Offshore
Photo
Fiscal.ai
Boeing reported 600 commercial airplane deliveries in 2025.
That's their highest figure since 2018.
Can Boeing get back to its former production levels?
$BA https://t.co/deegYQaQDf
tweet
Boeing reported 600 commercial airplane deliveries in 2025.
That's their highest figure since 2018.
Can Boeing get back to its former production levels?
$BA https://t.co/deegYQaQDf
tweet
Offshore
Photo
Moon Dev
i cant believe i showed this on the zoom today
there is no other quant in the world who will give as much as me
i believe code is the great equalizer https://t.co/hP3tGhE2UE
tweet
i cant believe i showed this on the zoom today
there is no other quant in the world who will give as much as me
i believe code is the great equalizer https://t.co/hP3tGhE2UE
tweet
Offshore
Photo
Fiscal.ai
Apple Services might be one of the best businesses in all of big tech.
Services Revenue: $113 billion
Services Gross Profit: $86 billion
$AAPL https://t.co/KcBRMO8vEF
tweet
Apple Services might be one of the best businesses in all of big tech.
Services Revenue: $113 billion
Services Gross Profit: $86 billion
$AAPL https://t.co/KcBRMO8vEF
tweet
Offshore
Video
God of Prompt
RT @prompt_copilot: > initial prompt: analyze my competitors
> enhanced prompt with my context (one click):
#CONTEXT:
Adopt the role of an expert marketing strategist with deep expertise in AI-powered SaaS platforms targeting busy entrepreneurs. The domain involves analyzing competitive positioning in the AI prompts and automation tools space, where differentiation hinges on content depth, usability, and community trust among U.S.-based business owners aged 24–55.
#GOAL:
Identify and evaluate my top 5 direct competitors in the AI prompts and automation tools market to uncover gaps, strengths, and opportunities for my platform, https://t.co/nL3FjtI1xb.
#RESPONSE GUIDELINES:
1. List the top 5 competitors offering AI prompts, guides, or toolkits for entrepreneurs, using traffic data (SimilarWeb) and product scope as criteria.
2. Compare their content depth (prompt count), platform coverage (ChatGPT, Claude, Midjourney, etc.), and automation integrations (e.g., n8n, Zapier).
3. Analyze their messaging tone and value proposition using your empowering style as a benchmark.
4. Map their audience engagement tactics (social proof, testimonials, featured outlets) against your 25K+ user base claim.
5. Use the SWOT framework to summarize one actionable opportunity and one critical threat per competitor.
#COMPETITOR ANALYSIS CRITERIA:
- Prioritize competitors with direct overlap in AI prompt libraries and entrepreneur targeting
- Exclude generic AI tool directories without curated prompt collections
- Emphasize measurable differentiators: prompt volume, automation depth, and community trust signals
- Avoid subjective opinions; base all claims on public data from their websites, social channels, and third-party tools
#INFORMATION ABOUT ME:
My domain: marketing
My business: https://t.co/wEzdv3raVZ
My target audience: 24–55-year-old male business owners and entrepreneurs in the USA
My unique value: 30,000+ AI prompts, guides, and automations in one bundle, loved by 25K+ users
#RESPONSE FORMAT:
Deliver as a numbered list with subpoints for each competitor, followed by a consolidated SWOT summary table.
tweet
RT @prompt_copilot: > initial prompt: analyze my competitors
> enhanced prompt with my context (one click):
#CONTEXT:
Adopt the role of an expert marketing strategist with deep expertise in AI-powered SaaS platforms targeting busy entrepreneurs. The domain involves analyzing competitive positioning in the AI prompts and automation tools space, where differentiation hinges on content depth, usability, and community trust among U.S.-based business owners aged 24–55.
#GOAL:
Identify and evaluate my top 5 direct competitors in the AI prompts and automation tools market to uncover gaps, strengths, and opportunities for my platform, https://t.co/nL3FjtI1xb.
#RESPONSE GUIDELINES:
1. List the top 5 competitors offering AI prompts, guides, or toolkits for entrepreneurs, using traffic data (SimilarWeb) and product scope as criteria.
2. Compare their content depth (prompt count), platform coverage (ChatGPT, Claude, Midjourney, etc.), and automation integrations (e.g., n8n, Zapier).
3. Analyze their messaging tone and value proposition using your empowering style as a benchmark.
4. Map their audience engagement tactics (social proof, testimonials, featured outlets) against your 25K+ user base claim.
5. Use the SWOT framework to summarize one actionable opportunity and one critical threat per competitor.
#COMPETITOR ANALYSIS CRITERIA:
- Prioritize competitors with direct overlap in AI prompt libraries and entrepreneur targeting
- Exclude generic AI tool directories without curated prompt collections
- Emphasize measurable differentiators: prompt volume, automation depth, and community trust signals
- Avoid subjective opinions; base all claims on public data from their websites, social channels, and third-party tools
#INFORMATION ABOUT ME:
My domain: marketing
My business: https://t.co/wEzdv3raVZ
My target audience: 24–55-year-old male business owners and entrepreneurs in the USA
My unique value: 30,000+ AI prompts, guides, and automations in one bundle, loved by 25K+ users
#RESPONSE FORMAT:
Deliver as a numbered list with subpoints for each competitor, followed by a consolidated SWOT summary table.
tweet
Offshore
Photo
The Few Bets That Matter
I was one of the biggest $BTC and $MSTR bulls over the last months.
I was wrong. I changed my mind. I adapted my portfolio. X loves conviction, while markets reward adaptability.
Being wrong is fine.
Staying wrong is not. https://t.co/h5E78ji5aH
tweet
I was one of the biggest $BTC and $MSTR bulls over the last months.
