⁠Alex Bilzerian
'Necessity of negativity in quantum theory' - Ferrie, Morris & Emerson (2018, PDF):
https://t.co/jPw042dbqT
tweet

⁠Alex Bilzerian
RT @st_aphian: we always knew this https://t.co/n1w8cY7RPe

The paradox of poetry and information theory https://t.co/YvLQOSq0yQ - Alex Bilzerian
tweet

⁠Alex Bilzerian
RT @MongyPears: Bro clearly didn’t hasn’t read any of my papers

Mathematics may be the only field left untainted by decline & mediocrity. - Alex Bilzerian
tweet

⁠Alex Bilzerian
RT @pmontu33: Conflating probability and exposure is an example of linear thinking as only a perfectly linear payoff would allow you to do this.
tweet

⁠Alex Bilzerian
'Negative Probabilities in Financial Modeling' - Mark Burgin & Gunter Meissner:
https://t.co/sph43bZGnO

Published in Wilmott Magazine in 2012. https://t.co/iUQn7whtRr
tweet

⁠Alex Bilzerian
Negative energies and probabilities should not be considered as nonsense. They are well-defined concepts mathematically, like a negative of money (referring to debt).

— Wigner
tweet

⁠Alex Bilzerian
Dumb money economist like this wouldn't last a cup of coffee at the old fund. https://t.co/vyYjF1BUZ2

As my first fall econometric lectures are on probability theory and the relationship between probability theory and decision theory, this video is a great help.

PPHA42000 Problem Set 1. Explain why this discussion is complete nonsense. - Steven N. Durlauf
tweet

⁠Alex Bilzerian
RT @alexbilz: 'Introduction to Machine Learning Class Notes' - Huy Nguyen, Carnegie Mellon (PDF):
https://t.co/D0qATBKVRN
tweet

⁠Alex Bilzerian
RT @alexbilz: "Without understanding probability, there is almost no chance for anyone to truly understand the intricacies of the financial market, the financial products, and how to price them."

study probability or give up https://t.co/1qwTfpIcQp - booklet boy
tweet

⁠Alex Bilzerian
RT @alexbilz: 'Mathematical Reasoning & Proofs' - Alistair Savage (2021, PDF):
https://t.co/f0KhbLhxVj
tweet

⁠Alex Bilzerian
If this is tripping you up, maybe you should rethink your career path.

Taleb: “physicists use negative probabilities in QM”

Physicists: “negative probabilities are real, but we don’t use them in standard QM interpretations”

Taleb simps: “But this random paper shows a there’s some theoretical application”

Physicists: “Ok, and?”

Simps: “FRAUD!” - flux
tweet

⁠Alex Bilzerian
RT @alexbilz: 'How to Win if You Can?' - Mori & Székely (1982, PDF):
https://t.co/W1oWu3cmFW
tweet