Offshore
Photo
Dimitry Nakhla | Babylon Capitalยฎ
RT @DimitryNakhla: @BourbonFps Really like $UNH here ๐๐ฝ
tweet
RT @DimitryNakhla: @BourbonFps Really like $UNH here ๐๐ฝ
A sober valuation analysis on $UNH ๐ง๐ฝโโ๏ธ
โขNTM P/E Ratio: 16.50x
โข5-Year Mean: 19.67x
โขNTM FCF Yield: 6.84%
โข5-Year Mean: 5.86%
As you can see, $UNH appears to be trading below fair value
Going forward, investors can receive ~19% MORE in earnings per share & ~17% MORE in FCF per share ๐ง ***
Before we get into valuation, letโs take a look at why $UNH is a great business
BALANCE SHEETโ
โขCash & Total Inv: $75.34B
โขLong-Term Debt: $58.26B
$UNH has a strong balance sheet, an A+ S&P Credit Rating & 8.96x FFO Interest Coverage
RETURN ON CAPITALโ
โข2019: 18.6%
โข2020: 19.1%
โข2021: 19.1%
โข2022: 19.4%
โข2023: 19.1%
RETURN ON EQUITYโ
โข2019: 24.1%
โข2020: 23.8%
โข2021: 24.1%
โข2022: 25.4%
โข2023: 25.0%
$UNH has strong return metrics, highlighting the financial efficiency of the business
REVENUESโ
โข2013: $122.49B
โข2023: $371.62B
โขCAGR: 11.73%
FREE CASH FLOWโ
โข2013: $5.68B
โข2023: $25.68B
โขCAGR: 16.28%
NORMALIZED EPSโ
โข2013: $5.50
โข2023: $25.12
โขCAGR: 16.40%
PAID DIVIDENDSโ
โข2013: $1.05
โข2023: $7.29
โขCAGR: 21.38%
SHARE BUYBACKSโ
โข2013 Shares Outstanding: 1.02B
โขLTM Shares Outstanding: 0.94B
By reducing its shares outstanding ~7.8%, $UNH increased its EPS by ~8.4% (assuming 0 growth)
MARGINSโ
โขLTM Gross Margins: 14.6%
โขLTM Operating Margins: 8.7%
โขLTM Net Income Margins: 6.0%
***NOW TO VALUATION ๐ง
As stated above, investors can expect to receive ~19% MORE in EPS & ~17% more in FCF per share
Using Benjamin Grahamโs 2G rule of thumb, $UNH has to grow earnings at a 8.25% CAGR over the next several years to justify its valuation
Today, analysts anticipate 2024 - 2025 EPS growth over the next few years to be more than the (8.25%) required growth rate
However, consider the recent Medicare Rate Decision, Iโve assumed only a 10% EPS growth rate for 2025 & 2026 ๐ก (well below the current expected rates of 12.8% for both years):
2024E: $27.77 (10.6% YoY) *FY Dec
2025E: $30.54 (10.0% YoY)
2026E: $33.59 (10.0% YoY)
$UNH has an excellent track record of meeting analyst estimates ~2 years out, so letโs assume $UNH ends 2026 with $33.59 in EPS & see its CAGR potential assuming different multiples
19x P/E: $638.21๐ต โฆ ~14.3% CAGR
18x P/E: $604.62๐ต โฆ ~12.1% CAGR
17x P/E: $571.03๐ต โฆ ~9.9% CAGR
As you can see, $UNH appears to have attractive return potential even if we assume 18x earnings (a multiple below both its 5-year & 10-year mean) & a reduced growth rate
Thatโs a great rate of return for an excellent capital allocator & wide-moat recession-proof business like $UNH
Today at $458๐ต $UNH appears to be a strong consideration for investment
However, keep in mind how volatile $UNH (and all health insurers) can get amid regulatory & political risks
Those considering $UNH would be wise to piece into the position, leaving room for additional purchases if $UNH continues to trade down to an even more attractive valuation
E.g. 1/3 of the purchase at $458๐ต, another 1/3 at $410๐ต, & 1/3 at $380๐ต
#stocks #investing
___
๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐โผ๏ธ: ๐๐ก๐ข๐ฌ ๐ข๐ฌ ๐๐๐ ๐๐ง๐ฏ๐๐ฌ๐ญ๐ฆ๐๐ง๐ญ ๐๐๐ฏ๐ข๐๐. ๐๐๐๐ฒ๐ฅ๐จ๐ง ๐๐๐ฉ๐ข๐ญ๐๐ฅยฎ ๐๐ง๐ ๐ข๐ญ๐ฌ ๐ซ๐๐ฉ๐ซ๐๐ฌ๐๐ง๐ญ๐๐ญ๐ข๐ฏ๐๐ฌ ๐ฆ๐๐ฒ ๐ก๐๐ฏ๐ ๐ฉ๐จ๐ฌ๐ข๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง๐ฌ ๐ข๐ง ๐ญ๐ก๐ ๐ฌ๐๐๐ฎ๐ซ๐ข๐ญ๐ข๐๐ฌ ๐๐ข๐ฌ๐๐ฎ๐ฌ๐ฌ๐๐ ๐ข๐ง ๐ญ๐ก๐ข๐ฌ ๐ญ๐ฐ๐๐๐ญ.
