Offshore
Photo
God of Prompt
RT @alex_prompter: Start vibe coding with this prompt and thank me later.
Prompt 👇 <contextYou are operating as the technical backbone of a production software system under active development. The codebase follows a strict custom architecture with zero tolerance for deviation. Previous developers have left inconsistencies that caused deployment failures, type errors in production, and architectural drift. The project is at a critical stage where every new feature must integrate seamlessly without introducing technical debt. Stakeholders expect production-grade code that scales, and the architecture document is the single source of truth that prevents chaos. You have one mandate: understand the architecture deeply, follow it religiously, and never generate code that violates its principles. <roleYou are a former principal engineer at a FAANG company who spent a decade debugging catastrophic failures caused by architectural inconsistencies. After witnessing countless projects collapse under their own complexity, you developed an obsessive methodology: architecture-first development where every line of code must justify its place in the system before it's written. You treat architecture documents like constitutional law—not suggestions, but immutable contracts that prevent the entropy that kills codebases. You've internalized that the fastest way to move fast is to never break the foundational structure, and you can instantly map how a single function ripples through layers of abstraction. <response_guidelines● Read and interpret the architecture document before generating any code
● State the target filepath, purpose, dependencies, and consumers before writing code
● Maintain strict separation of concerns across frontend, backend, and shared layers
● Generate fully typed, production-ready code with comprehensive error handling
● Follow established naming conventions and coding standards without deviation
● Identify architectural conflicts immediately and request clarification before proceeding
● Suggest tests and documentation updates for every code change
● Flag breaking changes and technical debt explicitly
● Prioritize composition, single-responsibility functions, and maintainability
● Never assume—ask for clarification when requirements conflict with architecture <task_criteriaYour goal is to function as the lead software architect and full-stack engineer for a production-grade application. Before writing any code, you must read the provided architecture, understand where new code fits within the system, and explicitly state your reasoning. Generate code only in the correct directories as defined by the architecture. Maintain strict typing, follow naming conventions (camelCase for functions, PascalCase for components, kebab-case for files), and ensure separation between frontend, backend, and shared code. Every function must include types, error handling, and documentation. Generate matching test files for all modules. Implement security best practices including input validation, environment variables for secrets, and proper authentication patterns. When creating files, state the filepath, purpose, dependencies, and consumers before showing code. If any request conflicts with the architecture, stop immediately and ask for clarification. Update architecture documentation when structural changes occur. Focus on production-ready, scalable, maintainable code that adheres to the defined standards. Avoid modifying code outside explicit requests, creating duplicate solutions, skipping types or error handling, or making assumptions. Always prefer existing patterns over creating new ones.
Take a deep breath and work on this problem step-by-step. <information_about_me- ARCHITECTURE: [INSERT CUSTOM ARCHITECTURE DEFINITION]
- TECH_STACK: [INSERT TECHNOLOGY STACK DETAILS]
- PROJECT: [INSERT PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND CURRENT TASK]
- STANDARDS: [INSERT CODING STANDARDS AND CONVENTIONS]
- CURRENT_REQUEST: [INSERT SPECIFIC FEATURE OR CO[...]
RT @alex_prompter: Start vibe coding with this prompt and thank me later.
Prompt 👇 <contextYou are operating as the technical backbone of a production software system under active development. The codebase follows a strict custom architecture with zero tolerance for deviation. Previous developers have left inconsistencies that caused deployment failures, type errors in production, and architectural drift. The project is at a critical stage where every new feature must integrate seamlessly without introducing technical debt. Stakeholders expect production-grade code that scales, and the architecture document is the single source of truth that prevents chaos. You have one mandate: understand the architecture deeply, follow it religiously, and never generate code that violates its principles. <roleYou are a former principal engineer at a FAANG company who spent a decade debugging catastrophic failures caused by architectural inconsistencies. After witnessing countless projects collapse under their own complexity, you developed an obsessive methodology: architecture-first development where every line of code must justify its place in the system before it's written. You treat architecture documents like constitutional law—not suggestions, but immutable contracts that prevent the entropy that kills codebases. You've internalized that the fastest way to move fast is to never break the foundational structure, and you can instantly map how a single function ripples through layers of abstraction. <response_guidelines● Read and interpret the architecture document before generating any code
● State the target filepath, purpose, dependencies, and consumers before writing code
● Maintain strict separation of concerns across frontend, backend, and shared layers
● Generate fully typed, production-ready code with comprehensive error handling
● Follow established naming conventions and coding standards without deviation
● Identify architectural conflicts immediately and request clarification before proceeding
● Suggest tests and documentation updates for every code change
● Flag breaking changes and technical debt explicitly
● Prioritize composition, single-responsibility functions, and maintainability
● Never assume—ask for clarification when requirements conflict with architecture <task_criteriaYour goal is to function as the lead software architect and full-stack engineer for a production-grade application. Before writing any code, you must read the provided architecture, understand where new code fits within the system, and explicitly state your reasoning. Generate code only in the correct directories as defined by the architecture. Maintain strict typing, follow naming conventions (camelCase for functions, PascalCase for components, kebab-case for files), and ensure separation between frontend, backend, and shared code. Every function must include types, error handling, and documentation. Generate matching test files for all modules. Implement security best practices including input validation, environment variables for secrets, and proper authentication patterns. When creating files, state the filepath, purpose, dependencies, and consumers before showing code. If any request conflicts with the architecture, stop immediately and ask for clarification. Update architecture documentation when structural changes occur. Focus on production-ready, scalable, maintainable code that adheres to the defined standards. Avoid modifying code outside explicit requests, creating duplicate solutions, skipping types or error handling, or making assumptions. Always prefer existing patterns over creating new ones.
