Offshore
Photo
โ Dimitry Nakhla | Babylon Capitalยฎ
2 weeks ago, I set a $120๐ต target stock price to accumulate $NVDA & shared my thoughts in one of my posts
Yesterday, it hit that mark ๐ฏ
This morning, I highlighted $NVDA as a good investment consideration at $118๐ต, & itโs already surged +7% since https://t.co/pOQJSO5ecX
A quality valuation analysis on $NVDA ๐ง๐ฝโโ๏ธ
โขNTM P/E Ratio: 30.14x
โข5-Year Mean: 42.92x
โขNTM FCF Yield: 3.01%
โข5-Year Mean: 2.32%
As you can see, $NVDA appears to be trading below fair value
Going forward, investors can receive ~42% MORE in earnings per share & ~29% MORE in FCF per share ๐ง ***
Before we get into valuation, letโs take a look at why $NVDA is a quality business
BALANCE SHEETโ
โขCash & Short-Term Inv: $38.49B
โขLong-Term Debt: $8.46B
$NVDA has a strong balance sheet, an AA- S&P Credit Rating, & 236x FFO Interest Coverage Ratio
RETURN ON CAPITALโ
โข2020: 19.1%
โข2021: 19.1%
โข2022: 26.0%
โข2023: 16.2%
โข2024: 60.5%
โขLTM: 92.4%
RETURN ON EQUITYโ
โข2020: 26.0%
โข2021: 29.8%
โข2022: 44.8%
โข2023: 17.9%
โข2024: 91.5%
โขLTM: 127.2%
$NVDA has strong return metrics, highlighting the financial efficiency of the business
REVENUESโ
โข2020: $10.92B
โข2025E: $129.23B
โขCAGR: 63.94%
FREE CASH FLOWโ
โข2020: $4.27B
โข2025E: $64.54B
โขCAGR: 72.13%
NORMALIZED EPSโ
โข2020: $0.14
โข2025E: $2.95
โขCAGR: 83.96%
SHARE BUYBACKSโ (nominal change)
โข2019 Shares Outstanding: 25.00B
โขLTM Shares Outstanding: 24.86B
โโ โ as $NVDA is investing in its own growth, driving innovation, and expanding its market leadership. This strategic use of capital is generating higher returns for investors
MARGINSโ
โขLTM Gross Margins: 75.9%
โขLTM Operating Margins: 62.7%
โขLTM Net Income Margins: 55.7%
***NOW TO VALUATION ๐ง
As stated above, investors can expect to receive ~42% MORE in EPS & ~29% MORE in FCF per share
Using Benjamin Grahamโs 2G rule of thumb, $NVDA has to grow earnings at a 15.07% CAGR over the next several years to justify its valuation
Today, analysts anticipate 2026 - 2027 EPS growth over the next few years to be more than the (15.07%) required growth rate:
2025E: $2.95 (127.9% YoY) *FY Jan
2026E: $4.45 (50.6% YoY)
2027E: $5.61 (26.2% YoY)
$NVDA has an excellent track record of meeting analyst estimates ~2 years out, so letโs assume $NVDA ends 2027 with $5.61 in EPS & see its CAGR potential assuming different multiples
30x P/E: $168.30๐ต โฆ ~19.1% CAGR
29x P/E: $162.69๐ต โฆ ~17.1% CAGR
28x P/E: $157.08๐ต โฆ ~15.0% CAGR
27x P/E: $151.47๐ต โฆ ~13.0% CAGR
26x P/E: $145.86๐ต โฆ ~10.9% CAGR
As you can see, $NVDA appears to have attractive return potential EVEN IF we assume >26x earnings, a multiple generally below its historical averages & a multiple thatโs justified given the companyโs growth rate & moat
$NVDA is a good consideration today at $118.58๐ต
Given its volatility, Iโd likely strategically buy in tranches, enhancing margin of safety, while positioning myself to win-win regardless of short-term price action
E.g. purchase 1/3 at ~$118, 1/3 at ~$100, & 1/3 at ~$87
If the stock price goes ๐ I can accumulate more shares at an even more attractive valuation, if the stock price goes ๐ Iโm in the green
#stocks #investing
___
๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐โผ๏ธ: ๐๐ก๐ข๐ฌ ๐ข๐ฌ ๐๐๐ ๐๐ง๐ฏ๐๐ฌ๐ญ๐ฆ๐๐ง๐ญ ๐๐๐ฏ๐ข๐๐. ๐๐๐๐ฒ๐ฅ๐จ๐ง ๐๐๐ฉ๐ข๐ญ๐๐ฅยฎ ๐๐ง๐ ๐ข๐ญ๐ฌ ๐ซ๐๐ฉ๐ซ๐๐ฌ๐๐ง๐ญ๐๐ญ๐ข๐ฏ๐๐ฌ ๐ฆ๐๐ฒ ๐ก๐๐ฏ๐ ๐ฉ๐จ๐ฌ๐ข๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง๐ฌ ๐ข๐ง ๐ญ๐ก๐ ๐ฌ๐๐๐ฎ๐ซ๐ข๐ญ๐ข๐๐ฌ ๐๐ข๐ฌ๐๐ฎ๐ฌ๐ฌ๐๐ ๐ข๐ง ๐ญ๐ก๐ข๐ฌ ๐ญ๐ฐ๐๐๐ญ.
