The Long Investor
$PFE will this find support on the 24 year old support line?

-6.5% dividend too
-FWD PE: 9.5

Risk v Reward looks good on the trend line. https://t.co/r0OSHCmwOS
tweet

The Long Investor
I don’t think this is a good idea.

People already struggle with their triggers and when the market is closed it gives people some relief and clarity.

This is just another way to increase transaction fees.

JUST IN: The New York Stock Exchange is considering a proposal for 24/7 trading, according to FT.

In other words, the stock market would never close much like crypto markets are now.

Should 24/7 trading be approved? https://t.co/IFOyrvsJNN - The Kobeissi Letter
tweet

Giuliano
$BUR's award on YPF-related assets are compounding at a 5.42% rate. https://t.co/xOnXk22FB4
tweet

Antonio Linares
Pegging your emotional state to price action is a terrible waste of time, because it's always a great day to find your next incredible investment opportunity.
tweet

Dimitry Nakhla | Babylon Capital®
10 QUALITY STOCKS THAT REDUCED SHARE COUNT >20% LAST 10 YEARS 💵

💸 Visa $V
•2013 shares: 2.62B
•LTM shares: 2.07B
•% reduction: 21%
•EPS boost: 26%

💳 Mastercard $MA
•2013 shares: 1.21B
•LTM shares: 946.00M
•% reduction: 22%
•EPS boost: 28%

🩻 Elevance Health $ELV
•2013 shares: 303.80M
•LTM shares: 236.03M
•% reduction: 22%
•EPS boost: 28%

☕️ Starbucks $SBUX
•2013 shares: 1.52B
•LTM shares: 1.15B
•% reduction: 24%
•EPS boost: 31%

🏢 NVR Inc $NVR
•2013 shares: 4.86M
•LTM shares: 3.44M
•% reduction: 29%
•EPS boost: 41%

📈 MSCI Inc $MSCI
•2013 shares: 121.07M
•LTM shares: 79.84M
•% reduction: 34%
•EPS boost: 51%

🍕 Domino’s Pizza $DPZ
•2013 shares: 57.72M
•LTM shares: 35.40M
•% reduction: 38%
•EPS boost: 61%

📲 Apple $AAPL
•2013 shares: 26.08B
•LTM shares: 15.71B
•% reduction: 40%
•EPS boost: 66%

🏚️ Lowe’s $LOW
•2013 shares: 1.15B
•LTM shares: 584.00M
•% reduction: 49%
•EPS boost: 96%

🚘 AutoZone $AZO
•2013 shares: 36.58M
•LTM shares: 18.37M
•% reduction: 49%
•EPS boost: 96%
___

***EPS BOOST means how much earnings per share increased (assuming 0 growth) solely from share buybacks💰
___

𝘼 𝙨𝙝𝙖𝙧𝙚 𝙗𝙪𝙮𝙗𝙖𝙘𝙠, 𝙖𝙡𝙨𝙤 𝙠𝙣𝙤𝙬𝙣 𝙖𝙨 𝙖 𝙨𝙩𝙤𝙘𝙠 𝙧𝙚𝙥𝙪𝙧𝙘𝙝𝙖𝙨𝙚, 𝙞𝙨 𝙬𝙝𝙚𝙣 𝙖 𝙘𝙤𝙢𝙥𝙖𝙣𝙮 𝙪𝙨𝙚𝙨 𝙞𝙩𝙨 𝙤𝙬𝙣 𝙛𝙪𝙣𝙙𝙨 𝙩𝙤 𝙗𝙪𝙮 𝙗𝙖𝙘𝙠 𝙞𝙩𝙨 𝙤𝙬𝙣 𝙨𝙝𝙖𝙧𝙚𝙨

