Offshore
Video
Quiver Quantitative
There are reports that the GOP intentionally goaded Jasmine Crockett into running for Senate in Texas.
Speaker Mike Johnson just gave this reaction to her decision: https://t.co/0DY5YdE2xB
tweet
There are reports that the GOP intentionally goaded Jasmine Crockett into running for Senate in Texas.
Speaker Mike Johnson just gave this reaction to her decision: https://t.co/0DY5YdE2xB
tweet
Offshore
Photo
WealthyReadings
$HIMS continues to expand and to execute.
Yet, the market continues to ignore the stock, as expected.
Why? Because the market doesn't care about "maybes" or god given missions. It cares about cash.
"But the market doesn’t care about this. It cares about data and narratives. Right now, both are shifting negatively & I personally do not see any reasons to stay invested in Hims as they might succeed, but it will take time without any guarantee.
Better to sit out from here. Let others take the risks, let the market adjust. Observe. And I will gladly buy back in if valuation allows me, if we have more clarity on the short & medium term and if Hims shows early signs of success. Until then, I’ll continue to comment. But I won’t be involved."
This is what I shared back in October when I sold my shares above $60. So far, I see no reasons to be involved again.
tweet
$HIMS continues to expand and to execute.
Yet, the market continues to ignore the stock, as expected.
Why? Because the market doesn't care about "maybes" or god given missions. It cares about cash.
"But the market doesn’t care about this. It cares about data and narratives. Right now, both are shifting negatively & I personally do not see any reasons to stay invested in Hims as they might succeed, but it will take time without any guarantee.
Better to sit out from here. Let others take the risks, let the market adjust. Observe. And I will gladly buy back in if valuation allows me, if we have more clarity on the short & medium term and if Hims shows early signs of success. Until then, I’ll continue to comment. But I won’t be involved."
This is what I shared back in October when I sold my shares above $60. So far, I see no reasons to be involved again.
I decided to close my $HIMS position today, after last night's earnings.
If you are interested by a clear & unbiased summary of the earnings, why I am closing my position & why I believe $HIMS will go through some tough times, it's all detailed below.
https://t.co/vTcjV48al4 - WealthyReadingstweet
Offshore
Photo
Fiscal.ai
Airports are natural monopolies.
And they tend to have major pricing power.
Here are the best performing airport stocks of the last 5 years:
1. Corporación American Airports $CAAP
5yr Total Return: +543% https://t.co/2ZE3wWbpTh
tweet
Airports are natural monopolies.
And they tend to have major pricing power.
Here are the best performing airport stocks of the last 5 years:
1. Corporación American Airports $CAAP
5yr Total Return: +543% https://t.co/2ZE3wWbpTh
tweet
Offshore
Photo
App Economy Insights
Wealthfront is going public this week.
Ticker: $WLTH
Valuation: ~$2B
Funded Clients: 1.3M
Platform Assets: $88B
📊 How They Make Money: ~75% of revenue comes from cash management (not advisory fees). This makes the model highly sensitive to interest rates.
Would you buy this over $HOOD or $SOFI?
tweet
Wealthfront is going public this week.
Ticker: $WLTH
Valuation: ~$2B
Funded Clients: 1.3M
Platform Assets: $88B
📊 How They Make Money: ~75% of revenue comes from cash management (not advisory fees). This makes the model highly sensitive to interest rates.
Would you buy this over $HOOD or $SOFI?
tweet
WealthyReadings
While everyone panicked in November as the chances of rate cuts reduced, I kept my head cool & shared that I'd continue to buy my stocks during the dip, with clear arguments why.
All my buys are green since that day, some of them are even very green - namely $ALAB, $NBIS, $ONON, $BTC & $ETH.
And yes, without much surprises, the FED did cut rates.
When investing, reacting is losing.
tweet
While everyone panicked in November as the chances of rate cuts reduced, I kept my head cool & shared that I'd continue to buy my stocks during the dip, with clear arguments why.
