Forwarded from Russian MFA 🇷🇺
🎙 Explanation of Vote Permanent Representative of the Russian Federation to the UN Vassily Nebenzia after UNSC Vote on Bahraini Draft Resolution on Iran's Strikes on Gulf Cooperation Council Countries (New York, March 11, 2026)
💬 Vassily Nebenzia: The Russian Federation abstained in the vote on the draft resolution tabled by Bahrain because it is extremely unbalanced and does not serve the purposes of maintaining international peace and security.
we do understand and regret the situation in which the Middle East countries find themselves today. Moreover, Russia deems unacceptable any strikes on the territory of Arab States in the Persian Gulf, in particular on civilian infrastructure there. <...>
However, it would be impossible and unfair to talk about attacks on countries in the region without regard for the root causes of the current escalation, namely the aggression of the US and Israel against Iran.
⚠️ To our deep regret, the resolution that has just been adopted is framed precisely in such a biased and one-sided tone. It muddles up the cause and effect. If someone who is not well versed in international affairs reads this resolution, they will inevitably get the impression that Tehran, willingly and out of malice, conducted an unprovoked attack on Arab countries.
Nor does the document mention the fact that the authorities in Tehran have repeatedly emphasized that their retaliatory actions are directed not against the countries in the region, but against US military facilities and infrastructure located on their territory, and are legitimate targets within Iran's right to self-defense under Article 51 of the UN Charter. <...>
The unconditional imperative to protect civilians and infrastructure in the current conflict is also presented in the adopted resolution in a very one-sided manner. Strikes targeting civilians and civilian infrastructure are unacceptable under any circumstances and in any country – be it Iran, Bahrain, Jordan, Qatar, Kuwait, Oman, Saudi Arabia, the UAE, or Israel.
However, the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) draft suggests that no one has ever attacked the civilian population of Iran. <...>
☝️ Passing such a resolution will not advance peace in the Middle East. It will only exacerbate the differences between key players in the region.
We are worried that, rushing to condemn Iran, the GCC countries may undo all the latest accomplishments on the path to restoring good-neighborly relations with Tehran, thus pushing away the prospect of creating a common security space for the entire region for many years to come.
Moreover, a positive decision by the Council on this document could be interpreted by bad-faith actors, and primarily by those who started this war, as a “blessing” to proceed with aggression against Iran. We urge all UN members to bear this in mind.
Read in full
💬 Vassily Nebenzia: The Russian Federation abstained in the vote on the draft resolution tabled by Bahrain because it is extremely unbalanced and does not serve the purposes of maintaining international peace and security.
we do understand and regret the situation in which the Middle East countries find themselves today. Moreover, Russia deems unacceptable any strikes on the territory of Arab States in the Persian Gulf, in particular on civilian infrastructure there. <...>
However, it would be impossible and unfair to talk about attacks on countries in the region without regard for the root causes of the current escalation, namely the aggression of the US and Israel against Iran.
⚠️ To our deep regret, the resolution that has just been adopted is framed precisely in such a biased and one-sided tone. It muddles up the cause and effect. If someone who is not well versed in international affairs reads this resolution, they will inevitably get the impression that Tehran, willingly and out of malice, conducted an unprovoked attack on Arab countries.
Nor does the document mention the fact that the authorities in Tehran have repeatedly emphasized that their retaliatory actions are directed not against the countries in the region, but against US military facilities and infrastructure located on their territory, and are legitimate targets within Iran's right to self-defense under Article 51 of the UN Charter. <...>
The unconditional imperative to protect civilians and infrastructure in the current conflict is also presented in the adopted resolution in a very one-sided manner. Strikes targeting civilians and civilian infrastructure are unacceptable under any circumstances and in any country – be it Iran, Bahrain, Jordan, Qatar, Kuwait, Oman, Saudi Arabia, the UAE, or Israel.
However, the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) draft suggests that no one has ever attacked the civilian population of Iran. <...>
☝️ Passing such a resolution will not advance peace in the Middle East. It will only exacerbate the differences between key players in the region.
We are worried that, rushing to condemn Iran, the GCC countries may undo all the latest accomplishments on the path to restoring good-neighborly relations with Tehran, thus pushing away the prospect of creating a common security space for the entire region for many years to come.
Moreover, a positive decision by the Council on this document could be interpreted by bad-faith actors, and primarily by those who started this war, as a “blessing” to proceed with aggression against Iran. We urge all UN members to bear this in mind.
