Offshore
Photo
โ Dimitry Nakhla | Babylon Capitalยฎ
A quality valuation analysis on $AMD ๐Ÿง˜๐Ÿฝโ€โ™‚๏ธ

โ€ขNTM P/E Ratio: 30.59x
โ€ข3-Year Mean: 32.10x

โ€ขNTM FCF Yield: 2.97%
โ€ข3-Year Mean: 3.10%

As you can see, $AMD appears to be trading near fair value

Going forward, investors can receive ~5% MORE in earnings per share & ~4% LESS in FCF per share ๐Ÿง ***

Before we get into valuation, letโ€™s take a look at why $AMD is a good business

BALANCE SHEETโœ…
โ€ขCash & Short-Term Inv: $4.54B
โ€ขLong-Term Debt: $1.72B

$PYPL has an excellent balance sheet, an A- S&P Credit Rating, & 21x FFO Interest Coverage

RETURN ON CAPITALโœ…โžก๏ธโŒ
โ€ข2019: 17.9%
โ€ข2020: 21.5%
โ€ข2021: 44.7%
โ€ข2022: 2.1%
โ€ข2023: 0.7%
โ€ขLTM: 2.3%

RETURN ON EQUITYโœ…โžก๏ธโŒ*
โ€ข2019: 16.7%
โ€ข2020: 57.5%
โ€ข2021: 47.4%
โ€ข2022: 4.2%
โ€ข2023: 1.5%
โ€ขLTM: 3.3%

$AMD has strong return metrics, highlighting the financial efficiency of the business

*the notable drop in ROIC can be attributed to Xilinx acquisition in 2022, increased expenses and investments, among other things

REVENUESโœ…
โ€ข2018: $6.48B
โ€ข2023: $22.68B
โ€ขCAGR: 28.47%

FREE CASH FLOWโŒโžก๏ธโœ…
โ€ข2018: ($0.13B)
โ€ข2023: $1.12B

*2024E FCF is $3.68B ๐Ÿ“ˆ

NORMALIZED EPSโœ…
โ€ข2018: $0.46
โ€ข2023: $2.65
โ€ขCAGR: 41.93%

SHARE BUYBACKSโŒ
โ€ข2018 Shares Outstanding: 1.06B
โ€ขLTM Shares Outstanding: 1.64B

By increasing its shares outstanding by 54%, $AMD decreased its EPS by 35% (assuming 0 growth)

MARGINS๐Ÿ†—
โ€ขLTM Gross Margins: 52.1%
โ€ขLTM Operating Margins: 5.6%
โ€ขLTM Net Income Margins: 7.5%

***NOW TO VALUATION ๐Ÿง 

As stated above, investors can expect to receive ~5% MORE in EPS & ~4% LESS in FCF per share

Using Benjamin Grahamโ€™s 2G rule of thumb, $AMD has to grow earnings at a 15.30% CAGR over the next several years to justify its valuation

Today, analysts anticipate 2025 - 2027 EPS growth over the next few years to be greater than the (15.30%) required growth rate:

2024E: $3.32 (25.5% YoY) *FY Dec

2025E: $5.11 (53.8% YoY)
2026E: $7.10 (38.9% YoY)
2027E*: $9.11 (28.2% YoY)

$AMD has a mediocre track record of meeting analyst estimates ~2 years out, so letโ€™s assume $AMD ends 2027 with $8.20* in EPS (10% below estimates) & see its CAGR potential assuming different multiples

26x P/E: $213.20๐Ÿ’ต โ€ฆ ~15.0% CAGR

24x P/E: $196.80๐Ÿ’ต โ€ฆ ~12.1% CAGR

22x P/E: $180.40๐Ÿ’ต โ€ฆ ~8.9% CAGR

20x P/E: $164.00๐Ÿ’ต โ€ฆ ~5.7% CAGR

As you can see, $AMD appears to have attractive return potential if we assume >24x earnings & aggressive return potential if we assume >26x earnings

Assuming 24x is very reasonable given $AMD growth rate โ€” however this is a high degree of uncertainty when it comes to $AMD multi-year projections (for better or for worse)

Today at $138๐Ÿ’ต $AMD still appears to be a decent consideration for investment

To account for the high uncertainty and aggressive growth projections, I would require a more substantial margin of safety

Iโ€™d consider $AMD a strong consideration closer to $120๐Ÿ’ต (~13.5% below todayโ€™s price) or at ~26.50x NTM estimates, where I can expect ~14% CAGR assuming 22x

