⁠Alex Bilzerian
RT @trishankkarthik: No respect for academics who don’t contribute to the real world

One always hears academics whimpering about "impostor syndrome"—most of them actually happen to be imposters.

Fraud & incompetence in academia are more widespread than many realize. - Alex Bilzerian
tweet

⁠Alex Bilzerian
The same physicists that brought you this are now nitpicking over the mere mention of "negative probability". https://t.co/MiSFDoPPXQ
tweet

⁠Alex Bilzerian
Don't bother with this if you're a physicist; too much math for you.

'Interpretations of Probability' - Andrei Khrennikov (2003, PDF):
https://t.co/dyFkbYk13E

See Ch. 3 for negative probabilities & Ch. 4 for p-adic probability. - Alex Bilzerian
tweet

⁠Alex Bilzerian
RT @alexbilz: Probability Lecture Notes, Carnegie Mellon - Tomasz Tkocz (2020, PDF):
https://t.co/zkcKEZUMSk https://t.co/nSXlsX5b9x
tweet

⁠Alex Bilzerian
RT @mikeharrisNY: @alexbilz While people clash over the existence of negative probabilities, this book shows that even the notion of randomness is not well defined. It is so complex that it was defined in the sense of complexity. 😂
tweet

⁠Alex Bilzerian
'Necessity of negativity in quantum theory' - Ferrie, Morris & Emerson (2018, PDF):
https://t.co/jPw042dbqT
tweet

⁠Alex Bilzerian
RT @st_aphian: we always knew this https://t.co/n1w8cY7RPe

The paradox of poetry and information theory https://t.co/YvLQOSq0yQ - Alex Bilzerian
tweet

⁠Alex Bilzerian
RT @MongyPears: Bro clearly didn’t hasn’t read any of my papers

Mathematics may be the only field left untainted by decline & mediocrity. - Alex Bilzerian
tweet

⁠Alex Bilzerian
RT @pmontu33: Conflating probability and exposure is an example of linear thinking as only a perfectly linear payoff would allow you to do this.
tweet

⁠Alex Bilzerian
'Negative Probabilities in Financial Modeling' - Mark Burgin & Gunter Meissner:
https://t.co/sph43bZGnO

Published in Wilmott Magazine in 2012. https://t.co/iUQn7whtRr
tweet

⁠Alex Bilzerian
Negative energies and probabilities should not be considered as nonsense. They are well-defined concepts mathematically, like a negative of money (referring to debt).

— Wigner
tweet

⁠Alex Bilzerian
Dumb money economist like this wouldn't last a cup of coffee at the old fund. https://t.co/vyYjF1BUZ2

As my first fall econometric lectures are on probability theory and the relationship between probability theory and decision theory, this video is a great help.

PPHA42000 Problem Set 1. Explain why this discussion is complete nonsense. - Steven N. Durlauf
tweet