⁠Stock Analysis Compilation
Artisan Partners on Colliers International $CIGI US

Thesis: Colliers leverages its global reach and expertise to capitalize on profit cycle drivers as interest rate pressures ease.

(Extract from their Q3 letter) https://t.co/2saXI3mmrz
tweet

<a href="https://t.me/iv?url=https%3A%2F%2Fr.tfrbot.com%2Fapi%2Freadability%3Furl%3Dhttps%253a%252f%252ftwitter.com%252fDimitryNakhla%252fstatus%252f1870574345174790287&rhash=cc31aa64cf012a">⁠</a><b>Dimitry Nakhla | Babylon Capital®</b>
Now that $AMD reached my $120💵 target, here are the updated CAGR Estimates:

23x P/E: $162.15💵 … ~16.4% CAGR

22x P/E: $155.10💵 … ~13.8% CAGR

21x P/E: $148.05💵 … ~11.3% CAGR

20x P/E: $141.00💵 … ~8.6% CAGR

19x P/E: $133.95💵 … ~5.9% CAGR

*Assuming 2026 EPS of $7.05
_______

Check out the photo below, you'll notice that $AMD tends to bottom near 25x - 26x earnings. Interestingly, it’s trading at that level today

Of course in rare circumstances, such as the prolonged bear market in 2022, $AMD can trade at much lower multiples

However, it’s encouraging to see $AMD trade near what I call a “Fundamental Bottom” and it’s certainly peaking my interest today at $120💵 (along with $ASML $LRCX & $AMAT)<code>

A quality valuation analysis on $AMD 🧘🏽‍♂️

•NTM P/E Ratio: 30.59x
•3-Year Mean: 32.10x

•NTM FCF Yield: 2.97%
•3-Year Mean: 3.10%

As you can see, $AMD appears to be trading near fair value

Going forward, investors can receive ~5% MORE in earnings per share & ~4% LESS in FCF per share 🧠***

Before we get into valuation, let’s take a look at why $AMD is a good business

BALANCE SHEET✅
•Cash & Short-Term Inv: $4.54B
•Long-Term Debt: $1.72B

$AMD has an excellent balance sheet, an A- S&P Credit Rating, & 21x FFO Interest Coverage

RETURN ON CAPITAL✅➡️❌
•2019: 17.9%
•2020: 21.5%
•2021: 44.7%
•2022: 2.1%
•2023: 0.7%
•LTM: 2.3%

RETURN ON EQUITY✅➡️❌*
•2019: 16.7%
•2020: 57.5%
•2021: 47.4%
•2022: 4.2%
•2023: 1.5%
•LTM: 3.3%

$AMD has strong return metrics, highlighting the financial efficiency of the business

*the notable drop in ROIC can be attributed to Xilinx acquisition in 2022, increased expenses and investments, among other things

REVENUES✅
•2018: $6.48B
•2023: $22.68B
•CAGR: 28.47%

FREE CASH FLOW❌➡️✅
•2018: ($0.13B)
•2023: $1.12B

*2024E FCF is $3.68B 📈

NORMALIZED EPS✅
•2018: $0.46
•2023: $2.65
•CAGR: 41.93%

SHARE BUYBACKS❌
•2018 Shares Outstanding: 1.06B
•LTM Shares Outstanding: 1.64B

By increasing its shares outstanding by 54%, $AMD decreased its EPS by 35% (assuming 0 growth)

MARGINS🆗
•LTM Gross Margins: 52.1%
•LTM Operating Margins: 5.6%
•LTM Net Income Margins: 7.5%

***NOW TO VALUATION 🧠

As stated above, investors can expect to receive ~5% MORE in EPS & ~4% LESS in FCF per share

Using Benjamin Graham’s 2G rule of thumb, $AMD has to grow earnings at a 15.30% CAGR over the next several years to justify its valuation

Today, analysts anticipate 2025 - 2027 EPS growth over the next few years to be greater than the (15.30%) required growth rate:

