Offshore
Photo
โ Capital Employed
Another big batch of quarterly letters added. 56 added so far with more to come ๐
https://t.co/z8VTurKKQI https://t.co/SPdJhBURvE
tweet
Another big batch of quarterly letters added. 56 added so far with more to come ๐
https://t.co/z8VTurKKQI https://t.co/SPdJhBURvE
tweet
โ Capital Employed
What the fudge. That's nuts.
tweet
What the fudge. That's nuts.
"South Korea is also implementing a policy to boost the stock market where excess cash on the balance sheet will be taxed" - Michael Fritzell (Asian Century Stocks)tweet
twitter.com
undefined
undefined
Offshore
Photo
โ Stock Analysis Compilation
Night Watch IM on X-FAB Global Foundries $XFAB FP
Thesis: X-FAB Global Foundries (XFAB FP) offers a strong upside with potential earnings growth and major catalysts in semiconductor demand, alongside insider ownership backing
(Extract from their Q3 letter) https://t.co/qvuS99A5E7
tweet
Night Watch IM on X-FAB Global Foundries $XFAB FP
Thesis: X-FAB Global Foundries (XFAB FP) offers a strong upside with potential earnings growth and major catalysts in semiconductor demand, alongside insider ownership backing
(Extract from their Q3 letter) https://t.co/qvuS99A5E7
tweet
Offshore
Photo
โ Hidden Value Gems
Pretty impressive: Mag7 stocks responsible for most of earnings growth of the S&P500 index ๐๐ผ https://t.co/mAt6qQrdrG
tweet
Pretty impressive: Mag7 stocks responsible for most of earnings growth of the S&P500 index ๐๐ผ https://t.co/mAt6qQrdrG
tweet
Offshore
Video
โ Startup Archive
Keith Rabois explains โFounder Modeโ and its similarities to how PayPal was run in the early days
โAt PayPal, we never promoted anybody based on their management skill. We promoted everybody based on their craft. So if you wanted to run the design team, you had to be the best designer. If you wanted to run the engineering team, you had to be the best engineer. If you wanted to run product, you had to be the best product person. The CFO had to be the best finance person.โ
The elimination of middle management from company org charts that Airbnb founder Brian Chesky talks about and Paul Grahamโs viral essay Founder Mode, Keith argues, โre-popularized ideas that are pretty old schoolโฆ Itโs the antithesis of hiring someone whose expertise is managing versus someone whose expertise is building.โ
Keith points out that Elon Musk has always run his companies in โfounder modeโ with the slashing of headcount by 80% and promoting individual contributors to managers at X being perhaps the most prominent example.
But Apple has been run this way for a lot of its history too:
โAt Apple you get promoted by mastering something. Not by being a generalistโฆ Apple collates and collects a bunch of people who are literally the best in the world at 26 different things and mixes them together. Thatโs a much better model.โ
When asked what to do if, say, the best salesperson canโt grow into a VP of sales, Keith replies that most people should be able to and you should try it anyway:
โSometimes its mentoring, pairing them with the right person, giving them the right feedback. But at least if you promote that person, youโre not going to demoralize your team because everybody knows that they were the best salespersonโฆ They may have to learn how to coach and mentor other people, but you have enthusiasm and energy from the rank and file.โ
He contrasts this to the alternative scenario:
โIf you bring in someone whoโs never hit a quota, never proven that they can sell product X, and youโre like โOh, youโre the new manager.โ Sometimes people are like, โWho the hell are you?โ And itโs a very valid critique.โ
Video source: @imchrisvasquez (2024)
tweet
Keith Rabois explains โFounder Modeโ and its similarities to how PayPal was run in the early days
โAt PayPal, we never promoted anybody based on their management skill. We promoted everybody based on their craft. So if you wanted to run the design team, you had to be the best designer. If you wanted to run the engineering team, you had to be the best engineer. If you wanted to run product, you had to be the best product person. The CFO had to be the best finance person.โ
The elimination of middle management from company org charts that Airbnb founder Brian Chesky talks about and Paul Grahamโs viral essay Founder Mode, Keith argues, โre-popularized ideas that are pretty old schoolโฆ Itโs the antithesis of hiring someone whose expertise is managing versus someone whose expertise is building.โ
Keith points out that Elon Musk has always run his companies in โfounder modeโ with the slashing of headcount by 80% and promoting individual contributors to managers at X being perhaps the most prominent example.
