🟠 Bitcoin +3%: the gap with gold hints at “strong upside”

BTC returned to $65–66K amid a rebound in the stock market. Nasdaq +1.05%, S&P 500 +0.68% — risk is being switched back on. But the key point — divergence from gold and equities may play in Bitcoin’s favor.

📊 What’s happening:

— The Coinbase Premium Index turned positive for the first time since January 15 — “US buyers are returning.”
— ETFs recorded +$258M in net inflows.
— BTC correlation with the S&P 500 is just 0.32, with gold — −0.45 (the lowest since 2022).

💡 What’s the signal:

— Over 6 months: gold +51%, S&P +7%, BTC −43%.
— Historically, such gaps do not last long — the asset “catches up.”
— Analysts see potential for “significant upside” if correlations return to normal.

⚠️ Context:

— QCP Capital: this is not a narrative failure, but the effect of position and liquidity unwinding.
— Bitcoin remains an inflation hedge and a form of collateral.
— Institutional adoption in 2025 has only strengthened.

The gap is too large to be permanent.
The question — is this the start of a catch-up rally or just a pause before new pressure?

Satoshi Tweeted🔑

🟠 100 BTC club nears 20,000 wallets: a bullish distribution signal?

The number of wallets holding ≥100 BTC is approaching 20,000. Currently at 19,993 addresses, each worth roughly $6.71M at current prices. Santiment expects the milestone to be reached soon.

📊 What it means:

— More 100+ BTC wallets = less extreme top consolidation.
— Reduced risk of a small whale group dominating price swings.
— After a −47% drop from $126K to ~$67K, large holders accumulating can be a bullish sign.

⚠️ The nuance:

— The overall supply share of this cohort hasn’t changed much.
— New wallets are hitting 100 BTC while some long-term holders are selling.
— That’s why price remains suppressed.

💬 Context:
— Will Clemente suggests OG holders may be done selling aggressively.
— Michaël van de Poppe says BTC needs to form a higher low to resume the uptrend.

Distribution is improving, but supply pressure isn’t gone.
If 20K wallets is breached, it could mark the next accumulation phase.

Satoshi Tweeted🔑

#promo

💰 USDT Giveaway from WEEX 💰

Want to get $45 instantly? Deposit $100 and claim your bonus 💸

Tasks and rewards

For new users:
1️⃣ Net deposit ≥ 100 USDT + Futures trading ≥ 100 USDT (min. margin: 10 USDT)
🎁 5 USDT (first 200 users)

2️⃣ Net deposit ≥ 100 USDT (hold until the end of the promotion) + Futures trading ≥ 500 USDT (min. margin: 10 USDT)
🎁 25 USDT (first 200 users)

3️⃣ New P2P user
First purchase via P2P = bonus from 2 to 15 USDT

For existing users:
1️⃣ Net deposit ≥ 100 USDT (hold until the end of the promotion) + Futures trading ≥ 500 USDT (min. margin: 10 USDT)
🎁 10 USDT (first 200 users)

📆 Deadline: 02.03 — 11.03.26

Don’t miss the opportunity to claim your bonuses!

Participate in the promotion here 📌

🟠 ETFs are fueling the bounce: +$462M inflows, BTC briefly above $73K

US spot Bitcoin ETFs keep pulling cash while sentiment is still shaky. Wednesday brought +$462M in net inflows — three green days in a row, pushing the weekly total to $1.1B. BTC briefly popped above $73,000 on the back of that demand.

📊 Flow snapshot

— Day: +$462M (3-day inflow streak)
— Week: $1.1B
— YTD: roughly +$700M (after a brutal -$3.8B, five-week outflow stretch)
— Leader: IBIT +$307M
— Next: FBTC +$48M, Grayscale Mini (BTC) +$32M

🧩 Broad participation
It was a rare session where almost every US spot BTC ETF saw inflows (only one posted flat/zero). Analysts note most funds have flipped net positive YTD, with losses concentrated in just a few holdouts.

⚠️ Sentiment is still “extreme fear”
Fear & Greed ticked up, but it’s still stuck in extreme fear. Translation: money is coming back before the crowd feels safe.

📌 Bottom line
ETF flows look like an early tell: capital is willing to buy risk again, even while emotions lag. If inflows keep stacking, $73K won’t be a ceiling — it’ll be a doorway. Stay sharp and keep alerts on — the next leg can move fast. Don’t miss it.

Satoshi Tweeted🔑

🟠 A 1,000,000-qubit quantum facility: “Bitcoin can be broken” fears are back

PsiQuantum has started building a 1M-qubit quantum computing facility — a number that sounds like “enough to crack crypto” in theory. Naturally, the old narrative resurfaced fast: what if this finally threatens BTC security?

📊 What actually matters

— Quantum risk is not a tomorrow-morning event — it’s a multi-year race: big qubit counts ≠ a ready-to-use key-breaking machine
— Bitcoin devs have been discussing post-quantum defenses (including hard-fork-level options), so the topic is already on the network’s radar
— CoinShares estimates only ~10,230 BTC sits in a legitimately quantum-vulnerable posture — a size the market could absorb without “end of Bitcoin” drama

🧩 Who’s most exposed
The most vulnerable coins are tied to addresses where the public key has been revealed — especially older UTXO-era wallets and early-age holdings that have never been spent.

