Offshore
Photo
โ Hidden Value Gems
Europe and UK still look very attractive, at least according to GS. Hard to disagree. https://t.co/pd34WrCM0S
tweet
Offshore
Photo
โ Hidden Value Gems
RT @HiddenValueGems: One of Hidden Value Gems Premium members asked us if we knew a talented analyst who could help them with financial research. They are a family office with a five-year history focused on well-managed compounders in protected niches. You can see the full description and contact details below.๐Ÿ‘‡
tweet
Offshore
Photo
โ Hidden Value Gems
Missed this. The new CEO of Prosus will receive $100mn worth of shares in Prosus and Naspers if the market cap of Prosus hits $168bn by mid-2028 and stays there for a year.

$PRX.AS $NPN.JO $TCEHY https://t.co/x3GaNvtn8l
tweet
Offshore
Photo
โ Stock Analysis Compilation
Timesquare CM on Timee $215A JP

Thesis: Timeeโ€™s efficient platform for short-term job seekers and gig workers has made it a market leader in Japan, positioning it well for growth.

(Extract from their Q3 letter) https://t.co/c6RGB3C00d
tweet
Offshore
Video
โ Startup Archive
Airbnb founder Brian Chesky on how to interview and reference check new hires

Brianโ€™s first piece of advice comes from Steve Jobs:

โ€œStart with the results and work backwards to the people. Most people start with resumes. They start with brands โ€” โ€˜Oh, this person worked at Google.โ€™ But you should actually ask yourself: What products do I admire? And then who built those products?โ€

With respect to actually interviewing them, Brianโ€™s first tip is to ask follow-up questions:

โ€œAsk them to explain how they did something, and then the key is to ask two follow-ups. You never want the first answer. You always want the third answer. And if people donโ€™t know what theyโ€™re talking about, they struggle. They might be able to follow-up, but the second follow-up, they become absent of details.โ€

But more important than interviewing, Brian argues, is references:

โ€œI prioritize references over interviewing, especially with executives who have more experience BSing you than you have experience detecting their BS.โ€

Brian recalls that Andreessen Horowitz would tell him to do 8 hours of reference checks per employee:

โ€œ[Thatโ€™s] probably over the top, but you should probably spend as much time referencing as you do hiring.โ€

He also believes the CEO should interview and reference check new hires as long as possible. Brian interviewed the first 400 people at Airbnb, but he wishes he interviewed longer.

And with respect to tactics for reference checks, Brian offers the following advice:

โ€œA lot of people are polite. Theyโ€™re afraid of the feedback getting back. So the first thing to say when you start the call is that everything is off the record โ€” and it should be off the record. It should never be attributed to them. The more itโ€™s unattributed to them, the more honest theyโ€™re going to be.โ€

On this topic, Brian recommends avoiding disqualifying questions:

โ€œA lot of people donโ€™t want to say somebody sucks or is not goodโ€ฆ Say, โ€˜Okay, separate from this topic, I just want to know whoโ€™s the best person youโ€™ve ever worked with?โ€™ Do they say the personโ€™s name you just asked about? They usually tell the truth and if they donโ€™t say that personโ€™s name, theyโ€™re not the best, right?โ€

And then ask for specifics:

โ€œThey said theyโ€™re amazing โ€” well why are they amazing? What would you point to? If they have no specifics, maybe they werenโ€™t really goodโ€ฆ Then ask questions like, โ€˜Okay, what do I need to watch out for if I were to hire them?โ€™ or โ€˜Whatโ€™s the one area of development you would give them?โ€™ If you say that, they have to tell you something because theyโ€™ll feel like theyโ€™re not thoughtful enoughโ€ฆ. And then you ask them at the end who else you should talk to: โ€˜Can you give me two more names?โ€™ And then you use that to build a network.โ€

Brian believes recruiting should be more like building a talent network than a sales pipeline.
tweet
Offshore
Photo
โ Dimitry Nakhla | Babylon Capitalยฎ
PayPal Reports Q3 Earnings Tomorrow ๐ŸŒ… ๐Ÿ‘‡๐Ÿฝ