#stocks #investing
___

๐ƒ๐ˆ๐’๐‚๐‹๐Ž๐’๐”๐‘๐„โ€ผ๏ธ: ๐“๐ก๐ข๐ฌ ๐ข๐ฌ ๐๐Ž๐“ ๐ˆ๐ง๐ฏ๐ž๐ฌ๐ญ๐ฆ๐ž๐ง๐ญ ๐€๐๐ฏ๐ข๐œ๐ž. ๐๐š๐›๐ฒ๐ฅ๐จ๐ง ๐‚๐š๐ฉ๐ข๐ญ๐š๐ฅยฎ ๐š๐ง๐ ๐ข๐ญ๐ฌ ๐ซ๐ž๐ฉ๐ซ๐ž๐ฌ๐ž๐ง๐ญ๐š๐ญ๐ข๐ฏ๐ž๐ฌ ๐ฆ๐š๐ฒ ๐ก๐š๐ฏ๐ž ๐ฉ๐จ๐ฌ๐ข๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง๐ฌ ๐ข๐ง ๐ญ๐ก๐ž ๐ฌ๐ž๐œ๐ฎ๐ซ๐ข๐ญ๐ข๐ž๐ฌ ๐๐ข๐ฌ๐œ๐ฎ๐ฌ๐ฌ๐ž๐ ๐ข๐ง ๐ญ๐ก๐ข๐ฌ ๐ญ๐ฐ๐ž๐ž๐ญ.

๐“๐ก๐ž ๐ข๐ง๐Ÿ๐จ๐ซ๐ฆ๐š๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง ๐œ๐จ๐ง๐ญ๐š๐ข๐ง๐ž๐ ๐ข๐ง ๐ญ๐ก๐ข๐ฌ ๐ญ๐ฐ๐ž๐ž๐ญ ๐ข๐ฌ ๐ข๐ง๐ญ๐ž๐ง๐๐ž๐ ๐Ÿ๐จ๐ซ ๐ข๐ง๐Ÿ๐จ๐ซ๐ฆ๐š๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง๐š๐ฅ ๐ฉ๐ฎ๐ซ๐ฉ๐จ๐ฌ๐ž๐ฌ ๐จ๐ง๐ฅ๐ฒ ๐š๐ง๐ ๐ฌ๐ก๐จ๐ฎ๐ฅ๐ ๐ง๐จ๐ญ ๐›๐ž ๐œ๐จ๐ง๐ฌ๐ญ๐ซ๐ฎ๐ž๐ ๐š๐ฌ ๐ข๐ง๐ฏ๐ž๐ฌ๐ญ๐ฆ๐ž๐ง๐ญ ๐š๐๐ฏ๐ข๐œ๐ž ๐ญ๐จ ๐ฆ๐ž๐ž๐ญ ๐ญ๐ก๐ž ๐ฌ๐ฉ๐ž๐œ๐ข๐Ÿ๐ข๐œ ๐ง๐ž๐ž๐๐ฌ ๐จ๐Ÿ ๐š๐ง๐ฒ ๐ข๐ง๐๐ข๐ฏ๐ข๐๐ฎ๐š๐ฅ ๐จ๐ซ ๐ฌ๐ข๐ญ๐ฎ๐š๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง. ๐๐š๐ฌ๐ญ ๐ฉ๐ž๐ซ๐Ÿ๐จ๐ซ๐ฆ๐š๐ง๐œ๐ž ๐ข๐ฌ ๐ง๐จ ๐ ๐ฎ๐š๐ซ๐š๐ง๐ญ๐ž๐ž ๐จ๐Ÿ ๐Ÿ๐ฎ๐ญ๐ฎ๐ซ๐ž ๐ซ๐ž๐ฌ๐ฎ๐ฅ๐ญ๐ฌ.

