Offshore
Photo
Dimitry Nakhla | Babylon Capitalยฎ
A sober valuation analysis on $MSCI ๐ง๐ฝโโ๏ธ
โขNTM P/E Ratio: 29.33x
โข10-Year Mean: 34.93x
โขNTM FCF Yield: 3.64%
โข10-Year Mean: 3.37%
As you can see, $MSCI appears to be trading below fair value
Going forward, investors can receive ~19% MORE in earnings per share & ~9% MORE in FCF per share ๐ง ***
Before we get into valuation, letโs take a look at why $MSCI is a good business
BALANCE SHEET๐
โขCash & Short-Term Inv: $519.31M
โขLong-Term Debt: $4.50B
$MSCI has an ok balance sheet, a BBB- S&P Credit Rating, & 6.80x FFO Interest Coverate
RETURN ON CAPITALโ
โข2019: 23.4%
โข2020: 28.6%
โข2021: 26.5%
โข2022: 33.0%
โข2023: 35.2%
RETURN ON EQUITY๐
โข2019: (463.5%)
โข2020: (231.5%)
โข2021: (239.3%)
โข2022: (148.6%)
โข2023: (131.4%)
*ROE negative due to heavy use of debt
$MSCI has strong return metrics, highlighting the financial efficiency of the business
REVENUESโ
โข2013: $913.36M
โข2023: $2,528.92M
โขCAGR: 10.72%
FREE CASH FLOWโ
โข2013: $280.93M
โข2023: $1,213.27M
โขCAGR: 15.75%
NORMALIZED EPSโ
โข2013: $2.16
โข2023: $13.52
โขCAGR: 20.13%
SHARE BUYBACKSโ
โข2013 Shares Outstanding: 121.07M
โขLTM Shares Outstanding: 79.60M
By reducing its shares outstanding 34.2%, $MSCI increased its EPS by 51.9% (assuming 0 growth)
MARGINSโ
โขLTM Gross Margins: 82.2%
โขLTM Operating Margins: 53.9%
โขLTM Net Income Margins: 44.6%
***NOW TO VALUATION ๐ง
As stated above, investors can expect to receive ~19% MORE in EPS & ~9% MORE in FCF per share
Using Benjamin Grahamโs 2G rule of thumb, $MSCI has to grow earnings at an 14.67% CAGR over the next several years to justify its valuation
Today, analysts anticipate 2024 - 2026 EPS growth over the next few years to be less than the (14.67%) required growth rate:
2024E: $14.84 (9.8% YoY) *FY Dec
2025E: $17.07 (15.0% YoY)
2026E: $19.39 (13.6% YoY)
$MSCI has a great track record of meeting analyst estimates ~2 years out, but letโs assume $MSCI ends 2026 with $19.39 in EPS & see its CAGR potential assuming different multiples
32x P/E: $620.48๐ต โฆ ~14.6% CAGR
31x P/E: $601.09๐ต โฆ ~13.2% CAGR
30x P/E: $581.70๐ต โฆ ~11.9% CAGR
29x P/E: $562.31๐ต โฆ ~10.5% CAGR
28x P/E: $542.92๐ต โฆ ~9.1% CAGR
As you can see, $MSCI appears to have double-digit return potential if we assume >29x earnings, a level of fundamental support (first green line in P/E chart) & a level below its 10-year average multiple of 34.93x
Given its wide moat, exemplary capital allocation, & linearity in its EPS & FCF, I believe 29x is fair for $MSCI & leaves us with some margin of safety
Today at $446๐ต my research leads me to believe that $MSCI is a worthwhile consideration for investment
Knowing that $MSCI could trade down a bit more (closer to 25x as youโll see in second green line in P/E chart) I would piece into the position
In other words, if I wanted to allocate 5% to $MSCI, Iโd likely look to initiate a 3% - 3.5% allocation & leave room to add more & make it 5% if we see $MSCI trade between $380๐ต - $400๐ต
#stocks #investing
___
๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐โผ๏ธ: ๐๐ก๐ข๐ฌ ๐ข๐ฌ ๐๐๐ ๐๐ง๐ฏ๐๐ฌ๐ญ๐ฆ๐๐ง๐ญ ๐๐๐ฏ๐ข๐๐. ๐๐๐๐ฒ๐ฅ๐จ๐ง ๐๐๐ฉ๐ข๐ญ๐๐ฅยฎ ๐๐ง๐ ๐ข๐ญ๐ฌ ๐ซ๐๐ฉ๐ซ๐๐ฌ๐๐ง๐ญ๐๐ญ๐ข๐ฏ๐๐ฌ ๐ฆ๐๐ฒ ๐ก๐๐ฏ๐ ๐ฉ๐จ๐ฌ๐ข๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง๐ฌ ๐ข๐ง ๐ญ๐ก๐ ๐ฌ๐๐๐ฎ๐ซ๐ข๐ญ๐ข๐๐ฌ ๐๐ข๐ฌ๐๐ฎ๐ฌ๐ฌ๐๐ ๐ข๐ง ๐ญ๐ก๐ข๐ฌ ๐ญ๐ฐ๐๐๐ญ.