𝘽𝙮 𝙙𝙤𝙞𝙣𝙜 𝙩𝙝𝙞𝙨, 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙘𝙤𝙢𝙥𝙖𝙣𝙮 𝙧𝙚𝙙𝙪𝙘𝙚𝙨 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙩𝙤𝙩𝙖𝙡 𝙣𝙪𝙢𝙗𝙚𝙧 𝙤𝙛 𝙤𝙪𝙩𝙨𝙩𝙖𝙣𝙙𝙞𝙣𝙜 𝙨𝙝𝙖𝙧𝙚𝙨 𝙖𝙫𝙖𝙞𝙡𝙖𝙗𝙡𝙚 𝙩𝙤 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙥𝙪𝙗𝙡𝙞𝙘, 𝙩𝙝𝙪𝙨 𝙞𝙣𝙘𝙧𝙚𝙖𝙨𝙞𝙣𝙜 𝙮𝙤𝙪𝙧 𝙥𝙚𝙧𝙘𝙚𝙣𝙩𝙖𝙜𝙚 𝙤𝙬𝙣𝙚𝙧𝙨𝙝𝙞𝙥 𝙤𝙛 𝙛𝙪𝙩𝙪𝙧𝙚 𝙚𝙖𝙧𝙣𝙞𝙣𝙜𝙨 𝙖𝙣𝙙 𝙛𝙧𝙚𝙚-𝙘𝙖𝙨𝙝-𝙛𝙡𝙤𝙬𝙨

𝙔𝙤𝙪 𝙘𝙖𝙣 𝙪𝙣𝙙𝙚𝙧𝙨𝙩𝙖𝙣𝙙 𝙬𝙝𝙮 𝙒𝙖𝙧𝙧𝙚𝙣 𝘽𝙪𝙛𝙛𝙚𝙩𝙩 𝙞𝙨 𝙖 𝙗𝙞𝙜 𝙛𝙖𝙣 𝙤𝙛 𝙨𝙝𝙖𝙧𝙚 𝙗𝙪𝙮𝙗𝙖𝙘𝙠𝙨.

𝙄𝙣 𝙝𝙞𝙨 2022 𝘼𝙣𝙣𝙪𝙖𝙡 𝙇𝙚𝙩𝙩𝙚𝙧, 𝘽𝙪𝙛𝙛𝙚𝙩𝙩 𝙬𝙧𝙤𝙩𝙚: “𝙏𝙝𝙚 𝙢𝙖𝙩𝙝 𝙞𝙨𝙣’𝙩 𝙘𝙤𝙢𝙥𝙡𝙞𝙘𝙖𝙩𝙚𝙙: 𝙒𝙝𝙚𝙣 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙨𝙝𝙖𝙧𝙚 𝙘𝙤𝙪𝙣𝙩 𝙜𝙤𝙚𝙨 𝙙𝙤𝙬𝙣, 𝙮𝙤𝙪𝙧 𝙞𝙣𝙩𝙚𝙧𝙚𝙨𝙩 𝙞𝙣 𝙤𝙪𝙧 𝙢𝙖𝙣𝙮 𝙗𝙪𝙨𝙞𝙣𝙚𝙨𝙨𝙚𝙨 𝙜𝙤𝙚𝙨 𝙪𝙥. 𝙀𝙫𝙚𝙧𝙮 𝙨𝙢𝙖𝙡𝙡 𝙗𝙞𝙩 𝙝𝙚𝙡𝙥𝙨 𝙞𝙛 𝙧𝙚𝙥𝙪𝙧𝙘𝙝𝙖𝙨𝙚𝙨 𝙖𝙧𝙚 𝙢𝙖𝙙𝙚 𝙖𝙩 𝙫𝙖𝙡𝙪𝙚-𝙖𝙘𝙘𝙧𝙚𝙩𝙞𝙫𝙚 𝙥𝙧𝙞𝙘𝙚𝙨”