๐ˆ๐ง๐Ÿ๐จ๐ซ๐ฆ๐š๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง ๐œ๐จ๐ง๐ญ๐š๐ข๐ง๐ž๐ ๐ข๐ง ๐ญ๐ก๐ข๐ฌ ๐ญ๐ฐ๐ž๐ž๐ญ ๐ก๐š๐ฌ ๐›๐ž๐ž๐ง ๐จ๐›๐ญ๐š๐ข๐ง๐ž๐ ๐Ÿ๐ซ๐จ๐ฆ ๐ฌ๐จ๐ฎ๐ซ๐œ๐ž๐ฌ ๐›๐ž๐ฅ๐ข๐ž๐ฏ๐ž๐ ๐ญ๐จ ๐›๐ž ๐ซ๐ž๐ฅ๐ข๐š๐›๐ฅ๐ž, ๐›๐ฎ๐ญ ๐ข๐ฌ ๐ง๐จ๐ญ ๐ ๐ฎ๐š๐ซ๐š๐ง๐ญ๐ž๐ž๐ ๐š๐ฌ ๐ญ๐จ ๐œ๐จ๐ฆ๐ฉ๐ฅ๐ž๐ญ๐ž๐ง๐ž๐ฌ๐ฌ ๐จ๐ซ ๐š๐œ๐œ๐ฎ๐ซ๐š๐œ๐ฒ.
tweet
Offshore
Photo
โ Startup Archive
RT @foundertribune: "Startup Thinking" by Peter Thiel https://t.co/XXP3ngZAVK
tweet
Offshore
Photo
โ Startup Archive
"A startup is the largest group of people you can convince of a plan to build a different future."

- Peter Thiel

"Startup Thinking" by Peter Thiel https://t.co/XXP3ngZAVK
- The Founders' Tribune
tweet
Offshore
Photo
โ Dimitry Nakhla | Babylon Capitalยฎ
A quality valuation analysis on $AMD ๐Ÿง˜๐Ÿฝโ€โ™‚๏ธ

โ€ขNTM P/E Ratio: 30.59x
โ€ข3-Year Mean: 32.10x

โ€ขNTM FCF Yield: 2.97%
โ€ข3-Year Mean: 3.10%

As you can see, $AMD appears to be trading near fair value

Going forward, investors can receive ~5% MORE in earnings per share & ~4% LESS in FCF per share ๐Ÿง ***

Before we get into valuation, letโ€™s take a look at why $AMD is a good business

BALANCE SHEETโœ…
โ€ขCash & Short-Term Inv: $4.54B
โ€ขLong-Term Debt: $1.72B

$AMD has an excellent balance sheet, an A- S&P Credit Rating, & 21x FFO Interest Coverage

RETURN ON CAPITALโœ…โžก๏ธโŒ
โ€ข2019: 17.9%
โ€ข2020: 21.5%
โ€ข2021: 44.7%
โ€ข2022: 2.1%
โ€ข2023: 0.7%
โ€ขLTM: 2.3%

RETURN ON EQUITYโœ…โžก๏ธโŒ*
โ€ข2019: 16.7%
โ€ข2020: 57.5%
โ€ข2021: 47.4%
โ€ข2022: 4.2%
โ€ข2023: 1.5%
โ€ขLTM: 3.3%

$AMD has strong return metrics, highlighting the financial efficiency of the business

*the notable drop in ROIC can be attributed to Xilinx acquisition in 2022, increased expenses and investments, among other things

REVENUESโœ…
โ€ข2018: $6.48B
โ€ข2023: $22.68B
โ€ขCAGR: 28.47%

FREE CASH FLOWโŒโžก๏ธโœ…
โ€ข2018: ($0.13B)
โ€ข2023: $1.12B

*2024E FCF is $3.68B ๐Ÿ“ˆ

NORMALIZED EPSโœ…
โ€ข2018: $0.46
โ€ข2023: $2.65
โ€ขCAGR: 41.93%

SHARE BUYBACKSโŒ
โ€ข2018 Shares Outstanding: 1.06B
โ€ขLTM Shares Outstanding: 1.64B

By increasing its shares outstanding by 54%, $AMD decreased its EPS by 35% (assuming 0 growth)

MARGINS๐Ÿ†—
โ€ขLTM Gross Margins: 52.1%
โ€ขLTM Operating Margins: 5.6%
โ€ขLTM Net Income Margins: 7.5%

***NOW TO VALUATION ๐Ÿง 

As stated above, investors can expect to receive ~5% MORE in EPS & ~4% LESS in FCF per share

Using Benjamin Grahamโ€™s 2G rule of thumb, $AMD has to grow earnings at a 15.30% CAGR over the next several years to justify its valuation

Today, analysts anticipate 2025 - 2027 EPS growth over the next few years to be greater than the (15.30%) required growth rate:

2024E: $3.32 (25.5% YoY) *FY Dec

2025E: $5.11 (53.8% YoY)
2026E: $7.10 (38.9% YoY)
2027E*: $9.11 (28.2% YoY)

$AMD has a mediocre track record of meeting analyst estimates ~2 years out, so letโ€™s assume $AMD ends 2027 with $8.20* in EPS (10% below estimates) & see its CAGR potential assuming different multiples

