AkhenOsiris
$GENI
From earlier this morning:
Citizens reiterated Outperform, $15 target.
The firm expects the upcoming investor day to focus on EBITDA margin progression from the current 20-30% range, free cash flow metrics, and the trajectory of the media business. Citizens noted that Genius Sports’ fundamental thesis has remained largely consistent since its previous investor day in early 2022.
They highlighted that major operators like DraftKings and FanDuel, which control approximately 70% of the sports betting market share, are increasingly focused on driving higher in-play betting mix. In-play handle currently represents about half of their respective businesses.
Citizens projects that 2026 could mark a meaningful inflection point for in-play betting, potentially shifting Genius Sports toward a more lucrative take-rate model as the industry evolves beyond its current focus on pre-game parlays.
tweet
$GENI
From earlier this morning:
Citizens reiterated Outperform, $15 target.
The firm expects the upcoming investor day to focus on EBITDA margin progression from the current 20-30% range, free cash flow metrics, and the trajectory of the media business. Citizens noted that Genius Sports’ fundamental thesis has remained largely consistent since its previous investor day in early 2022.
They highlighted that major operators like DraftKings and FanDuel, which control approximately 70% of the sports betting market share, are increasingly focused on driving higher in-play betting mix. In-play handle currently represents about half of their respective businesses.
Citizens projects that 2026 could mark a meaningful inflection point for in-play betting, potentially shifting Genius Sports toward a more lucrative take-rate model as the industry evolves beyond its current focus on pre-game parlays.
tweet
Offshore
Photo
Dimitry Nakhla | Babylon Capital®
RT @StockMKTNewz: Meta Platforms $META is reportedly considering using Google $GOOGL's TPUs in their data centers - The Information https://t.co/qi490TyAnb
tweet
RT @StockMKTNewz: Meta Platforms $META is reportedly considering using Google $GOOGL's TPUs in their data centers - The Information https://t.co/qi490TyAnb
tweet
Offshore
Photo
EndGame Macro
China’s Long Glide into Slowdown And The Real Story Behind the Red Line
When you step back and look at this chart, you’re basically watching China’s entire post 2008 playbook drawn as a single line. The red curve tells the story better than any policy memo ever could. China leaned on credit harder and longer than any major economy, and it worked for a while. The early stimulus built things the country actually needed like rails, roads, airports, basic infrastructure. Growth exploded, and the world looked at China like it had discovered a cheat code.
But every credit cycle eventually hits diminishing returns, and you can see that happening in real time. By the mid 2010s, Beijing knew the system was getting unstable and tried a deleveraging moment. It didn’t last because growth softened and political tolerance for pain is low. So they went back to the old model, but this time the output wasn’t 10% growth, it was a property bubble, stressed local governments, and a financial system stretched across layers of shadow lending.
What really changes the tone is 2022. That’s the moment China’s total non financial debt surpasses U.S. and EU levels, even though the country is still dramatically poorer per capita. That’s the profile of a system that has already spent tomorrow’s growth to pay for yesterday’s. And now, with property cracking and domestic demand weakening, they’re leaning again on targeted stimulus to prevent a disorderly unwind. It’s no longer about creating the future; it’s about maintaining the balance sheet.
The Push Abroad, And What It Really Means
The other half of the story is this idea that China is trying to export its way out of deflation. You can see why they’d try. Domestic consumption is soft. Real estate isn’t coming back in any meaningful way. Factories have excess capacity. So they’re pushing goods outward like EV’s, solar panels, machinery hoping global markets can absorb what the domestic economy can’t.
But that strategy carries its own risks. It puts China on a collision course with the U.S. and Europe, both of which have become far more protective of their own industries. And even if China can sell more abroad, it doesn’t fix the fundamental issue that households at home aren’t spending, developers are underwater, and local governments are suffocating under years of accumulated liabilities. The chart is blunt: the more they push, the more the debt burden grows, and the harder it becomes to generate genuine, organic growth from within.