But Apple has been run this way for a lot of its history too:
โAt Apple you get promoted by mastering something. Not by being a generalistโฆ Apple collates and collects a bunch of people who are literally the best in the world at 26 different things and mixes them together. Thatโs a much better model.โ
When asked what to do if, say, the best salesperson canโt grow into a VP of sales, Keith replies that most people should be able to and you should try it anyway:
โSometimes its mentoring, pairing them with the right person, giving them the right feedback. But at least if you promote that person, youโre not going to demoralize your team because everybody knows that they were the best salespersonโฆ They may have to learn how to coach and mentor other people, but you have enthusiasm and energy from the rank and file.โ
He contrasts this to the alternative scenario:
โIf you bring in someone whoโs never hit a quota, never proven that they can sell product X, and youโre like โOh, youโre the new manager.โ Sometimes people are like, โWho the hell are you?โ And itโs a very valid critique.โ
Video source: @imchrisvasquez (2024)
tweet
Offshore
Photo
โ Dimitry Nakhla | Babylon Capitalยฎ
A sober valuation analysis on $ELV ๐ง๐ฝโโ๏ธ
โขNTM P/E Ratio: 11.52x
โข5-Year Mean: 14.05x
โขNTM FCF Yield: 8.28%
โข5-Year Mean: 6.87%
As you can see, $ELV appears to be trading below fair value
Going forward, investors can expect to receive ~22% MORE in earnings per share & ~20% MORE in FCF per share๐ง ***
Before we get into valuation, letโs take a look at why $ELV is a quality business
BALANCE SHEETโ
โขCash & Equivalents: $7.86B
โขTotal Investments: $40.35B
โขLong-Term Debt: $24.68B
$ELV has a strong balance sheet, an A S&P Credit Rating & 1.93x FFO Interest Coverage Ratio (temporarily lower FFO)
RETURN ON CAPITALโ
โข2019: 12.3%
โข2020: 14.7%
โข2021: 14.3%
โข2022: 13.4%
โข2023: 14.7%
โขLTM: 14.5%
RETURN ON EQUITYโ
โข2019: 16.0%
โข2020: 14.1%
โข2021: 17.7%
โข2022: 16.3%
โข2023: 15.8%
โขLTM: 15.5%
$ELV has solid return metrics, highlighting the financial efficiency of the business
REVENUESโ
โข2013: $71.02B
โข2023: $171.34B
โขCAGR: 9.20%
FREE CASH FLOWโ
โข2013: $2.41B
โข2023: $6.77B
โขCAGR: 10.88%
NORMALIZED EPSโ
โข2013: $8.52
โข2023: $33.14
โขCAGR: 14.54%
SHARE BUYBACKSโ
โข2013 Shares Outstanding: 303.80M
โขLTM Shares Outstanding: 234.10M
By reducing its shares outstanding ~23%, $ELV increases its EPS by ~30% (assuming 0 growth)
MARGINS๐
โขLTM Gross Margins: 9.4%
โขLTM Operating Margins: 6.1%
โขLTM Net Income Margins: 3.7%
PAID DIVIDENDSโ
โข2013: $1.50
โข2023: $5.92
โขCAGR: 14.71%
