Offshore
Photo
Brandon Beylo
Here's one for all you uranium nerds.
Cameco $CCJ with a confirmed inverse H&S breakout today.
The pitch here is that if funds want uranium exposure, they really only have a few options: $U.UN, $YCA.L, and $CCJ.
Remember, it's all about fund flows.
#uranium https://t.co/DnQwszCPzH
tweet
Here's one for all you uranium nerds.
Cameco $CCJ with a confirmed inverse H&S breakout today.
The pitch here is that if funds want uranium exposure, they really only have a few options: $U.UN, $YCA.L, and $CCJ.
Remember, it's all about fund flows.
#uranium https://t.co/DnQwszCPzH
tweet
Dimitry Nakhla | Babylon Capitalยฎ
10 Quality Stocks Flying Under The Radar ๐ต
๐ฅ๏ธ CDW Corp $CDW
โข5-Year EPS CAGR: 13.8%
โขLTM ROIC: 20.5%
๐ณ๏ธ Broadridge Financial $BR
โข5-Year EPS CAGR: 10.8%
โขLTM ROIC: 16.1%
๐ฆ Fair Isaac Corp $FICO
โข5-Year EPS CAGR: 25.9%
โขLTM ROIC: 51.3%
๐พ Agilent Technologies $A
โข5-Year EPS CAGR: 14.2%
โขLTM ROIC: 15.4%
๐ข NVR Inc $NVR
โข5-Year EPS CAGR: 18.9%
โขLTM ROIC: 37.2%
๐ฟ A O Smith $AOS
โข5-Year EPS CAGR: 7.8%
โขLTM ROIC: 36.8%
๐ FactSet Research $FDS
โข5-Year EPS CAGR: 11.2%
โขLTM ROIC: 19.5%
๐ชซ Amphenol $APH
โข5-Year EPS CAGR: 9.7%
โขLTM ROIC: 19.9%
๐ฅ Medpace $MEDP
โข5-Year EPS CAGR: 25.9%
โขLTM ROIC: 42.6%
๐๐ผโโ๏ธ Pool Corp $POOL
โข5-Year EPS CAGR: 18.5%
โขLTM ROIC: 26.2%
#stocks #investing
*5-Year EPS CAGR (Normalized EPS)
___
๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐โผ๏ธ: ๐๐ก๐ข๐ฌ ๐ข๐ฌ ๐๐๐ ๐๐ง๐ฏ๐๐ฌ๐ญ๐ฆ๐๐ง๐ญ ๐๐๐ฏ๐ข๐๐. ๐๐๐๐ฒ๐ฅ๐จ๐ง ๐๐๐ฉ๐ข๐ญ๐๐ฅยฎ ๐๐ง๐ ๐ข๐ญ๐ฌ ๐ซ๐๐ฉ๐ซ๐๐ฌ๐๐ง๐ญ๐๐ญ๐ข๐ฏ๐๐ฌ ๐ฆ๐๐ฒ ๐ก๐๐ฏ๐ ๐ฉ๐จ๐ฌ๐ข๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง๐ฌ ๐ข๐ง ๐ญ๐ก๐ ๐ฌ๐๐๐ฎ๐ซ๐ข๐ญ๐ข๐๐ฌ ๐๐ข๐ฌ๐๐ฎ๐ฌ๐ฌ๐๐ ๐ข๐ง ๐ญ๐ก๐ข๐ฌ ๐ญ๐ฐ๐๐๐ญ.
๐๐ก๐ ๐ข๐ง๐๐จ๐ซ๐ฆ๐๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง ๐๐จ๐ง๐ญ๐๐ข๐ง๐๐ ๐ข๐ง ๐ญ๐ก๐ข๐ฌ ๐ญ๐ฐ๐๐๐ญ ๐ข๐ฌ ๐ข๐ง๐ญ๐๐ง๐๐๐ ๐๐จ๐ซ ๐ข๐ง๐๐จ๐ซ๐ฆ๐๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง๐๐ฅ ๐ฉ๐ฎ๐ซ๐ฉ๐จ๐ฌ๐๐ฌ ๐จ๐ง๐ฅ๐ฒ ๐๐ง๐ ๐ฌ๐ก๐จ๐ฎ๐ฅ๐ ๐ง๐จ๐ญ ๐๐ ๐๐จ๐ง๐ฌ๐ญ๐ซ๐ฎ๐๐ ๐๐ฌ ๐ข๐ง๐ฏ๐๐ฌ๐ญ๐ฆ๐๐ง๐ญ ๐๐๐ฏ๐ข๐๐ ๐ญ๐จ ๐ฆ๐๐๐ญ ๐ญ๐ก๐ ๐ฌ๐ฉ๐๐๐ข๐๐ข๐ ๐ง๐๐๐๐ฌ ๐จ๐ ๐๐ง๐ฒ ๐ข๐ง๐๐ข๐ฏ๐ข๐๐ฎ๐๐ฅ ๐จ๐ซ ๐ฌ๐ข๐ญ๐ฎ๐๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง. ๐๐๐ฌ๐ญ ๐ฉ๐๐ซ๐๐จ๐ซ๐ฆ๐๐ง๐๐ ๐ข๐ฌ ๐ง๐จ ๐ ๐ฎ๐๐ซ๐๐ง๐ญ๐๐ ๐จ๐ ๐๐ฎ๐ญ๐ฎ๐ซ๐ ๐ซ๐๐ฌ๐ฎ๐ฅ๐ญ๐ฌ.