A sober valuation analysis on $PYPL ๐Ÿง˜๐Ÿฝโ€โ™‚๏ธ

โ€ขNTM P/E Ratio: 18.12x
โ€ขAll-Time Mean: 29.65x

โ€ขNTM FCF Yield: 7.59%
โ€ขAll-Time Mean: 5.05%

As you can see, $PYPL appears to be trading below fair value

Going forward, investors can receive ~63% MORE in earnings per share & ~50% MORE in FCF per share ๐Ÿง ***

Before we get into valuation, letโ€™s take a look at why $PYPL is a good business

BALANCE SHEETโœ…
โ€ขCash & Short-Term Inv: $13.62B
โ€ขLong-Term Debt: $9.73B

$PYPL has an excellent balance sheet, an A- S&P Credit Rating, & 20.78x FFO Interest Coverage

RETURN ON CAPITALโœ…
โ€ข2019: 12.4%
โ€ข2020: 11.5%
โ€ข2021: 13.6%
โ€ข2022: 12.7%
โ€ข2023: 14.8%
โ€ขLTM: 15.8%

RETURN ON EQUITYโœ…
โ€ข2019: 15.2%
โ€ข2020: 22.7%
โ€ข2021: 20.0%
โ€ข2022: 11.5%
โ€ข2023: 20.5%
โ€ขLTM: 22.0%

$PYPL has strong return metrics, highlighting the financial efficiency of the business

REVENUESโœ…
โ€ข2018: $15.45B
โ€ข2023: $29.77B
โ€ขCAGR: 14.01%

FREE CASH FLOWโŒ*
โ€ข2018: $4.66B
โ€ข2023: $4.22B
โ€ขDecrease: (9.44%)

*LTM FCF is $6.70B ๐Ÿ“ˆ

*Also, FCF in 2017 was $1.86B, so FCF rose ~150% in 2018 start date (โ€œnormalizingโ€ the decline above)

NORMALIZED EPSโœ…
โ€ข2018: $2.42
โ€ข2023: $5.10
โ€ขCAGR: 16.07%

SHARE BUYBACKSโœ…
โ€ข2015 Shares Outstanding: 1.20B
โ€ขLTM Shares Outstanding: 1.08B

By reducing its shares outstanding by 10.0%, $PYPL increased its EPS by 11.1% (assuming 0 growth)

MARGINSโœ…
โ€ขLTM Gross Margins: 39.6%
โ€ขLTM Operating Margins: 17.1%
โ€ขLTM Net Income Margins: 14.3%

***NOW TO VALUATION ๐Ÿง 

As stated above, investors can expect to receive ~63% MORE in EPS & ~50% MORE in FCF per share

Using Benjamin Grahamโ€™s 2G rule of thumb, $PYPL has to grow earnings at an 9.06% CAGR over the next several years to justify its valuation

Today, analysts anticipate 2024 - 2026 EPS growth over the next few years to be greater than the (9.06%) required growth rate:

2024E: $4.42 (-13.4% YoY) *FY Dec

2025E: $4.82 (9.2% YoY)
2026E: $5.41 (12.1% YoY)

$PYPL has an ok track record of meeting analyst estimates ~2 years out, but letโ€™s assume $PYPL ends 2026 with $5.41 in EPS & see its CAGR potential assuming different multiples

20x P/E: $108.20๐Ÿ’ต โ€ฆ ~13.9% CAGR

19x P/E: $102.79๐Ÿ’ต โ€ฆ ~11.2% CAGR

18x P/E: $97.38๐Ÿ’ต โ€ฆ ~8.5% CAGR

As you can see, $PYPL appears to have attractive return potential if we assume >19 earnings & aggressive return potential if we assume >20x earnings

The ๐Ÿ”‘ isn't a mean reversion in $PYPL's multiple, but a modest increase (still below its historical average) - a reasonable and safe assumption

Everyone wanted $PYPL when it traded 50x earnings, not many wanted it when it traded for 12x earnings โ˜ฏ๏ธ

Thereโ€™s STILL negative sentiment around $PYPL and this sentiment is already being changed as management continues to make progress towards its goals as weโ€™ve seen in the most recent quarters