๐๐ก๐ ๐ข๐ง๐๐จ๐ซ๐ฆ๐๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง ๐๐จ๐ง๐ญ๐๐ข๐ง๐๐ ๐ข๐ง ๐ญ๐ก๐ข๐ฌ ๐ญ๐ฐ๐๐๐ญ ๐ข๐ฌ ๐ข๐ง๐ญ๐๐ง๐๐๐ ๐๐จ๐ซ ๐ข๐ง๐๐จ๐ซ๐ฆ๐๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง๐๐ฅ ๐ฉ๐ฎ๐ซ๐ฉ๐จ๐ฌ๐๐ฌ ๐จ๐ง๐ฅ๐ฒ ๐๐ง๐ ๐ฌ๐ก๐จ๐ฎ๐ฅ๐ ๐ง๐จ๐ญ ๐๐ ๐๐จ๐ง๐ฌ๐ญ๐ซ๐ฎ๐๐ ๐๐ฌ ๐ข๐ง๐ฏ๐๐ฌ๐ญ๐ฆ๐๐ง๐ญ ๐๐๐ฏ๐ข๐๐ ๐ญ๐จ ๐ฆ๐๐๐ญ ๐ญ๐ก๐ ๐ฌ๐ฉ๐๐[...]
2 weeks ago, I set a $120๐ต target stock price to accumulate $NVDA & shared my thoughts in one of my posts
Yesterday, it hit that mark ๐ฏ
This morning, I highlighted $NVDA as a good investment consideration at $118๐ต, & itโs already surged +7% since https://t.co/pOQJSO5ecX
A quality valuation analysis on $NVDA ๐ง๐ฝโโ๏ธ
โขNTM P/E Ratio: 30.14x
โข5-Year Mean: 42.92x
โขNTM FCF Yield: 3.01%
โข5-Year Mean: 2.32%
As you can see, $NVDA appears to be trading below fair value
Going forward, investors can receive ~42% MORE in earnings per share & ~29% MORE in FCF per share ๐ง ***
Before we get into valuation, letโs take a look at why $NVDA is a quality business
BALANCE SHEETโ
โขCash & Short-Term Inv: $38.49B
โขLong-Term Debt: $8.46B
$NVDA has a strong balance sheet, an AA- S&P Credit Rating, & 236x FFO Interest Coverage Ratio
RETURN ON CAPITALโ
โข2020: 19.1%
โข2021: 19.1%
โข2022: 26.0%
โข2023: 16.2%
โข2024: 60.5%
โขLTM: 92.4%
RETURN ON EQUITYโ
โข2020: 26.0%
โข2021: 29.8%
โข2022: 44.8%
โข2023: 17.9%
โข2024: 91.5%
โขLTM: 127.2%
$NVDA has strong return metrics, highlighting the financial efficiency of the business
REVENUESโ
โข2020: $10.92B
โข2025E: $129.23B
โขCAGR: 63.94%
FREE CASH FLOWโ
โข2020: $4.27B
โข2025E: $64.54B
โขCAGR: 72.13%
NORMALIZED EPSโ
โข2020: $0.14
โข2025E: $2.95
โขCAGR: 83.96%
SHARE BUYBACKSโ (nominal change)
โข2019 Shares Outstanding: 25.00B
โขLTM Shares Outstanding: 24.86B
โโ โ as $NVDA is investing in its own growth, driving innovation, and expanding its market leadership. This strategic use of capital is generating higher returns for investors
MARGINSโ
โขLTM Gross Margins: 75.9%
โขLTM Operating Margins: 62.7%
โขLTM Net Income Margins: 55.7%