***NOW TO VALUATION ๐ง
As stated above, investors can expect to receive ~22% MORE in EPS & ~20% MORE in FCF per share
Using Benjamin Grahamโs 2G rule of thumb, $ELV has to grow earnings at a 5.76% CAGR over the next several years to justify its valuation
Today, analysts anticipate 2024 - 2026 EPS growth over the next few years to be greater than the (5.76%) required growth rate:
2024E: $35.36 (6.7% YoY) *FY Dec
2025E: $39.00 (10.3% YoY)
2026E: $44.01 (12.8% YoY)
$ELV has a great track record of meeting analyst estimates ~2 years out, so letโs assume $ELV ends 2026 with $44.01 in EPS & see its CAGR potential assuming different multiples
14x P/E: $616.14๐ต โฆ ~19.1% CAGR
13x P/E: $572.13๐ต โฆ ~15.2% CAGR
12x P/E: $528.12๐ต โฆ ~11.2% CAGR
As you can see, $ELV has attractive CAGR potential if we assume a >12x multiple (below its 14.05x 5-year mean & below its 14.22x 10-year mean)
More importantly, 12x is MORE than reasonable for a business thatโs expected to grow earnings at a >10% rate & has a strong history of linear earnings growth ( $ELV has increased EPS annually since 2008 ๐ฏ)
I also like the negative price correlation $ELV can have, relative to tech, in the short-term โฆ adding a layer of safety in a portfolio
In short, $ELV appears to be a strong consideration at $430๐ต
However, knowing that health insurers often face volatility amid the perception of political risks (among other things), itโs wise to piece in & perhaps be prepared to add a second tranche at lower prices (as Iโve mentioned before)
#stocks #investing
___
๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐โผ๏ธ: ๐๐ก๐ข๐ฌ ๐ข๐ฌ ๐๐๐ ๐๐ง๐ฏ๐๐ฌ๐ญ๐ฆ๐๐ง๐ญ ๐๐๐ฏ๐ข๐๐. ๐๐๐๐ฒ๐ฅ๐จ๐ง ๐๐๐ฉ๐ข๐ญ๐๐ฅยฎ ๐๐ง๐ ๐ข๐ญ๐ฌ ๐ซ๐๐ฉ๐ซ๐๐ฌ๐๐ง๐ญ๐๐ญ๐ข๐ฏ๐๐ฌ ๐ฆ๐๐ฒ ๐ก๐๐ฏ๐ ๐ฉ๐จ๐ฌ๐ข๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง๐ฌ ๐ข๐ง ๐ญ๐ก๐ ๐ฌ๐๐๐ฎ๐ซ๐ข๐ญ๐ข๐๐ฌ ๐๐ข๐ฌ๐๐ฎ๐ฌ๐ฌ๐๐ ๐ข๐ง ๐ญ๐ก๐ข๐ฌ ๐ญ๐ฐ๐๐๐ญ.
๐๐ก๐ ๐ข๐ง๐๐จ๐ซ๐ฆ๐๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง ๐๐จ๐ง๐ญ๐๐ข๐ง๐๐ ๐ข๐ง ๐ญ๐ก๐ข๐ฌ ๐ญ๐ฐ๐๐๐ญ ๐ข๐ฌ ๐ข๐ง๐ญ๐๐ง๐๐๐ ๐๐จ๐ซ ๐ข๐ง๐๐จ๐ซ๐ฆ๐๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง๐๐ฅ ๐ฉ๐ฎ๐ซ๐ฉ๐จ๐ฌ๐๐ฌ ๐จ๐ง๐ฅ๐ฒ ๐๐ง๐ ๐ฌ๐ก๐จ๐ฎ๐ฅ๐ ๐ง๐จ๐ญ ๐๐ ๐๐จ๐ง๐ฌ๐ญ๐ซ๐ฎ๐๐ ๐๐ฌ ๐ข๐ง๐ฏ๐๐ฌ๐ญ๐ฆ๐๐ง๐ญ ๐๐๐ฏ๐ข๐๐ ๐ญ๐จ ๐ฆ๐๐๐ญ ๐ญ๐ก๐ ๐ฌ๐ฉ๐๐๐ข๐๐ข๐ ๐ง๐๐๐๐ฌ ๐จ๐ ๐๐ง๐ฒ ๐ข๐ง๐๐ข๐ฏ๐ข๐๐ฎ๐๐ฅ ๐จ๐ซ ๐ฌ๐ข๐ญ๐ฎ๐๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง. ๐๐๐ฌ๐ญ ๐ฉ๐๐ซ๐๐จ๐ซ๐ฆ๐๐ง๐๐ ๐ข๐ฌ ๐ง๐จ ๐ ๐ฎ๐๐ซ๐๐ง๐ญ๐๐ ๐จ๐ ๐๐ฎ๐ญ๐ฎ๐ซ๐ ๐ซ๐๐ฌ๐ฎ๐ฅ๐ญ๐ฌ.
๐๐ง๐๐จ๐ซ๐ฆ๐๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง ๐๐จ๐ง๐ญ๐๐ข๐ง๐๐ ๐ข๐ง ๐ญ๐ก๐ข๐ฌ ๐ญ๐ฐ๐๐๐ญ ๐ก๐๐ฌ ๐๐๐๐ง ๐จ๐๐ญ๐๐ข๐ง๐๐ ๐๐ซ๐จ๐ฆ ๐ฌ๐จ๐ฎ๐ซ๐๐๐ฌ ๐๐๐ฅ๐ข๐๐ฏ๐๐ ๐ญ๐จ ๐๐ ๐ซ๐๐ฅ๐ข๐๐๐ฅ๐, ๐๐ฎ๐ญ ๐ข๐ฌ ๐ง๐จ๐ญ ๐ ๐ฎ๐๐ซ๐๐ง๐ญ๐๐๐ ๐๐ฌ ๐ญ๐จ ๐๐จ๐ฆ๐ฉ๐ฅ๐๐ญ๐๐ง๐๐ฌ๐ฌ ๐จ๐ซ ๐๐๐๐ฎ๐ซ๐๐๐ฒ.