26x P/E: $213.20๐Ÿ’ต โ€ฆ ~15.0% CAGR

24x P/E: $196.80๐Ÿ’ต โ€ฆ ~12.1% CAGR

22x P/E: $180.40๐Ÿ’ต โ€ฆ ~8.9% CAGR

20x P/E: $164.00๐Ÿ’ต โ€ฆ ~5.7% CAGR

As you can see, $AMD appears to have attractive return potential if we assume >24x earnings & aggressive return potential if we assume >26x earnings

Assuming 24x is very reasonable given $AMD growth rate โ€” however this is a high degree of uncertainty when it comes to $AMD multi-year projections (for better or for worse)

Today at $138๐Ÿ’ต $AMD still appears to be a decent consideration for investment

To account for the high uncertainty and aggressive growth projections, I would require a more substantial margin of safety

Iโ€™d consider $AMD a strong consideration closer to $120๐Ÿ’ต (~13.5% below todayโ€™s price) or at ~26.50x NTM estimates, where I can expect ~14% CAGR assuming 22x

#stocks #investing
___

๐ƒ๐ˆ๐’๐‚๐‹๐Ž๐’๐”๐‘๐„โ€ผ๏ธ: ๐“๐ก๐ข๐ฌ ๐ข๐ฌ ๐๐Ž๐“ ๐ˆ๐ง๐ฏ๐ž๐ฌ๐ญ๐ฆ๐ž๐ง๐ญ ๐€๐๐ฏ๐ข๐œ๐ž. ๐๐š๐›๐ฒ๐ฅ๐จ๐ง ๐‚๐š๐ฉ๐ข๐ญ๐š๐ฅยฎ ๐š๐ง๐ ๐ข๐ญ๐ฌ ๐ซ๐ž๐ฉ๐ซ๐ž๐ฌ๐ž๐ง๐ญ๐š๐ญ๐ข๐ฏ๐ž๐ฌ ๐ฆ๐š๐ฒ ๐ก๐š๐ฏ๐ž ๐ฉ๐จ๐ฌ๐ข๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง๐ฌ ๐ข๐ง ๐ญ๐ก๐ž ๐ฌ๐ž๐œ๐ฎ๐ซ๐ข๐ญ๐ข๐ž๐ฌ ๐๐ข๐ฌ๐œ๐ฎ๐ฌ๐ฌ๐ž๐ ๐ข๐ง ๐ญ๐ก๐ข๐ฌ ๐ญ๐ฐ๐ž๐ž๐ญ.

๐“๐ก๐ž ๐ข๐ง๐Ÿ๐จ๐ซ๐ฆ๐š๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง ๐œ๐จ๐ง๐ญ๐š๐ข๐ง๐ž๐ ๐ข๐ง ๐ญ๐ก๐ข๐ฌ ๐ญ๐ฐ๐ž๐ž๐ญ ๐ข๐ฌ ๐ข๐ง๐ญ๐ž๐ง๐๐ž๐ ๐Ÿ๐จ๐ซ ๐ข๐ง๐Ÿ๐จ๐ซ๐ฆ๐š๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง๐š๐ฅ ๐ฉ๐ฎ๐ซ๐ฉ๐จ๐ฌ๐ž๐ฌ ๐จ๐ง๐ฅ๐ฒ ๐š๐ง๐ ๐ฌ๐ก๐จ๐ฎ๐ฅ๐ ๐ง๐จ๐ญ ๐›๐ž ๐œ๐จ๐ง๐ฌ๐ญ๐ซ๐ฎ๐ž๐ ๐š๐ฌ ๐ข๐ง๐ฏ๐ž๐ฌ๐ญ๐ฆ๐ž๐ง๐ญ ๐š๐๐ฏ๐ข๐œ๐ž ๐ญ๐จ ๐ฆ๐ž๐ž๐ญ ๐ญ๐ก๐ž ๐ฌ๐ฉ๐ž๐œ๐ข๐Ÿ๐ข๐œ ๐ง๐ž๐ž๐๐ฌ ๐จ๐Ÿ ๐š๐ง๐ฒ ๐ข๐ง๐๐ข๐ฏ๐ข๐๐ฎ๐š๐ฅ ๐จ๐ซ ๐ฌ๐ข๐ญ๐ฎ๐š๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง. ๐๐š๐ฌ๐ญ ๐ฉ๐ž๐ซ๐Ÿ๐จ๐ซ๐ฆ๐š๐ง๐œ๐ž ๐ข๐ฌ ๐ง๐จ ๐ ๐ฎ๐š๐ซ๐š๐ง๐ญ๐ž๐ž ๐จ๐Ÿ ๐Ÿ๐ฎ๐ญ๐ฎ๐ซ๐ž ๐ซ๐ž๐ฌ๐ฎ๐ฅ๐ญ๐ฌ.