In my opinion, China is already slipping into a long, slow chapter that looks less like its 2000s boom and more like Japan’s post bubble era, just compressed into a tighter, more politically managed timeframe. Not a dramatic collapse, but a stretched out stagnation marked by endless interventions, declining returns on stimulus, and a system that never fully resets. And that means the world should probably stop waiting for the next China boom. That era is over. What’s coming next is an economy trying to keep the machine running without the engine that once powered it.
tweet
China’s Long Glide into Slowdown And The Real Story Behind the Red Line
When you step back and look at this chart, you’re basically watching China’s entire post 2008 playbook drawn as a single line. The red curve tells the story better than any policy memo ever could. China leaned on credit harder and longer than any major economy, and it worked for a while. The early stimulus built things the country actually needed like rails, roads, airports, basic infrastructure. Growth exploded, and the world looked at China like it had discovered a cheat code.
But every credit cycle eventually hits diminishing returns, and you can see that happening in real time. By the mid 2010s, Beijing knew the system was getting unstable and tried a deleveraging moment. It didn’t last because growth softened and political tolerance for pain is low. So they went back to the old model, but this time the output wasn’t 10% growth, it was a property bubble, stressed local governments, and a financial system stretched across layers of shadow lending.
What really changes the tone is 2022. That’s the moment China’s total non financial debt surpasses U.S. and EU levels, even though the country is still dramatically poorer per capita. That’s the profile of a system that has already spent tomorrow’s growth to pay for yesterday’s. And now, with property cracking and domestic demand weakening, they’re leaning again on targeted stimulus to prevent a disorderly unwind. It’s no longer about creating the future; it’s about maintaining the balance sheet.
The Push Abroad, And What It Really Means
The other half of the story is this idea that China is trying to export its way out of deflation. You can see why they’d try. Domestic consumption is soft. Real estate isn’t coming back in any meaningful way. Factories have excess capacity. So they’re pushing goods outward like EV’s, solar panels, machinery hoping global markets can absorb what the domestic economy can’t.
But that strategy carries its own risks. It puts China on a collision course with the U.S. and Europe, both of which have become far more protective of their own industries. And even if China can sell more abroad, it doesn’t fix the fundamental issue that households at home aren’t spending, developers are underwater, and local governments are suffocating under years of accumulated liabilities. The chart is blunt: the more they push, the more the debt burden grows, and the harder it becomes to generate genuine, organic growth from within.
In my opinion, China is already slipping into a long, slow chapter that looks less like its 2000s boom and more like Japan’s post bubble era, just compressed into a tighter, more politically managed timeframe. Not a dramatic collapse, but a stretched out stagnation marked by endless interventions, declining returns on stimulus, and a system that never fully resets. And that means the world should probably stop waiting for the next China boom. That era is over. What’s coming next is an economy trying to keep the machine running without the engine that once powered it.
tweet
Offshore
Photo
Quiver Quantitative
Nancy Pelosi made $3.5M in the stock market today, per our estimates.
We estimate that she is now worth $278M. https://t.co/lSrmqK69Qt
tweet
Nancy Pelosi made $3.5M in the stock market today, per our estimates.
We estimate that she is now worth $278M. https://t.co/lSrmqK69Qt
tweet
Offshore
Photo
EndGame Macro
White House Launches the Genesis Mission: America’s New National AI Backbone
If you strip away the branding, Genesis is the U.S. government building a national AI backbone inside the Department of Energy and then inviting the biggest private sector AI players to plug into it. The executive order makes the DOE responsible for building a unified platform that connects national lab supercomputers, cloud AI environments, decades of federal datasets, and automated AI directed laboratories. The purpose is spelled out directly in Section 1: scientific acceleration, national security strength, energy dominance, and technological leadership.
The order goes further than earlier AI initiatives. It doesn’t just talk about safety or innovation, it directs DOE to inventory every compute resource available, including those through industry partners, within 90 days, and stand up an operational capability within 270 days. It also requires top tier data access frameworks, model sharing agreements, intellectual property rules, and strict vetting systems for anyone allowed onto the platform.
