%
tweet
We released "Trump Donors" and "Kamala Donors" portfolios on Autopilot at the start of this month.
Here's how some of the companies in each portfolio have done so far:
TRUMP
Tesla, $TSLA: +38%
Trump Media, $DJT: -7%
Palantir, $PLTR: +46%
Schwab, $SCHW: +8%
Home Depot, $HD: +4%
HARRIS:
Netflix, $NFLX: +6%
Microsoft, $MSFT: +2%
Apple, $AAPL: +0%
Palantir, $PLTR: +46%
Google, $GOOGL: +5%
tweet