Today at $81.70๐Ÿ’ต $PYPL still appears to be a strong consideration for investment (albeit, with some turnaround & competitive risks)

#stocks #investing
___

๐ƒ๐ˆ๐’๐‚๐‹๐Ž๐’๐”๐‘๐„โ€ผ๏ธ: ๐“๐ก๐ข๐ฌ ๐ข๐ฌ ๐๐Ž๐“ ๐ˆ๐ง๐ฏ๐ž๐ฌ๐ญ๐ฆ๐ž๐ง๐ญ ๐€๐๐ฏ๐ข๐œ๐ž. ๐๐š๐›๐ฒ๐ฅ๐จ๐ง ๐‚๐š๐ฉ๐ข๐ญ๐š๐ฅยฎ ๐š๐ง๐ ๐ข๐ญ๐ฌ ๐ซ๐ž๐ฉ๐ซ๐ž๐ฌ๐ž๐ง๐ญ๐š๐ญ๐ข๐ฏ๐ž๐ฌ ๐ฆ๐š๐ฒ ๐ก๐š๐ฏ๐ž ๐ฉ๐จ๐ฌ๐ข๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง๐ฌ ๐ข๐ง ๐ญ๐ก๐ž ๐ฌ๐ž๐œ๐ฎ๐ซ๐ข๐ญ๐ข๐ž๐ฌ ๐๐ข๐ฌ๐œ๐ฎ๐ฌ๐ฌ๐ž๐ ๐ข๐ง ๐ญ๐ก๐ข๐ฌ ๐ญ๐ฐ๐ž๐ž๐ญ.

๐“๐ก๐ž ๐ข๐ง๐Ÿ๐จ๐ซ๐ฆ๐š๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง ๐œ๐จ๐ง๐ญ๐š๐ข๐ง๐ž๐ ๐ข๐ง ๐ญ๐ก๐ข๐ฌ ๐ญ๐ฐ๐ž๐ž๐ญ ๐ข๐ฌ ๐ข๐ง๐ญ๐ž๐ง๐๐ž๐ ๐Ÿ๐จ๐ซ ๐ข๐ง๐Ÿ๐จ๐ซ๐ฆ๐š๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง๐š๐ฅ ๐ฉ๐ฎ๐ซ๐ฉ๐จ๐ฌ๐ž๐ฌ ๐จ๐ง๐ฅ๐ฒ ๐š๐ง๐ ๐ฌ๐ก๐จ๐ฎ๐ฅ๐ ๐ง๐จ๐ญ ๐›๐ž ๐œ๐จ๐ง๐ฌ๐ญ๐ซ๐ฎ๐ž๐ ๐š๐ฌ ๐ข๐ง๐ฏ๐ž๐ฌ๐ญ๐ฆ๐ž๐ง๐ญ ๐š๐๐ฏ๐ข๐œ๐ž ๐ญ๐จ ๐ฆ๐ž๐ž๐ญ ๐ญ๐ก๐ž ๐ฌ๐ฉ๐ž๐œ๐ข๐Ÿ๐ข๐œ ๐ง๐ž๐ž๐๐ฌ ๐จ๐Ÿ ๐š๐ง๐ฒ ๐ข๐ง๐๐ข๐ฏ๐ข๐๐ฎ๐š๐ฅ ๐จ๐ซ ๐ฌ๐ข๐ญ๐ฎ๐š๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง. ๐๐š๐ฌ๐ญ ๐ฉ๐ž๐ซ๐Ÿ๐จ๐ซ๐ฆ๐š๐ง๐œ๐ž ๐ข๐ฌ ๐ง๐จ ๐ ๐ฎ๐š๐ซ๐š๐ง๐ญ๐ž๐ž ๐จ๐Ÿ ๐Ÿ๐ฎ๐ญ๐ฎ๐ซ๐ž ๐ซ๐ž๐ฌ๐ฎ๐ฅ๐ญ๐ฌ.