DOE’s 17 national labs will open their massive scientific datasets and instruments to approved researchers; AI will be used to accelerate simulations by orders of magnitude; and the platform will run across both government supercomputers and private hyperscalers. Companies like Nvidia, Oracle, Dell, AMD, and Hewlett Packard Enterprise are already named as likely infrastructure partners.
Layer in the earlier White House AI commitments where Amazon, Google, Microsoft, Meta, OpenAI, Anthropic, Inflection, Adobe, IBM, Nvidia, Palantir, Salesforce, Cohere, Scale AI, Stability all agreed to safety testing, watermarking, and security protocols and you see the roster of firms whose models and tools are expected to align with Genesis by design.
Put together, you have a tight, government aligned AI ecosystem spanning chips, compute, cloud, models, data, and safety rules.
What This Will Actually Do
My read is that Genesis serves two goals at once. On the surface, it’s about scientific speed, letting AI search vast design spaces, automate experiments, and explore energy, biotech, materials, and semiconductor breakthroughs faster than human run labs ever could. The executive order explicitly compares it to the Manhattan Project and promises “dramatic acceleration” in discovery.
But underneath, it centralizes the AI stack. Instead of letting the highest end compute and model capabilities drift entirely into the private sector, Genesis pulls them back into a structured federal environment. Access becomes conditional: follow the safety rules, share the data, integrate into the platform and you get to operate at the frontier. Don’t, and you’re on the outside looking in.
It also creates a controlled pipeline for national security use cases in public research data, proprietary data for things like semiconductor R&D, and a classified bucket for defense relevant datasets. That segmentation is deliberate.
And at a geopolitical level, it’s a response to China. The EO makes it explicit: this is about maintaining global technological dominance.
My View
Genesis is the beginning of a nationalized AI infrastructure strategy. It will function as the bridge between government compute and private sector models, letting Washington influence which companies sit closest to the frontier and which capabilities get priority. It will speed up real scientific breakthroughs, but it will also quietly define the rules of the AI race on who participates, who gets access, and how the most powerful systems are directed.
It’s not just an acceleration plan. It’s the architecture of AI power in the U.S. for the next decade.
tweet
White House Launches the Genesis Mission: America’s New National AI Backbone
If you strip away the branding, Genesis is the U.S. government building a national AI backbone inside the Department of Energy and then inviting the biggest private sector AI players to plug into it. The executive order makes the DOE responsible for building a unified platform that connects national lab supercomputers, cloud AI environments, decades of federal datasets, and automated AI directed laboratories. The purpose is spelled out directly in Section 1: scientific acceleration, national security strength, energy dominance, and technological leadership.
The order goes further than earlier AI initiatives. It doesn’t just talk about safety or innovation, it directs DOE to inventory every compute resource available, including those through industry partners, within 90 days, and stand up an operational capability within 270 days. It also requires top tier data access frameworks, model sharing agreements, intellectual property rules, and strict vetting systems for anyone allowed onto the platform.
DOE’s 17 national labs will open their massive scientific datasets and instruments to approved researchers; AI will be used to accelerate simulations by orders of magnitude; and the platform will run across both government supercomputers and private hyperscalers. Companies like Nvidia, Oracle, Dell, AMD, and Hewlett Packard Enterprise are already named as likely infrastructure partners.
Layer in the earlier White House AI commitments where Amazon, Google, Microsoft, Meta, OpenAI, Anthropic, Inflection, Adobe, IBM, Nvidia, Palantir, Salesforce, Cohere, Scale AI, Stability all agreed to safety testing, watermarking, and security protocols and you see the roster of firms whose models and tools are expected to align with Genesis by design.
Put together, you have a tight, government aligned AI ecosystem spanning chips, compute, cloud, models, data, and safety rules.
What This Will Actually Do
My read is that Genesis serves two goals at once. On the surface, it’s about scientific speed, letting AI search vast design spaces, automate experiments, and explore energy, biotech, materials, and semiconductor breakthroughs faster than human run labs ever could. The executive order explicitly compares it to the Manhattan Project and promises “dramatic acceleration” in discovery.
