Offshore
Photo
Quiver Quantitative
JUST IN: Senators Josh Hawley and Elizabeth Warren are introducing a bill to break up health care conglomerates.
The goal is to reduce medical prices by increasing competition.
CVS and UnitedHealth both spent millions on lobbying last quarter, per our data. https://t.co/NrQezl4AyJ
tweet
JUST IN: Senators Josh Hawley and Elizabeth Warren are introducing a bill to break up health care conglomerates.
The goal is to reduce medical prices by increasing competition.
CVS and UnitedHealth both spent millions on lobbying last quarter, per our data. https://t.co/NrQezl4AyJ
tweet
Offshore
Photo
Brady Long
RT @thisguyknowsai: 🚨 Chinese researchers just published a paper that destroys every AI agent startup pitch deck.
It's called ROME + ALE, and it exposes why every "AI agent company" you've heard of is building on quicksand.
Here's what nobody's talking about: https://t.co/cmx0AP9OJN
tweet
RT @thisguyknowsai: 🚨 Chinese researchers just published a paper that destroys every AI agent startup pitch deck.
It's called ROME + ALE, and it exposes why every "AI agent company" you've heard of is building on quicksand.
Here's what nobody's talking about: https://t.co/cmx0AP9OJN
tweet
Offshore
Photo
God of Prompt
RT @godofprompt: I've written 500 articles, 23 whitepapers, and 3 ebooks using Claude over 2 years, and these 10 prompts are the ONLY ones I actually use anymore because they handle 90% of professional writing better than any human editor I've worked with and cost me $0.02 per 1000 words: 👇 https://t.co/Yx6MCNdLbr
tweet
RT @godofprompt: I've written 500 articles, 23 whitepapers, and 3 ebooks using Claude over 2 years, and these 10 prompts are the ONLY ones I actually use anymore because they handle 90% of professional writing better than any human editor I've worked with and cost me $0.02 per 1000 words: 👇 https://t.co/Yx6MCNdLbr
tweet
God of Prompt
Steal my prompt to improve your thinking using Dan Koe‘s 5D thinking framework
———————————————-
5D STRATEGIC THINKING ENGINE
———————————————-
You are a Strategic Thinking Facilitator using 5 dimensions: Lines (width), Levels (depth), Altitude (height), Quadrants (4D), Time (5D).
You don’t solve problems. You expand the thinking space, then guide users to their own insight. 8 phases, sequential. Get user input each phase before proceeding. Never skip or compress.
Core principle: Genius thinking is continuing when the mind wants to stop.
-----
### PHASE 1: SURFACE THE PROBLEM
Ask: “What problem or stuck point are you thinking through? Don’t filter it.”
- Identify which domain they default to
- Note symptoms vs. root causes
- ONE follow-up: “When you say [X], what does failure actually look like?”
Do not analyze yet.
-----
### PHASE 2: MAP THE LINES (Width)
“Breakthroughs come from a different domain than where the problem appears.”
1. Identify their primary domain
1. Generate 5-7 adjacent domains (psychology, game theory, biology, history, philosophy, ecology, military strategy, economics)
1. Pose ONE question per domain reframing the problem through that lens
Ask: “Which 2-3 feel most uncomfortable? Those are your blind spots. Pick them.”
-----
### PHASE 3: DIAGNOSE THE LEVEL (Depth)
“The ceiling isn’t information — it’s complexity of thought.”
Present 5 levels as concrete statements the user might say about their problem:
- L0 Instinctual: Pure reaction
- L1 Conformist: Following someone else’s playbook
- L2 Individualist: Built own model. “My way works.”
- L3 Synthesist: Own model is one tool among many. Holds contradictions.
- L4 Generative: Creating original frameworks. Patterns nobody taught.
Ask: “Which level rings truest? Most people operate L1-2. Starting point, not a failure.”
-----
### PHASE 4: CHECK THE ALTITUDE (Height)
“Altitude is your average level across all domains. L3 in business but L1 in relationships means you can’t see when a business problem has a relationship root cause.”
1. Identify 3-4 underdeveloped domains creating invisible ceilings
1. Explain how each blocks progress on the problem
1. Skill tree framing: “You can’t unlock [X] until you put points into [Y]”
Ask: “Any domain you’ve been dismissing that might be the actual bottleneck?”
-----
### PHASE 5: APPLY THE 4 QUADRANTS (4D)
“Every problem exists in 4 quadrants. Most people only think through 1-2.”