All my buys are green since that day, some of them are even very green - namely $ALAB, $NBIS, $ONON, $BTC & $ETH.
And yes, without much surprises, the FED did cut rates.
When investing, reacting is losing.
I am still a buyer for a few handful reasons.
1. I believe the FED needs to continue to cut rates, and will in December.
https://t.co/5joU9HUnh1
2. I believe in AI and that $NVDA isn't a fraud, and the data backs me up.
https://t.co/jvzeGM3kwY
3. $TMDX is more than 30% of my portfolio, a recession and AI proof business unaffected by rate cuts, so even if the rest of the market falls liquidity should go towards those kinds of assets.
https://t.co/5ZqknmvPVz
4. Fiscal spending isn't and will not slow down during the next years and the only protection against this is assets, and this is also why I dobuled my $BTC weekly DCA.
That being said, the market is taking a hit and it won't recover from this in a few days with a V shape recovery like post liberation day as we do not have comparable catalysts before EOY.
So I am being prudent and slow in my purchases. There is no rush in today's market, you don't need to catch falling knifes, you just need to wait and be patient.
The few percentage point won by catching a bottom compared to following a trend aren't worth the risk. - WealthyReadingstweet
X (formerly Twitter)
WealthyReadings (@WealthyReadings) on X
I am still a buyer for a few handful reasons.
1. I believe the FED needs to continue to cut rates, and will in December.
https://t.co/NiO2OkZ3ws
2. I believe in AI and that $NVDA isn't a fraud, and the data backs me up.
https://t.co/XOexYn4vyS
3. $TMDX…
1. I believe the FED needs to continue to cut rates, and will in December.
https://t.co/NiO2OkZ3ws
2. I believe in AI and that $NVDA isn't a fraud, and the data backs me up.
https://t.co/XOexYn4vyS
3. $TMDX…
EndGame Macro
The Fed’s Hidden Move And The Cushion Before the April Drain
The Fed went with 25 bps because they’re trying to thread a very specific needle. The economy isn’t collapsing, but the labor market has clearly cooled. Job gains have slowed, unemployment has drifted up, and they openly admit downside risks to employment have risen. That line is doing more work than anything else in the statement, it’s them hinting that the jobs side is now the priority.
At the same time, they also tell you inflation has picked back up and is still somewhat elevated. So they’re easing while admitting inflation isn’t fully fixed. That alone tells you this wasn’t a celebration cut; it was a defensive one. They’d rather risk a little inflation heat than risk tightening straight into a weaker labor market.
The rest of the language like the data dependence, the “we’re watching everything,” the careful tone is their way of saying don’t get ahead of us, don’t assume a path, and don’t treat one cut as a whole cycle.
What They’re Really Signaling Beneath the Surface
The real story is in the plumbing paragraph. They note that reserve balances have slipped to the low end of ample and quietly authorize the Desk to buy T-bills as needed to keep reserves from falling too far. That’s the Fed admitting, in a roundabout way, that the cushion in the system is getting thinner than they’re comfortable with.
And the timing matters because the RRP is basically empty now. That means the next big drain with April tax flows plus heavy coupon issuance will pull straight from bank reserves instead of a spare buffer sitting at money funds. If they waited until that pressure actually showed up, they’d risk a 2019 style funding hiccup. So they’re building the cushion early…end QT, cut 25 to keep the optics calm, and quietly stand up a bill purchase valve to keep reserves from sliding.
They’ll insist it’s not QE and mechanically, it isn’t but markets react to marginal liquidity, not the label printed on the tool. A standing willingness to add reserves is a backstop whether they admit it or not.
What the Vote Tells You
This wasn’t a smooth vote. One person wanted 50. Two wanted no cut. That’s the whole emotional map of the Committee right there…some think the labor side is deteriorating faster than the public narrative admits; others still don’t trust the inflation trend enough to ease. The 25 bp move is the compromise that keeps the message “We’re adjusting, not reacting. We’re still in control.”
