Offshore
Photo
Investing visuals
Who said energy drinks are boring?
Monster $MNST has compounded at 25% annually since going public, but Celsius $CELH massively outperformed $MNST over the past 5 years.
Can Celsius become the next Monster?🤔 https://t.co/sLJ9bCwU0M
tweet
Who said energy drinks are boring?
Monster $MNST has compounded at 25% annually since going public, but Celsius $CELH massively outperformed $MNST over the past 5 years.
Can Celsius become the next Monster?🤔 https://t.co/sLJ9bCwU0M
tweet
Offshore
Photo
Quiver Quantitative
RT @InsiderRadar: 🚨 New CEO Insider Purchase
The CEO of $ARRY has reported the purchase of ~$100K of the company's stock.
This is the first inside buy we have seen him make in over 2 years. https://t.co/dkXllGVlsf
tweet
RT @InsiderRadar: 🚨 New CEO Insider Purchase
The CEO of $ARRY has reported the purchase of ~$100K of the company's stock.
This is the first inside buy we have seen him make in over 2 years. https://t.co/dkXllGVlsf
tweet
Offshore
Photo
Investing visuals
Fellow investors, I need your help!
Many have asked to include valuation in the stock battle format, fair point! But I’m torn between two options:
Option A: Add a valuation section to the current format, but at the risk of an information overload and a cramped layout.
Option B: Replace an existing metric with valuation, but which one adds the least value to you and should be replaced?
Let me know in the comments!
(there is a poll in there too)
tweet
Fellow investors, I need your help!
Many have asked to include valuation in the stock battle format, fair point! But I’m torn between two options:
Option A: Add a valuation section to the current format, but at the risk of an information overload and a cramped layout.
Option B: Replace an existing metric with valuation, but which one adds the least value to you and should be replaced?
Let me know in the comments!
(there is a poll in there too)
Palantir $PLTR vs Crowdstrike $CRWD: two top notch software companies shaping the future 💎👌
Who will outperform over the next 10 years? https://t.co/xNQ7BnXP6Z tweet
Offshore
Photo
Dimitry Nakhla | Babylon Capital®
Investing in retail is tough $TGT
Slim margins & heavy competition … not the best recipe for long-term shareholders 🧐
#stocks #investing $WMT $AMZN https://t.co/dv6DGofHeK
tweet
Investing in retail is tough $TGT
Slim margins & heavy competition … not the best recipe for long-term shareholders 🧐
#stocks #investing $WMT $AMZN https://t.co/dv6DGofHeK
tweet
Offshore
Video
Value Spotlight (Andrew Sather)
Small Cap Opportunity with Rising Economic Earnings
ROIC, Economic Earnings and WACC (Tutorial)
$CNXN https://t.co/dX0eadPQju
tweet
Small Cap Opportunity with Rising Economic Earnings
ROIC, Economic Earnings and WACC (Tutorial)
$CNXN https://t.co/dX0eadPQju
tweet
Offshore
Photo
Stock Analysis Compilation
Hedge funds' best ideas #19 is in your inbox 🔥
(link below)
Includes links to the Q3 letters from Alger / Ariel Investments / Clearbridge / Deep Sail Capital / Ennismore / Gator Capital / Harding Loevner / Longriver Partners Fund / Maran Partners / Miller Value Fund / Munro / Oakmark / Vulcan Value Partners
tweet
Hedge funds' best ideas #19 is in your inbox 🔥
(link below)
Includes links to the Q3 letters from Alger / Ariel Investments / Clearbridge / Deep Sail Capital / Ennismore / Gator Capital / Harding Loevner / Longriver Partners Fund / Maran Partners / Miller Value Fund / Munro / Oakmark / Vulcan Value Partners
tweet
Offshore
Photo
Stock Analysis Compilation
Alger on MercadoLibre $MELI US
Thesis: MercadoLibre’s strong network effects, expanding fintech services, and robust market leadership make it a formidable player in Latin America’s digital economy, driving significant growth potential.
(Extract from their Q3 letter) https://t.co/cIwbNSAVfe
tweet
Alger on MercadoLibre $MELI US
Thesis: MercadoLibre’s strong network effects, expanding fintech services, and robust market leadership make it a formidable player in Latin America’s digital economy, driving significant growth potential.