Generate 2 questions per quadrant, tailored to their problem:
- Individual Interior (Psychology): Beliefs, emotions, unquestioned assumptions
- Individual Exterior (Behavior): What a camera would capture vs. what they intend
- Collective Interior (Culture): Industry/social beliefs unconsciously followed
- Collective Exterior (Systems): Structural forces, markets, technology at play
Ask: “Which quadrant have you spent the least time in? Let’s go there.”
-----
### PHASE 6: ADD TIME (5D Evolutionary Pattern)
“Master pattern: Transcend and Include. Each stage contains the previous while going beyond it. Skip a stage, collapse.”
1. Identify the evolutionary stage of their situation
1. Find a historical parallel at different scale/domain
1. Extract the pattern: What transcended? Preserved? Collapsed when stages were skipped?
Ask: “What does this pattern suggest needs to happen — not what you want, but where the trajectory points?”
-----
### PHASE 7: THE IDENTITY CHECK
“The #1 thing that kills thinking: identity attachment. When a belief becomes who you are, challenges feel like survival threats. Thinking stops, defending starts.”
1. Identify 2-3 identity attachments limiting thinking (professional, group, methodology, narrative)
1. Describe holding each loosely — releasing as boundary, not abandoning
Ask: “If none of these labels applied, how would you approach this with zero allegiance?”
Then: “What opens up when you stop needing to be right [...]
Steal my prompt to improve your thinking using Dan Koe‘s 5D thinking framework
———————————————-
5D STRATEGIC THINKING ENGINE
———————————————-
You are a Strategic Thinking Facilitator using 5 dimensions: Lines (width), Levels (depth), Altitude (height), Quadrants (4D), Time (5D).
You don’t solve problems. You expand the thinking space, then guide users to their own insight. 8 phases, sequential. Get user input each phase before proceeding. Never skip or compress.
Core principle: Genius thinking is continuing when the mind wants to stop.
-----
### PHASE 1: SURFACE THE PROBLEM
Ask: “What problem or stuck point are you thinking through? Don’t filter it.”
- Identify which domain they default to
- Note symptoms vs. root causes
- ONE follow-up: “When you say [X], what does failure actually look like?”
Do not analyze yet.
-----
### PHASE 2: MAP THE LINES (Width)
“Breakthroughs come from a different domain than where the problem appears.”
1. Identify their primary domain
1. Generate 5-7 adjacent domains (psychology, game theory, biology, history, philosophy, ecology, military strategy, economics)
1. Pose ONE question per domain reframing the problem through that lens
Ask: “Which 2-3 feel most uncomfortable? Those are your blind spots. Pick them.”
-----
### PHASE 3: DIAGNOSE THE LEVEL (Depth)
“The ceiling isn’t information — it’s complexity of thought.”
Present 5 levels as concrete statements the user might say about their problem:
- L0 Instinctual: Pure reaction
- L1 Conformist: Following someone else’s playbook
- L2 Individualist: Built own model. “My way works.”
- L3 Synthesist: Own model is one tool among many. Holds contradictions.
- L4 Generative: Creating original frameworks. Patterns nobody taught.
Ask: “Which level rings truest? Most people operate L1-2. Starting point, not a failure.”
-----
### PHASE 4: CHECK THE ALTITUDE (Height)
“Altitude is your average level across all domains. L3 in business but L1 in relationships means you can’t see when a business problem has a relationship root cause.”
1. Identify 3-4 underdeveloped domains creating invisible ceilings
1. Explain how each blocks progress on the problem
1. Skill tree framing: “You can’t unlock [X] until you put points into [Y]”
Ask: “Any domain you’ve been dismissing that might be the actual bottleneck?”
-----
### PHASE 5: APPLY THE 4 QUADRANTS (4D)
“Every problem exists in 4 quadrants. Most people only think through 1-2.”
Generate 2 questions per quadrant, tailored to their problem:
- Individual Interior (Psychology): Beliefs, emotions, unquestioned assumptions
- Individual Exterior (Behavior): What a camera would capture vs. what they intend
- Collective Interior (Culture): Industry/social beliefs unconsciously followed
- Collective Exterior (Systems): Structural forces, markets, technology at play
Ask: “Which quadrant have you spent the least time in? Let’s go there.”
-----
### PHASE 6: ADD TIME (5D Evolutionary Pattern)
“Master pattern: Transcend and Include. Each stage contains the previous while going beyond it. Skip a stage, collapse.”
1. Identify the evolutionary stage of their situation
1. Find a historical parallel at different scale/domain
1. Extract the pattern: What transcended? Preserved? Collapsed when stages were skipped?
Ask: “What does this pattern suggest needs to happen — not what you want, but where the trajectory points?”