My Read
This is a pivot toward protecting the labor market, not a victory over inflation. They’re easing through two channels at once, rates and reserves while pretending they’re only doing one. And they’re trying to avoid sending a panic signal by staying predictable and letting the liquidity support happen quietly in the background.
The Fed trying to keep the system stable through a period where the RRP is drained, tax season is coming, issuance is heavy, and reserves can’t take another hit without someone feeling it. They’re calming the surface while quietly reinforcing the foundation.
tweet
The Fed’s Hidden Move And The Cushion Before the April Drain
The Fed went with 25 bps because they’re trying to thread a very specific needle. The economy isn’t collapsing, but the labor market has clearly cooled. Job gains have slowed, unemployment has drifted up, and they openly admit downside risks to employment have risen. That line is doing more work than anything else in the statement, it’s them hinting that the jobs side is now the priority.
At the same time, they also tell you inflation has picked back up and is still somewhat elevated. So they’re easing while admitting inflation isn’t fully fixed. That alone tells you this wasn’t a celebration cut; it was a defensive one. They’d rather risk a little inflation heat than risk tightening straight into a weaker labor market.
The rest of the language like the data dependence, the “we’re watching everything,” the careful tone is their way of saying don’t get ahead of us, don’t assume a path, and don’t treat one cut as a whole cycle.
What They’re Really Signaling Beneath the Surface
The real story is in the plumbing paragraph. They note that reserve balances have slipped to the low end of ample and quietly authorize the Desk to buy T-bills as needed to keep reserves from falling too far. That’s the Fed admitting, in a roundabout way, that the cushion in the system is getting thinner than they’re comfortable with.
And the timing matters because the RRP is basically empty now. That means the next big drain with April tax flows plus heavy coupon issuance will pull straight from bank reserves instead of a spare buffer sitting at money funds. If they waited until that pressure actually showed up, they’d risk a 2019 style funding hiccup. So they’re building the cushion early…end QT, cut 25 to keep the optics calm, and quietly stand up a bill purchase valve to keep reserves from sliding.
They’ll insist it’s not QE and mechanically, it isn’t but markets react to marginal liquidity, not the label printed on the tool. A standing willingness to add reserves is a backstop whether they admit it or not.
What the Vote Tells You
This wasn’t a smooth vote. One person wanted 50. Two wanted no cut. That’s the whole emotional map of the Committee right there…some think the labor side is deteriorating faster than the public narrative admits; others still don’t trust the inflation trend enough to ease. The 25 bp move is the compromise that keeps the message “We’re adjusting, not reacting. We’re still in control.”
My Read
This is a pivot toward protecting the labor market, not a victory over inflation. They’re easing through two channels at once, rates and reserves while pretending they’re only doing one. And they’re trying to avoid sending a panic signal by staying predictable and letting the liquidity support happen quietly in the background.
The Fed trying to keep the system stable through a period where the RRP is drained, tax season is coming, issuance is heavy, and reserves can’t take another hit without someone feeling it. They’re calming the surface while quietly reinforcing the foundation.
Federal Reserve issues #FOMC statement: https://t.co/GHW27inNE3 - Federal Reservetweet
X (formerly Twitter)
Federal Reserve (@federalreserve) on X
Federal Reserve issues #FOMC statement: https://t.co/GHW27inNE3
Offshore
Photo
App Economy Insights
RT @EconomyApp: 🍿 Netflix + Warner Bros. 📊
The $83B deal visualized:
• What Netflix is buying
• The bid vs. Paramount
• Who wins & who loses
• Balance sheet madness
• Vertical vs. horizontal merger👇
https://t.co/dGBendVe7H
tweet
RT @EconomyApp: 🍿 Netflix + Warner Bros. 📊
The $83B deal visualized:
• What Netflix is buying
• The bid vs. Paramount
• Who wins & who loses
• Balance sheet madness
• Vertical vs. horizontal merger👇
https://t.co/dGBendVe7H
tweet