🟠 100 BTC club nears 20,000 wallets: a bullish distribution signal?

The number of wallets holding ≥100 BTC is approaching 20,000. Currently at 19,993 addresses, each worth roughly $6.71M at current prices. Santiment expects the milestone to be reached soon.

📊 What it means:

— More 100+ BTC wallets = less extreme top consolidation.
— Reduced risk of a small whale group dominating price swings.
— After a −47% drop from $126K to ~$67K, large holders accumulating can be a bullish sign.

⚠️ The nuance:

— The overall supply share of this cohort hasn’t changed much.
— New wallets are hitting 100 BTC while some long-term holders are selling.
— That’s why price remains suppressed.

💬 Context:
— Will Clemente suggests OG holders may be done selling aggressively.
— Michaël van de Poppe says BTC needs to form a higher low to resume the uptrend.

Distribution is improving, but supply pressure isn’t gone.
If 20K wallets is breached, it could mark the next accumulation phase.

Satoshi Tweeted🔑

#promo

💰 USDT Giveaway from WEEX 💰

Want to get $45 instantly? Deposit $100 and claim your bonus 💸

Tasks and rewards

For new users:
1️⃣ Net deposit ≥ 100 USDT + Futures trading ≥ 100 USDT (min. margin: 10 USDT)
🎁 5 USDT (first 200 users)

2️⃣ Net deposit ≥ 100 USDT (hold until the end of the promotion) + Futures trading ≥ 500 USDT (min. margin: 10 USDT)
🎁 25 USDT (first 200 users)

3️⃣ New P2P user
First purchase via P2P = bonus from 2 to 15 USDT

For existing users:
1️⃣ Net deposit ≥ 100 USDT (hold until the end of the promotion) + Futures trading ≥ 500 USDT (min. margin: 10 USDT)
🎁 10 USDT (first 200 users)

📆 Deadline: 02.03 — 11.03.26

Don’t miss the opportunity to claim your bonuses!

Participate in the promotion here 📌

🟠 ETFs are fueling the bounce: +$462M inflows, BTC briefly above $73K

US spot Bitcoin ETFs keep pulling cash while sentiment is still shaky. Wednesday brought +$462M in net inflows — three green days in a row, pushing the weekly total to $1.1B. BTC briefly popped above $73,000 on the back of that demand.

📊 Flow snapshot

— Day: +$462M (3-day inflow streak)
— Week: $1.1B
— YTD: roughly +$700M (after a brutal -$3.8B, five-week outflow stretch)
— Leader: IBIT +$307M
— Next: FBTC +$48M, Grayscale Mini (BTC) +$32M

🧩 Broad participation
It was a rare session where almost every US spot BTC ETF saw inflows (only one posted flat/zero). Analysts note most funds have flipped net positive YTD, with losses concentrated in just a few holdouts.

⚠️ Sentiment is still “extreme fear”
Fear & Greed ticked up, but it’s still stuck in extreme fear. Translation: money is coming back before the crowd feels safe.

📌 Bottom line
ETF flows look like an early tell: capital is willing to buy risk again, even while emotions lag. If inflows keep stacking, $73K won’t be a ceiling — it’ll be a doorway. Stay sharp and keep alerts on — the next leg can move fast. Don’t miss it.

Satoshi Tweeted🔑

🟠 A 1,000,000-qubit quantum facility: “Bitcoin can be broken” fears are back

PsiQuantum has started building a 1M-qubit quantum computing facility — a number that sounds like “enough to crack crypto” in theory. Naturally, the old narrative resurfaced fast: what if this finally threatens BTC security?

📊 What actually matters

— Quantum risk is not a tomorrow-morning event — it’s a multi-year race: big qubit counts ≠ a ready-to-use key-breaking machine
— Bitcoin devs have been discussing post-quantum defenses (including hard-fork-level options), so the topic is already on the network’s radar
— CoinShares estimates only ~10,230 BTC sits in a legitimately quantum-vulnerable posture — a size the market could absorb without “end of Bitcoin” drama

🧩 Who’s most exposed
The most vulnerable coins are tied to addresses where the public key has been revealed — especially older UTXO-era wallets and early-age holdings that have never been spent.