๐๐ก๐ ๐ข๐ง๐๐จ๐ซ๐ฆ๐๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง ๐๐จ๐ง๐ญ๐๐ข๐ง๐๐ ๐ข๐ง ๐ญ๐ก๐ข๐ฌ ๐ญ๐ฐ๐๐๐ญ ๐ข๐ฌ ๐ข๐ง๐ญ๐๐ง๐๐๐ ๐๐จ๐ซ ๐ข๐ง๐๐จ๐ซ๐ฆ๐๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง๐๐ฅ ๐ฉ๐ฎ๐ซ๐ฉ๐จ๐ฌ๐๐ฌ ๐จ๐ง๐ฅ๐ฒ ๐๐ง๐ ๐ฌ๐ก๐จ๐ฎ๐ฅ๐ ๐ง๐จ๐ญ ๐๐ ๐๐จ๐ง๐ฌ๐ญ๐ซ๐ฎ๐๐ ๐๐ฌ ๐ข๐ง๐ฏ๐๐ฌ๐ญ๐ฆ๐๐ง๐ญ ๐๐๐ฏ๐ข๐๐ ๐ญ๐จ ๐ฆ๐๐๐ญ ๐ญ๐ก๐ ๐ฌ๐ฉ๐๐๐ข๐๐ข๐ ๐ง๐๐๐๐ฌ ๐จ๐ ๐๐ง๐ฒ ๐ข๐ง๐๐ข๐ฏ๐ข๐๐ฎ๐๐ฅ ๐จ๐ซ ๐ฌ๐ข๐ญ๐ฎ๐๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง. ๐๐๐ฌ๐ญ ๐ฉ๐๐ซ๐๐จ๐ซ๐ฆ๐๐ง๐๐ ๐ข๐ฌ ๐ง๐จ ๐ ๐ฎ๐๐ซ๐๐ง๐ญ๐๐ ๐จ๐ ๐๐ฎ๐ญ๐ฎ๐ซ๐ ๐ซ๐๐ฌ๐ฎ๐ฅ๐ญ๐ฌ.
๐๐ง๐๐จ๐ซ๐ฆ๐๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง ๐๐จ๐ง๐ญ๐๐ข๐ง๐๐ ๐ข๐ง ๐ญ๐ก๐ข๐ฌ ๐ญ๐ฐ๐๐๐ญ ๐ก๐๐ฌ ๐๐๐๐ง ๐จ๐๐ญ๐๐ข๐ง๐๐ ๐๐ซ๐จ๐ฆ ๐ฌ๐จ๐ฎ๐ซ๐๐๐ฌ ๐๐๐ฅ๐ข๐๐ฏ๐๐ ๐ญ๐จ ๐๐ ๐ซ๐๐ฅ๐ข๐๐๐ฅ๐, ๐๐ฎ๐ญ ๐ข๐ฌ ๐ง๐จ๐ญ ๐ ๐ฎ๐๐ซ๐๐ง๐ญ๐๐๐ ๐๐ฌ ๐ญ๐จ ๐๐จ๐ฆ๐ฉ๐ฅ๐๐ญ๐๐ง๐๐ฌ๐ฌ ๐จ๐ซ ๐๐๐๐ฎ๐ซ๐๐๐ฒ.
