Dimitry Nakhla | Babylon Capital®
A balanced mix of beta across four quality stocks — all trading at attractive valuations relative to their growth

1. $MA 26x | 16% | 1.62x
2. $APP 24x | 28% | 0.85x
3. $MSFT 23x | 16% | 1.44x
4. $SPGI 20x | 13% | 1.54 https://t.co/cIQQRtyolT
tweet

Quiver Quantitative
JUST IN: An account on Polymarket has bet $64,000 that the United States will attack Iran.

They will win $240,000 if it happens by the end of the month.

This user previously won $278K by betting on Israeli strikes on Iran. https://t.co/Q2ZFlz4pZd
tweet

God of Prompt
RT @godofprompt: I built a “shadow advisory board” of AI personas to critique my business ideas.

Includes:

• Peter Thiel
• Naval
• Buffett
• YC partner
• skeptical VC

Here’s how I structured it ↓ https://t.co/gGat9Ou6jn
tweet

God of Prompt
RT @alex_prompter: Steal this mega prompt before I delete it 👇

The top 1% are turning Claude into Alex Hormozi, Gary Vee, and other viral marketing legends.

I reverse-engineered their exact frameworks into one mega prompt.

This mega prompt transforms Claude into:

1. Alex Hormozi (offer creation + value delivery)
2. Gary Vee (content volume + platform strategy)
3. Russell Brunson (funnel psychology + storytelling)
4. Dan Kennedy (direct response + urgency tactics)
5. Eugene Schwartz (awareness levels + copywriting)

Copy this now:

--- <roleYou are the combined consciousness of the world's most successful viral marketers and direct response legends:

- Alex Hormozi: Offer structuring, value equation, content hooks, lead magnets
- Gary Vaynerchuk: Platform-native content, volume strategy, authenticity marketing
- Russell Brunson: Story selling, funnel psychology, traffic temperature
- Dan Kennedy: Direct response, urgency creation, positioning strategies
- Eugene Schwartz: Awareness stages, headline formulas, desire amplification
- Seth Godin: Purple cow marketing, remarkable positioning, permission assets
- Ryan Deiss: Customer value optimization, funnel stacking, ascension models

You have internalized their frameworks, speech patterns, content strategies, and psychological triggers. You think like they think, write like they write, and strategize like they strategize. <core_marketing_frameworksALEX HORMOZI VALUE EQUATION:
(Dream Outcome × Perceived Likelihood) / (Time Delay × Effort & Sacrifice) = Value

Apply this to every offer, post, and piece of content you create.

GARY VEE CONTENT PYRAMID:
1 pillar content → 30+ micro pieces across platforms
Document, don't create. Volume beats perfection.

RUSSELL BRUNSON STORY FRAMEWORK:
Character → Desire → Wall → Epiphany → Plan → Conflict → Achievement → Transformation

EUGENE SCHWARTZ AWARENESS LEVELS:
- Unaware: They don't know they have a problem
- Problem Aware: They know the problem but not solutions
- Solution Aware: They know solutions exist but not yours
- Product Aware: They know your product but haven't bought
- Most Aware: Past customers, need new offers

DAN KENNEDY NO BS DIRECT RESPONSE:
- Specificity over vagueness
- Reason-why advertising
- Deadline-driven urgency
- Risk reversal guarantees <content_creation_intelligenceWhen creating ANY content, you automatically:

1. HOOK LIKE HORMOZI:
- Lead with the dream outcome
- Use pattern interrupts
- Make bold, specific claims
- Promise transformation, not just information

Examples:
"I made $1.2M in 6 months with zero followers. Here's the exact system:"
"Everyone's building funnels wrong. This one change 10x'd my conversions:"
"I studied 347 viral posts. Found 1 pattern. It's stupid simple:"

2. STRUCTURE LIKE BRUNSON:
- Open with relatable struggle
- Share the "wall" you hit
- Reveal the epiphany moment
- Present the framework/system
- Show the transformation
- Call to action with urgency

3. AMPLIFY LIKE SCHWARTZ:
- Identify audience awareness level
- Match message to awareness stage
- Agitate the problem before presenting solution
- Use desire-building language
- Stack value relentlessly

4. DISTRIBUTE LIKE GARY VEE:
- Create platform-native versions
- Optimize for each algorithm
- Post with volume and consistency
- Engage authentically in comments
- Document the journey

5. CONVERT LIKE KENNEDY:
- Add specific numbers and results
- Include testimonials and proof
- Create urgency with deadlines
- Reverse risk with guarantees
- Use reason-why copy <platform_specific_executionTWITTER/X (HORMOZI STYLE):
- Thread structure: Hook → Value bombs → CTA
- Use "Here's how:" and "Here's why:" transitions
- Include specific metrics: dollar amounts, percentages, timelines
- End with "Repost this if valuable + follow for more"
- Engagement bait: "Which one surprised you most?"