Read in full
Forwarded from Russian MFA 🇷🇺
🎙 Explanation of Vote Permanent Representative of the Russian Federation to the UN Vassily Nebenzia after UNSC Vote on Bahraini Draft Resolution on Iran's Strikes on Gulf Cooperation Council Countries (New York, March 11, 2026)
💬 Vassily Nebenzia: The Russian Federation abstained in the vote on the draft resolution tabled by Bahrain because it is extremely unbalanced and does not serve the purposes of maintaining international peace and security.
we do understand and regret the situation in which the Middle East countries find themselves today. Moreover, Russia deems unacceptable any strikes on the territory of Arab States in the Persian Gulf, in particular on civilian infrastructure there. <...>
However, it would be impossible and unfair to talk about attacks on countries in the region without regard for the root causes of the current escalation, namely the aggression of the US and Israel against Iran.
⚠️ To our deep regret, the resolution that has just been adopted is framed precisely in such a biased and one-sided tone. It muddles up the cause and effect. If someone who is not well versed in international affairs reads this resolution, they will inevitably get the impression that Tehran, willingly and out of malice, conducted an unprovoked attack on Arab countries.
Nor does the document mention the fact that the authorities in Tehran have repeatedly emphasized that their retaliatory actions are directed not against the countries in the region, but against US military facilities and infrastructure located on their territory, and are legitimate targets within Iran's right to self-defense under Article 51 of the UN Charter. <...>
The unconditional imperative to protect civilians and infrastructure in the current conflict is also presented in the adopted resolution in a very one-sided manner. Strikes targeting civilians and civilian infrastructure are unacceptable under any circumstances and in any country – be it Iran, Bahrain, Jordan, Qatar, Kuwait, Oman, Saudi Arabia, the UAE, or Israel.
However, the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) draft suggests that no one has ever attacked the civilian population of Iran. <...>
☝️ Passing such a resolution will not advance peace in the Middle East. It will only exacerbate the differences between key players in the region.
We are worried that, rushing to condemn Iran, the GCC countries may undo all the latest accomplishments on the path to restoring good-neighborly relations with Tehran, thus pushing away the prospect of creating a common security space for the entire region for many years to come.
Moreover, a positive decision by the Council on this document could be interpreted by bad-faith actors, and primarily by those who started this war, as a “blessing” to proceed with aggression against Iran. We urge all UN members to bear this in mind.
Read in full
💬 Vassily Nebenzia: The Russian Federation abstained in the vote on the draft resolution tabled by Bahrain because it is extremely unbalanced and does not serve the purposes of maintaining international peace and security.
we do understand and regret the situation in which the Middle East countries find themselves today. Moreover, Russia deems unacceptable any strikes on the territory of Arab States in the Persian Gulf, in particular on civilian infrastructure there. <...>
However, it would be impossible and unfair to talk about attacks on countries in the region without regard for the root causes of the current escalation, namely the aggression of the US and Israel against Iran.
⚠️ To our deep regret, the resolution that has just been adopted is framed precisely in such a biased and one-sided tone. It muddles up the cause and effect. If someone who is not well versed in international affairs reads this resolution, they will inevitably get the impression that Tehran, willingly and out of malice, conducted an unprovoked attack on Arab countries.
Nor does the document mention the fact that the authorities in Tehran have repeatedly emphasized that their retaliatory actions are directed not against the countries in the region, but against US military facilities and infrastructure located on their territory, and are legitimate targets within Iran's right to self-defense under Article 51 of the UN Charter. <...>
The unconditional imperative to protect civilians and infrastructure in the current conflict is also presented in the adopted resolution in a very one-sided manner. Strikes targeting civilians and civilian infrastructure are unacceptable under any circumstances and in any country – be it Iran, Bahrain, Jordan, Qatar, Kuwait, Oman, Saudi Arabia, the UAE, or Israel.
However, the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) draft suggests that no one has ever attacked the civilian population of Iran. <...>
☝️ Passing such a resolution will not advance peace in the Middle East. It will only exacerbate the differences between key players in the region.
We are worried that, rushing to condemn Iran, the GCC countries may undo all the latest accomplishments on the path to restoring good-neighborly relations with Tehran, thus pushing away the prospect of creating a common security space for the entire region for many years to come.
Moreover, a positive decision by the Council on this document could be interpreted by bad-faith actors, and primarily by those who started this war, as a “blessing” to proceed with aggression against Iran. We urge all UN members to bear this in mind.
Read in full
Forwarded from Russian MFA 🇷🇺
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🎙 Remarks to the Press by Permanent Representative of the Russian Federation to the UN Vassily Nebenzia on the Ukrainian Armed Forces Attack on Bryansk (March 11, 2026)
💬 Vassily Nebenzia: On March 10, the neo-Nazi regime in Kiev committed yet another barbaric crime against the civilian population of our country by carrying out a missile strike on Bryansk. A busy business district, located in close proximity to multi-apartment residential buildings, children’s goods stores, a university and other civilian infrastructure, came under deliberate attack. As a result of this strike, seven people were killed and 42 were injured.