tweet
A sober valuation analysis on $MSCI ๐ง๐ฝโโ๏ธ
โขNTM P/E Ratio: 29.33x
โข10-Year Mean: 34.93x
โขNTM FCF Yield: 3.64%
โข10-Year Mean: 3.37%
As you can see, $MSCI appears to be trading below fair value
Going forward, investors can receive ~19% MORE in earnings per share & ~9% MORE in FCF per share ๐ง ***
Before we get into valuation, letโs take a look at why $MSCI is a good business
BALANCE SHEET๐
โขCash & Short-Term Inv: $519.31M
โขLong-Term Debt: $4.50B
$MSCI has an ok balance sheet, a BBB- S&P Credit Rating, & 6.80x FFO Interest Coverate
RETURN ON CAPITALโ
โข2019: 23.4%
โข2020: 28.6%
โข2021: 26.5%
โข2022: 33.0%
โข2023: 35.2%
RETURN ON EQUITY๐
โข2019: (463.5%)
โข2020: (231.5%)
โข2021: (239.3%)
โข2022: (148.6%)
โข2023: (131.4%)
*ROE negative due to heavy use of debt
$MSCI has strong return metrics, highlighting the financial efficiency of the business
REVENUESโ
โข2013: $913.36M
โข2023: $2,528.92M
โขCAGR: 10.72%
FREE CASH FLOWโ
โข2013: $280.93M
โข2023: $1,213.27M
โขCAGR: 15.75%
NORMALIZED EPSโ
โข2013: $2.16
โข2023: $13.52
โขCAGR: 20.13%
SHARE BUYBACKSโ
โข2013 Shares Outstanding: 121.07M
โขLTM Shares Outstanding: 79.60M
By reducing its shares outstanding 34.2%, $MSCI increased its EPS by 51.9% (assuming 0 growth)
MARGINSโ
โขLTM Gross Margins: 82.2%
โขLTM Operating Margins: 53.9%
โขLTM Net Income Margins: 44.6%
***NOW TO VALUATION ๐ง
As stated above, investors can expect to receive ~19% MORE in EPS & ~9% MORE in FCF per share
Using Benjamin Grahamโs 2G rule of thumb, $MSCI has to grow earnings at an 14.67% CAGR over the next several years to justify its valuation
Today, analysts anticipate 2024 - 2026 EPS growth over the next few years to be less than the (14.67%) required growth rate:
2024E: $14.84 (9.8% YoY) *FY Dec
2025E: $17.07 (15.0% YoY)
2026E: $19.39 (13.6% YoY)
$MSCI has a great track record of meeting analyst estimates ~2 years out, but letโs assume $MSCI ends 2026 with $19.39 in EPS & see its CAGR potential assuming different multiples
32x P/E: $620.48๐ต โฆ ~14.6% CAGR
31x P/E: $601.09๐ต โฆ ~13.2% CAGR
30x P/E: $581.70๐ต โฆ ~11.9% CAGR
29x P/E: $562.31๐ต โฆ ~10.5% CAGR
28x P/E: $542.92๐ต โฆ ~9.1% CAGR
As you can see, $MSCI appears to have double-digit return potential if we assume >29x earnings, a level of fundamental support (first green line in P/E chart) & a level below its 10-year average multiple of 34.93x
Given its wide moat, exemplary capital allocation, & linearity in its EPS & FCF, I believe 29x is fair for $MSCI & leaves us with some margin of safety
Today at $446๐ต my research leads me to believe that $MSCI is a worthwhile consideration for investment
Knowing that $MSCI could trade down a bit more (closer to 25x as youโll see in second green line in P/E chart) I would piece into the position
In other words, if I wanted to allocate 5% to $MSCI, Iโd likely look to initiate a 3% - 3.5% allocation & leave room to add more & make it 5% if we see $MSCI trade between $380๐ต - $400๐ต
#stocks #investing
___
๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐โผ๏ธ: ๐๐ก๐ข๐ฌ ๐ข๐ฌ ๐๐๐ ๐๐ง๐ฏ๐๐ฌ๐ญ๐ฆ๐๐ง๐ญ ๐๐๐ฏ๐ข๐๐. ๐๐๐๐ฒ๐ฅ๐จ๐ง ๐๐๐ฉ๐ข๐ญ๐๐ฅยฎ ๐๐ง๐ ๐ข๐ญ๐ฌ ๐ซ๐๐ฉ๐ซ๐๐ฌ๐๐ง๐ญ๐๐ญ๐ข๐ฏ๐๐ฌ ๐ฆ๐๐ฒ ๐ก๐๐ฏ๐ ๐ฉ๐จ๐ฌ๐ข๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง๐ฌ ๐ข๐ง ๐ญ๐ก๐ ๐ฌ๐๐๐ฎ๐ซ๐ข๐ญ๐ข๐๐ฌ ๐๐ข๐ฌ๐๐ฎ๐ฌ๐ฌ๐๐ ๐ข๐ง ๐ญ๐ก๐ข๐ฌ ๐ญ๐ฐ๐๐๐ญ.
