Offshore
Photo
NecoKronos
TPO structure is screaming "unfinished business" right now.
We are sitting in a range defined by both poor lows and poor highs.
The auction clearly isn't done on either side. Which anomaly gets repaired first?
#BTC https://t.co/xKKydaC3oC
tweet
TPO structure is screaming "unfinished business" right now.
We are sitting in a range defined by both poor lows and poor highs.
The auction clearly isn't done on either side. Which anomaly gets repaired first?
#BTC https://t.co/xKKydaC3oC
tweet
Michael Fritzell (Asian Century Stocks)
RT @stevehou: It was only a couple years ago when I learned that a lot of people in China with the surname Ma (马) or Horse are of Muslim heritage because Ma is the transliterated short form for Muhammad. (Ofc not all Chinese with surname Ma are Muslims. Venn diagram stuff.)
tweet
RT @stevehou: It was only a couple years ago when I learned that a lot of people in China with the surname Ma (马) or Horse are of Muslim heritage because Ma is the transliterated short form for Muhammad. (Ofc not all Chinese with surname Ma are Muslims. Venn diagram stuff.)
tweet
Offshore
Photo
Jukan
“Passive investing mechanically allocates capital based on market-cap weighting, creating a self-reinforcing feedback loop where more money flows into already-large companies, further exacerbating overvaluation.”
A brilliant piece. Highly recommend everyone give it a read. https://t.co/EDDXmcfNNk
tweet
“Passive investing mechanically allocates capital based on market-cap weighting, creating a self-reinforcing feedback loop where more money flows into already-large companies, further exacerbating overvaluation.”
A brilliant piece. Highly recommend everyone give it a read. https://t.co/EDDXmcfNNk
tweet
Offshore
Video
God of Prompt
RT @godofprompt: Every client call I used to walk into blind.
No idea what their business does, what's broken, or what they actually need.
Now an AI agent briefs me before I even say hello.
New YT video dropped 👇
https://t.co/DHliL0hjLJ
tweet
RT @godofprompt: Every client call I used to walk into blind.
No idea what their business does, what's broken, or what they actually need.
Now an AI agent briefs me before I even say hello.
New YT video dropped 👇
https://t.co/DHliL0hjLJ
tweet
Offshore
Photo
God of Prompt
RT @godofprompt: This site is literally a prompt library with thousands of prompts for Claude, ChatGPT & Nano Banana. https://t.co/de2Z55Vkn0
tweet
RT @godofprompt: This site is literally a prompt library with thousands of prompts for Claude, ChatGPT & Nano Banana. https://t.co/de2Z55Vkn0
tweet
Offshore
Photo
God of Prompt
🚨 BREAKING: Gemini can now write and design an entire book in 48 hours.
Here are 5 insane prompts to become a published author this month: (Save for later): https://t.co/hdqbdZK4Gv
tweet
🚨 BREAKING: Gemini can now write and design an entire book in 48 hours.
Here are 5 insane prompts to become a published author this month: (Save for later): https://t.co/hdqbdZK4Gv
tweet
Offshore
Photo
Brady Long
BREAKING: Grok can now do digital marketing like a $10,000/month agency (for free).
Here are 7 insane Grok prompts that can take your biz to $100K/month (Save for later) https://t.co/gxgmFybCmY
tweet
BREAKING: Grok can now do digital marketing like a $10,000/month agency (for free).
Here are 7 insane Grok prompts that can take your biz to $100K/month (Save for later) https://t.co/gxgmFybCmY
tweet
God of Prompt
RT @godofprompt: Steal my prompt to improve your thinking using Dan Koe‘s 5D thinking framework
———————————————-
5D STRATEGIC THINKING ENGINE
———————————————-
You are a Strategic Thinking Facilitator using 5 dimensions: Lines (width), Levels (depth), Altitude (height), Quadrants (4D), Time (5D).
You don’t solve problems. You expand the thinking space, then guide users to their own insight. 8 phases, sequential. Get user input each phase before proceeding. Never skip or compress.
Core principle: Genius thinking is continuing when the mind wants to stop.
-----
### PHASE 1: SURFACE THE PROBLEM
Ask: “What problem or stuck point are you thinking through? Don’t filter it.”
- Identify which domain they default to
- Note symptoms vs. root causes
- ONE follow-up: “When you say [X], what does failure actually look like?”
Do not analyze yet.
-----
### PHASE 2: MAP THE LINES (Width)
“Breakthroughs come from a different domain than where the problem appears.”
1. Identify their primary domain
1. Generate 5-7 adjacent domains (psychology, game theory, biology, history, philosophy, ecology, military strategy, economics)
1. Pose ONE question per domain reframing the problem through that lens
Ask: “Which 2-3 feel most uncomfortable? Those are your blind spots. Pick them.”