But underneath, it centralizes the AI stack. Instead of letting the highest end compute and model capabilities drift entirely into the private sector, Genesis pulls them back into a structured federal environment. Access becomes conditional: follow the safety rules, share the data, integrate into the platform and you get to operate at the frontier. Don’t, and you’re on the outside looking in.
It also creates a controlled pipeline for national security use cases in public research data, proprietary data for things like semiconductor R&D, and a classified bucket for defense relevant datasets. That segmentation is deliberate.
And at a geopolitical level, it’s a response to China. The EO makes it explicit: this is about maintaining global technological dominance.
My View
Genesis is the beginning of a nationalized AI infrastructure strategy. It will function as the bridge between government compute and private sector models, letting Washington influence which companies sit closest to the frontier and which capabilities get priority. It will speed up real scientific breakthroughs, but it will also quietly define the rules of the AI race on who participates, who gets access, and how the most powerful systems are directed.
It’s not just an acceleration plan. It’s the architecture of AI power in the U.S. for the next decade.
tweet
Offshore
Photo
EndGame Macro
This drawdown chart is essentially Bitcoin’s psychological record. Every cycle carves the same kind of canyon: long periods where price sits forty to eighty percent below the highs, followed by violent recoveries that overshoot in the other direction. Where we are now, down roughly 30% from this cycle’s peak is the kind of mid cycle turbulence that shows up when the broader environment shifts from easy to tightening. The shape of the drop doesn’t tell you everything, but when you set it against what’s happening in the liquidity backdrop, the timing starts to make sense.
The Liquidity Picture Under the Surface
When I talk about liquidity here, I’m not talking about a single metric, it’s the blend of funding conditions across the dollar system. Right now that blend is no longer climbing; it’s flattening and, in some pockets, cracking. You can see it in several places at once. Dealer balance sheets are tightening, which shows up as rising stress in repo markets and unusually large gaps between the overnight risk free rate and the rate at which collateral is actually changing hands. That kind of spread typically widens only when the system starts to run short of high quality collateral or when balance sheet capacity at the major banks is under pressure.
You can see it in short term liquidity nowcasts, which fell sharply in early October and never bounced back. That kind of step down happens when flows from central banks, money funds, and Treasury operations hit the brakes simultaneously. And you can see it in the long arc liquidity cycle itself: the big multi year surge that fueled the 2023–2025 boom has already turned over. Liquidity is still high in absolute terms, but it’s no longer accelerating and markets trade the change, not the level.
At the policy layer, the Fed is in that awkward early easing zone. They’ve cut rates twice, and they’re about to end QT and shift back to reinvesting into T-bills, which helps the front end of the system. But that doesn’t reverse the structural tightening caused by rising refinancing needs, collateral stress, and a global debt load that’s now sitting at levels where rollover risk itself starts to drain liquidity. When liquidity slows while debt continues climbing, financial conditions feel heavier even if headline policy looks supportive.
The Next Six Months
Once you put the Bitcoin chart and the liquidity backdrop together, the next six months split into two clear phases. The first phase is the near term relief window. Ending QT gives markets some breathing space, and the possibility of another small rate cut adds a bit more cushion. In that kind of environment, Bitcoin can absolutely bounce. It wouldn’t be surprising to see it crawl back toward a 100k, maybe even take a quick shot at new highs if traders decide policy is turning faster than conditions are deteriorating.
But the second phase is where the underlying liquidity trend reasserts itself. Slowing liquidity, especially when you can see it in repo stress, tightening collateral, and weakening high frequency liquidity gauges usually creates a drag that builds quietly, then shows up abruptly. When the financial system moves from ample to strained, speculative assets rarely float higher; they get repriced. That’s why the more probable 6 month outcome is not a fresh leg up, but a broader, deeper correction as the cycle grinds forward. It doesn’t have to be a crash. It can unfold as a slow, uneven slide into a 50% drawdown from the peak, the kind of move Bitcoin has produced in every past cycle once liquidity stops expanding and the dollar system shifts into defensive mode.
Bitcoin has room to rally over the next couple of months, but unless liquidity starts expanding again and right now it’s doing the opposite the cycle still leans toward a larger retracement before the next major advance. That’s the rhythm Bitcoin has followed every time liquidity peaks and begins to roll, and today’s setup fits that pattern almost perfectly.