๐๐ก๐ ๐ข๐ง๐๐จ๐ซ๐ฆ๐๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง ๐๐จ๐ง๐ญ๐๐ข๐ง๐๐ ๐ข๐ง ๐ญ๐ก๐ข๐ฌ ๐ญ๐ฐ๐๐๐ญ ๐ข๐ฌ ๐ข๐ง๐ญ๐๐ง๐๐๐ ๐๐จ๐ซ ๐ข๐ง๐๐จ๐ซ๐ฆ๐๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง๐๐ฅ ๐ฉ๐ฎ๐ซ๐ฉ๐จ๐ฌ๐๐ฌ ๐จ๐ง๐ฅ๐ฒ ๐๐ง๐ ๐ฌ๐ก๐จ๐ฎ๐ฅ๐ ๐ง๐จ๐ญ ๐๐ ๐๐จ๐ง๐ฌ๐ญ๐ซ๐ฎ๐๐ ๐๐ฌ ๐ข๐ง๐ฏ๐๐ฌ๐ญ๐ฆ๐๐ง๐ญ ๐๐๐ฏ๐ข๐๐ ๐ญ๐จ ๐ฆ๐๐๐ญ ๐ญ๐ก๐ ๐ฌ๐ฉ๐๐๐ข๐๐ข๐ ๐ง๐๐๐๐ฌ ๐จ๐ ๐๐ง๐ฒ ๐ข๐ง๐๐ข๐ฏ๐ข๐๐ฎ๐๐ฅ ๐จ๐ซ ๐ฌ๐ข๐ญ๐ฎ๐๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง. ๐๐๐ฌ๐ญ ๐ฉ๐๐ซ๐๐จ๐ซ๐ฆ๐๐ง๐๐ ๐ข๐ฌ ๐ง๐จ ๐ ๐ฎ๐๐ซ๐๐ง๐ญ๐๐ ๐จ๐ ๐๐ฎ๐ญ๐ฎ๐ซ๐ ๐ซ๐๐ฌ๐ฎ๐ฅ๐ญ๐ฌ.
๐๐ง๐๐จ๐ซ๐ฆ๐๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง ๐๐จ๐ง๐ญ๐๐ข๐ง๐๐ ๐ข๐ง ๐ญ๐ก๐ข๐ฌ ๐ญ๐ฐ๐๐๐ญ ๐ก๐๐ฌ ๐๐๐๐ง ๐จ๐๐ญ๐๐ข๐ง๐๐ ๐๐ซ๐จ๐ฆ ๐ฌ๐จ๐ฎ๐ซ๐๐๐ฌ ๐๐๐ฅ๐ข๐๐ฏ๐๐ ๐ญ๐จ ๐๐ ๐ซ๐๐ฅ๐ข๐๐๐ฅ๐, ๐๐ฎ๐ญ ๐ข๐ฌ ๐ง๐จ๐ญ ๐ ๐ฎ๐๐ซ๐๐ง๐ญ๐๐๐ ๐๐ฌ ๐ญ๐จ ๐๐จ๐ฆ๐ฉ๐ฅ๐๐ญ๐๐ง๐๐ฌ๐ฌ ๐จ๐ซ ๐๐๐๐ฎ๐ซ๐๐๐ฒ.
tweet
Offshore
Photo
๎จ Q-Cap ๎จ
Mauboussin argues that typical valuation methods like P/E and EV/EBITDA are getting worst at reflecting the real economic picture of a company due to the rise of intangible assets on balance sheets.