tweet
A sober valuation analysis on $ELV ๐ง๐ฝโโ๏ธ
โขNTM P/E Ratio: 11.52x
โข5-Year Mean: 14.05x
โขNTM FCF Yield: 8.28%
โข5-Year Mean: 6.87%
As you can see, $ELV appears to be trading below fair value
Going forward, investors can expect to receive ~22% MORE in earnings per share & ~20% MORE in FCF per share๐ง ***
Before we get into valuation, letโs take a look at why $ELV is a quality business
BALANCE SHEETโ
โขCash & Equivalents: $7.86B
โขTotal Investments: $40.35B
โขLong-Term Debt: $24.68B
$ELV has a strong balance sheet, an A S&P Credit Rating & 1.93x FFO Interest Coverage Ratio (temporarily lower FFO)
RETURN ON CAPITALโ
โข2019: 12.3%
โข2020: 14.7%
โข2021: 14.3%
โข2022: 13.4%
โข2023: 14.7%
โขLTM: 14.5%
RETURN ON EQUITYโ
โข2019: 16.0%
โข2020: 14.1%
โข2021: 17.7%
โข2022: 16.3%
โข2023: 15.8%
โขLTM: 15.5%
$ELV has solid return metrics, highlighting the financial efficiency of the business
REVENUESโ
โข2013: $71.02B
โข2023: $171.34B
โขCAGR: 9.20%
FREE CASH FLOWโ
โข2013: $2.41B
โข2023: $6.77B
โขCAGR: 10.88%
NORMALIZED EPSโ
โข2013: $8.52
โข2023: $33.14
โขCAGR: 14.54%
SHARE BUYBACKSโ
โข2013 Shares Outstanding: 303.80M
โขLTM Shares Outstanding: 234.10M
By reducing its shares outstanding ~23%, $ELV increases its EPS by ~30% (assuming 0 growth)
MARGINS๐
โขLTM Gross Margins: 9.4%
โขLTM Operating Margins: 6.1%
โขLTM Net Income Margins: 3.7%
PAID DIVIDENDSโ
โข2013: $1.50
โข2023: $5.92
โขCAGR: 14.71%
***NOW TO VALUATION ๐ง
As stated above, investors can expect to receive ~22% MORE in EPS & ~20% MORE in FCF per share
Using Benjamin Grahamโs 2G rule of thumb, $ELV has to grow earnings at a 5.76% CAGR over the next several years to justify its valuation
Today, analysts anticipate 2024 - 2026 EPS growth over the next few years to be greater than the (5.76%) required growth rate:
2024E: $35.36 (6.7% YoY) *FY Dec
2025E: $39.00 (10.3% YoY)
2026E: $44.01 (12.8% YoY)
$ELV has a great track record of meeting analyst estimates ~2 years out, so letโs assume $ELV ends 2026 with $44.01 in EPS & see its CAGR potential assuming different multiples
14x P/E: $616.14๐ต โฆ ~19.1% CAGR
13x P/E: $572.13๐ต โฆ ~15.2% CAGR
12x P/E: $528.12๐ต โฆ ~11.2% CAGR
As you can see, $ELV has attractive CAGR potential if we assume a >12x multiple (below its 14.05x 5-year mean & below its 14.22x 10-year mean)
More importantly, 12x is MORE than reasonable for a business thatโs expected to grow earnings at a >10% rate & has a strong history of linear earnings growth ( $ELV has increased EPS annually since 2008 ๐ฏ)
I also like the negative price correlation $ELV can have, relative to tech, in the short-term โฆ adding a layer of safety in a portfolio
In short, $ELV appears to be a strong consideration at $430๐ต
However, knowing that health insurers often face volatility amid the perception of political risks (among other things), itโs wise to piece in & perhaps be prepared to add a second tranche at lower prices (as Iโve mentioned before)
#stocks #investing
___
๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐โผ๏ธ: ๐๐ก๐ข๐ฌ ๐ข๐ฌ ๐๐๐ ๐๐ง๐ฏ๐๐ฌ๐ญ๐ฆ๐๐ง๐ญ ๐๐๐ฏ๐ข๐๐. ๐๐๐๐ฒ๐ฅ๐จ๐ง ๐๐๐ฉ๐ข๐ญ๐๐ฅยฎ ๐๐ง๐ ๐ข๐ญ๐ฌ ๐ซ๐๐ฉ๐ซ๐๐ฌ๐๐ง๐ญ๐๐ญ๐ข๐ฏ๐๐ฌ ๐ฆ๐๐ฒ ๐ก๐๐ฏ๐ ๐ฉ๐จ๐ฌ๐ข๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง๐ฌ ๐ข๐ง ๐ญ๐ก๐ ๐ฌ๐๐๐ฎ๐ซ๐ข๐ญ๐ข๐๐ฌ ๐๐ข๐ฌ๐๐ฎ๐ฌ๐ฌ๐๐ ๐ข๐ง ๐ญ๐ก๐ข๐ฌ ๐ญ๐ฐ๐๐๐ญ.