***NOW TO VALUATION ๐ง
As stated above, investors can expect to receive ~42% MORE in EPS & ~29% MORE in FCF per share
Using Benjamin Grahamโs 2G rule of thumb, $NVDA has to grow earnings at a 15.07% CAGR over the next several years to justify its valuation
Today, analysts anticipate 2026 - 2027 EPS growth over the next few years to be more than the (15.07%) required growth rate:
2025E: $2.95 (127.9% YoY) *FY Jan
2026E: $4.45 (50.6% YoY)
2027E: $5.61 (26.2% YoY)
$NVDA has an excellent track record of meeting analyst estimates ~2 years out, so letโs assume $NVDA ends 2027 with $5.61 in EPS & see its CAGR potential assuming different multiples
30x P/E: $168.30๐ต โฆ ~19.1% CAGR
29x P/E: $162.69๐ต โฆ ~17.1% CAGR
28x P/E: $157.08๐ต โฆ ~15.0% CAGR
27x P/E: $151.47๐ต โฆ ~13.0% CAGR
26x P/E: $145.86๐ต โฆ ~10.9% CAGR
As you can see, $NVDA appears to have attractive return potential EVEN IF we assume >26x earnings, a multiple generally below its historical averages & a multiple thatโs justified given the companyโs growth rate & moat
$NVDA is a good consideration today at $118.58๐ต
Given its volatility, Iโd likely strategically buy in tranches, enhancing margin of safety, while positioning myself to win-win regardless of short-term price action
E.g. purchase 1/3 at ~$118, 1/3 at ~$100, & 1/3 at ~$87
If the stock price goes ๐ I can accumulate more shares at an even more attractive valuation, if the stock price goes ๐ Iโm in the green
#stocks #investing
___
๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐โผ๏ธ: ๐๐ก๐ข๐ฌ ๐ข๐ฌ ๐๐๐ ๐๐ง๐ฏ๐๐ฌ๐ญ๐ฆ๐๐ง๐ญ ๐๐๐ฏ๐ข๐๐. ๐๐๐๐ฒ๐ฅ๐จ๐ง ๐๐๐ฉ๐ข๐ญ๐๐ฅยฎ ๐๐ง๐ ๐ข๐ญ๐ฌ ๐ซ๐๐ฉ๐ซ๐๐ฌ๐๐ง๐ญ๐๐ญ๐ข๐ฏ๐๐ฌ ๐ฆ๐๐ฒ ๐ก๐๐ฏ๐ ๐ฉ๐จ๐ฌ๐ข๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง๐ฌ ๐ข๐ง ๐ญ๐ก๐ ๐ฌ๐๐๐ฎ๐ซ๐ข๐ญ๐ข๐๐ฌ ๐๐ข๐ฌ๐๐ฎ๐ฌ๐ฌ๐๐ ๐ข๐ง ๐ญ๐ก๐ข๐ฌ ๐ญ๐ฐ๐๐๐ญ.
๐๐ก๐ ๐ข๐ง๐๐จ๐ซ๐ฆ๐๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง ๐๐จ๐ง๐ญ๐๐ข๐ง๐๐ ๐ข๐ง ๐ญ๐ก๐ข๐ฌ ๐ญ๐ฐ๐๐๐ญ ๐ข๐ฌ ๐ข๐ง๐ญ๐๐ง๐๐๐ ๐๐จ๐ซ ๐ข๐ง๐๐จ๐ซ๐ฆ๐๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง๐๐ฅ ๐ฉ๐ฎ๐ซ๐ฉ๐จ๐ฌ๐๐ฌ ๐จ๐ง๐ฅ๐ฒ ๐๐ง๐ ๐ฌ๐ก๐จ๐ฎ๐ฅ๐ ๐ง๐จ๐ญ ๐๐ ๐๐จ๐ง๐ฌ๐ญ๐ซ๐ฎ๐๐ ๐๐ฌ ๐ข๐ง๐ฏ๐๐ฌ๐ญ๐ฆ๐๐ง๐ญ ๐๐๐ฏ๐ข๐๐ ๐ญ๐จ ๐ฆ๐๐๐ญ ๐ญ๐ก๐ ๐ฌ๐ฉ๐๐[...]
