God of Prompt
RT @godofprompt: OpenAI and Google engineers leaked these automation patterns that separate amateurs from pros.
I've been using insider knowledge from actual AI architects for 8 months. The difference is insane.
Here are 8 patterns they don't want you to know (but I'm sharing anyway):
tweet
RT @godofprompt: OpenAI and Google engineers leaked these automation patterns that separate amateurs from pros.
I've been using insider knowledge from actual AI architects for 8 months. The difference is insane.
Here are 8 patterns they don't want you to know (but I'm sharing anyway):
tweet
Offshore
Video
Startup Archive
Marc Andreessen: “I’m always urging founders to raise prices, raise prices, raise prices.”
“We spend a lot of time working with our companies on pricing,” a16z co-founder Marc Andreessen explains. “It’s really this magical art and science that a lot of companies don’t take seriously enough.”
Marc continues:
“A core principle of pricing is that you don’t want to price by cost if you can avoid it. You want to price by value. Especially when you’re selling to businesses, you want to price as a percentage of the business value you’re creating.”
He gives the example of building an AI that can do the job of a programmer, a lawyer, or a radiologist:
“Can you price by value and get a percentage of what otherwise would’ve literally been a person? Or equivalently can you price by marginal productivity? If you can take a human doctor and make them much more productive because you give them AI, can you price as a percentage of the productivity uplift?”
Marc argues that high prices are under-appreciated by founders:
“The naive view on pricing is the lower the pricing, the better it is for the customer. The more sophisticated way of looking at it is that higher prices are often good for the customer because the higher price means the vendor can make the product better, faster. Companies with higher prices and higher margins can actually invest more in R&D and make the product better. Most people who buy things aren’t just looking for the cheapest price. They want something that’s going to work really well.”
Marc also emphasizes this point in an interview in Elad Gil’s High Growth Handbook:
“What I hear from companies is, ‘Oh, we have an awesome moat, and we’re still going to price our product cheap, because we think that’s somehow going to maximize our business.’ I’m always urging founders to raise prices, raise prices, raise prices. I’m always urging founders to raise prices, raise prices, raise prices.
First of all, raising prices is a great way to flesh out whether you actually do have a moat. If you do have a moat, the customers will still buy, because they have to. The definition of a moat is the ability to charge more. And so number one, it’s just a good way to flesh out that topic and really expose it to sunlight.
And then number two, companies that charge more can better fund both their distribution efforts and their ongoing R&D efforts. Charging more is a key lever to be able to grow. And the companies that charge more therefore tend to grow faster.
That’s counterintuitive to a lot of engineers. A lot of engineers think there’s a one-dimensional relationship between price and value. They have this mental model of commerce like they’re selling rice or something. It’s like, “My product is magical and nobody can replicate it, and I need to price it like it’s a commodity.” No, you don’t. In fact, quite the opposite. If you price it high, then you can fund a much more expensive sales and marketing effort, which means you’re much more likely to win the market, which means you’re much more likely to be able afford to do all the R&D and acquisitions you’re going to want to do. And so we always try to snap people into a two-dimensional mindset, where higher prices equals faster growth.”
Video source: @a16z (2026)
tweet
Marc Andreessen: “I’m always urging founders to raise prices, raise prices, raise prices.”
“We spend a lot of time working with our companies on pricing,” a16z co-founder Marc Andreessen explains. “It’s really this magical art and science that a lot of companies don’t take seriously enough.”
Marc continues:
“A core principle of pricing is that you don’t want to price by cost if you can avoid it. You want to price by value. Especially when you’re selling to businesses, you want to price as a percentage of the business value you’re creating.”
He gives the example of building an AI that can do the job of a programmer, a lawyer, or a radiologist:
“Can you price by value and get a percentage of what otherwise would’ve literally been a person? Or equivalently can you price by marginal productivity? If you can take a human doctor and make them much more productive because you give them AI, can you price as a percentage of the productivity uplift?”
Marc argues that high prices are under-appreciated by founders:
“The naive view on pricing is the lower the pricing, the better it is for the customer. The more sophisticated way of looking at it is that higher prices are often good for the customer because the higher price means the vendor can make the product better, faster. Companies with higher prices and higher margins can actually invest more in R&D and make the product better. Most people who buy things aren’t just looking for the cheapest price. They want something that’s going to work really well.”
Marc also emphasizes this point in an interview in Elad Gil’s High Growth Handbook:
“What I hear from companies is, ‘Oh, we have an awesome moat, and we’re still going to price our product cheap, because we think that’s somehow going to maximize our business.’ I’m always urging founders to raise prices, raise prices, raise prices. I’m always urging founders to raise prices, raise prices, raise prices.
First of all, raising prices is a great way to flesh out whether you actually do have a moat. If you do have a moat, the customers will still buy, because they have to. The definition of a moat is the ability to charge more. And so number one, it’s just a good way to flesh out that topic and really expose it to sunlight.
