⁠Alex Bilzerian
RT @alexbilz: 'Feynman's approach to negative probability in quantum mechanics' - Scully, Walther & Schleich (1994, PDF):
https://t.co/uXB4BK9gl5
tweet

⁠Alex Bilzerian
RT @alexbilz: 'Cargo Cult Science' - Richard Feynman https://t.co/FoMjOL0KSM
tweet

⁠Alex Bilzerian
RT @alexbilz: Richard Feynman on the general differences between the interests and customs of mathematicians and physicists: https://t.co/gbZu7gdKQZ
tweet

⁠Alex Bilzerian
RT @EGHaug: https://t.co/MB6f4xhb71
tweet

⁠Alex Bilzerian
RT @trishankkarthik: No respect for academics who don’t contribute to the real world

One always hears academics whimpering about "impostor syndrome"—most of them actually happen to be imposters.

Fraud & incompetence in academia are more widespread than many realize. - Alex Bilzerian
tweet

⁠Alex Bilzerian
The same physicists that brought you this are now nitpicking over the mere mention of "negative probability". https://t.co/MiSFDoPPXQ
tweet

⁠Alex Bilzerian
Don't bother with this if you're a physicist; too much math for you.

'Interpretations of Probability' - Andrei Khrennikov (2003, PDF):
https://t.co/dyFkbYk13E

See Ch. 3 for negative probabilities & Ch. 4 for p-adic probability. - Alex Bilzerian
tweet

⁠Alex Bilzerian
RT @alexbilz: Probability Lecture Notes, Carnegie Mellon - Tomasz Tkocz (2020, PDF):
https://t.co/zkcKEZUMSk https://t.co/nSXlsX5b9x
tweet

⁠Alex Bilzerian
RT @mikeharrisNY: @alexbilz While people clash over the existence of negative probabilities, this book shows that even the notion of randomness is not well defined. It is so complex that it was defined in the sense of complexity. 😂
tweet