Offshore
โ Dimitry Nakhla | Babylon Capitalยฎ 2 weeks ago, I set a $120๐ต target stock price to accumulate $NVDA & shared my thoughts in one of my posts Yesterday, it hit that mark ๐ฏ This morning, I highlighted $NVDA as a good investment consideration at $118๐ต, & itโsโฆ
๐ข๐๐ข๐ ๐ง๐๐๐๐ฌ ๐จ๐ ๐๐ง๐ฒ ๐ข๐ง๐๐ข๐ฏ๐ข๐๐ฎ๐๐ฅ ๐จ๐ซ ๐ฌ๐ข๐ญ๐ฎ๐๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง. ๐๐๐ฌ๐ญ ๐ฉ๐๐ซ๐๐จ๐ซ๐ฆ๐๐ง๐๐ ๐ข๐ฌ ๐ง๐จ ๐ ๐ฎ๐๐ซ๐๐ง๐ญ๐๐ ๐จ๐ ๐๐ฎ๐ญ๐ฎ๐ซ๐ ๐ซ๐๐ฌ๐ฎ๐ฅ๐ญ๐ฌ.
๐๐ง๐๐จ๐ซ๐ฆ๐๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง ๐๐จ๐ง๐ญ๐๐ข๐ง๐๐ ๐ข๐ง ๐ญ๐ก๐ข๐ฌ ๐ญ๐ฐ๐๐๐ญ ๐ก๐๐ฌ ๐๐๐๐ง ๐จ๐๐ญ๐๐ข๐ง๐๐ ๐๐ซ๐จ๐ฆ ๐ฌ๐จ๐ฎ๐ซ๐๐๐ฌ ๐๐๐ฅ๐ข๐๐ฏ๐๐ ๐ญ๐จ ๐๐ ๐ซ๐๐ฅ๐ข๐๐๐ฅ๐, ๐๐ฎ๐ญ ๐ข๐ฌ ๐ง๐จ๐ญ ๐ ๐ฎ๐๐ซ๐๐ง๐ญ๐๐๐ ๐๐ฌ ๐ญ๐จ ๐๐จ๐ฆ๐ฉ๐ฅ๐๐ญ๐๐ง๐๐ฌ๐ฌ ๐จ๐ซ ๐๐๐๐ฎ๐ซ๐๐๐ฒ. - Dimitry Nakhla | Babylon Capitalยฎ tweet
๐๐ง๐๐จ๐ซ๐ฆ๐๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง ๐๐จ๐ง๐ญ๐๐ข๐ง๐๐ ๐ข๐ง ๐ญ๐ก๐ข๐ฌ ๐ญ๐ฐ๐๐๐ญ ๐ก๐๐ฌ ๐๐๐๐ง ๐จ๐๐ญ๐๐ข๐ง๐๐ ๐๐ซ๐จ๐ฆ ๐ฌ๐จ๐ฎ๐ซ๐๐๐ฌ ๐๐๐ฅ๐ข๐๐ฏ๐๐ ๐ญ๐จ ๐๐ ๐ซ๐๐ฅ๐ข๐๐๐ฅ๐, ๐๐ฎ๐ญ ๐ข๐ฌ ๐ง๐จ๐ญ ๐ ๐ฎ๐๐ซ๐๐ง๐ญ๐๐๐ ๐๐ฌ ๐ญ๐จ ๐๐จ๐ฆ๐ฉ๐ฅ๐๐ญ๐๐ง๐๐ฌ๐ฌ ๐จ๐ซ ๐๐๐๐ฎ๐ซ๐๐๐ฒ. - Dimitry Nakhla | Babylon Capitalยฎ tweet
Offshore
Photo
โ App Economy Insights
LVMH Louis Vuitton Moรซt Hennessy FY24.
$LVMUY Revenue -2% Y/Y to โฌ84.7B.
๐ท Wines & Spirits -11% to โฌ5.9B.
๐ Fashion & Leather goods -3% to โฌ41.1B.
๐ Perfumes & Cosmetics +2% to โฌ8.4B.
๐ Watches & Jewelry -3% to โฌ10.6B.
๐๏ธ Selective retailers +2% to โฌ18.3B. https://t.co/atX2zLxObP
tweet
LVMH Louis Vuitton Moรซt Hennessy FY24.