Bitco[...]
This drawdown chart is essentially Bitcoin’s psychological record. Every cycle carves the same kind of canyon: long periods where price sits forty to eighty percent below the highs, followed by violent recoveries that overshoot in the other direction. Where we are now, down roughly 30% from this cycle’s peak is the kind of mid cycle turbulence that shows up when the broader environment shifts from easy to tightening. The shape of the drop doesn’t tell you everything, but when you set it against what’s happening in the liquidity backdrop, the timing starts to make sense.
The Liquidity Picture Under the Surface
When I talk about liquidity here, I’m not talking about a single metric, it’s the blend of funding conditions across the dollar system. Right now that blend is no longer climbing; it’s flattening and, in some pockets, cracking. You can see it in several places at once. Dealer balance sheets are tightening, which shows up as rising stress in repo markets and unusually large gaps between the overnight risk free rate and the rate at which collateral is actually changing hands. That kind of spread typically widens only when the system starts to run short of high quality collateral or when balance sheet capacity at the major banks is under pressure.
You can see it in short term liquidity nowcasts, which fell sharply in early October and never bounced back. That kind of step down happens when flows from central banks, money funds, and Treasury operations hit the brakes simultaneously. And you can see it in the long arc liquidity cycle itself: the big multi year surge that fueled the 2023–2025 boom has already turned over. Liquidity is still high in absolute terms, but it’s no longer accelerating and markets trade the change, not the level.
At the policy layer, the Fed is in that awkward early easing zone. They’ve cut rates twice, and they’re about to end QT and shift back to reinvesting into T-bills, which helps the front end of the system. But that doesn’t reverse the structural tightening caused by rising refinancing needs, collateral stress, and a global debt load that’s now sitting at levels where rollover risk itself starts to drain liquidity. When liquidity slows while debt continues climbing, financial conditions feel heavier even if headline policy looks supportive.
The Next Six Months
Once you put the Bitcoin chart and the liquidity backdrop together, the next six months split into two clear phases. The first phase is the near term relief window. Ending QT gives markets some breathing space, and the possibility of another small rate cut adds a bit more cushion. In that kind of environment, Bitcoin can absolutely bounce. It wouldn’t be surprising to see it crawl back toward a 100k, maybe even take a quick shot at new highs if traders decide policy is turning faster than conditions are deteriorating.
But the second phase is where the underlying liquidity trend reasserts itself. Slowing liquidity, especially when you can see it in repo stress, tightening collateral, and weakening high frequency liquidity gauges usually creates a drag that builds quietly, then shows up abruptly. When the financial system moves from ample to strained, speculative assets rarely float higher; they get repriced. That’s why the more probable 6 month outcome is not a fresh leg up, but a broader, deeper correction as the cycle grinds forward. It doesn’t have to be a crash. It can unfold as a slow, uneven slide into a 50% drawdown from the peak, the kind of move Bitcoin has produced in every past cycle once liquidity stops expanding and the dollar system shifts into defensive mode.
Bitcoin has room to rally over the next couple of months, but unless liquidity starts expanding again and right now it’s doing the opposite the cycle still leans toward a larger retracement before the next major advance. That’s the rhythm Bitcoin has followed every time liquidity peaks and begins to roll, and today’s setup fits that pattern almost perfectly.
Bitco[...]
Offshore
EndGame Macro This drawdown chart is essentially Bitcoin’s psychological record. Every cycle carves the same kind of canyon: long periods where price sits forty to eighty percent below the highs, followed by violent recoveries that overshoot in the other direction.…
in drawdowns https://t.co/qMjDbnuud5 - zerohedge tweet
Offshore
Photo
EndGame Macro
A Quiet Warning from the 2 Year Treasury
When you look at the 2 year Treasury, you’re basically looking at the market’s best guess about where the Fed will need to take policy over the next couple of years. It isn’t a sentiment indicator, and it isn’t reacting to headlines the way equities do. It reflects deeper expectations about growth, inflation, and stress inside the financial system.
