Offshore
Photo
Librarian Capital
Smithson $SSON exited TechnologyOne $TNE in Sep
"Unsustainably high rating" after "strong performance"
New position in MonotaRO, Japanese "online industrial products distributor"
NAV -0.5% in Sep-24 (£)
NAV now +1.8% YTD vs. MSCI World SMID +6.9%
$FEVR among top Sep detractors https://t.co/w4IVvZa3GR
tweet
Smithson $SSON exited TechnologyOne $TNE in Sep
"Unsustainably high rating" after "strong performance"
New position in MonotaRO, Japanese "online industrial products distributor"
NAV -0.5% in Sep-24 (£)
NAV now +1.8% YTD vs. MSCI World SMID +6.9%
$FEVR among top Sep detractors https://t.co/w4IVvZa3GR
tweet
Offshore
Photo
Investing visuals
Tesla $TSLA deliveries are out👇
🔹 462,890 vs. est. 463,897 (up +6%, slight miss)
🔹Stock is down -6% on the news
tweet
Tesla $TSLA deliveries are out👇
🔹 462,890 vs. est. 463,897 (up +6%, slight miss)
🔹Stock is down -6% on the news
Tesla $TSLA is reporting quarterly delivery numbers on Tuesday. A quick preview:
🔹Expected deliveries of 465k, up 7% y/y
🔹Deliveries increased by 9% in March and 5% in June https://t.co/ZeQFZ9PlIh tweet
Offshore
Photo
Alex Bilzerian
RT @RDouady: Thank you, Alex, for posting this paper.
It was an answer to questions from Riskdata's clients on whether to use "normal" or "lognormal" (so-called "market model") models for interest rates.
Quants, especially on the sell-side for option pricing, tend to select models purely on their capabilities: "Do they handle negative rates?" Indeed, the question arose after 2008 crisis, when rates fell to almost 0, and at times, passed the negative barrier. How to price a floor at 0% with a "market model"?
They just forgot that a model is supposed to reflect the reality of some behavior. As such, they must respect certain stylized facts of the statistics of underlying.
The question is not so much "do we allow negative rates". Of course, we have no choice, rates do become negative, and we must be able to price a 0% floor. But then, what happens when they rise back?
It wasn't by chance that lognormal models were called "market model". So, I went on checking the relationship between the level of rates and their volatility to see what the most appropriate model was.
The conclusion is just what we could have expected: for low rates (even slightly negative), a normal model is better, but as soon as they pass a certain level of a few percents on the positive side, the volatility becomes proportional to the rate level (even more so for credit spreads, by the way).
This is why I propose a simple remedy using a shifted zero, i.e. a lognormal model in which the volatility is proportional to the rate + a margin to handle negative rates up to minus the margin.
tweet
RT @RDouady: Thank you, Alex, for posting this paper.
It was an answer to questions from Riskdata's clients on whether to use "normal" or "lognormal" (so-called "market model") models for interest rates.
Quants, especially on the sell-side for option pricing, tend to select models purely on their capabilities: "Do they handle negative rates?" Indeed, the question arose after 2008 crisis, when rates fell to almost 0, and at times, passed the negative barrier. How to price a floor at 0% with a "market model"?
They just forgot that a model is supposed to reflect the reality of some behavior. As such, they must respect certain stylized facts of the statistics of underlying.
The question is not so much "do we allow negative rates". Of course, we have no choice, rates do become negative, and we must be able to price a 0% floor. But then, what happens when they rise back?
It wasn't by chance that lognormal models were called "market model". So, I went on checking the relationship between the level of rates and their volatility to see what the most appropriate model was.
The conclusion is just what we could have expected: for low rates (even slightly negative), a normal model is better, but as soon as they pass a certain level of a few percents on the positive side, the volatility becomes proportional to the rate level (even more so for credit spreads, by the way).
This is why I propose a simple remedy using a shifted zero, i.e. a lognormal model in which the volatility is proportional to the rate + a margin to handle negative rates up to minus the margin.
'The Volatility of Low Rates' - @RDouady (2013, PDF):
https://t.co/uYzm106fOT tweet
Offshore
Photo
Librarian Capital
It's been ~1 year since Diageo's $DGE Scotch day*
Scotch had value CAGR of ~5% in 2016-21, ahead of TBA
Since then Diageo had reported Scotch organic net sales of +29% in FY22, +12% in FY23, -10% in FY24
* Jun-23; section on LAC growth was unfortunate given later events https://t.co/6JNFTxEDak
tweet
It's been ~1 year since Diageo's $DGE Scotch day*
Scotch had value CAGR of ~5% in 2016-21, ahead of TBA
Since then Diageo had reported Scotch organic net sales of +29% in FY22, +12% in FY23, -10% in FY24
* Jun-23; section on LAC growth was unfortunate given later events https://t.co/6JNFTxEDak
tweet
Offshore
Photo
Stock Analysis Compilation
Hedge funds' best ideas #12 is in your inbox 🔥
(link below)
Artemis / Artisan Partners / Bilbel Capital / Harding Loevner / Harris Associates / Hayden Capital / Horizon Kinetics / Impact AM / Langdon / Madison Funds / Marlton Partners / Orbis / Patient Capital Management / Pender Fund / Perritt Capital / River Oaks Capital / Rowan Street / RS Investments / Silver Beech / Southernsun / The London Company
tweet
Hedge funds' best ideas #12 is in your inbox 🔥
(link below)
Artemis / Artisan Partners / Bilbel Capital / Harding Loevner / Harris Associates / Hayden Capital / Horizon Kinetics / Impact AM / Langdon / Madison Funds / Marlton Partners / Orbis / Patient Capital Management / Pender Fund / Perritt Capital / River Oaks Capital / Rowan Street / RS Investments / Silver Beech / Southernsun / The London Company
tweet
Offshore
Photo
Quiver Quantitative
BREAKING: Representative Michael Burgess has sold up to $100K of Illumina stock, $ILMN, this month.
Illumina is a biotech company.
Burgess is a former doctor, and sits on a House Subcommittee on Health. https://t.co/rjTZcxBfPr
tweet
BREAKING: Representative Michael Burgess has sold up to $100K of Illumina stock, $ILMN, this month.
Illumina is a biotech company.
Burgess is a former doctor, and sits on a House Subcommittee on Health. https://t.co/rjTZcxBfPr
tweet
Offshore
Photo
Librarian Capital
Diageo $DGE has been long-time holding at Lindsell Train; also at Fundsmith until they sold in Aug-24
During COVID, EPS c. halved in FY20, before rebounding from FY21 onwards
EPS was 130.1p in FY19, peaked at 164.4p in FY23
Shares at 4,036p at 2021YE, 31x FY19 EPS
#NeverSell? https://t.co/7nR7kseniG
tweet
Diageo $DGE has been long-time holding at Lindsell Train; also at Fundsmith until they sold in Aug-24
During COVID, EPS c. halved in FY20, before rebounding from FY21 onwards
EPS was 130.1p in FY19, peaked at 164.4p in FY23
Shares at 4,036p at 2021YE, 31x FY19 EPS
#NeverSell? https://t.co/7nR7kseniG
tweet
Offshore
Photo
Offshore
Photo