๐๐ง๐๐จ๐ซ๐ฆ๐๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง ๐๐จ๐ง๐ญ๐๐ข๐ง๐๐ ๐ข๐ง ๐ญ๐ก๐ข๐ฌ ๐ญ๐ฐ๐๐๐ญ ๐ก๐๐ฌ ๐๐๐๐ง ๐จ๐๐ญ๐๐ข๐ง๐๐ ๐๐ซ๐จ๐ฆ ๐ฌ๐จ๐ฎ๐ซ๐๐๐ฌ ๐๐๐ฅ๐ข๐๐ฏ๐๐ ๐ญ๐จ ๐๐ ๐ซ๐๐ฅ๐ข๐๐๐ฅ๐, ๐๐ฎ๐ญ ๐ข๐ฌ ๐ง๐จ๐ญ ๐ ๐ฎ๐๐ซ๐๐ง๐ญ๐๐๐ ๐๐ฌ ๐ญ๐จ ๐๐จ๐ฆ๐ฉ๐ฅ๐๐ญ๐๐ง๐๐ฌ๐ฌ ๐จ๐ซ ๐๐๐๐ฎ๐ซ๐๐๐ฒ.
tweet
10 Quality Stocks Flying Under The Radar ๐ต
๐ฅ๏ธ CDW Corp $CDW
โข5-Year EPS CAGR: 13.8%
โขLTM ROIC: 20.5%
๐ณ๏ธ Broadridge Financial $BR
โข5-Year EPS CAGR: 10.8%
โขLTM ROIC: 16.1%
๐ฆ Fair Isaac Corp $FICO
โข5-Year EPS CAGR: 25.9%
โขLTM ROIC: 51.3%
๐พ Agilent Technologies $A
โข5-Year EPS CAGR: 14.2%
โขLTM ROIC: 15.4%
๐ข NVR Inc $NVR
โข5-Year EPS CAGR: 18.9%
โขLTM ROIC: 37.2%
๐ฟ A O Smith $AOS
โข5-Year EPS CAGR: 7.8%
โขLTM ROIC: 36.8%
๐ FactSet Research $FDS
โข5-Year EPS CAGR: 11.2%
โขLTM ROIC: 19.5%
๐ชซ Amphenol $APH
โข5-Year EPS CAGR: 9.7%
โขLTM ROIC: 19.9%
๐ฅ Medpace $MEDP
โข5-Year EPS CAGR: 25.9%
โขLTM ROIC: 42.6%
๐๐ผโโ๏ธ Pool Corp $POOL
โข5-Year EPS CAGR: 18.5%
โขLTM ROIC: 26.2%
#stocks #investing
*5-Year EPS CAGR (Normalized EPS)
___
๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐โผ๏ธ: ๐๐ก๐ข๐ฌ ๐ข๐ฌ ๐๐๐ ๐๐ง๐ฏ๐๐ฌ๐ญ๐ฆ๐๐ง๐ญ ๐๐๐ฏ๐ข๐๐. ๐๐๐๐ฒ๐ฅ๐จ๐ง ๐๐๐ฉ๐ข๐ญ๐๐ฅยฎ ๐๐ง๐ ๐ข๐ญ๐ฌ ๐ซ๐๐ฉ๐ซ๐๐ฌ๐๐ง๐ญ๐๐ญ๐ข๐ฏ๐๐ฌ ๐ฆ๐๐ฒ ๐ก๐๐ฏ๐ ๐ฉ๐จ๐ฌ๐ข๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง๐ฌ ๐ข๐ง ๐ญ๐ก๐ ๐ฌ๐๐๐ฎ๐ซ๐ข๐ญ๐ข๐๐ฌ ๐๐ข๐ฌ๐๐ฎ๐ฌ๐ฌ๐๐ ๐ข๐ง ๐ญ๐ก๐ข๐ฌ ๐ญ๐ฐ๐๐๐ญ.