The Microsoft example is really shocking. https://t.co/BY3AXUwfhN
tweet
Mauboussin argues that typical valuation methods like P/E and EV/EBITDA are getting worst at reflecting the real economic picture of a company due to the rise of intangible assets on balance sheets.
The Microsoft example is really shocking. https://t.co/BY3AXUwfhN
tweet
The Long Investor
$SPY 50 Day MA is at $510 right now so there is still more room for this relief bounce as $META, $MSFT and $GOOG report today and tomorrow.
A rejection at this level and I expect another leg down
tweet
$SPY 50 Day MA is at $510 right now so there is still more room for this relief bounce as $META, $MSFT and $GOOG report today and tomorrow.
A rejection at this level and I expect another leg down
$SPY I have gone through every correction since 1993 and only once has the $SPY not retested the 50 Day MA from below before rejecting further down.
This happened in 2020 due Covid and the abrupt decline.
I suspect earnings will help retest the 50 Day MA but a rejection here and the correction is confirmed. - The Long Investortweet
X (formerly Twitter)
The Long Investor (@TheLongInvest) on X
$SPY I have gone through every correction since 1993 and only once has the $SPY not retested the 50 Day MA from below before rejecting further down.
This happened in 2020 due Covid and the abrupt decline.
I suspect earnings will help retest the 50 Day MAโฆ
This happened in 2020 due Covid and the abrupt decline.
I suspect earnings will help retest the 50 Day MAโฆ
Offshore
Photo
Giuliano
Astonishingly curious move.
tweet
Astonishingly curious move.
Historic move for customers & the #construction industry: the @NemetschekGroup & @Autodesk agree on joint #interoperability announcement, including key software solutions from both companies, enabling a silo-free ecosystem & end-to-end workkflows.
More | https://t.co/EG5j1npRvN https://t.co/0F1aLwsh3P - mediarelations@nemetschek.comtweet
The Long Investor
$TSLA analysts targets range from
$147 to $234
Yeah, thanks for that clarity.
tweet
$TSLA analysts targets range from
$147 to $234
Yeah, thanks for that clarity.
$TSLA: Citi Raises target price to $182 from $180
$TSLA: UBS Cuts target price to $147 from $160
$TSLA: Canaccord Genuity Cuts target price to $222 from $234
$TSLA: Truist Securities Cuts target price to $162 from $176
$TSLA: Mizuho Cuts target price to $180 from $195 - *Walter Bloombergtweet
X (formerly Twitter)
*Walter Bloomberg (@DeItaone) on X
$TSLA: Citi Raises target price to $182 from $180
$TSLA: UBS Cuts target price to $147 from $160
$TSLA: Canaccord Genuity Cuts target price to $222 from $234
$TSLA: Truist Securities Cuts target price to $162 from $176
$TSLA: Mizuho Cuts target price toโฆ
$TSLA: UBS Cuts target price to $147 from $160
$TSLA: Canaccord Genuity Cuts target price to $222 from $234
$TSLA: Truist Securities Cuts target price to $162 from $176
$TSLA: Mizuho Cuts target price toโฆ
Offshore
Photo
Daniel
Michael Mauboussin just wrote a phenomenal paper on multiples and their role in valuing companies.
The paper is 15 pages long.
Let me give you an introduction by breaking it down for you:
The paper discusses 4 topics:
1. What Multiples Miss
2. The Two Most Popular Multiples
3. Alternative Measures of Earnings
4. EV/EBITDA Deep Dive
1. What Multiples Miss
1.1 Main Problem:
Multiples tell us nothing about the returns of a company.
And if the returns are insufficient (below or at the cost of capital), growing earnings are irrelevant.