And then number two, companies that charge more can better fund both their distribution efforts and their ongoing R&D efforts. Charging more is a key lever to be able to grow. And the companies that charge more therefore tend to grow faster.
That’s counterintuitive to a lot of engineers. A lot of engineers think there’s a one-dimensional relationship between price and value. They have this mental model of commerce like they’re selling rice or something. It’s like, “My product is magical and nobody can replicate it, and I need to price it like it’s a commodity.” No, you don’t. In fact, quite the opposite. If you price it high, then you can fund a much more expensive sales and marketing effort, which means you’re much more likely to win the market, which means you’re much more likely to be able afford to do all the R&D and acquisitions you’re going to want to do. And so we always try to snap people into a two-dimensional mindset, where higher prices equals faster growth.”
Video source: @a16z (2026)
tweet
Offshore
Video
God of Prompt
RT @alex_prompter: Bluedot just dropped something I’ve been waiting for…
You can now record meetings without bots on desktop and mobile.
Zoom, Teams, or in-person conversations… all handled quietly in the background, with clean AI summaries afterwards. https://t.co/FV3KyNePdF
tweet
RT @alex_prompter: Bluedot just dropped something I’ve been waiting for…
You can now record meetings without bots on desktop and mobile.
Zoom, Teams, or in-person conversations… all handled quietly in the background, with clean AI summaries afterwards. https://t.co/FV3KyNePdF
tweet
Offshore
Video
Brady Long
I’ve been talking about this thesis for a while now. Happy someone capitalized on it.
Scaling with silicon, not headcount. No more barrier to entry to build a SaaS
tweet
I’ve been talking about this thesis for a while now. Happy someone capitalized on it.
Scaling with silicon, not headcount. No more barrier to entry to build a SaaS
Introducing Atoms: the first AI team that builds real businesses.
From research to build, launch, and scale, all autonomous.
Don’t Vibe Code. Vibe Business.
→ https://t.co/g0L4NRU7xE https://t.co/igplCnPrEQ tweet
Offshore
Video
Brady Long
RT @thisdudelikesAI: Does barrier to entry for startups even exist anymore?
Atoms isn't just a coding assistant it's a co-founder in your browser. So many solo 🦄 otw.
tweet
RT @thisdudelikesAI: Does barrier to entry for startups even exist anymore?
Atoms isn't just a coding assistant it's a co-founder in your browser. So many solo 🦄 otw.
Introducing Atoms: the first AI team that builds real businesses.
From research to build, launch, and scale, all autonomous.
Don’t Vibe Code. Vibe Business.
→ https://t.co/g0L4NRU7xE https://t.co/igplCnPrEQ tweet
Offshore
Photo
God of Prompt
RT @godofprompt: AI agents are dying. Prompting is evolving. MCP is rewriting the rules.
I'm moderating a panel at AI Skills'2026 to break down what's dead vs. what's next.
Jan 22. 3,000+ attendees. 4+ hours. Free.
Save your free seat: https://t.co/T3LxdWm0DL https://t.co/pb98xxBBUY
tweet
RT @godofprompt: AI agents are dying. Prompting is evolving. MCP is rewriting the rules.
I'm moderating a panel at AI Skills'2026 to break down what's dead vs. what's next.
Jan 22. 3,000+ attendees. 4+ hours. Free.
Save your free seat: https://t.co/T3LxdWm0DL https://t.co/pb98xxBBUY
tweet
Offshore
Photo
Illiquid
$ichr positive pre announcement.
https://t.co/X0gIGlqb1e
tweet
$ichr positive pre announcement.
https://t.co/X0gIGlqb1e
Alot of attention on $acmr but the American subsystem companies have been no slouch either. $uctt $ichr $mksi https://t.co/HfuQ39rcc6 tweet
Offshore
Photo
The Few Bets That Matter
Well. Well. Well.
It took a bit less than a month, and gave me the time to grow my position to be more than significant.
$TMDX https://t.co/rcpRknAumI
tweet
Well. Well. Well.
It took a bit less than a month, and gave me the time to grow my position to be more than significant.
$TMDX https://t.co/rcpRknAumI
$TMDX should & will trade above $150 sooner rather than later.
Only one metric matters: annual transplant cases. Management's target is 10,000 and should be reached before EOY28.
At ~$103k per case (FY23–24 avg), that’s $1.03B in revenue.
We have a 25%+ grower in an expanding healthcare niche, largely insulated from AI risk, CapEx cycles, tariffs and recession noise.
Peers in the same sector with comparable growth trade 7–10x sales.
Middle ground gives you $8.8B valuation, or ~$256/share once 10k cases are reached - within the next two years as per management once again.
This is based on measured growth target and peer valuation.
Even with a lower multiples due to expansion execution risks, $TMDX stock price remains muted today, mostly by a missfocus from analysts and an incomprehension from the market.
👇
https://t.co/FThbpSnXtX tweet