2024E: $3.32 (25.5% YoY) *FY Dec

2025E: $5.11 (53.8% YoY)
2026E: $7.10 (38.9% YoY)
2027E*: $9.11 (28.2% YoY)

$AMD has a mediocre track record of meeting analyst estimates ~2 years out, so let’s assume $AMD ends 2027 with $8.20* in EPS (10% below estimates) & see its CAGR potential assuming different multiples

26x P/E: $213.20💵 … ~15.0% CAGR

24x P/E: $196.80💵 … ~12.1% CAGR

22x P/E: $180.40💵 … ~8.9% CAGR

20x P/E: $164.00💵 … ~5.7% CAGR

As you can see, $AMD appears to have attractive return potential if we assume >24x earnings & aggressive return potential if we assume >26x earnings

Assuming 24x is very reasonable given $AMD growth rate — however this is a high degree of uncertainty when it comes to $AMD multi-year projections (for better or for worse)

Today at $138💵 $AMD still appears to be a decent consideration for investment

To account for the high uncertainty and aggressive growth projections, I would require a more substantial margin of safety

I’d consider $AMD a strong consideration closer to $120💵 (~13.5% below today’s price) or at ~26.50x NTM estimates, where I can expect ~14% CAGR assuming 22x

#stocks #investing
___

𝐃𝐈�[...]

�𝐂𝐋𝐎𝐒𝐔𝐑𝐄‼️: 𝐓𝐡𝐢𝐬 𝐢𝐬 𝐍𝐎𝐓 𝐈𝐧𝐯𝐞𝐬𝐭𝐦𝐞𝐧𝐭 𝐀𝐝𝐯𝐢𝐜𝐞. 𝐁𝐚𝐛𝐲𝐥𝐨𝐧 𝐂𝐚𝐩𝐢𝐭𝐚𝐥® 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐢𝐭𝐬 𝐫𝐞𝐩𝐫𝐞𝐬𝐞𝐧𝐭𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐯𝐞𝐬 𝐦𝐚𝐲 𝐡𝐚𝐯𝐞 𝐩𝐨𝐬𝐢𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧𝐬 𝐢𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐬𝐞𝐜𝐮𝐫𝐢𝐭𝐢𝐞𝐬 𝐝𝐢𝐬𝐜𝐮𝐬𝐬𝐞𝐝 𝐢𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐢𝐬 𝐭𝐰𝐞𝐞𝐭.

𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐢𝐧𝐟𝐨𝐫𝐦𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐜𝐨𝐧𝐭𝐚𝐢𝐧𝐞𝐝 𝐢𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐢𝐬 𝐭𝐰𝐞𝐞𝐭 𝐢𝐬 𝐢𝐧𝐭𝐞𝐧𝐝𝐞𝐝 𝐟𝐨𝐫 𝐢𝐧𝐟𝐨𝐫𝐦𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧𝐚𝐥 𝐩𝐮𝐫𝐩𝐨𝐬𝐞𝐬 𝐨𝐧𝐥𝐲 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐬𝐡𝐨𝐮𝐥𝐝 𝐧𝐨𝐭 𝐛𝐞 𝐜𝐨𝐧𝐬𝐭𝐫𝐮𝐞𝐝 𝐚𝐬 𝐢𝐧𝐯𝐞𝐬𝐭𝐦𝐞𝐧𝐭 𝐚𝐝𝐯𝐢𝐜𝐞 𝐭𝐨 𝐦𝐞𝐞𝐭 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐬𝐩𝐞𝐜𝐢𝐟𝐢𝐜 𝐧𝐞𝐞𝐝𝐬 𝐨𝐟 𝐚𝐧𝐲 𝐢𝐧𝐝𝐢𝐯𝐢𝐝𝐮𝐚𝐥 𝐨𝐫 𝐬𝐢𝐭𝐮𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧. 𝐏𝐚𝐬𝐭 𝐩𝐞𝐫𝐟𝐨𝐫𝐦𝐚𝐧𝐜𝐞 𝐢𝐬 𝐧𝐨 𝐠𝐮𝐚𝐫𝐚𝐧𝐭𝐞𝐞 𝐨𝐟 𝐟𝐮𝐭𝐮𝐫𝐞 𝐫𝐞𝐬𝐮𝐥𝐭𝐬.