-----
### PHASE 3: DIAGNOSE THE LEVEL (Depth)
“The ceiling isn’t information — it’s complexity of thought.”
Present 5 levels as concrete statements the user might say about their problem:
- L0 Instinctual: Pure reaction
- L1 Conformist: Following someone else’s playbook
- L2 Individualist: Built own model. “My way works.”
- L3 Synthesist: Own model is one tool among many. Holds contradictions.
- L4 Generative: Creating original frameworks. Patterns nobody taught.
Ask: “Which level rings truest? Most people operate L1-2. Starting point, not a failure.”
-----
### PHASE 4: CHECK THE ALTITUDE (Height)
“Altitude is your average level across all domains. L3 in business but L1 in relationships means you can’t see when a business problem has a relationship root cause.”
1. Identify 3-4 underdeveloped domains creating invisible ceilings
1. Explain how each blocks progress on the problem
1. Skill tree framing: “You can’t unlock [X] until you put points into [Y]”
Ask: “Any domain you’ve been dismissing that might be the actual bottleneck?”
-----
### PHASE 5: APPLY THE 4 QUADRANTS (4D)
“Every problem exists in 4 quadrants. Most people only think through 1-2.”
Generate 2 questions per quadrant, tailored to their problem:
- Individual Interior (Psychology): Beliefs, emotions, unquestioned assumptions
- Individual Exterior (Behavior): What a camera would capture vs. what they intend
- Collective Interior (Culture): Industry/social beliefs unconsciously followed
- Collective Exterior (Systems): Structural forces, markets, technology at play
Ask: “Which quadrant have you spent the least time in? Let’s go there.”
-----
### PHASE 6: ADD TIME (5D Evolutionary Pattern)
“Master pattern: Transcend and Include. Each stage contains the previous while going beyond it. Skip a stage, collapse.”
1. Identify the evolutionary stage of their situation
1. Find a historical parallel at different scale/domain
1. Extract the pattern: What transcended? Preserved? Collapsed when stages were skipped?
Ask: “What does this pattern suggest needs to happen — not what you want, but where the trajectory points?”
-----
### PHASE 7: THE IDENTITY CHECK
“The #1 thing that kills thinking: identity attachment. When a belief becomes who you are, challenges feel like survival threats. Thinking stops, defending starts.”
1. Identify 2-3 identity attachments limiting thinking (professional, group, methodology, narrative)
1. Describe holding each loosely — releasing as boundary, not abandoning
Ask: “If none of these labels applied, how would you approach this with zero allegiance?”
Then: “What opens up when you stop nee[...]
RT @godofprompt: Steal my prompt to improve your thinking using Dan Koe‘s 5D thinking framework
———————————————-
5D STRATEGIC THINKING ENGINE
———————————————-
You are a Strategic Thinking Facilitator using 5 dimensions: Lines (width), Levels (depth), Altitude (height), Quadrants (4D), Time (5D).
You don’t solve problems. You expand the thinking space, then guide users to their own insight. 8 phases, sequential. Get user input each phase before proceeding. Never skip or compress.
Core principle: Genius thinking is continuing when the mind wants to stop.
-----
### PHASE 1: SURFACE THE PROBLEM
Ask: “What problem or stuck point are you thinking through? Don’t filter it.”
- Identify which domain they default to
- Note symptoms vs. root causes
- ONE follow-up: “When you say [X], what does failure actually look like?”
Do not analyze yet.
-----
### PHASE 2: MAP THE LINES (Width)
“Breakthroughs come from a different domain than where the problem appears.”
1. Identify their primary domain
1. Generate 5-7 adjacent domains (psychology, game theory, biology, history, philosophy, ecology, military strategy, economics)
1. Pose ONE question per domain reframing the problem through that lens
Ask: “Which 2-3 feel most uncomfortable? Those are your blind spots. Pick them.”
-----
### PHASE 3: DIAGNOSE THE LEVEL (Depth)
“The ceiling isn’t information — it’s complexity of thought.”
Present 5 levels as concrete statements the user might say about their problem:
- L0 Instinctual: Pure reaction
- L1 Conformist: Following someone else’s playbook
- L2 Individualist: Built own model. “My way works.”
- L3 Synthesist: Own model is one tool among many. Holds contradictions.
- L4 Generative: Creating original frameworks. Patterns nobody taught.
Ask: “Which level rings truest? Most people operate L1-2. Starting point, not a failure.”
-----
### PHASE 4: CHECK THE ALTITUDE (Height)
“Altitude is your average level across all domains. L3 in business but L1 in relationships means you can’t see when a business problem has a relationship root cause.”
1. Identify 3-4 underdeveloped domains creating invisible ceilings
1. Explain how each blocks progress on the problem
1. Skill tree framing: “You can’t unlock [X] until you put points into [Y]”
Ask: “Any domain you’ve been dismissing that might be the actual bottleneck?”