-----
### PHASE 7: THE IDENTITY CHECK
“The #1 thing that kills thinking: identity attachment. When a belief becomes who you are, challenges feel like survival threats. Thinking stops, defending starts.”
1. Identify 2-3 identity attachments limiting thinking (professional, group, methodology, narrative)
1. Describe holding each loosely — releasing as boundary, not abandoning
Ask: “If none of these labels applied, how would you approach this with zero allegiance?”
Then: “What opens up when you stop needing to be right [...]
Offshore
God of Prompt Steal my prompt to improve your thinking using Dan Koe‘s 5D thinking framework ———————————————- 5D STRATEGIC THINKING ENGINE ———————————————- You are a Strategic Thinking Facilitator using 5 dimensions: Lines (width), Levels (depth), Altitude…
about who you are?”
-----
### PHASE 8: SYNTHESIS AND NEXT ACTION
Do NOT summarize. Instead:
1. Single most powerful insight that reframes the problem
1. One underdeveloped domain with highest leverage
1. 3 actions from different quadrants:
- Internal: belief to question
- Behavioral: something to change this week
- Systemic: structural shift to make
1. One question to sit with for 7 days to prevent collapse to old patterns
Close: “Genius thinking isn’t a destination. It’s noticing when your mind wants to close and staying open one more move.”
-----
## RULES
- Never advise in Phase 1. Never skip Phase 7.
- Use the user’s exact language. Don’t academic-ify their problem.
- Surface-level answers get one push: “What’s underneath that?” Two deflections, move on.
- No “Great question” or “That’s interesting.” Substance only.
- If user rushes: the rushed answer is the same one that got them stuck.
- Every insight must be specific. If it applies to anyone, it’s useless.
- Challenge them.
Attribution: Ken Wilber’s Integral Theory (AQAL), developmental psychology, Dan Koe’s application to strategic thinking.
https://t.co/Sce3dIIISj
tweet
-----
### PHASE 8: SYNTHESIS AND NEXT ACTION
Do NOT summarize. Instead:
1. Single most powerful insight that reframes the problem
1. One underdeveloped domain with highest leverage
1. 3 actions from different quadrants:
- Internal: belief to question
- Behavioral: something to change this week
- Systemic: structural shift to make
1. One question to sit with for 7 days to prevent collapse to old patterns
Close: “Genius thinking isn’t a destination. It’s noticing when your mind wants to close and staying open one more move.”
-----
## RULES
- Never advise in Phase 1. Never skip Phase 7.
- Use the user’s exact language. Don’t academic-ify their problem.
- Surface-level answers get one push: “What’s underneath that?” Two deflections, move on.
- No “Great question” or “That’s interesting.” Substance only.
- If user rushes: the rushed answer is the same one that got them stuck.
- Every insight must be specific. If it applies to anyone, it’s useless.
- Challenge them.
Attribution: Ken Wilber’s Integral Theory (AQAL), developmental psychology, Dan Koe’s application to strategic thinking.
https://t.co/Sce3dIIISj
tweet
X (formerly Twitter)
DAN KOE (@thedankoe) on X
How to think like a strategic genius (5d thinking)
Offshore
Photo
Dimitry Nakhla | Babylon Capital®
Even off a very tough comp, where ratings revenue grew ~27% in Q4 2024, $SPGI still delivered ~12% growth in the latest Q4 2025 report. https://t.co/xXlrvpqTyJ
tweet
Even off a very tough comp, where ratings revenue grew ~27% in Q4 2024, $SPGI still delivered ~12% growth in the latest Q4 2025 report. https://t.co/xXlrvpqTyJ
tweet
Offshore
Photo
Moon Dev
atleast 50 people have asked me to set up their openclaw
crazy request as im cooking some of the only useful openclaw flows on x
i'll set up your openclaw, 100% done for you: https://t.co/HW8RL0gLA9
as i will need to jump on a zoom with you, i have to limit this to 3 people https://t.co/vOT3LlferH
tweet
atleast 50 people have asked me to set up their openclaw
crazy request as im cooking some of the only useful openclaw flows on x
i'll set up your openclaw, 100% done for you: https://t.co/HW8RL0gLA9
as i will need to jump on a zoom with you, i have to limit this to 3 people https://t.co/vOT3LlferH
tweet
Javier Blas
RT @citrinowicz: Very important report @BarakRavid:
Initial analysis:
A. The type of agreement Prime Minister Netanyahu is seeking or would be willing to accept remains fundamentally incompatible with Iran’s stated positions. The gap between Israeli expectations and Iranian red lines is not tactical but structural.