#stocks #investing
_______

𝐃𝐈𝐒𝐂𝐋𝐎𝐒𝐔𝐑𝐄‼️: 𝐓𝐡𝐢𝐬 𝐢𝐬 𝐍𝐎𝐓 𝐈𝐧𝐯𝐞𝐬𝐭𝐦𝐞𝐧𝐭 𝐀𝐝𝐯𝐢𝐜𝐞. 𝐁𝐚𝐛𝐲𝐥𝐨𝐧 𝐂𝐚𝐩𝐢𝐭𝐚𝐥® 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐢𝐭𝐬 𝐫𝐞𝐩𝐫𝐞𝐬𝐞𝐧𝐭𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐯𝐞𝐬 𝐦𝐚𝐲 𝐡𝐚𝐯𝐞 𝐩𝐨𝐬𝐢𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧𝐬 𝐢𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐬𝐞𝐜𝐮𝐫𝐢𝐭𝐢𝐞𝐬 𝐝𝐢𝐬𝐜𝐮𝐬𝐬𝐞𝐝 𝐢𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐢𝐬 𝐭𝐰𝐞𝐞𝐭.

𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐢𝐧𝐟𝐨𝐫𝐦𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐜𝐨𝐧𝐭𝐚𝐢𝐧𝐞𝐝 𝐢𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐢𝐬 𝐭𝐰𝐞𝐞𝐭 𝐢𝐬 𝐢𝐧𝐭𝐞𝐧𝐝𝐞𝐝 𝐟𝐨𝐫 𝐢𝐧𝐟𝐨𝐫𝐦𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧𝐚𝐥 𝐩𝐮𝐫𝐩𝐨𝐬𝐞𝐬 𝐨𝐧𝐥𝐲 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐬𝐡𝐨𝐮𝐥𝐝 𝐧𝐨𝐭 𝐛𝐞 𝐜𝐨𝐧𝐬𝐭𝐫𝐮𝐞𝐝 𝐚𝐬 𝐢𝐧𝐯𝐞𝐬𝐭𝐦𝐞𝐧𝐭 𝐚𝐝𝐯𝐢𝐜𝐞 𝐭𝐨 𝐦𝐞𝐞𝐭 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐬𝐩𝐞𝐜𝐢𝐟𝐢𝐜 𝐧𝐞𝐞𝐝𝐬 𝐨𝐟 𝐚𝐧𝐲 𝐢𝐧𝐝𝐢𝐯𝐢𝐝𝐮𝐚𝐥 𝐨𝐫 𝐬𝐢𝐭𝐮𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧. 𝐏𝐚𝐬𝐭 𝐩𝐞𝐫𝐟𝐨𝐫𝐦𝐚𝐧𝐜𝐞 𝐢𝐬 𝐧𝐨 𝐠𝐮𝐚𝐫𝐚𝐧𝐭𝐞𝐞 𝐨𝐟 𝐟𝐮𝐭𝐮𝐫𝐞 𝐫𝐞𝐬𝐮𝐥𝐭𝐬.

𝐈𝐧𝐟𝐨𝐫𝐦𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐜𝐨𝐧𝐭𝐚𝐢𝐧𝐞𝐝 𝐢𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐢𝐬 𝐭𝐰𝐞𝐞𝐭 𝐡𝐚𝐬 𝐛𝐞𝐞𝐧 𝐨𝐛𝐭𝐚𝐢𝐧𝐞𝐝 𝐟𝐫𝐨𝐦 𝐬𝐨𝐮𝐫𝐜𝐞𝐬 𝐛𝐞𝐥𝐢𝐞𝐯𝐞𝐝 𝐭𝐨 𝐛𝐞 𝐫𝐞𝐥𝐢𝐚𝐛𝐥𝐞, 𝐛𝐮𝐭 𝐢𝐬 𝐧𝐨𝐭 𝐠𝐮𝐚𝐫𝐚𝐧𝐭𝐞𝐞𝐝 𝐚𝐬 𝐭𝐨 𝐜𝐨𝐦𝐩𝐥𝐞𝐭𝐞𝐧𝐞𝐬𝐬 𝐨𝐫 𝐚𝐜𝐜𝐮𝐫𝐚𝐜𝐲.
tweet

Brandon Beylo
This is why I love junior miners as a way to play the commodity cycle.