That’s why, historically, when the 2 year starts drifting lower after a period of tightening, it almost always means the same thing: the economy is weakening under the surface, and the Fed is going to have to ease more aggressively than it’s admitting. You saw this in 2000, in 2006–07, in 2018–19. The rollover tends to show up months before the data confirms anything.
What This Chart Is Telling You Now
If you trace the past year on this chart, the downtrend is obvious. Early 2025 had yields hovering in the low 4s, bouncing around as the Fed was still talking tough. But from spring onward, the direction is mostly one way with softer highs, softer lows, and a clear slide that takes us to roughly 3.5% today.
That matters because the Fed funds rate is still sitting above that, around 3.75–4.0%. When the 2 year drops below the actual policy rate, it’s a quiet acknowledgment by the bond market that the Fed is behind the curve. Add to that the fact that QT ends next week, rate cuts have already begun, and stress is showing up in dollar funding markets and you can feel why the 2 year isn’t buying the soft landing forever narrative.
This isn’t the kind of decline you get when everything is suddenly wonderful. It’s the kind you get when the system starts to tighten on its own and when balance sheets get heavy, collateral dries up, and markets sense that the Fed will need to respond sooner or later.
My View Going Forward
The 2 year is speaking clearly that the tightening cycle is over in reality, even if not in tone. Unless something changes dramatically on the growth side and there’s not much evidence of that, the most likely path is more easing over the next year, not less.
That doesn’t mean yields crash in a straight line. They can easily bounce on a strong data print or a hawkish comment. But the broader rhythm looks like a market preparing for slower growth, softer labor numbers, and a Fed that eventually has to address it. And when that’s the setup, the 2 year tends to grind lower, not higher.
So when you read this chart, don’t just see a number. See the shift underneath it: the market quietly positioning for an economy that’s losing altitude and a Fed that will have to catch it.
tweet
A Quiet Warning from the 2 Year Treasury
When you look at the 2 year Treasury, you’re basically looking at the market’s best guess about where the Fed will need to take policy over the next couple of years. It isn’t a sentiment indicator, and it isn’t reacting to headlines the way equities do. It reflects deeper expectations about growth, inflation, and stress inside the financial system.
That’s why, historically, when the 2 year starts drifting lower after a period of tightening, it almost always means the same thing: the economy is weakening under the surface, and the Fed is going to have to ease more aggressively than it’s admitting. You saw this in 2000, in 2006–07, in 2018–19. The rollover tends to show up months before the data confirms anything.
What This Chart Is Telling You Now
If you trace the past year on this chart, the downtrend is obvious. Early 2025 had yields hovering in the low 4s, bouncing around as the Fed was still talking tough. But from spring onward, the direction is mostly one way with softer highs, softer lows, and a clear slide that takes us to roughly 3.5% today.
That matters because the Fed funds rate is still sitting above that, around 3.75–4.0%. When the 2 year drops below the actual policy rate, it’s a quiet acknowledgment by the bond market that the Fed is behind the curve. Add to that the fact that QT ends next week, rate cuts have already begun, and stress is showing up in dollar funding markets and you can feel why the 2 year isn’t buying the soft landing forever narrative.
This isn’t the kind of decline you get when everything is suddenly wonderful. It’s the kind you get when the system starts to tighten on its own and when balance sheets get heavy, collateral dries up, and markets sense that the Fed will need to respond sooner or later.
My View Going Forward
The 2 year is speaking clearly that the tightening cycle is over in reality, even if not in tone. Unless something changes dramatically on the growth side and there’s not much evidence of that, the most likely path is more easing over the next year, not less.
That doesn’t mean yields crash in a straight line. They can easily bounce on a strong data print or a hawkish comment. But the broader rhythm looks like a market preparing for slower growth, softer labor numbers, and a Fed that eventually has to address it. And when that’s the setup, the 2 year tends to grind lower, not higher.
So when you read this chart, don’t just see a number. See the shift underneath it: the market quietly positioning for an economy that’s losing altitude and a Fed that will have to catch it.
https://t.co/dwQEH7Nirv tweet