⁠Stock Analysis Compilation
Aristotle on American International Group $AIG US

Thesis: AIG’s transformation under its current CEO and focus on divesting non-core divisions position it for improved profitability, making it an attractive investment.

(Extract from their Q3 letter) https://t.co/ripKfDQhEf
tweet

⁠App Economy Insights
📊 This Week in Visuals:

$KO, $SAP, $IBM, $NOW, $TMUS, $VZ, $T, $LMT, $BA, $TXN, $LRCX, $SNY, $UPS, $FI, $MCO, $GM, $LUV, $AAL, $ALGN, $APPF.

Get up to speed with the latest earnings. 👇
https://t.co/e7P9Ktw1o8
tweet

⁠Startup Archive
Marc Andreessen explains the “Onion Theory of Risk”

“I think the single-biggest thing entrepreneurs are missing — both on fundraising and how they run their companies — is the relationship between risk and cash. I’ve always been a fan of something Andy Rachleff taught me years ago. He calls it the ‘Onion Theory of Risk.’”

You can think of a day 1 startup as having every conceivable kind of risk: founding team risk, product risk, technical risk, market acceptance risk, revenue risk, cost of sales risk, viral growth risk, etc.

A startup is basically just a long list of risks, and as Marc explains:

"The way I think about running a startup is the way I think about raising money. It's a process of peeling away layers of risk as you go."

You raise seed money to peel away the first two or three risks (e.g. founding team risk, product risk, initial launch risk).

You raise the Series A round to peel away the next layer of risks (e.g. recruiting risk, customer risk, revenue risk, cost of sales risk)

And so on.

Basically, you're peeling away risk as you're achieving milestones. And as you achieve milestones, you're both: making progress on your business and justifying raising more capital.

So in terms of fundraising, you should be calibrating the amount money you're raising to the risks you need to pull out of your business for you to raise your next round.

For example, if you're raising your Series A round, the best way to do that is to say to investors: "I raised a seed round then achieved ____ milestones and eliminated ____ risks. Now I'm going to raise $ X for the Series A to achieve ____ milestones and eliminate ____ risks. This will get the company to ____ state for the Series B round. "

This seems fairly obvious, but as Marc points out, it's a much more systematic way of going about things versus just raising as much money as possible, renting fancy offices, and hiring as many people as you can to grow as fast as you can.

The more money you raise, the more you dilute your ownership stake in your business so it pays to be thoughtful.

Raise the capital you will need to achieve the milestones and eliminate the risks required for your next financing round. It also probably makes sense to give yourself some margin as safety because things never go exactly as planned in startup land.

Video source: @ycombinator (2014)
tweet

⁠App Economy Insights
What are you watching this week?

• Monday: $CDNS, $F.
• Tuesday: $AMD, $CMG, $EA, $GOOG, $MCD, $PFE, $PYPL, $SOFI, $SNAP, $V.
• Wednesday: $META, $MSFT, $LLY, $ABBV, $AMGN, $BKNG, $COIN, $HOOD, $ROKU, $ETSY, $GPN, $SBUX, $TDOC.
• Thursday: $AAPL, $AMZN, $CMCSA, $INTC, $UBER, $TEAM, $MA, $MCK, $PTON, $RBLX.

All visualized in our PRO coverage next Saturday.
tweet

⁠Startup Archive
RT @AAkerstein: Excellent way to think about risk - peeling away the layers. Raise enough to peel back 2-3/raise (plus buffer)

Marc Andreessen explains the “Onion Theory of Risk”

“I think the single-biggest thing entrepreneurs are missing — both on fundraising and how they run their companies — is the relationship between risk and cash. I’ve always been a fan of something Andy Rachleff taught me years ago. He calls it the ‘Onion Theory of Risk.’”

You can think of a day 1 startup as having every conceivable kind of risk: founding team risk, product risk, technical risk, market acceptance risk, revenue risk, cost of sales risk, viral growth risk, etc.

A startup is basically just a long list of risks, and as Marc explains:

"The way I think about running a startup is the way I think about raising money. It's a process of peeling away layers of risk as you go."

You raise seed money to peel away the first two or three risks (e.g. founding team risk, product risk, initial launch risk).

You raise the Series A round to peel away the next layer of risks (e.g. recruiting risk, customer risk, revenue risk, cost of sales risk)

And so on.

Basically, you're peeling away risk as you're achieving milestones. And as you achieve milestones, you're both: making progress on your business and justifying raising more capital.

So in terms of fundraising, you should be calibrating the amount money you're raising to the risks you need to pull out of your business for you to raise your next round.

For example, if you're raising your Series A round, the best way to do that is to say to investors: "I raised a seed round then achieved ____ milestones and eliminated ____ risks. Now I'm going to raise $ X for the Series A to achieve ____ milestones and eliminate ____ risks. This will get the company to ____ state for the Series B round. "

This seems fairly obvious, but as Marc points out, it's a much more systematic way of going about things versus just raising as much money as possible, renting fancy offices, and hiring as many people as you can to grow as fast as you can.

The more money you raise, the more you dilute your ownership stake in your business so it pays to be thoughtful.

Raise the capital you will need to achieve the milestones and eliminate the risks required for your next financing round. It also probably makes sense to give yourself some margin as safety because things never go exactly as planned in startup land.

Video source: @ycombinator (2014) - Startup Archive
tweet

⁠Stock Analysis Compilation
Clearbridge on Light and Wonder $LNW US

Thesis: Light and Wonder’s focus on expanding its gaming equipment leasing and its entry into online gaming position it well for growth, particularly as more U.S. states approve online gambling.

(Extract from their Q3 letter) https://t.co/Y83MDr1bJ9
tweet

⁠Ahmad Jivraj
Convergence to the mean: The notion that companies with the highest profitability decline while the lowest rise. https://t.co/V6HQdRvTc9
tweet

⁠Stock Analysis Compilation
Patient Capital Management on Dave & Buster’s Entertainment $PLAY US

Thesis: Dave & Buster’s ongoing transformation efforts and share buybacks position it for significant growth once consumer spending rebounds.

(Extract from their Q3 letter) https://t.co/T94FO0cqN2
tweet

⁠iinvested
Great write up by White Falcon Capital Management on $DAVA

More fund letters here:
https://t.co/ccjFhSPQ2v https://t.co/vawrQmTEXA
tweet

⁠Investing visuals
Alphabet $GOOGL kicks off big tech earnings on Tuesday. Earnings preview:
🔹Est. Revenue: $86.2 Bln (+12.4%)
🔹Est. Earnings per share: $1.85 (+19%) https://t.co/pd6WsxyuIR
tweet