๐๐ก๐ ๐ข๐ง๐๐จ๐ซ๐ฆ๐๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง ๐๐จ๐ง๐ญ๐๐ข๐ง๐๐ ๐ข๐ง ๐ญ๐ก๐ข๐ฌ ๐ญ๐ฐ๐๐๐ญ ๐ข๐ฌ ๐ข๐ง๐ญ๐๐ง๐๐๐ ๐๐จ๐ซ ๐ข๐ง๐๐จ๐ซ๐ฆ๐๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง๐๐ฅ ๐ฉ๐ฎ๐ซ๐ฉ๐จ๐ฌ๐๐ฌ ๐จ๐ง๐ฅ๐ฒ ๐๐ง๐ ๐ฌ๐ก๐จ๐ฎ๐ฅ๐ ๐ง๐จ๐ญ ๐๐ ๐๐จ๐ง๐ฌ๐ญ๐ซ๐ฎ๐๐ ๐๐ฌ ๐ข๐ง๐ฏ๐๐ฌ๐ญ๐ฆ๐๐ง๐ญ ๐๐๐ฏ๐ข๐๐ ๐ญ๐จ ๐ฆ๐๐๐ญ ๐ญ๐ก๐ ๐ฌ๐ฉ๐๐๐ข๐๐ข๐ ๐ง๐๐๐๐ฌ ๐จ๐ ๐๐ง๐ฒ ๐ข๐ง๐๐ข๐ฏ๐ข๐๐ฎ๐๐ฅ ๐จ๐ซ ๐ฌ๐ข๐ญ๐ฎ๐๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง. ๐๐๐ฌ๐ญ ๐ฉ๐๐ซ๐๐จ๐ซ๐ฆ๐๐ง๐๐ ๐ข๐ฌ ๐ง๐จ ๐ ๐ฎ๐๐ซ๐๐ง๐ญ๐๐ ๐จ๐ ๐๐ฎ๐ญ๐ฎ๐ซ๐ ๐ซ๐๐ฌ๐ฎ๐ฅ๐ญ๐ฌ.
๐๐ง๐๐จ๐ซ๐ฆ๐๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง ๐๐จ๐ง๐ญ๐๐ข๐ง๐๐ ๐ข๐ง ๐ญ๐ก๐ข๐ฌ ๐ญ๐ฐ๐๐๐ญ ๐ก๐๐ฌ ๐๐๐๐ง ๐จ๐๐ญ๐๐ข๐ง๐๐ ๐๐ซ๐จ๐ฆ ๐ฌ๐จ๐ฎ๐ซ๐๐๐ฌ ๐๐๐ฅ๐ข๐๐ฏ๐๐ ๐ญ๐จ ๐๐ ๐ซ๐๐ฅ๐ข๐๐๐ฅ๐, ๐๐ฎ๐ญ ๐ข๐ฌ ๐ง๐จ๐ญ ๐ ๐ฎ๐๐ซ๐๐ง๐ญ๐๐๐ ๐๐ฌ ๐ญ๐จ ๐๐จ๐ฆ๐ฉ๐ฅ๐๐ญ๐๐ง๐๐ฌ๐ฌ ๐จ๐ซ ๐๐๐๐ฎ๐ซ๐๐๐ฒ. - Dimitry Nakhla | Babylon Capitalยฎtweet
The Long Investor
I believe there are three types of investors:
1. The Buy and Hold investor, any substantial dip and this investor buys, focuses solely on Long Term, most suited for buying ETF's such as the $SPY.
2. The Buy before the breakout investor (High Risk)...this investor usually struggles to wait for confirmation out of fear of missing a strong bounce, usually very convinced of their assessment.
3. The Buy after support is confirmed investor (Low Risk) This Investor prefers to give up some gains in order to lower their risk, this is harder to do because you need more discipline then Investor Number 2.
- Ideal: Investor Number 3
- Most people are: Investor Number 2
- Rare: Investor Number 1.
tweet
I believe there are three types of investors:
1. The Buy and Hold investor, any substantial dip and this investor buys, focuses solely on Long Term, most suited for buying ETF's such as the $SPY.
2. The Buy before the breakout investor (High Risk)...this investor usually struggles to wait for confirmation out of fear of missing a strong bounce, usually very convinced of their assessment.
3. The Buy after support is confirmed investor (Low Risk) This Investor prefers to give up some gains in order to lower their risk, this is harder to do because you need more discipline then Investor Number 2.
- Ideal: Investor Number 3
- Most people are: Investor Number 2
- Rare: Investor Number 1.
tweet
The Long Investor
IMF has just said that the US will grow by 2.7% this year.