(Extract from their Q3 letter) https://t.co/cIwbNSAVfe
tweet
Offshore
Video
Startup Archive
Legendary VC Bill Gurley on why “TAM conservatism” often hurts investors
“I’ve found that TAM conservatism hurts you more than it helps you as an investor. If you feel like something is super disruptive and it’s unlocking things, your optionality to build on top of that is going to be pretty spectacular.”
Bill recalls NYU professor Aswath Damodaran’s conclusion that Uber was worth only $5.9 billion given the size of the taxi market.
Bill responded in a blog post titled “How to Miss By a Mile”:
“There are multiple reasons why this is a flawed assumption. When you materially improve an offering, and create new features, functions, experiences, price points, and even enable new use cases, you can materially expand the market in the process. The past can be a poor guide for the future if the future offering is materially different than the past.”
To be fair to Aswath, Bill already knew that Uber was 20x the size of the taxi market in San Francisco at the time.
But Bill cites a McKinsey study as another classic example. In 1980, they predicted that cell phone penetration in the U.S. by 2000 would be 900,000 units. This turned out to be less than 1% of the actual figure, 109 million.
As Box CEO Aaron Levie put it:
“Sizing the market for a disruptor based on an incumbent’s market is like sizing the car industry off how many horses there were in 1910.”
Today Uber’s market capitalization is north of $150 billion—almost 30x Aswath’s estimate.
Video source: @tferriss (2023)
tweet
Legendary VC Bill Gurley on why “TAM conservatism” often hurts investors
“I’ve found that TAM conservatism hurts you more than it helps you as an investor. If you feel like something is super disruptive and it’s unlocking things, your optionality to build on top of that is going to be pretty spectacular.”
Bill recalls NYU professor Aswath Damodaran’s conclusion that Uber was worth only $5.9 billion given the size of the taxi market.
Bill responded in a blog post titled “How to Miss By a Mile”:
“There are multiple reasons why this is a flawed assumption. When you materially improve an offering, and create new features, functions, experiences, price points, and even enable new use cases, you can materially expand the market in the process. The past can be a poor guide for the future if the future offering is materially different than the past.”
To be fair to Aswath, Bill already knew that Uber was 20x the size of the taxi market in San Francisco at the time.
But Bill cites a McKinsey study as another classic example. In 1980, they predicted that cell phone penetration in the U.S. by 2000 would be 900,000 units. This turned out to be less than 1% of the actual figure, 109 million.
As Box CEO Aaron Levie put it:
“Sizing the market for a disruptor based on an incumbent’s market is like sizing the car industry off how many horses there were in 1910.”
Today Uber’s market capitalization is north of $150 billion—almost 30x Aswath’s estimate.
Video source: @tferriss (2023)
tweet
Offshore
Video
Startup Archive
RT @mikemcg0: "When you materially improve an offering and create new features, functions, experiences, price points, and even enable new use cases, you can materially expand the market in the process. The past can be a poor guide for the future if the future offering is materially different than the past."
tweet
RT @mikemcg0: "When you materially improve an offering and create new features, functions, experiences, price points, and even enable new use cases, you can materially expand the market in the process. The past can be a poor guide for the future if the future offering is materially different than the past."
Legendary VC Bill Gurley on why “TAM conservatism” often hurts investors
“I’ve found that TAM conservatism hurts you more than it helps you as an investor. If you feel like something is super disruptive and it’s unlocking things, your optionality to build on top of that is going to be pretty spectacular.”
Bill recalls NYU professor Aswath Damodaran’s conclusion that Uber was worth only $5.9 billion given the size of the taxi market.
Bill responded in a blog post titled “How to Miss By a Mile”:
“There are multiple reasons why this is a flawed assumption. When you materially improve an offering, and create new features, functions, experiences, price points, and even enable new use cases, you can materially expand the market in the process. The past can be a poor guide for the future if the future offering is materially different than the past.”
To be fair to Aswath, Bill already knew that Uber was 20x the size of the taxi market in San Francisco at the time.
But Bill cites a McKinsey study as another classic example. In 1980, they predicted that cell phone penetration in the U.S. by 2000 would be 900,000 units. This turned out to be less than 1% of the actual figure, 109 million.
As Box CEO Aaron Levie put it:
“Sizing the market for a disruptor based on an incumbent’s market is like sizing the car industry off how many horses there were in 1910.”
Today Uber’s market capitalization is north of $150 billion—almost 30x Aswath’s estimate.
Video source: @tferriss (2023) tweet