𝐈𝐧𝐟𝐨𝐫𝐦𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐜𝐨𝐧𝐭𝐚𝐢𝐧𝐞𝐝 𝐢𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐢𝐬 𝐭𝐰𝐞𝐞𝐭 𝐡𝐚𝐬 𝐛𝐞𝐞𝐧 𝐨𝐛𝐭𝐚𝐢𝐧𝐞𝐝 𝐟𝐫𝐨𝐦 𝐬𝐨𝐮𝐫𝐜𝐞𝐬 𝐛𝐞𝐥𝐢𝐞𝐯𝐞𝐝 𝐭𝐨 𝐛𝐞 𝐫𝐞𝐥𝐢𝐚𝐛𝐥𝐞, 𝐛𝐮𝐭 𝐢𝐬 𝐧𝐨𝐭 𝐠𝐮𝐚𝐫𝐚𝐧𝐭𝐞𝐞𝐝 𝐚𝐬 𝐭𝐨 𝐜𝐨𝐦𝐩𝐥𝐞𝐭𝐞𝐧𝐞𝐬𝐬 𝐨𝐫 𝐚𝐜𝐜𝐮𝐫𝐚𝐜𝐲. </code>- <a href='https://twitter.com/DimitryNakhla/status/1865785877227581482'>Dimitry Nakhla | Babylon Capital®</a>
<a href='https://twitter.com/DimitryNakhla/status/1870574345174790287'>tweet</a>

⁠iinvested
1/2
3Q'24 FPA Queens Road Small Cap Value Fund on $AAP, $SFM, $IDCC, $FN, $CSWI, $DECK, $CNXC, $ALTM, $VSH, $DAR

More fund letters here:
https://t.co/ccjFhSPQ2v https://t.co/ioXOTdp0MB
tweet

⁠Stock Analysis Compilation
Sohra Peak on Auto Partner $APN PW

Thesis: Auto Partner’s normalized margins and strategic expansion into Western Europe signal robust growth opportunities ahead

(Extract from their Q3 letter) https://t.co/TFjvVSvbIS
tweet

⁠Ahmad Jivraj
Keep it simple: For the stock market to go up long term we need GDP per capita to go up

AI = productivity gains (and these gains are almost certainly higher than population growth rates)

Therefore, this should lead the markets higher long term

Here’s a way to think about the market size of AI. US labor costs are $11T. If a company pays 2% of headcount expenses to get a 10-50% productivity gain with AI, that’s $200B+. The US enterprise software market today is around $150-200B. So AI doubles that just in the base case. - Aaron Levie
tweet

⁠Investing visuals
Big News🥳

Introducing my X Subscriber Service with exclusive content!👇

✅ Business Breakdowns: All key info in one infographic
✅ Key Metrics: Essential numbers, visualized
✅ Portfolio Updates: my journey in building a $100K+ growth portfolio

Let’s grow together!🤝
tweet

⁠Startup Archive
Jony Ive recounts the time Steve Jobs called him vain

Jony recounts the time he asked Steve Jobs to be less harsh in his critique of a piece of work.

When Steve asked “why?”, Jony replied: “Well, because I care about the team.”

Steve then said, as Jony puts it, “this brutally, brilliantly, insightful thing”:

“No Jony, you’re just really vain. You just want people to like you. And I’m surprised at you because I thought you really held the work up as the most important—not how you believe you are perceived by other people.”

Jony reflects on the remark:

“I was terribly cross because I knew he was right.”

Video source: @VanityFair (2014)
tweet