$LVMUY Revenue -2% Y/Y to โฌ84.7B.
๐ท Wines & Spirits -11% to โฌ5.9B.
๐ Fashion & Leather goods -3% to โฌ41.1B.
๐ Perfumes & Cosmetics +2% to โฌ8.4B.
๐ Watches & Jewelry -3% to โฌ10.6B.
๐๏ธ Selective retailers +2% to โฌ18.3B. https://t.co/atX2zLxObP
tweet
Offshore
Photo
โ Quiver Quantitative
We posted this report on a suspicious purchase of Perella Weinberg stock by a U.S. Congressman in April.
$PWP has now risen 89% since the trade. https://t.co/mgUlOqWEWf
tweet
We posted this report on a suspicious purchase of Perella Weinberg stock by a U.S. Congressman in April.
$PWP has now risen 89% since the trade. https://t.co/mgUlOqWEWf
tweet
Offshore
Photo
โ Quiver Quantitative
RT @QuiverCongress: Senate Democrats just blocked the Illegitimate Court Counteraction Act.
Senator John Fetterman was the only Democrat to vote in favor of the bill. https://t.co/dja4sQLiZm
tweet
RT @QuiverCongress: Senate Democrats just blocked the Illegitimate Court Counteraction Act.
Senator John Fetterman was the only Democrat to vote in favor of the bill. https://t.co/dja4sQLiZm
tweet
Offshore
Photo
โ Hidden Value Gems
$BABA reporting tomorrow, wondering whatโs the second most popular question will be ๐ค https://t.co/5h0YGdfBbe
tweet
$BABA reporting tomorrow, wondering whatโs the second most popular question will be ๐ค https://t.co/5h0YGdfBbe
tweet
AkhenOsiris
Before your job is made redundant by AI, put your money in some stonks to generate an income
tweet
Before your job is made redundant by AI, put your money in some stonks to generate an income
The ultimate negative end game of AI to me is a huge rise in unemployment. I donโt buy this whole we will create *new* jobs narrative. Every industry wants wider margins and lower overhead and AI/Machine Learning/Automation will only accelerate this phenomena. The mobility industry, the trucking industry, the medical industry , the drug discovery industry , financial analysis, legal industry. No one is immune. Will the underlying companies using AI make more money as adoption becomes wider ? absolutely. Will it be at the cost of peopleโs job and earned living ? also absolutely. Thereโs just no way being more productive while also expecting unemployment to stay stagnant. You used to be able to sell the dream of go to a good school , take out a loan and become the best version of yourself and make lots of money when you graduate but thatโs a losing proposition for most people going forward imho.
AI will forever change everything I truly believe that but this will come at a societal cost which for now is being pushed aside to make room for the *productivity* gains. Iโm afraid this is a short sided view. One thing is for sure , the gap between the haves and the have nots will become even wider. Ferrari bulls will win and Walmart longs will win , just be careful about all those companies in the middle with no clear addressable markets.
Rant done - ๎จ Q-Cap ๎จtweet
AkhenOsiris
@Kantrowitz Good job there with the Judge. Not the process that matters, but the output, which is verifiable. Must be hard trying to get through all the others talking nonsense on TV ๐
tweet
@Kantrowitz Good job there with the Judge. Not the process that matters, but the output, which is verifiable. Must be hard trying to get through all the others talking nonsense on TV ๐
tweet
AkhenOsiris
RT @TechFundies: 3'd party contact leads tech practice on west coast for Accenture.
Supportive of ramp in AI proof-of-concepts w/ more success in IT / employee support desks followed by customer support.
Mentioned repeatedly that cost / AI query is a hurdle for adoption so supports view that decreasing cost will open up adoption / TAM.
Highlights
-Supports customers in communications, media, tech and fin svcs.
-Almost every customer is multi-cloud. Used to see AI workloads go to $GOOGL, enterprise to $MSFT and web/mobile to $AMZN. Now everything is landing everywhere.
-Customers focused on proof-of-concepts in 2024 mostly leveraging Azure / OpenAI. Saw uptick in usage of AMZN / GOOGL as well in 2H.
-At least 25% of these POCs moving into production in 2025.
-Saw very large uptick in software companies working on agentic solutions last qtr.
-One challenge for roll-outs has been that cost of AI is prohibitively expensive โ lots of customer support volume adds up [Supportive of view that AI gets cheaper and opens up market].