🛡 One more nuance
A PsiQuantum co-founder publicly said the company has no plans to attack Bitcoin, and it’s hard to “hide” something like that inside a large, real-world operation. Still, markets will use the quantum angle as a volatility narrative whenever it’s convenient.

📌 Bottom line
Quantum FUD comes in waves — almost always years ahead of real danger. The real signal won’t be headlines; it’ll be how fast Bitcoin moves toward quantum-resistant upgrades. Stay calm, track the updates, and stay ready — preparation beats panic. Don’t miss the next move.

Satoshi Tweeted🔑

🟠 Bitcoin mining in space: Starcloud plans to run ASICs from orbit this year

While Earth-based miners get squeezed by margins and power costs, Starcloud — an Nvidia-backed orbital data center startup — says it will start mining Bitcoin from space once its second spacecraft launches later this year.

📊 Why they think it works

— The bet is ASICs, not GPUs: they claim GPUs are ~30x more expensive per watt/kW than specialized mining chips
— If you’re building compute in orbit, mining is one of the most predictable “plug-and-monetize” use cases
— Power is largely solar, which fits the “stop buying energy, start harvesting it” story

🚀 The big claim
Starcloud’s CEO frames it as an endgame: Bitcoin mining uses ~20 GW continuously, so “in the final state” it makes more sense to move it off Earth. Wild? Yes. But markets love this blend of AI + energy + infrastructure narratives.

📉 Mining context

— Profitability has been pressured with BTC down roughly ~48% from the October peak
— A small relief: mining difficulty is down about ~7% from record levels, giving miners some breathing room

📌 Bottom line

“Mining BTC in space” is still more narrative + real-world testing than an instant revolution. But if they can actually keep ASICs running reliably in orbit, it opens a new battlefield for energy and hashpower. Watch the launch — some trends start exactly like this. Don’t miss it.

Satoshi Tweeted🔑

🟠 Bitcoin vs gold: ETF flows hint at early capital rotation

After gold’s massive 2025 run, we’re seeing a familiar pattern: profit-taking in gold ETFs — while Bitcoin ETF inflows turn positive again. It’s not a full switch yet, but the early rotation signals are getting louder.

📊 Flow snapshot

— The biggest US gold ETF, GLD, saw −$3B in a single day — the largest daily outflow in 2+ years
— That followed a −4.4% drop in gold (the sharpest since late January)
— Context matters: gold ETFs pulled +$18.7B in January and +$5.3B in February — a record start → taking profits is logical

🧲 Bitcoin ETFs moved the other way

— BTC ETF 30-day net flow flipped to +$273M (Mar 6) from −$1.9B (Feb 6)
— In native units, the divergence is even clearer:
— BTC ETFs: +4,021 BTC (from −42,275 BTC)
— Gold ETFs: holdings in ounces dropped over the same window
Native units matter: they show real accumulation/distribution without price distortion.

🧠 Why this could be a leadership shift

— Historically, gold and BTC often take turns outperforming
— After gold led hard in 2025, a phase where Bitcoin retakes leadership wouldn’t be surprising, especially if risk sentiment improves
— Both can benefit from deficits, trade tension, and geopolitics — the key is who becomes the leader now

📌 Bottom line
This looks like the classic setup: gold cools after overheating, while Bitcoin starts rebuilding demand via ETF flows. It’s early — but rotations usually start exactly like this. Track flows and balances, not headlines — when capital moves first, price follows.

Satoshi Tweeted🔑

Degenphone: a new era of earning on NFT phone numbers 📲

Degenphone is the first NFT phone number on-chain — full functionality plus a way to earn from resales and promos.

📌 Why it matters

— Instant SMS receiving
— Plugs into bots, AI tools, and automations
— Maximum anonymity (no identity link)
— Supported by Nicegram

💰 It’s not “pennies” anymore
These numbers used to be dirt cheap. Now pricing starts around 70 TON and goes up fast — with premium numbers hitting 1000+ TON.