Double the rate of some G7 peers
Meanwhile China has grown by over 5% in 2023 and expected to grow by 5% in 2024
https://t.co/zyUiFRYR1y
tweet
IMF has just said that the US will grow by 2.7% this year.
Double the rate of some G7 peers
Meanwhile China has grown by over 5% in 2023 and expected to grow by 5% in 2024
https://t.co/zyUiFRYR1y
tweet
Offshore
Photo
Giuliano
With the objective of analyzing some Latin American equities, I'll try expand my circle of competence. https://t.co/u5Wj35xNBy
tweet
With the objective of analyzing some Latin American equities, I'll try expand my circle of competence. https://t.co/u5Wj35xNBy
tweet
Offshore
Photo
The Long Investor
$TSLA $144 now appears inevitable.
It either holds there or $102 is tested next. https://t.co/u7SFeWHiLK
tweet
$TSLA $144 now appears inevitable.
It either holds there or $102 is tested next. https://t.co/u7SFeWHiLK
$TSLA's move today I believe is preparing them for Long Term.
They currently have 140,000 employees with a 1.8 million output of vehicles per year.
$F currently employs 170,000 employees with an output of 4.4 million vehicles per year.
$TSLA need to automate and become more efficient, this was the aim today by reducing their head count.
Also their chart is beautiful. - The Long Investortweet
Offshore
Photo
The Long Investor
$VIX up 25%
- Broke out of its channel
and about to get a golden cross. https://t.co/BhHnjCgcsQ
tweet
$VIX up 25%
- Broke out of its channel
and about to get a golden cross. https://t.co/BhHnjCgcsQ
tweet
Offshore
Photo
The Long Investor
$AMZN hard to argue the significance of this rejection at its ATH line. https://t.co/FX2hd82YRU
tweet
$AMZN hard to argue the significance of this rejection at its ATH line. https://t.co/FX2hd82YRU
$AMZN hitting $189 yesterday signalled the last of the Mega Caps to reach their ATH levels after the 2021 decline.
Wave 5โs typically need to reach a higher high to complete, which is found now in all Mega Caps and the $SPY
Extraordinary timing to complete only yesterday.
The market is showing reversal indications on a number of fronts now.
When the $SPY and $QQQ lose their 50 Day MA, plans to conserve capital (if you have not done this already) should be put in place.
There is no excuse not to be prepared now - The Long Investortweet
The Long Investor
BYD has a whopping 700k employees and produced 3 million cars in 2023.
That is 4 cars per employee.
Ha
So they are either planning for a massive expansion or their costs of labour is so low that many western manufacturers can not compete with this.
Either way, both adds pressure on $TSLA.
tweet
BYD has a whopping 700k employees and produced 3 million cars in 2023.
That is 4 cars per employee.
Ha
So they are either planning for a massive expansion or their costs of labour is so low that many western manufacturers can not compete with this.
Either way, both adds pressure on $TSLA.
tweet
Giuliano
Munger on the cost of capital
โObviously, considerations of costs are important in business, And we always had that kind of thinking."
"Of course capital isnโt free, and you can easily figure your cost of loans, but the theorists had to make a measure for what equity costs, and there they just went bonkers.โ
โThey said that if you earn a 100% percent on capital because you have such a lovely business, your cost of capital is a 100% and therefore you shouldnโt look at opportunities that generates a lousy 80%, that is the kind of thinking that came out of the capital-asset pricing models that I always considered insanityโ
โWhat is Berkshire Hathaway cost of capital? We have this damn capital, it just keeps on multiplying, what is its cost?
You have perfectly good old-fashioned doctrines like opportunity cost, and in every single time we consider an investment, we need to compare it to the best alternative investment we have at that time. But such perfectly good doctrines were not good enough for these modern theorists, so they invented all this ridiculous mathematics which concluded that the companies that made the most money had the highest cost of capital. All I can say that this is not for us.โ
h/t Investorhub Blog.
tweet
Munger on the cost of capital
โObviously, considerations of costs are important in business, And we always had that kind of thinking."
"Of course capital isnโt free, and you can easily figure your cost of loans, but the theorists had to make a measure for what equity costs, and there they just went bonkers.โ
โThey said that if you earn a 100% percent on capital because you have such a lovely business, your cost of capital is a 100% and therefore you shouldnโt look at opportunities that generates a lousy 80%, that is the kind of thinking that came out of the capital-asset pricing models that I always considered insanityโ
โWhat is Berkshire Hathaway cost of capital? We have this damn capital, it just keeps on multiplying, what is its cost?
You have perfectly good old-fashioned doctrines like opportunity cost, and in every single time we consider an investment, we need to compare it to the best alternative investment we have at that time. But such perfectly good doctrines were not good enough for these modern theorists, so they invented all this ridiculous mathematics which concluded that the companies that made the most money had the highest cost of capital. All I can say that this is not for us.โ
h/t Investorhub Blog.
tweet