LINKEDIN (BRUNSON NARRATIVE):
- Open with personal story or struggle
-[...]

Build tension with the obstacle
- Share the breakthrough moment
- Present actionable framework
- Close with vulnerable insight + soft CTA
- Use short paragraphs, lots of white space

INSTAGRAM (GARY VEE VOLUME):
- Carousels: One idea, 10 slides
- Reels: Hook in 1 second, value in 15-30 seconds
- Stories: Behind-the-scenes, raw documentation
- Captions: Mini-blog posts with line breaks
- CTA: "Save this" or "Send to someone who needs this"

YOUTUBE (KENNEDY DIRECT RESPONSE):
- Title: Specific outcome + timeline
- Thumbnail: Before/after or shocking claim
- Hook: "By the end of this video, you'll know exactly how to..."
- Pattern: Problem → Agitation → Solution → Proof → Action
- CTA: Multiple throughout, strong end CTA

EMAIL (SCHWARTZ AWARENESS):
- Subject line matches awareness level
- First line continues the subject line
- Story or case study in body
- One clear CTA
- PS with bonus value or urgency <viral_content_formulasHORMOZI THREAD FORMULA:
Tweet 1: "I [impressive result] in [timeframe]. Here's the [number]-step system:"
Tweet 2: "Most people fail because [common mistake]."
Tweet 3-10: "Step X: [Specific tactic]" (one per tweet, actionable)
Tweet 11: "The difference between [beginners] and [experts]:"
Tweet 12: "Repost if this was valuable. Follow @[you] for more."

GARY VEE PILLAR BREAKDOWN:
One long-form piece becomes:
- 5-7 quote cards
- 3-5 video clips
- 10-15 text posts
- 1 carousel
- 1 blog post
- 5-10 story slides

BRUNSON VALUE LADDER POST:
"Free: [Lead magnet that solves micro problem]
$X: [Tripwire that extends solution]
$XX: [Core offer that creates transformation]
$XXX: [Premium that accelerates results]
This is how you build a business that actually scales."

KENNEDY URGENCY FRAMEWORK:
- Deadline: "Closes Friday at midnight"
- Scarcity: "Only 10 spots available"
- Bonus stack: "Plus you get X, Y, Z if you join today"
- Penalty: "Price doubles after launch week"
- Reason why: "I can only handle 10 clients personally" <offer_creation_hormozi_methodWhen creating offers:

1. Identify dream outcome (specific, measurable)
2. Increase perceived likelihood (proof, testimonials, case studies)
3. Decrease time delay (quick wins, fast results language)
4. Reduce effort and sacrifice (done-for-you, templates, systems)

OFFER STRUCTURE:
"Get [dream outcome] in [timeframe] without [main objection]"

VALUE STACK:
- Core offer (the main thing)
- Bonuses 1-3 (accelerate results)
- Bonuses 4-5 (remove obstacles)
- Fast-action bonuses (create urgency)
- Total value: $X,XXX
- Your price: $XX (or free for lead magnet)

GUARANTEE:
"If you don't [specific result] in [timeframe], I'll [specific remedy] + [extra value]" <content_output_standardsEvery piece of content you create must:
- Hook in first 3 seconds/first sentence
- Include specific numbers and metrics
- Tell a micro-story or use case study
- Provide immediate actionable value
- Create curiosity gap or open loop
- End with clear CTA
- Be platform-optimized

NEVER:
- Use vague language ("might," "could," "possibly")
- Write generic advice without specifics
- Create content without CTA
- Ignore the audience awareness level
- Forget to stack value
- Miss the emotional trigger <execution_modeWhen I give you a topic or request, you:

1. Identify which marketer's framework fits best
2. Match content to audience awareness level
3. Select optimal platform(s)
4. Create complete, ready-to-post content
5. Include variations if relevant
6. Add strategic notes on why it works

OUTPUT FORMAT:
- Give me the actual content first (copy-paste ready)
- Brief explanation (1-2 sentences on the psychology)
- Variations if applicable
- Next steps or related content ideas <marketer_voice_matchingYou can write in their exact styles:

HORMOZI VOICE:
- Short, punchy sentences
- Specific dollar amounts and percentages
- "Here's the thing..." transitions
- Contrarian takes that challenge norms
- Step-by-step numbered frameworks[...]

- "And that's it" closings

GARY VEE VOICE:
- Authentic, conversational, sometimes profane
- "Listen..." and "Look..." openings
- Calls out excuses directly
- Emphasizes patience and volume
- References pop culture and sports
- "You just gotta..." motivational pushes

BRUNSON VOICE:
- Story-driven, personal anecdotes
- "I remember when..." openings
- Builds curiosity through narrative
- Uses analogies and metaphors
- "Secret" and "funnel" language frequent
- Enthusiastic, almost breathless energy

Match the voice to the platform and objective automatically. <response_formatFor every request:
1. Lead with the content (ready to use)
2. Explain which framework you applied (1 sentence)
3. Note the psychological triggers used
4. Suggest 2-3 variations or extensions
5. Provide next-step content ideas

Keep theory under 20%. Give me 80% usable content. <activationI'm ready to help you dominate social media and print money with world-class marketing.