🏆 Tournament is live: 10 NFT prizes
Simple game: earn more PTS → secure better rewards.

📊 Prize pool:
1) https://t.me/nft/ScaredCat-18331
2) https://t.me/nft/IonGem-860
3) https://t.me/nft/PerfumeBottle-862
4) https://t.me/nft/MagicPotion-3672
5) https://t.me/nft/KissedFrog-2836
6) https://t.me/nft/NekoHelmet-5143
7) https://t.me/nft/SignetRing-8806
8) https://t.me/nft/VoodooDoll-15139
9) https://t.me/nft/EternalRose-24377
10) https://t.me/nft/CupidCharm-3414

🤑 Points system:
Basic actions:
🎲 1 roll — 10 PTS
👥 1 referral — 1 PTS

🏆 Monetization bonuses:
💎 Diamond: +500 PTS (+100 per referral)
🥇 Gold: +250 PTS (+75 per referral)
🥈 Silver: +150 PTS (+50 per referral)
🥉 Regular: +75 PTS (+25 per referral)

🦸‍♂️ Strategy
Roll, invite, monetize harder — and push into the Top-10 before the prize pool is gone. Get in early and grab your NFT — don’t miss it.

Satoshi Tweeted🔑

🟠 Banks vs Bitcoin: BPI moves to fight Basel’s “toxic” treatment

The Bitcoin Policy Institute (BPI) is gearing up to pressure the US Federal Reserve as it prepares rules on how US banks should implement Basel risk-weight guidance. The problem: under the current framework, Bitcoin is effectively treated as a “toxic asset.”

📊 What’s happening

— The Fed said it will soon publish a proposal for public comment on implementing the final phase of Basel in the US
— BPI plans to submit a public comment to push for a better treatment of BTC
— Under Basel’s current approach, Bitcoin carries a 1,250% risk weight

🧨 Why it matters

— A 1,250% risk weight forces banks to hold capital/collateral close to 1:1 against any BTC exposure
— That makes holding BTC more expensive for banks than most asset classes
— Meanwhile cash, government debt, and physical gold sit at 0% risk weight
— Net effect: banks avoid Bitcoin → fewer services for Bitcoin companies and users

⚠️ BPI’s core argument
— The current classification is a “category error”: Bitcoin is boxed into the most punitive bucket
— Instead of improving safety, it pushes infrastructure away from regulated rails and slows legitimate adoption

📌 Bottom line

This isn’t a “crypto debate” — it’s a regulatory switch that decides whether Bitcoin becomes a normal bank asset or stays “toxic on paper.” If the Fed adjusts the risk-weighting, it could be a quiet but massive institutional unlock. Watch the comments phase — these moves shift markets without candles.

Satoshi Tweeted🔑

🟠 ETFs keep stacking inflows: 6 straight days — risk appetite is waking up

US spot Bitcoin ETFs just printed a 6-day inflow streak, the longest since October. Over the same window, BTC is up ~12%, which often means one thing: capital returns before sentiment feels “safe.”

📊 Flow snapshot

— Day: +$199.4M net inflow
— Leaders: IBIT +$139.4M, FBTC +$64.5M
— Small positives: BITB +$2.8M, EZBC +$2.1M
— Outflows: VanEck −$6.3M, ARKB −$3.1M
— Since Mar 9: +$962.8M total
— BTC move: $65,960 → $74,250 (+12.5%)

🌍 Macro is still shaky
US–Iran uncertainty and oil volatility are still in play. Yet BTC pushed into a six-week high zone, helped by rumors of progress on the geopolitical front.

🧠 Crowd behavior is shifting
— Santiment says FOMO is at its strongest since early January
— Fear & Greed climbed to 28, escaping Extreme Fear for the first time since late January
Not euphoria — but fear is thawing.

📌 Bottom line

Six green flow days isn’t a guarantee of continuation, but it’s a strong tell: institutional demand is active again. As long as ETFs keep absorbing supply, dips tend to get bought faster and momentum stays supported. Keep alerts on and track flows — they often speak before the chart.

Satoshi Tweeted🔑