- Return above Cost of Capital -> Higher growth leads to higher value
- Return at Cost of Capital -> Higher Growth has no impact
- Return below Cost of Capital -> Higher growth leads to negative value
1.2 Shift to Intangibles
In recent decades, we've seen a shift to intangible assets.
This shift has a material impact on the significance of multiples.
In contrast to tangible assets, intangible assets are often accounted for in SG&A and R&D expenses. Thus, they reduce earnings.
The differences are significant and adjusted for this accounting difference; companies would partially report up to 50% more EBIT or EBITDA.
Because of this, multiples are getting worse at reflecting the economic picture they are supposed to capture.
2. The Two Most Popular Multiples
Price to earnings (P/E) and Enterprise Value to Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization (EV/EBITDA) are the most used multiples.
And while they mostly correlate, there are some factors that cause them to differentiate.
3. Alternative Measures of Earnings
Companies have to report under GAAP regulation (or IFRS for companies outside the US).
But many companies also report non-GAAP numbers. These are adjusted by:
Overall, research has shown that companies report non-GAAP earnings to give investors a more realistic picture of their operations rather than making the company look more profitable than it is.
tweet
Michael Mauboussin just wrote a phenomenal paper on multiples and their role in valuing companies.
The paper is 15 pages long.
Let me give you an introduction by breaking it down for you:
The paper discusses 4 topics:
1. What Multiples Miss
2. The Two Most Popular Multiples
3. Alternative Measures of Earnings
4. EV/EBITDA Deep Dive
1. What Multiples Miss
1.1 Main Problem:
Multiples tell us nothing about the returns of a company.
And if the returns are insufficient (below or at the cost of capital), growing earnings are irrelevant.
- Return above Cost of Capital -> Higher growth leads to higher value
- Return at Cost of Capital -> Higher Growth has no impact
- Return below Cost of Capital -> Higher growth leads to negative value
1.2 Shift to Intangibles
In recent decades, we've seen a shift to intangible assets.
This shift has a material impact on the significance of multiples.
In contrast to tangible assets, intangible assets are often accounted for in SG&A and R&D expenses. Thus, they reduce earnings.
The differences are significant and adjusted for this accounting difference; companies would partially report up to 50% more EBIT or EBITDA.
Because of this, multiples are getting worse at reflecting the economic picture they are supposed to capture.
2. The Two Most Popular Multiples
Price to earnings (P/E) and Enterprise Value to Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization (EV/EBITDA) are the most used multiples.
And while they mostly correlate, there are some factors that cause them to differentiate.
3. Alternative Measures of Earnings
Companies have to report under GAAP regulation (or IFRS for companies outside the US).
But many companies also report non-GAAP numbers. These are adjusted by:
Overall, research has shown that companies report non-GAAP earnings to give investors a more realistic picture of their operations rather than making the company look more profitable than it is.
tweet
Offshore
Photo
The Long Investor
China is moving away from the Dollar as a store of value.
tweet
China is moving away from the Dollar as a store of value.
What is happening in China?
Gold trading volume in China is now 400% LARGER than the average seen in 2023.
The trading activity in gold on the Shanghai Futures Exchange spiked to 1.3 MILLION lots on the peak day of trading last week.
This came at the same time that gold prices broke above a record $2,400/oz.
Last year alone, China's central bank acquired more than 225 tonnes gold.
Since October, gold is nearly 30% posting one of its best 6-month performances in history.
Why is there so much gold buying in China? - The Kobeissi Lettertweet
Offshore
Photo
Brandon Beylo
Say what you want about Bitcoin $BTC and its usability, viability, and value as a currency/medium of exchange.
But @jack and Square $SQ are building the most practical infrastructure available to make that happen.
Like every SQ product, I'm sure this will be beautiful.
tweet
Say what you want about Bitcoin $BTC and its usability, viability, and value as a currency/medium of exchange.
But @jack and Square $SQ are building the most practical infrastructure available to make that happen.
Like every SQ product, I'm sure this will be beautiful.
square sellers: auto-convert a percent of your daily sales to bitcoin: https://t.co/sMiTIZV916 https://t.co/Glnt8gc2eC - jacktweet