๐๐ก๐ ๐ข๐ง๐๐จ๐ซ๐ฆ๐๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง ๐๐จ๐ง๐ญ๐๐ข๐ง๐๐ ๐ข๐ง ๐ญ๐ก๐ข๐ฌ ๐ญ๐ฐ๐๐๐ญ ๐ข๐ฌ ๐ข๐ง๐ญ๐๐ง๐๐๐ ๐๐จ๐ซ ๐ข๐ง๐๐จ๐ซ๐ฆ๐๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง๐๐ฅ ๐ฉ๐ฎ๐ซ๐ฉ๐จ๐ฌ๐๐ฌ ๐จ๐ง๐ฅ๐ฒ ๐๐ง๐ ๐ฌ๐ก๐จ๐ฎ๐ฅ๐ ๐ง๐จ๐ญ ๐๐ ๐๐จ๐ง๐ฌ๐ญ๐ซ๐ฎ๐๐ ๐๐ฌ ๐ข๐ง๐ฏ๐๐ฌ๐ญ๐ฆ๐๐ง๐ญ ๐๐๐ฏ๐ข๐๐ ๐ญ๐จ ๐ฆ๐๐๐ญ ๐ญ๐ก๐ ๐ฌ๐ฉ๐๐๐ข๐๐ข๐ ๐ง๐๐๐๐ฌ ๐จ๐ ๐๐ง๐ฒ ๐ข๐ง๐๐ข๐ฏ๐ข๐๐ฎ๐๐ฅ ๐จ๐ซ ๐ฌ๐ข๐ญ๐ฎ๐๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง. ๐๐๐ฌ๐ญ ๐ฉ๐๐ซ๐๐จ๐ซ๐ฆ๐๐ง๐๐ ๐ข๐ฌ ๐ง๐จ ๐ ๐ฎ๐๐ซ๐๐ง๐ญ๐๐ ๐จ๐ ๐๐ฎ๐ญ๐ฎ๐ซ๐ ๐ซ๐๐ฌ๐ฎ๐ฅ๐ญ๐ฌ.
๐๐ง๐๐จ๐ซ๐ฆ๐๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง ๐๐จ๐ง๐ญ๐๐ข๐ง๐๐ ๐ข๐ง ๐ญ๐ก๐ข๐ฌ ๐ญ๐ฐ๐๐๐ญ ๐ก๐๐ฌ ๐๐๐๐ง ๐จ๐๐ญ๐๐ข๐ง๐๐ ๐๐ซ๐จ๐ฆ ๐ฌ๐จ๐ฎ๐ซ๐๐๐ฌ ๐๐๐ฅ๐ข๐๐ฏ๐๐ ๐ญ๐จ ๐๐ ๐ซ๐๐ฅ๐ข๐๐๐ฅ๐, ๐๐ฎ๐ญ ๐ข๐ฌ ๐ง๐จ๐ญ ๐ ๐ฎ๐๐ซ๐๐ง๐ญ๐๐๐ ๐๐ฌ ๐ญ๐จ ๐๐จ๐ฆ๐ฉ๐ฅ๐๐ญ๐๐ง๐๐ฌ๐ฌ ๐จ๐ซ ๐๐๐๐ฎ๐ซ๐๐๐ฒ.
tweet
Offshore
Photo
โ Stock Analysis Compilation
Vltava Fund on Brookfield Corporation $BN
Thesis: Brookfield Corporation, with its massive global asset management business and strong infrastructure holdings, presents an attractive long-term investment with a 15% projected annual growth rate
(Extract from their Q3 letter) https://t.co/NaJZN0jjfz
tweet
Vltava Fund on Brookfield Corporation $BN
Thesis: Brookfield Corporation, with its massive global asset management business and strong infrastructure holdings, presents an attractive long-term investment with a 15% projected annual growth rate
(Extract from their Q3 letter) https://t.co/NaJZN0jjfz
tweet