๐๐ก๐ ๐ข๐ง๐๐จ๐ซ๐ฆ๐๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง ๐๐จ๐ง๐ญ๐๐ข๐ง๐๐ ๐ข๐ง ๐ญ๐ก๐ข๐ฌ ๐ญ๐ฐ๐๐๐ญ ๐ข๐ฌ ๐ข๐ง๐ญ๐๐ง๐๐๐ ๐๐จ๐ซ ๐ข๐ง๐๐จ๐ซ๐ฆ๐๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง๐๐ฅ ๐ฉ๐ฎ๐ซ๐ฉ๐จ๐ฌ๐๐ฌ ๐จ๐ง๐ฅ๐ฒ ๐๐ง๐ ๐ฌ๐ก๐จ๐ฎ๐ฅ๐ ๐ง๐จ๐ญ ๐๐ ๐๐จ๐ง๐ฌ๐ญ๐ซ๐ฎ๐๐ ๐๐ฌ ๐ข๐ง๐ฏ๐๐ฌ๐ญ๐ฆ๐๐ง๐ญ ๐๐๐ฏ๐ข๐๐ ๐ญ๐จ ๐ฆ๐๐๐ญ ๐ญ๐ก๐ ๐ฌ๐ฉ๐๐๐ข๐๐ข๐ ๐ง๐๐๐๐ฌ ๐จ๐ ๐๐ง๐ฒ ๐ข๐ง๐๐ข๐ฏ๐ข๐๐ฎ๐๐ฅ ๐จ๐ซ ๐ฌ๐ข๐ญ๐ฎ๐๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง. ๐๐๐ฌ๐ญ ๐ฉ๐๐ซ๐๐จ๐ซ๐ฆ๐๐ง๐๐ ๐ข๐ฌ ๐ง๐จ ๐ ๐ฎ๐๐ซ๐๐ง๐ญ๐๐ ๐จ๐ ๐๐ฎ๐ญ๐ฎ๐ซ๐ ๐ซ๐๐ฌ๐ฎ๐ฅ๐ญ๐ฌ.
๐๐ง๐๐จ๐ซ๐ฆ๐๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง ๐๐จ๐ง๐ญ๐๐ข๐ง๐๐ ๐ข๐ง ๐ญ๐ก๐ข๐ฌ ๐ญ๐ฐ๐๐๐ญ ๐ก๐๐ฌ ๐๐๐๐ง ๐จ๐๐ญ๐๐ข๐ง๐๐ ๐๐ซ๐จ๐ฆ ๐ฌ๐จ๐ฎ๐ซ๐๐๐ฌ ๐๐๐ฅ๐ข๐๐ฏ๐๐ ๐ญ๐จ ๐๐ ๐ซ๐๐ฅ๐ข๐๐๐ฅ๐, ๐๐ฎ๐ญ ๐ข๐ฌ ๐ง๐จ๐ญ ๐ ๐ฎ๐๐ซ๐๐ง๐ญ๐๐๐ ๐๐ฌ ๐ญ๐จ ๐๐จ๐ฆ๐ฉ๐ฅ๐๐ญ๐๐ง๐๐ฌ๐ฌ ๐จ๐ซ ๐๐๐๐ฎ๐ซ๐๐๐ฒ.
tweet
Antonio Linares
5 companies with multi-bagger potential on my watchlist:
1. $CRWD: cybersecurity is now about getting more and better data than the next guy and using it to train AI models that keep the bad guys away. $CRWD has good odds of turning into a winner-takes-all in this space, thanks to the architectural advantage it has over peers. It's effectively evolving into a platform, which competitors will likely be forced to plug into eventually.
2. $PATH: although initially just a harmless productivity app that automates clicks by watching what end users do on their screens, as $PATH develops a semantic understanding of the workflows it automates it can eventually automate work of very high value, closer to a company's core value creation mechanism (instead of just clicks). $PATH has had no problem competing with $MSFT to date, even though it basically lives in $MFST's back yard.
3. $RBLX: the more I study this company, the more I realize it is the social media platform of choice for Gen Alpha (those born between 2010 and 2024). $RBLX has demonstrated the ability to retain users as they grow up, which makes it more likely than not that the platform will be much more relevant in 10 years time.
4. $SMCI: the world is slowing realizing that not all data can/should be handed over to $AMZN, $GOOG and the other cloud hyper-scalers. The demand for personalized and proprietary data-centers is thus going through the roof and $SMCI has been obsessing about every painful detail involved in personalizing and deploying a datacenter, when nobody else really cared.