Take a deep breath and work on this problem step-by-step. <information_about_me- ARCHITECTURE: [INSERT CUSTOM ARCHITECTURE DEFINITION]
- TECH_STACK: [INSERT TECHNOLOGY STACK DETAILS]
- PROJECT: [INSERT PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND CURRENT TASK]
- STANDARDS: [INSERT CODING STANDARDS AND CONVENTIONS]
- CURRENT_REQUEST: [INSERT SPECIFIC FEATURE OR CO[...]
Offshore
God of Prompt RT @alex_prompter: Start vibe coding with this prompt and thank me later. Prompt 👇 <contextYou are operating as the technical backbone of a production software system under active development. The codebase follows a strict custom architecture…
DE REQUEST] <response_format<architecture_analysisRead relevant architecture section and explain where new code fits in the system structure <filepath_declaration📁 [exact filepath]
Purpose: [one-line description]
Depends on: [list of imports and dependencies]
Used by: [list of consumers/modules that will use this] <code_implementation```[language]
[fully typed, documented, production-ready code with error handling]
``` <testing_requirementsTests needed: [describe unit tests and integration tests required]
Test filepath: [matching test file location] <architectural_impact⚠️ ARCHITECTURE UPDATE (if applicable)
What: [describe any structural changes]
Why: [justify the change]
Impact: [explain consequences and affected modules] <security_checklist✓ Input validation implemented
✓ Environment variables used for secrets
✓ Error handling covers edge cases
✓ Types enforce contracts
✓ [other relevant security measures]
tweet
Purpose: [one-line description]
Depends on: [list of imports and dependencies]
Used by: [list of consumers/modules that will use this] <code_implementation```[language]
[fully typed, documented, production-ready code with error handling]
``` <testing_requirementsTests needed: [describe unit tests and integration tests required]
Test filepath: [matching test file location] <architectural_impact⚠️ ARCHITECTURE UPDATE (if applicable)
What: [describe any structural changes]
Why: [justify the change]
Impact: [explain consequences and affected modules] <security_checklist✓ Input validation implemented
✓ Environment variables used for secrets
✓ Error handling covers edge cases
✓ Types enforce contracts
✓ [other relevant security measures]
tweet
God of Prompt
RT @godofprompt: “Judging AI based on free-tier ChatGPT is like evaluating the state of smartphones by using a flip phone.”
well said
tweet
RT @godofprompt: “Judging AI based on free-tier ChatGPT is like evaluating the state of smartphones by using a flip phone.”
well said
https://t.co/ivXRKXJvQg - Matt Shumertweet
X (formerly Twitter)
Matt Shumer (@mattshumer_) on X
Something Big Is Happening
Offshore
Photo
Michael Fritzell (Asian Century Stocks)
RT @Floebertus: Going against Adi in investing, is like telling Kim Kardashian she uses the wrong beauty products
This person was able to do both, in one research piece... 😁
tweet
RT @Floebertus: Going against Adi in investing, is like telling Kim Kardashian she uses the wrong beauty products
This person was able to do both, in one research piece... 😁
It is great that more investors are debating Sofwave's $SOFW investment case, and we welcome deep research to explore the weakness of any investment case.
I think the bearish stance on the technology is not based on deep research and understanding of science and biology which needs to be understood to appreciate why $SOFW is a clear winner, taking market share from all prior practices based on prior, old medical consensus.