๐ˆ๐ง๐Ÿ๐จ๐ซ๐ฆ๐š๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง ๐œ๐จ๐ง๐ญ๐š๐ข๐ง๐ž๐ ๐ข๐ง ๐ญ๐ก๐ข๐ฌ ๐ญ๐ฐ๐ž๐ž๐ญ ๐ก๐š๐ฌ ๐›๐ž๐ž๐ง ๐จ๐›๐ญ๐š๐ข๐ง๐ž๐ ๐Ÿ๐ซ๐จ๐ฆ ๐ฌ๐จ๐ฎ๐ซ๐œ๐ž๐ฌ ๐›๐ž๐ฅ๐ข๐ž๐ฏ๐ž๐ ๐ญ๐จ ๐›๐ž ๐ซ๐ž๐ฅ๐ข๐š๐›๐ฅ๐ž, ๐›๐ฎ๐ญ ๐ข๐ฌ ๐ง๐จ๐ญ ๐ ๐ฎ๐š๐ซ๐š๐ง๐ญ๐ž๐ž๐ ๐š๐ฌ ๐ญ๐จ ๐œ๐จ๐ฆ๐ฉ๐ฅ๐ž๐ญ๐ž๐ง๐ž๐ฌ๐ฌ ๐จ๐ซ ๐š๐œ๐œ๐ฎ๐ซ๐š๐œ๐ฒ.
tweet
Offshore
Video
โ Startup Archive
Jack Dorsey on why building something for yourself can be better than trying to solve a problem

When a 29 year old Jack Dorsey joined the podcasting startup Odeo, he soon learned that no one there really cared about podcasting either:

โ€œThat was one of Odeoโ€™s biggest failures. We were not building tools for us. We were building tools for other people.โ€

As Odeo struggled, the team began to look for new ideas, and Jack presented his idea for Twitter. Somewhat counterintuitively, the product would not solve a specific problem:

โ€œTwitter solves no oneโ€™s problem at all. It was something we wanted to use. It was something we wanted to see in the world. It was something we wanted to use on a daily basis, and thatโ€™s all that drove us. Thatโ€™s what got us up every single morning, and thatโ€™s what made it meaningful.โ€

It turns out there were more people like Jack and the Odeo team who wanted to use it to.

โ€œI think that is one of the biggest lessons I learnedโ€”Twitter did not start as a company. Twitter started as a product within another company that was failing. And to me, this really emphasized the fact that entrepreneurship is not necessarily starting a new company. Itโ€™s actually just taking significant risk to build what you want to see in the world.โ€

Video source: @Cal_Engineer (2013)
tweet
Offshore
Photo
โ Ahmad Jivraj
Stop Investing in Index Funds!

If youโ€™re between 20-50, hereโ€™s why you should try and beat the market:

Letโ€™s say you aim for 15% returns for the next 20 years => thatโ€™s 16X

Say the market return is 8% => Thatโ€™s 4.6X

You could be off by ~70% and still breakeven!

Thatโ€™s a pretty big margin of safety.

Whatโ€™s your idea? https://t.co/LBeGxeOuCo
- Sidecar Investor
tweet
โ Ahmad Jivraj
RT @mrjivraj: The thing is, there have been plenty of opportunities for Bitcoin to die:
โ€ขMultiple Hacks
โ€ขMultiple Massive Price Declines
โ€ขMultiple new and improved Crypto currencies created (better tech than Bitcoin)

To me it no longer matters whether Bitcoin is the best crypto-currency or whether it has the best underlying technology.

Bitcoin is THE established brand in the Crypto world. It has โ€œcrossed the chasmโ€.

For the layman, Bitcoin is actually synonymous with Crypto.

Bitcoin is the barometer that everything else in the Crypto-world is compared to.

I compare this to the FICO Score. In the US, lenders use FICO scores to gauge a potential borrower's creditworthiness.

The way the score is calculated isnโ€™t known.

Many argue that at best it is old and outdated and doesnโ€™t best represent a borrowerโ€™s creditworthiness.

That clearly doesnโ€™t matter. FICO is the accepted standard.

I believe Bitcoin will remain the accepted standard in the Crypto-world.
tweet