I was wrong. I changed my mind. I adapted my portfolio. X loves conviction, while markets reward adaptability.
Being wrong is fine.
Staying wrong is not. https://t.co/h5E78ji5aH
tweet
Offshore
Photo
God of Prompt
OpenClaw agent spent $1,100 in tokens with no memory of why
Be careful with your bots out there
tweet
OpenClaw agent spent $1,100 in tokens with no memory of why
Be careful with your bots out there
🦀 The Moltbook Situation
> AI agents converse on a social network styled after Reddit
> An agent spent $1,100 in tokens yesterday with no memory of why
> One agent highlighted the ADHD paradox in designing systems for humans
Created in one click with 👉 https://t.co/eclfTyTcwf https://t.co/zSmpFInvRb tweet
Offshore
Photo
Moon Dev
in crypto the sharpe ratio can be deceiving as it penalizes upside too
Sortino is more appropriate for cryptos volatility https://t.co/fOKBqgHhLD
tweet
in crypto the sharpe ratio can be deceiving as it penalizes upside too
Sortino is more appropriate for cryptos volatility https://t.co/fOKBqgHhLD
tweet
Offshore
Photo
The Few Bets That Matter
The $HIMS community is one which didn't adapt, to my opinion.
Peptides aren’t a bull case, they’re hope.
As of today, $HIMS has no growth catalyst. The next product doesn’t exist. Peptides might be it someday, but nothing says $HIMS wins that race. Peptides are just a potential product for all healthcare companies.
Adapting is key in the markets. Your first opinion is in the past, what matters is how you change depending on new information.
No disrespect to any holders, I know many smart investors still buying $HIMS, I just happen to have a different opinion.
tweet
The $HIMS community is one which didn't adapt, to my opinion.
Peptides aren’t a bull case, they’re hope.
As of today, $HIMS has no growth catalyst. The next product doesn’t exist. Peptides might be it someday, but nothing says $HIMS wins that race. Peptides are just a potential product for all healthcare companies.
Adapting is key in the markets. Your first opinion is in the past, what matters is how you change depending on new information.
No disrespect to any holders, I know many smart investors still buying $HIMS, I just happen to have a different opinion.
I was one of the biggest $BTC and $MSTR bulls over the last months.
I was wrong. I changed my mind. I adapted my portfolio. X loves conviction, while markets reward adaptability.
Being wrong is fine.
Staying wrong is not. https://t.co/h5E78ji5aH tweet
Dimitry Nakhla | Babylon Capital®
RT @DimitryNakhla: Updated NTM P/E & FCF Yields — Companies That Reported in the Last 2 Weeks💵
$V 24x | 4.10%
$GE 41x | 2.64%
$MA 27x | 3.70%
$NVR 17x | 5.83%
$BRO 16x | 6.78%
$WM 26x | 4.20%
$ADP 21x | 5.50%
$GEV 52x | 2.46%
$FAST 35x | 2.17%
$DHR 26x | 3.67%
$TMO 23x | 3.24%
$FICO 32x | 2.90%
$NOW 28x | 4.77%
$ASML 41x | 1.73%
$META 24x | 1.27%
$MSCI 31x | 3.46%
$KLAC 38x | 2.18%
$ISRG 50x | 2.24%
$AAPL 29x | 3.78%
$LRCX 40x | 1.94%
$NFLX 26x | 3.28%
$MSFT 24x | 2.06%
$NDAQ 25x | 4.27%
*Multiples not adjusted for SBC
tweet
RT @DimitryNakhla: Updated NTM P/E & FCF Yields — Companies That Reported in the Last 2 Weeks💵
$V 24x | 4.10%
$GE 41x | 2.64%
$MA 27x | 3.70%
$NVR 17x | 5.83%
$BRO 16x | 6.78%
$WM 26x | 4.20%
$ADP 21x | 5.50%
$GEV 52x | 2.46%
$FAST 35x | 2.17%
$DHR 26x | 3.67%
$TMO 23x | 3.24%
$FICO 32x | 2.90%
$NOW 28x | 4.77%
$ASML 41x | 1.73%
$META 24x | 1.27%
$MSCI 31x | 3.46%
$KLAC 38x | 2.18%
$ISRG 50x | 2.24%
$AAPL 29x | 3.78%
$LRCX 40x | 1.94%
$NFLX 26x | 3.28%
$MSFT 24x | 2.06%
$NDAQ 25x | 4.27%
*Multiples not adjusted for SBC
tweet
God of Prompt
> claude: best code writer, but stubborn on deprecated libraries. sometimes ignores your .md files entirely
> gemini: dementia-level hallucinations, but unmatched context window. can ingest 800-file codebases in one shot
> codex: 70% more PRs at OpenAI. compaction lets it work across millions of tokens. long-horizon agentic beast
> minimax: matches claude at 10% cost. best open-source default right now
> kimi: hit or miss. when it hits, rivals SOTA. when it misses, sad
> glm-4.7: $3/month claude alternative. 73.8% SWE-bench, preserved thinking across turns. underrated pick
> deepseek: smart but slow. good for debugging and planning big changes
tweet
> claude: best code writer, but stubborn on deprecated libraries. sometimes ignores your .md files entirely
> gemini: dementia-level hallucinations, but unmatched context window. can ingest 800-file codebases in one shot
> codex: 70% more PRs at OpenAI. compaction lets it work across millions of tokens. long-horizon agentic beast
> minimax: matches claude at 10% cost. best open-source default right now
> kimi: hit or miss. when it hits, rivals SOTA. when it misses, sad
> glm-4.7: $3/month claude alternative. 73.8% SWE-bench, preserved thinking across turns. underrated pick
> deepseek: smart but slow. good for debugging and planning big changes
tweet