5. $ROKU: although largely disdained by the market at present, $ROKU has a privileged position in the smart TV OS space. Over the last few years, we saw a slowdown in the streaming space, which also affected $NFLX for example, and the market attributed $ROKU's weaker numbers to increased competition with $AMZN and $GOOG. My view is that $ROKU still dominates these two larger players and that, as the world continues to pivot towards smart TVs, $ROKU continues to compound an enormously valuable piece of digital real estate, which it may be able to capitalize on down the line via better unit economics.
tweet
5 companies with multi-bagger potential on my watchlist:
1. $CRWD: cybersecurity is now about getting more and better data than the next guy and using it to train AI models that keep the bad guys away. $CRWD has good odds of turning into a winner-takes-all in this space, thanks to the architectural advantage it has over peers. It's effectively evolving into a platform, which competitors will likely be forced to plug into eventually.
2. $PATH: although initially just a harmless productivity app that automates clicks by watching what end users do on their screens, as $PATH develops a semantic understanding of the workflows it automates it can eventually automate work of very high value, closer to a company's core value creation mechanism (instead of just clicks). $PATH has had no problem competing with $MSFT to date, even though it basically lives in $MFST's back yard.
3. $RBLX: the more I study this company, the more I realize it is the social media platform of choice for Gen Alpha (those born between 2010 and 2024). $RBLX has demonstrated the ability to retain users as they grow up, which makes it more likely than not that the platform will be much more relevant in 10 years time.
4. $SMCI: the world is slowing realizing that not all data can/should be handed over to $AMZN, $GOOG and the other cloud hyper-scalers. The demand for personalized and proprietary data-centers is thus going through the roof and $SMCI has been obsessing about every painful detail involved in personalizing and deploying a datacenter, when nobody else really cared.
5. $ROKU: although largely disdained by the market at present, $ROKU has a privileged position in the smart TV OS space. Over the last few years, we saw a slowdown in the streaming space, which also affected $NFLX for example, and the market attributed $ROKU's weaker numbers to increased competition with $AMZN and $GOOG. My view is that $ROKU still dominates these two larger players and that, as the world continues to pivot towards smart TVs, $ROKU continues to compound an enormously valuable piece of digital real estate, which it may be able to capitalize on down the line via better unit economics.
tweet
Offshore
Photo
Giuliano
This extract from The Wealth of Nations is fundamental for understanding currency depreciation.
It will be curious to observe what happens with Argentina's Peso. https://t.co/CfnDDiuc0h
tweet
This extract from The Wealth of Nations is fundamental for understanding currency depreciation.
It will be curious to observe what happens with Argentina's Peso. https://t.co/CfnDDiuc0h
tweet
Offshore
Photo
๎จ Q-Cap ๎จ
From Forbes in 2013.
One of the best articles I read on Palantirโs crazy govโt linked history.
TIL In 2005, the CIA literally saved Palantir from disappearing into the abyss with a $2M investment through its venture arm In-Q-Tel.
Also, this bit about Karp is worth every penny.
Still not investing in it but I like this guy now lol
tweet
From Forbes in 2013.
One of the best articles I read on Palantirโs crazy govโt linked history.
TIL In 2005, the CIA literally saved Palantir from disappearing into the abyss with a $2M investment through its venture arm In-Q-Tel.
Also, this bit about Karp is worth every penny.
Still not investing in it but I like this guy now lol
tweet
Offshore
Photo
Hidden Value Gems
A great post by @JohnHuber72 on the rising capital intensity of the Big Tech and the implications for earnings quality and future returns.
1/ Capex [of Big 4 Tech companies] is now over 3 times depreciation expense.
2/ This spending hasnโt yet hit the income statement, but it will in the next few years as depreciation expenses are set to triple in the coming years as D&A catches up with todayโs capex spending.
3/ If the returns on these investments are good, then sales growth will be able to absorb these much higher expenses. But this is not a sure thing.
4/ While the P/E ratios range from 25 to 35, the P/FCF ranges from 40-50.
5/ โIโm not predicting a poor result, but Iโm mindful of how difficult it will be given how different the companies are today.โ
6/ They used to grow with very little capital invested, but now they have a mountain of capital to deploy, which is obviously much harder at 7 times the size.
tweet
A great post by @JohnHuber72 on the rising capital intensity of the Big Tech and the implications for earnings quality and future returns.
1/ Capex [of Big 4 Tech companies] is now over 3 times depreciation expense.
2/ This spending hasnโt yet hit the income statement, but it will in the next few years as depreciation expenses are set to triple in the coming years as D&A catches up with todayโs capex spending.
3/ If the returns on these investments are good, then sales growth will be able to absorb these much higher expenses. But this is not a sure thing.
4/ While the P/E ratios range from 25 to 35, the P/FCF ranges from 40-50.
5/ โIโm not predicting a poor result, but Iโm mindful of how difficult it will be given how different the companies are today.โ
6/ They used to grow with very little capital invested, but now they have a mountain of capital to deploy, which is obviously much harder at 7 times the size.
tweet