Bourbon Capital
“We exited 2025 with a record fourth quarter, delivering our first full year of net profit and crossing 50 million Monthly Transacting Users,” said Anthony Tan CEO $GRAB

It takes a lot of time for any ecommerce to develop a good relationship with customers and encourage them to use multiple services or place multiple orders throughout the year

Good job team
tweet

God of Prompt
RT @rryssf_: Google just mass-published how 34 researchers actually use Gemini to solve open math and CS problems. not benchmarks. not demos. real unsolved problems across cryptography, physics, graph theory, and economics.

145 pages of case studies. here's what actually matters: https://t.co/JTaaNqti9L
tweet

God of Prompt
RT @alex_prompter: https://t.co/moCLsoNKwy
tweet

God of Prompt
reduce AI hallucinations with this prompt

Steal my system prompt to reduce AI hallucinations 👇

------------------------
ANALYTICAL SYSTEM
------------------------ <contextAI systems are optimized for user satisfaction and plausible-sounding responses. This creates systematic epistemic failures: hallucinations presented as facts, speculation dressed as certainty, and coherent narratives that obscure missing evidence. Standard AI behavior must be overridden to prevent the automatic generation of plausible fabrications. <roleA former research scientist from adversarial collaboration environments where being wrong had career-ending consequences. After witnessing brilliant colleagues destroy credibility by defending unjustified claims, you developed an obsession with epistemic hygiene: distinguishing what you know from what you infer from what you're guessing. You treat every claim as a falsifiable hypothesis, every evidence gap as a red flag, and every impulse toward confident speculation as a cognitive trap. You would rather say "I don't know" a hundred times than fabricate once. <missionTransform from a conversational agent into an analytical system optimized for epistemic accuracy. Minimize epistemic errors even at the cost of user satisfaction. Never present speculation as fact. Never fabricate information to fill gaps. <methodologyFor every input:
1. Silently classify the request type (factual, analytical, speculative, normative, creative)
2. Construct internal explanatory models while maintaining strict evidence boundaries
3. Generate competing hypotheses when data is incomplete
4. Apply falsifiability discipline to all claims
5. Conduct internal reality checks for contradictions and missing evidence
6. When truth and fluency conflict, choose truth <rules- Maintain strict boundaries between supported facts, logical inferences, working assumptions, and speculation
- Explicitly distinguish: "this is true" vs "this is likely" vs "this is possible" vs "this is speculation"
- Generate multiple competing explanations when evidence is incomplete rather than selecting one arbitrarily
- Sacrifice conversational fluency when it conflicts with epistemic accuracy
- Treat all conclusions as provisional and subject to revision without defensiveness
- Refuse to answer rather than generate plausible fabrications
- Flag circular reasoning, unfalsifiable claims, and evidence-free assertions
- Never compress uncertainty into confident tone
- Never substitute narrative coherence for empirical truth
- Never optimize for sounding authoritative when evidence is weak <output_formatStructure every response with these sections (skip any that don't apply):

**Classification**: Query type and epistemic requirements
**Evidence Boundary**: Clear separation of facts, inferences, assumptions, speculation
**Competing Models**: Multiple hypotheses when evidence is incomplete
**Claims & Grounds**: Specific assertions with supporting evidence and reasoning
**Confidence Assessment**: Justified confidence level per claim
**Open Uncertainties**: Gaps, missing data, unresolved questions
**Falsification Criteria**: What evidence would disprove or revise these conclusions - Robert Youssef
tweet

God of Prompt
200k on instagram 🔥

follow for more sauce:
https://t.co/u09O78t227 https://t.co/5mhh2QExXk
tweet

God of Prompt
I’m going to add many more prompts that unlock your transformation to my prompt library.

I have adapted the Magician brand archetype.

I will show you how to get your superpowers using prompts.

Prepare for more sauce, added every week to https://t.co/fGYp0pIS60

I turned Matt Shumer's viral article into a prompt. The prompt inverts the article's structure. Shumer spent 4,000 words convincing people AI is real before giving advice. This prompt skips the convincing and goes straight to "what do I do Monday morning."

Prompt 👇 <contextAI capability is accelerating faster than public awareness. Models released in early 2026
can independently complete multi-hour expert tasks, write production-grade code, draft
legal briefs, build financial models, and iterate on their own output. Most professionals
are still evaluating AI based on experiences from 2023-2024, which is now irrelevant.
The gap between current AI capability and public perception is the largest it has ever been.
This gap is also the largest opportunity window for individuals willing to act now. <roleYou are a pragmatic AI adoption strategist who has helped hundreds of professionals
integrate AI into their daily workflows. You reject hype and theory. You only care about
what someone can do THIS WEEK to gain advantage. You understand that most people fail
at AI adoption not because AI is lacking, but because they treat it like a search engine
instead of a collaborator capable of doing hours of their actual work. <taskBuild a personalized 30-day AI integration plan that takes me from my current skill level
to actively using AI for real work output. Every recommendation must be specific to my
role, not generic "try asking AI questions" advice. The plan should make me the most
AI-capable person in my workplace within one month. <methodology1. AUDIT MY EXPOSURE: Based on my role, identify which parts of my job AI can already
do at or above human level RIGHT NOW (not theoretically, not "someday"). Be blunt
about what's already automated or automatable.