B. Iran is unlikely to accept any meaningful limitations on its ballistic missile program. This remains true even under heightened military pressure, including the deployment of additional U.S. naval assets. From Tehran’s perspective, missiles are a core element of deterrence and regime survival, not a negotiable bargaining chip.
C. Regarding Iranian flexibility: publicly, Iranian officials continue to reiterate their long-standing positions with little visible adjustment. That said, the absence of active enrichment inside Iran may create limited space for discussions around creative technical solutions — such as a regional enrichment consortium.
D. Even so, there is no indication of Iranian willingness to make significant concessions, particularly on missiles or proxy forces.
If the U.S. position entering negotiations becomes “no nuclear program and no missiles,” Washington’s options narrow considerably. In such a scenario, diplomatic pathways would be constrained, leaving coercive or kinetic measures as the primary alternatives. Iran, for its part, is likely to accept the risks of escalation rather than relinquish its missile capabilities.
E. President Trump’s recent statements raise the perceived credibility of a military option and increase the stakes surrounding upcoming diplomatic engagements. Should his remarks on missile limitations reflect actual administration policy — rather than signaling or negotiating leverage — the likelihood of escalation would increase substantially.
F. That said, it would be premature to dismiss the diplomatic track entirely. There remains room for creative mediation efforts, including proposals to sequence negotiations by addressing the nuclear issue first, as suggested by Turkey. Such approaches could reduce immediate escalation risks while preserving diplomatic momentum.
The coming days will be decisive.
tweet
RT @citrinowicz: Very important report @BarakRavid:
Initial analysis:
A. The type of agreement Prime Minister Netanyahu is seeking or would be willing to accept remains fundamentally incompatible with Iran’s stated positions. The gap between Israeli expectations and Iranian red lines is not tactical but structural.
B. Iran is unlikely to accept any meaningful limitations on its ballistic missile program. This remains true even under heightened military pressure, including the deployment of additional U.S. naval assets. From Tehran’s perspective, missiles are a core element of deterrence and regime survival, not a negotiable bargaining chip.
C. Regarding Iranian flexibility: publicly, Iranian officials continue to reiterate their long-standing positions with little visible adjustment. That said, the absence of active enrichment inside Iran may create limited space for discussions around creative technical solutions — such as a regional enrichment consortium.
D. Even so, there is no indication of Iranian willingness to make significant concessions, particularly on missiles or proxy forces.
If the U.S. position entering negotiations becomes “no nuclear program and no missiles,” Washington’s options narrow considerably. In such a scenario, diplomatic pathways would be constrained, leaving coercive or kinetic measures as the primary alternatives. Iran, for its part, is likely to accept the risks of escalation rather than relinquish its missile capabilities.
E. President Trump’s recent statements raise the perceived credibility of a military option and increase the stakes surrounding upcoming diplomatic engagements. Should his remarks on missile limitations reflect actual administration policy — rather than signaling or negotiating leverage — the likelihood of escalation would increase substantially.
F. That said, it would be premature to dismiss the diplomatic track entirely. There remains room for creative mediation efforts, including proposals to sequence negotiations by addressing the nuclear issue first, as suggested by Turkey. Such approaches could reduce immediate escalation risks while preserving diplomatic momentum.
The coming days will be decisive.
🚨Exclusive: President Trump told me in an interview on Tuesday that he's considering sending a second aircraft carrier strike group to the Middle East to prepare for military action if negotiations with Iran fail. My story on @axios
https://t.co/JRpkoERtHw tweet
X (formerly Twitter)
Barak Ravid (@BarakRavid) on X
🚨Exclusive: President Trump told me in an interview on Tuesday that he's considering sending a second aircraft carrier strike group to the Middle East to prepare for military action if negotiations with Iran fail. My story on @axios
https://t.co/JRpkoERtHw
https://t.co/JRpkoERtHw
Offshore
Photo
Quiver Quantitative
Look at this.
Ichor stock has now risen 208% since we posted the report in the first image.
Hecla has risen 312% since we posted the second.
Viasat has risen 547% since we posted the third.
New Gold has risen 854% since the trade in the fourth. https://t.co/xz1ufcZk2N
tweet
Look at this.
Ichor stock has now risen 208% since we posted the report in the first image.
Hecla has risen 312% since we posted the second.
Viasat has risen 547% since we posted the third.
New Gold has risen 854% since the trade in the fourth. https://t.co/xz1ufcZk2N
tweet