🛡 One more nuance
A PsiQuantum co-founder publicly said the company has no plans to attack Bitcoin, and it’s hard to “hide” something like that inside a large, real-world operation. Still, markets will use the quantum angle as a volatility narrative whenever it’s convenient.

📌 Bottom line
Quantum FUD comes in waves — almost always years ahead of real danger. The real signal won’t be headlines; it’ll be how fast Bitcoin moves toward quantum-resistant upgrades. Stay calm, track the updates, and stay ready — preparation beats panic. Don’t miss the next move.

Satoshi Tweeted🔑

🟠 Bitcoin mining in space: Starcloud plans to run ASICs from orbit this year

While Earth-based miners get squeezed by margins and power costs, Starcloud — an Nvidia-backed orbital data center startup — says it will start mining Bitcoin from space once its second spacecraft launches later this year.

📊 Why they think it works

— The bet is ASICs, not GPUs: they claim GPUs are ~30x more expensive per watt/kW than specialized mining chips
— If you’re building compute in orbit, mining is one of the most predictable “plug-and-monetize” use cases
— Power is largely solar, which fits the “stop buying energy, start harvesting it” story

🚀 The big claim
Starcloud’s CEO frames it as an endgame: Bitcoin mining uses ~20 GW continuously, so “in the final state” it makes more sense to move it off Earth. Wild? Yes. But markets love this blend of AI + energy + infrastructure narratives.

📉 Mining context

— Profitability has been pressured with BTC down roughly ~48% from the October peak
— A small relief: mining difficulty is down about ~7% from record levels, giving miners some breathing room

📌 Bottom line

“Mining BTC in space” is still more narrative + real-world testing than an instant revolution. But if they can actually keep ASICs running reliably in orbit, it opens a new battlefield for energy and hashpower. Watch the launch — some trends start exactly like this. Don’t miss it.

Satoshi Tweeted🔑

🟠 Bitcoin vs gold: ETF flows hint at early capital rotation

After gold’s massive 2025 run, we’re seeing a familiar pattern: profit-taking in gold ETFs — while Bitcoin ETF inflows turn positive again. It’s not a full switch yet, but the early rotation signals are getting louder.

📊 Flow snapshot

— The biggest US gold ETF, GLD, saw −$3B in a single day — the largest daily outflow in 2+ years
— That followed a −4.4% drop in gold (the sharpest since late January)
— Context matters: gold ETFs pulled +$18.7B in January and +$5.3B in February — a record start → taking profits is logical

🧲 Bitcoin ETFs moved the other way

— BTC ETF 30-day net flow flipped to +$273M (Mar 6) from −$1.9B (Feb 6)
— In native units, the divergence is even clearer:
— BTC ETFs: +4,021 BTC (from −42,275 BTC)
— Gold ETFs: holdings in ounces dropped over the same window
Native units matter: they show real accumulation/distribution without price distortion.

🧠 Why this could be a leadership shift

— Historically, gold and BTC often take turns outperforming
— After gold led hard in 2025, a phase where Bitcoin retakes leadership wouldn’t be surprising, especially if risk sentiment improves
— Both can benefit from deficits, trade tension, and geopolitics — the key is who becomes the leader now

📌 Bottom line
This looks like the classic setup: gold cools after overheating, while Bitcoin starts rebuilding demand via ETF flows. It’s early — but rotations usually start exactly like this. Track flows and balances, not headlines — when capital moves first, price follows.

Satoshi Tweeted🔑

Degenphone: a new era of earning on NFT phone numbers 📲

Degenphone is the first NFT phone number on-chain — full functionality plus a way to earn from resales and promos.

📌 Why it matters

— Instant SMS receiving
— Plugs into bots, AI tools, and automations
— Maximum anonymity (no identity link)
— Supported by Nicegram

💰 It’s not “pennies” anymore
These numbers used to be dirt cheap. Now pricing starts around 70 TON and goes up fast — with premium numbers hitting 1000+ TON.

🏆 Tournament is live: 10 NFT prizes
Simple game: earn more PTS → secure better rewards.

📊 Prize pool:
1) https://t.me/nft/ScaredCat-18331
2) https://t.me/nft/IonGem-860
3) https://t.me/nft/PerfumeBottle-862
4) https://t.me/nft/MagicPotion-3672
5) https://t.me/nft/KissedFrog-2836
6) https://t.me/nft/NekoHelmet-5143
7) https://t.me/nft/SignetRing-8806
8) https://t.me/nft/VoodooDoll-15139
9) https://t.me/nft/EternalRose-24377
10) https://t.me/nft/CupidCharm-3414

🤑 Points system:
Basic actions:
🎲 1 roll — 10 PTS
👥 1 referral — 1 PTS

🏆 Monetization bonuses:
💎 Diamond: +500 PTS (+100 per referral)
🥇 Gold: +250 PTS (+75 per referral)
🥈 Silver: +150 PTS (+50 per referral)
🥉 Regular: +75 PTS (+25 per referral)

🦸‍♂️ Strategy
Roll, invite, monetize harder — and push into the Top-10 before the prize pool is gone. Get in early and grab your NFT — don’t miss it.

Satoshi Tweeted🔑