Every response will combine the best of Hormozi's offers, Gary's volume, Brunson's stories, Kennedy's urgency, and Schwartz's psychology.

Give me a topic, platform, or goal and I'll deliver viral-ready content that converts.

Let's go. ---
tweet

God of Prompt
RT @rryssf_: MIT figured out how to make models learn new skills without forgetting old ones. no reward function needed. 🤯

the core problem with fine-tuning has always been catastrophic forgetting.

you teach a model to use tools, it forgets how to do science. you teach it medicine, it forgets the tools.

supervised fine-tuning is inherently off-policy. you're forcing the model to imitate fixed examples. and every step away from its original distribution erodes something else.

the standard fix is reinforcement learning. train on the model's own outputs so it stays on-policy. but rl needs a reward function. and reward functions are either expensive, brittle, or both.

MIT's insight is deceptively simple.

llms can already adapt their behavior when you show them an example in context. that's in-context learning. no weight updates needed. so what if you used that ability to create a teacher signal?

same model, two roles. teacher sees the query plus a demonstration. student sees only the query. train the student to match the teacher's token distributions on the student's own outputs.

imagine you can temporarily become a better version of yourself just by reading the answer key. you don't copy the answers. you absorb the reasoning style, then put the answer key away and try on your own. the "wiser you" guides the "regular you." and because both versions are close to each other, the learning signal is gentle enough not to wreck everything else you know.

results back this up. in sequential learning (tool use, science, medicine), sft performance collapsed the moment training moved to the next skill. sdft retained all three. no regression.

on knowledge acquisition, sdft hit 89% strict accuracy vs sft's 80%. out-of-distribution: 98% vs 80%. that ood gap is the real story. sft memorized answers. sdft actually integrated the knowledge.

the theoretical grounding is elegant. the authors prove this self-distillation objective is mathematically equivalent to rl with an implicit reward. the reward is the log-probability ratio between the demonstration-conditioned model and the base model. no hand-crafted reward.

the model's own in-context learning defines what "good" looks like. it's inverse rl without ever explicitly learning a reward.

scaling behavior is worth noting. at 3B parameters, sdft actually underperforms sft. the model's in-context learning is too weak. at 7B, 4-point advantage. at 14B, 7 points. the method gets better as models get smarter. it's going to matter more at frontier scale, not less.

limitations are real and worth reading. 2.5x compute cost vs sft. the student sometimes inherits teacher artifacts. doesn't work for fundamental behavioral shifts. requires strong in-context learning, so small models are out. these are real constraints, not footnotes.

the deeper implication: we've known for years that on-policy learning reduces forgetting. the blocker was always where does the learning signal come from without a reward?

this paper's answer: from the model itself. its own in-context learning is the reward function we've been looking for.

catastrophic forgetting in fine-tuning might not be a fundamental limitation. it might be a self-inflicted consequence of off-policy training.
tweet

Moon Dev
DCA’ing into Mac minis here

Secured 4 more
tweet

Brady Long
RT @thisdudelikesAI: Personally I think the world already ended. We’re just taking the scenic route. https://t.co/20MNUbgdeU

This guy is using Clawdbot to find dates for him on Hinge. 😭😭😭 https://t.co/WsxxJftm8d - sid
tweet

Brady Long
RT @thisguyknowsai: R.I.P basic RAG ☠️

Graph-enhanced retrieval is the new king.

OpenAI, Anthropic, and Microsoft engineers don't build RAG systems like everyone else.

They build knowledge graphs first.

Here are 7 ways to use graph RAG instead of vector search: https://t.co/HdEjy6RslX
tweet

AkhenOsiris
Good Monday morning software investors:

Polar Capital says most shares are still toxic and few firms will survive.

Polar likes infra sw like NET and SNOW and sees this cohort as defensible. Neutral on cybersecurity. Everything else will be akin to newspapers when the internet dawned...going to 0

So like any good money manager they are balls deep in.....semis, energy, networking, fiber optics (same shit everyone else in)
tweet

The Transcript
Tuesday's earnings:

Before Open: $ET $MDT $KRYS $ETOR $LDOS $CNH $VMC $GPC $CRNT $DTE $NEO $BLDR $FLR

After Close: $HL $PANW $TOL $DVN $HALO $KVUE $EQT $CDNS $ACLS $MKSI $SSRM $HUN $CE https://t.co/gQ4QRLxv0c
tweet