-Low-hanging fruit has been IT and HR helpdesk support. Problem is tailor-made for GenAI.
-Can use $NOW Assist or build on your own by prompt engineering Azure OpenAI. If volumes very high and cost of $NOW expensive, somewhat better off attempting a homegrown solution. See 25-30% complete resolution of tickets.
-In IT / HR helpdesk, 100% agentic automation is happening w/ 30-35% of ticket volumes, copilot happening for 40% of tickets and rest is entirely humans.
-$CRM Agentforce also seeing POCs. Works well if you have medium ticket volume because pricing is very expensive. A customer issue that takes 3-5 conversations ends up costing $6-8 / ticket and is too high. Again, if volumes very high, then makes sense to try to prompt engineer on own. Expect 1/3 of POCs on employee help desk to convert to pilots.
-Have had reasonable success testing $CRM AgentForce for sales development rep โ coaching, lead nurturing, follow-up all automated. Emerging area is marketing automation โ campaign generation / execution across channels โ not quite there yet and more of a copilot for now w/ human in the loop.
-On-premise builds are not easy. Fine tuning is expensive and requires totally different data center architecture focused on GPUs / cooling issues / etc. Better have a really good use case to pursue AI builds internally. Som of largest clients who are trying to do AI on-premise running into issues where their data centers simply arenโt configured correctly.[ie just use cloud / packaged software]
-Starting to see ecosystem build abstraction so inference can go off $NVDA GPUs to $AMZN Inferentia or $AMD or whomever. Very little of this is in production.
-POCโs are ramping quickly, conversion to production happening more slowly especially as customers move away from low-hanging fruit type use cases.
tweet
RT @TechFundies: 3'd party contact leads tech practice on west coast for Accenture.
Supportive of ramp in AI proof-of-concepts w/ more success in IT / employee support desks followed by customer support.
Mentioned repeatedly that cost / AI query is a hurdle for adoption so supports view that decreasing cost will open up adoption / TAM.
Highlights
-Supports customers in communications, media, tech and fin svcs.
-Almost every customer is multi-cloud. Used to see AI workloads go to $GOOGL, enterprise to $MSFT and web/mobile to $AMZN. Now everything is landing everywhere.
-Customers focused on proof-of-concepts in 2024 mostly leveraging Azure / OpenAI. Saw uptick in usage of AMZN / GOOGL as well in 2H.
-At least 25% of these POCs moving into production in 2025.
-Saw very large uptick in software companies working on agentic solutions last qtr.
-One challenge for roll-outs has been that cost of AI is prohibitively expensive โ lots of customer support volume adds up [Supportive of view that AI gets cheaper and opens up market].
-Low-hanging fruit has been IT and HR helpdesk support. Problem is tailor-made for GenAI.
-Can use $NOW Assist or build on your own by prompt engineering Azure OpenAI. If volumes very high and cost of $NOW expensive, somewhat better off attempting a homegrown solution. See 25-30% complete resolution of tickets.
-In IT / HR helpdesk, 100% agentic automation is happening w/ 30-35% of ticket volumes, copilot happening for 40% of tickets and rest is entirely humans.
-$CRM Agentforce also seeing POCs. Works well if you have medium ticket volume because pricing is very expensive. A customer issue that takes 3-5 conversations ends up costing $6-8 / ticket and is too high. Again, if volumes very high, then makes sense to try to prompt engineer on own. Expect 1/3 of POCs on employee help desk to convert to pilots.
-Have had reasonable success testing $CRM AgentForce for sales development rep โ coaching, lead nurturing, follow-up all automated. Emerging area is marketing automation โ campaign generation / execution across channels โ not quite there yet and more of a copilot for now w/ human in the loop.
-On-premise builds are not easy. Fine tuning is expensive and requires totally different data center architecture focused on GPUs / cooling issues / etc. Better have a really good use case to pursue AI builds internally. Som of largest clients who are trying to do AI on-premise running into issues where their data centers simply arenโt configured correctly.[ie just use cloud / packaged software]
-Starting to see ecosystem build abstraction so inference can go off $NVDA GPUs to $AMZN Inferentia or $AMD or whomever. Very little of this is in production.
-POCโs are ramping quickly, conversion to production happening more slowly especially as customers move away from low-hanging fruit type use cases.
tweet