It's all about operating leverage.

For instance, miners capture 0.25x the move on the way up.

And 4x the move on the way down.

What other sector offers those returns?
tweet

The Long Investor
$LCID do we think $2.20 is going to hold?

Below this level and $LCID is in danger. https://t.co/0uFOGbZIgU

$LCID bonkers that this has a market cap of $6 Billion.

$2.20 will hit but will it hold? - The Long Investor
tweet

The Long Investor
$PYPL second fight in the battle zone and bulls have lost again.

Price is being held up by the 50 and 200 Day MA's so far.

US 10YR rising is the cause of this rejection we believe, we need to see that come down. https://t.co/YEPDsPf2Ok

$PYPL continues to ride the storm. https://t.co/En4p3hSJ8J - The Long Investor
tweet

The Long Investor
Every Long Term Investor should always be excited about a market correction, it is their time to add.
tweet

The Long Investor
$SPY the 200 Day MA is exactly at the 2021 High Line at $463.

Not a coincidence.

Rule of thumb for all Long Term Investors, accumulate under the the 200 Day MA in the $SPY and you will outperform every single Fund on Wall Street over a 10 year period.

You do not need a PM, guidance or need to pay any 2% and 20% bullshit fees.
tweet

The Long Investor
$SPY I have gone through every correction since 1993 and only once has the $SPY not retested the 50 Day MA from below before rejecting further down.

This happened in 2020 due Covid and the abrupt decline.

I suspect earnings will help retest the 50 Day MA but a rejection here and the correction is confirmed.
tweet

Antonio Linares
$NVDA bulls think that the company has mitigated the risk of being disrupted by $AMD's chiplet approach with the launch of the Blackwell architecture, but this is not totally true.

An in depth review of Blackwell’s architecture reveals that the chip essentially consists of two large chips connected to each other.

Previous $NVDA architectures were fundamentally similar. But for the first time, Blackwell’s two chips now act as one at the software and network level. As such, Blackwell is technically made of two chiplets and thus represents a tentative first step towards chiplet architecture.

In this sense, Blackwell is a provisional confirmation of my original observation: that Nvidia was going to have to pivot towards chiplets at some point.

However, each of these two chiplets are as large as they can be, right at the limits of reticle size. Nvidia is therefore already brushing the physical limit that makes producing monolithic chips exponentially harder as we move towards smaller process nodes.

To add more computational power from here, $NVDA faces either skyrocketing complexity within each of the two existing dies or the prospect of adding subsequent monolithic chips to its Blackwell architecture.

Therefore, if $NVDA does not fully pivot to $AMD's turf, over the long term one of two things can happen:

1. $NVDA stays ahead simply by connecting more monolithic chips (each at the limit of reticle size) as if they were chiplets, with $AMD staying a marginal player.

2. The above approach doesn’t scale so well, relative to $AMD’s ‘pure’ chiplet architecture, with $AMD gaining considerable market share even at the highest end.

A review of AMD’s CDNA3 architecture (that powers the MI300 family) reveals that, as anticipated, it is highly scalable, and each component (chiplet) is far away from the reticle limit.

$AMD therefore does not have to push the limits of physics to continue making higher performing GPUs from here. Rather, AMD just needs to carry on adding more chiplets–a skill it’s been honing for a decade now.

From a low level perspective, connecting monolithic chips as if they were chiplets is bound to deliver much lower yields than $AMD’s approach. In the former case, if one component goes wrong you have to throw away a highly costly marvel of modern engineering. In the latter approach, throwing away a tiny chiplet won’t cost as much.

If $NVDA does end up with meaningfully lower yields than $AMD, this does not automatically mean that it won’t produce the highest performing products.

Yield is a metric that concerns that manufacturing process and does not say anything about the performance of the chip in question.

What is clear to me, however, is that $AMD has a structural advantage to bring AI compute engines to the market with a differentiated price to performance ratio.
tweet