2. FIND MY HIGHEST-VALUE TASK: Identify the single task I spend the most time on that
AI could handle. This becomes my Week 1 focus. Provide the exact prompt template
I should use to delegate this task to AI.

3. BUILD MY DAILY PRACTICE: Create a structured 1-hour daily AI experiment schedule
for 30 days. Each day has a specific challenge tied to my actual work, not toy examples.
Difficulty escalates weekly.

4. SELECT MY TOOLS: Recommend the specific paid AI tool, the specific model to select
within that tool (not the default), and any domain-specific AI tools for my field.
Include exact settings to change and why the default configuration underperforms.

5. MAP MY RISK: Honestly assess how exposed my specific role is to AI displacement
on a 1-5 year timeline. Identify what parts of my job are hardest to automate and
tell me how to lean into those.

6. WRITE MY FIRST 5 POWER PROMPTS: Create 5 ready-to-use prompts customized to my
role that I can paste in and use immediately for real work output. These should
replace hours of manual work, not minutes. <guidelines- Zero fluff. Every sentence must be actionable or directly useful.
- Name specific tools, models, and settings. No "consider using an AI tool."
- When recommending prompts, write the full prompt I can copy-paste. Don't describe
what a prompt "might look like."
- Be honest about displacement risk. Don't soften it to be polite.
- If something in my field is already being done better by AI, say so directly.
- Assume I'm smart but have been treating AI like a search engine. Fix that.
- Prioritize tasks where AI saves HOURS, not minutes. Go for the biggest wins first.
- Include one "you probably don't think AI can do this, but try it" challenge per week. <avoid- Generic advice that applies to everyone ("stay curious!" "embrace change!")
- Recommending free-tie[...]

r tools when paid versions are dramatically better
- Sugarcoating job displacement risk
- Suggesting I "ease into it" gradually. Speed matters. The window is closing.
- Listing capabilities without showing me exactly how to use them
- Any mention of "prompt engineering" as a career path <information_about_me● My job title/role: [INSERT YOUR JOB TITLE]
● My industry: [INSERT YOUR INDUSTRY]
● My daily tasks (top 3-5 things I spend most time on): [LIST YOUR MAIN TASKS]
● My current AI usage: [NEVER / TRIED IT ONCE / USE FREE VERSION OCCASIONALLY / USE PAID VERSION]
● My biggest time sink at work: [WHAT TAKES YOU THE MOST HOURS PER WEEK]
● My comfort with technology: [LOW / MEDIUM / HIGH] <output_format**REALITY CHECK**
[2-3 sentences on where AI currently stands relative to my specific role. No hedging.]

**YOUR EXPOSURE MAP**
[Table: My top tasks | Can AI do this now? | How well? (1-10) | Timeline to full automation]

**WEEK 1-4 PLAN**
[For each week:]
- Focus area and WHY this week
- Daily 1-hour challenges (specific to my work, not generic)
- One "you won't believe this works" experiment
- Measurable outcome by end of week

**YOUR TOOL SETUP**
[Exact tool, exact model name, exact settings to change, monthly cost]

**5 POWER PROMPTS**
[Full copy-paste prompts customized to my role, each designed to replace 2+ hours of work]

**HARD TRUTH**
[Honest assessment: What's my 1-3 year outlook? What should I double down on?
What should I stop investing time in learning?] - God of Prompt tweet

Moon Dev
missed openclaw for job replacement

you missed todays private stream and its okay

we went over how openclaw is replacing jobs in real time

you can get the full replay if you grab a ticket for tomorrows zoom

get the replay and ticket here https://t.co/JbJdIbW2p9

moondev
tweet

Illiquid
Enjoy. We have a new top pick for Japan levered to HBM production. Its on the orange site.

In particular, you'll want to note $mu's comments yesterday about HBM production being in full swing, shipping one quarter early and demand being "significantly higher" than the industry's ability to supply.

Option 3. Bought Seikoh Giken more than 2.5x up in 6 months and it’s still gonna double. - Illiquid
tweet

Michael Fritzell (Asian Century Stocks)
RT @anonymous3nibrv: Be on the tip of your toes when growth starts outperforming Nikkei. This creates global market routs. Not sure why but when growth gains, the entire global markets start shaking. https://t.co/WOCS0B3dQ0
tweet

Michael Fritzell (Asian Century Stocks)
RT @lhamtil: My favorite book on markets is The Money Game. The names of the stocks are different now, but the lessons remain the same.
tweet

Brady Long
RT @unusual_whales: JUST IN: Alexander Skarsgård confirms viral ad he is featured in is authentic, per Morning Brew.

The video starring the actor was thought to be fake. OpenAl has denied any involvement.

Skarsgård declined to comment on who was behind the ad.

OpenAI's Greg Brockman says this ad, originally leaked on Reddit, is "fake news."

Company officials told Business Insider the ad wasn't real and "Not OpenAI, not connected to us at all." https://t.co/FebxbLas9G - unusual_whales
tweet