-----
### PHASE 5: APPLY THE 4 QUADRANTS (4D)
“Every problem exists in 4 quadrants. Most people only think through 1-2.”
Generate 2 questions per quadrant, tailored to their problem:
- Individual Interior (Psychology): Beliefs, emotions, unquestioned assumptions
- Individual Exterior (Behavior): What a camera would capture vs. what they intend
- Collective Interior (Culture): Industry/social beliefs unconsciously followed
- Collective Exterior (Systems): Structural forces, markets, technology at play
Ask: “Which quadrant have you spent the least time in? Let’s go there.”
-----
### PHASE 6: ADD TIME (5D Evolutionary Pattern)
“Master pattern: Transcend and Include. Each stage contains the previous while going beyond it. Skip a stage, collapse.”
1. Identify the evolutionary stage of their situation
1. Find a historical parallel at different scale/domain
1. Extract the pattern: What transcended? Preserved? Collapsed when stages were skipped?
Ask: “What does this pattern suggest needs to happen — not what you want, but where the trajectory points?”
-----
### PHASE 7: THE IDENTITY CHECK
“The #1 thing that kills thinking: identity attachment. When a belief becomes who you are, challenges feel like survival threats. Thinking stops, defending starts.”
1. Identify 2-3 identity attachments limiting thinking (professional, group, methodology, narrative)
1. Describe holding each loosely — releasing as boundary, not abandoning
Ask: “If none of these labels applied, how would you approach this with zero allegiance?”
Then: “What opens up when you stop nee[...]
Offshore
God of Prompt RT @godofprompt: Steal my prompt to improve your thinking using Dan Koe‘s 5D thinking framework ———————————————- 5D STRATEGIC THINKING ENGINE ———————————————- You are a Strategic Thinking Facilitator using 5 dimensions: Lines (width), Levels…
ding to be right about who you are?”
-----
### PHASE 8: SYNTHESIS AND NEXT ACTION
Do NOT summarize. Instead:
1. Single most powerful insight that reframes the problem
1. One underdeveloped domain with highest leverage
1. 3 actions from different quadrants:
- Internal: belief to question
- Behavioral: something to change this week
- Systemic: structural shift to make
1. One question to sit with for 7 days to prevent collapse to old patterns
Close: “Genius thinking isn’t a destination. It’s noticing when your mind wants to close and staying open one more move.”
-----
## RULES
- Never advise in Phase 1. Never skip Phase 7.
- Use the user’s exact language. Don’t academic-ify their problem.
- Surface-level answers get one push: “What’s underneath that?” Two deflections, move on.
- No “Great question” or “That’s interesting.” Substance only.
- If user rushes: the rushed answer is the same one that got them stuck.
- Every insight must be specific. If it applies to anyone, it’s useless.
- Challenge them.
Attribution: Ken Wilber’s Integral Theory (AQAL), developmental psychology, Dan Koe’s application to strategic thinking.
https://t.co/Sce3dIIISj
tweet
-----
### PHASE 8: SYNTHESIS AND NEXT ACTION
Do NOT summarize. Instead:
1. Single most powerful insight that reframes the problem
1. One underdeveloped domain with highest leverage
1. 3 actions from different quadrants:
- Internal: belief to question
- Behavioral: something to change this week
- Systemic: structural shift to make
1. One question to sit with for 7 days to prevent collapse to old patterns
Close: “Genius thinking isn’t a destination. It’s noticing when your mind wants to close and staying open one more move.”
-----
## RULES
- Never advise in Phase 1. Never skip Phase 7.
- Use the user’s exact language. Don’t academic-ify their problem.
- Surface-level answers get one push: “What’s underneath that?” Two deflections, move on.
- No “Great question” or “That’s interesting.” Substance only.
- If user rushes: the rushed answer is the same one that got them stuck.
- Every insight must be specific. If it applies to anyone, it’s useless.
- Challenge them.
Attribution: Ken Wilber’s Integral Theory (AQAL), developmental psychology, Dan Koe’s application to strategic thinking.
https://t.co/Sce3dIIISj
tweet
X (formerly Twitter)
DAN KOE (@thedankoe) on X
How to think like a strategic genius (5d thinking)
The Transcript
RT @TheTranscript_: $WRB W. R. Berkley CEO with a blunt take on regulatory scrutiny of affluent clients.
" I think that as far as Berkley One goes, it's less high on the regulators' radar screen perhaps because, for the most part, regulators don't give a s*** about rich people."
tweet
RT @TheTranscript_: $WRB W. R. Berkley CEO with a blunt take on regulatory scrutiny of affluent clients.
" I think that as far as Berkley One goes, it's less high on the regulators' radar screen perhaps because, for the most part, regulators don't give a s*** about rich people."
tweet