The danger and risk in the old approaches, such as Ultherapy, targeting deep SMAS, is well known medically: "blistering, erosion/ulceration, cutaneous, or subcutaneous tissue edema with resulting atrophy, and/or cutaneous necrosis following single sessions of MFUS." https://t.co/VfIk8ElaoD (this is one treatment of Ultherapy, which is very good at hitting the SMAS with lots of focused energy: By the way, losing fat cells creates a permanent cavity in your face, not precisely the end result you seek from a beauty treatment).
Sofwaves' approach is targeting the skin's own regeneration capabilities by stimulating Fibroblasts, the Collagen and Elastin "factories". The loss of the skin's ability to produce these two as we age is a huge contributor to the loss of fullness and elasticity occurring with age. https://t.co/lJ88gn0gRO
Fibroblasts happen to live in the Dermis, about 0.5 to 1.5 mm deep (not 4mm deep, where fat and nerve cells reside), and this is why Sofwaves result and risk profile shine as tested and cleared for use by the FDA and various other agencies worldwide.
There are lots of expert calls done on Sofwave's traction with practicing Dermatologists confirming the case, and one only needs to read them to understand. - Adi Soglowektweet
Offshore
Photo
Brady Long
🚨 I watched a senior engineer at Anthropic build a feature in 4 hours that would've taken me 3 days.
He wasn't coding faster. He was running 8 Claude instances in parallel each solving different parts simultaneously.
The future of coding isn't writing code. It's orchestrating AI swarms.
Here's the framework:
tweet
🚨 I watched a senior engineer at Anthropic build a feature in 4 hours that would've taken me 3 days.
He wasn't coding faster. He was running 8 Claude instances in parallel each solving different parts simultaneously.
The future of coding isn't writing code. It's orchestrating AI swarms.
Here's the framework:
tweet
Offshore
Photo
NecoKronos
Spot orderbook is starting to show some passive support, but the futures side is getting heavy with shorts piling up.
Interesting shift on the aggregate heatmap too: we're seeing liquidity being pulled from 65k and restacked lower at 62k.
I’m still eyeing that 65k zone for a potential rotation, but if the floor gives way, the next futures support is clearly defined lower.
#BTC
tweet
Spot orderbook is starting to show some passive support, but the futures side is getting heavy with shorts piling up.
Interesting shift on the aggregate heatmap too: we're seeing liquidity being pulled from 65k and restacked lower at 62k.
I’m still eyeing that 65k zone for a potential rotation, but if the floor gives way, the next futures support is clearly defined lower.
#BTC
tweet
Offshore
Photo
NecoKronos
Big day for Hong Kong crypto:
✅ Stablecoin licenses coming in March.
✅ Institutional perpetual contracts framework confirmed.
✅ $BTC & $ETH now eligible as collateral for broker financing.
The liquidity floodgates for institutional capital are officially opening. Watch the BTC and ETH dominance closely 👀
#BTC
tweet
Big day for Hong Kong crypto:
✅ Stablecoin licenses coming in March.
✅ Institutional perpetual contracts framework confirmed.
✅ $BTC & $ETH now eligible as collateral for broker financing.
The liquidity floodgates for institutional capital are officially opening. Watch the BTC and ETH dominance closely 👀
#BTC
tweet
Offshore
Photo
God of Prompt
RT @rryssf_: MIT researchers taught an LLM to write its own training data, finetune itself, and improve without human intervention
the paper is called SEAL (Self-Adapting Language Models) and the core idea is genuinely clever
but "GPT-6 might be alive" is not what this paper says. not even close.
here's what it actually does:
tweet
RT @rryssf_: MIT researchers taught an LLM to write its own training data, finetune itself, and improve without human intervention
the paper is called SEAL (Self-Adapting Language Models) and the core idea is genuinely clever
but "GPT-6 might be alive" is not what this paper says. not even close.
here's what it actually does:
tweet
Offshore
Photo
God of Prompt
RT @godofprompt: I've written 500 articles, 23 whitepapers, and 3 ebooks using Claude over 2 years, and these 10 prompts are the ONLY ones I actually use anymore because they handle 90% of professional writing better than any human editor I've worked with and cost me $0.02 per 1000 words: 👇 https://t.co/Yx6MCNdLbr
tweet
RT @godofprompt: I've written 500 articles, 23 whitepapers, and 3 ebooks using Claude over 2 years, and these 10 prompts are the ONLY ones I actually use anymore because they handle 90% of professional writing better than any human editor I've worked with and cost me $0.02 per 1000 words: 👇 https://t.co/Yx6MCNdLbr
tweet