๐ˆ๐ง๐Ÿ๐จ๐ซ๐ฆ๐š๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง ๐œ๐จ๐ง๐ญ๐š๐ข๐ง๐ž๐ ๐ข๐ง ๐ญ๐ก๐ข๐ฌ ๐ญ๐ฐ๐ž๐ž๐ญ ๐ก๐š๐ฌ ๐›๐ž๐ž๐ง ๐จ๐›๐ญ๐š๐ข๐ง๐ž๐ ๐Ÿ๐ซ๐จ๐ฆ ๐ฌ๐จ๐ฎ๐ซ๐œ๐ž๐ฌ ๐›๐ž๐ฅ๐ข๐ž๐ฏ๐ž๐ ๐ญ๐จ ๐›๐ž ๐ซ๐ž๐ฅ๐ข๐š๐›๐ฅ๐ž, ๐›๐ฎ๐ญ ๐ข๐ฌ ๐ง๐จ๐ญ ๐ ๐ฎ๐š๐ซ๐š๐ง๐ญ๐ž๐ž๐ ๐š๐ฌ ๐ญ๐จ ๐œ๐จ๐ฆ๐ฉ๐ฅ๐ž๐ญ๐ž๐ง๐ž๐ฌ๐ฌ ๐จ๐ซ ๐š๐œ๐œ๐ฎ๐ซ๐š๐œ๐ฒ.
tweet
Offshore
Video
โ Startup Archive
RT @BalwaniPrem: Great advice on bring on the right talent.

Airbnb founder Brian Chesky on how to interview and reference check new hires

Brianโ€™s first piece of advice comes from Steve Jobs:

โ€œStart with the results and work backwards to the people. Most people start with resumes. They start with brands โ€” โ€˜Oh, this person worked at Google.โ€™ But you should actually ask yourself: What products do I admire? And then who built those products?โ€

With respect to actually interviewing them, Brianโ€™s first tip is to ask follow-up questions:

โ€œAsk them to explain how they did something, and then the key is to ask two follow-ups. You never want the first answer. You always want the third answer. And if people donโ€™t know what theyโ€™re talking about, they struggle. They might be able to follow-up, but the second follow-up, they become absent of details.โ€

But more important than interviewing, Brian argues, is references:

โ€œI prioritize references over interviewing, especially with executives who have more experience BSing you than you have experience detecting their BS.โ€

Brian recalls that Andreessen Horowitz would tell him to do 8 hours of reference checks per employee:

โ€œ[Thatโ€™s] probably over the top, but you should probably spend as much time referencing as you do hiring.โ€

He also believes the CEO should interview and reference check new hires as long as possible. Brian interviewed the first 400 people at Airbnb, but he wishes he interviewed longer.

And with respect to tactics for reference checks, Brian offers the following advice:

โ€œA lot of people are polite. Theyโ€™re afraid of the feedback getting back. So the first thing to say when you start the call is that everything is off the record โ€” and it should be off the record. It should never be attributed to them. The more itโ€™s unattributed to them, the more honest theyโ€™re going to be.โ€

On this topic, Brian recommends avoiding disqualifying questions:

โ€œA lot of people donโ€™t want to say somebody sucks or is not goodโ€ฆ Say, โ€˜Okay, separate from this topic, I just want to know whoโ€™s the best person youโ€™ve ever worked with?โ€™ Do they say the personโ€™s name you just asked about? They usually tell the truth and if they donโ€™t say that personโ€™s name, theyโ€™re not the best, right?โ€

And then ask for specifics:

โ€œThey said theyโ€™re amazing โ€” well why are they amazing? What would you point to? If they have no specifics, maybe they werenโ€™t really goodโ€ฆ Then ask questions like, โ€˜Okay, what do I need to watch out for if I were to hire them?โ€™ or โ€˜Whatโ€™s the one area of development you would give them?โ€™ If you say that, they have to tell you something because theyโ€™ll feel like theyโ€™re not thoughtful enoughโ€ฆ. And then you ask them at the end who else you should talk to: โ€˜Can you give me two more names?โ€™ And then you use that to build a network.โ€

Brian believes recruiting should be more like building a talent network than a sales pipeline.
- Startup Archive
tweet
Offshore
Photo
โ Hidden Value Gems
Quote of the day #111 https://t.co/ufe4rT8CCa
tweet