The expired head of the regime Zelensky, speaking to the press, described this heinous attack as a “successful operation” and thanked the Armed Forces of Ukraine for their service. This is yet another striking example of the sheer cynicism with which the Kiev authorities treat attacks that claim lives of civilians.
The strike was carried out with the use of at least seven long-range British Storm Shadow missiles. It is entirely obvious – and we have repeatedly pointed this out – that such an operation would be technically impossible for the Ukrainian Armed Forces to conduct on their own.
The use of advanced Western weaponry takes place only with the direct involvement of foreign specialists who guide the targeting. In addition, certain NATO countries provide the necessary intelligence data.
❗️ As such, the Western sponsors of Zelensky bear full responsibility for the killing of civilians. Instead of giving peace negotiations, facilitated by the United States, a genuine chance, Kiev and London are seeking ways to further escalate tensions.
This tactic is not new. It has been repeatedly employed whenever a real prospect of settlement begins to emerge. It is hardly a coincidence that the timing of this attack coincided with signals from Washington expressing hope that negotiations on the Ukrainian settlement have reached a “turning point” and that achieving peace is entirely possible.
Regrettably, international organizations have once again remained blind and deaf to what has happened. Yesterday, during the daily noon briefing, the spokesperson for the UN Secretary-General mentioned the issue only in passing and only after being asked a direct question. Even then, he stated that he “hasn’t seen that particular report”, limiting himself to a general remark that “the UN is against” such attacks.
❓ But where is clear and unequivocal condemnation of this crime? Where is the statement from the Secretary-General himself?
The continued silence on this and similar grave incidents raises serious questions about the impartiality and consistency of the Organization’s approach.
👉 We call on the UN Secretariat to abandon the policy of double standards and to provide an appropriate, clear and unequivocal assessment of this heinous attack.
Read in full
💬 Vassily Nebenzia: On March 10, the neo-Nazi regime in Kiev committed yet another barbaric crime against the civilian population of our country by carrying out a missile strike on Bryansk. A busy business district, located in close proximity to multi-apartment residential buildings, children’s goods stores, a university and other civilian infrastructure, came under deliberate attack. As a result of this strike, seven people were killed and 42 were injured.
The expired head of the regime Zelensky, speaking to the press, described this heinous attack as a “successful operation” and thanked the Armed Forces of Ukraine for their service. This is yet another striking example of the sheer cynicism with which the Kiev authorities treat attacks that claim lives of civilians.
The strike was carried out with the use of at least seven long-range British Storm Shadow missiles. It is entirely obvious – and we have repeatedly pointed this out – that such an operation would be technically impossible for the Ukrainian Armed Forces to conduct on their own.
The use of advanced Western weaponry takes place only with the direct involvement of foreign specialists who guide the targeting. In addition, certain NATO countries provide the necessary intelligence data.
❗️ As such, the Western sponsors of Zelensky bear full responsibility for the killing of civilians. Instead of giving peace negotiations, facilitated by the United States, a genuine chance, Kiev and London are seeking ways to further escalate tensions.
This tactic is not new. It has been repeatedly employed whenever a real prospect of settlement begins to emerge. It is hardly a coincidence that the timing of this attack coincided with signals from Washington expressing hope that negotiations on the Ukrainian settlement have reached a “turning point” and that achieving peace is entirely possible.
Regrettably, international organizations have once again remained blind and deaf to what has happened. Yesterday, during the daily noon briefing, the spokesperson for the UN Secretary-General mentioned the issue only in passing and only after being asked a direct question. Even then, he stated that he “hasn’t seen that particular report”, limiting himself to a general remark that “the UN is against” such attacks.
❓ But where is clear and unequivocal condemnation of this crime? Where is the statement from the Secretary-General himself?
The continued silence on this and similar grave incidents raises serious questions about the impartiality and consistency of the Organization’s approach.
👉 We call on the UN Secretariat to abandon the policy of double standards and to provide an appropriate, clear and unequivocal assessment of this heinous attack.
Read in full
Forwarded from Russian MFA 🇷🇺
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🇷🇺🇮🇷 Embassy of Russia in Iran:
An Il-76 aircraft of Russia’s EMERCOM delivered humanitarian assistance for our Iranian friends.
The humanitarian operation was carried out in accordance with instructions from the President of the Russia Vladimir Putin and on the orders of EMERCOM head Alexander Kurenkov.
The Ministry’s special flight delivered over 13 tonnes of medicines to Azerbaijan, where the cargo was delivered to authorised representatives of the Iranian government and subsequently forwarded to Iran.
📹 Russia's EMERCOM
An Il-76 aircraft of Russia’s EMERCOM delivered humanitarian assistance for our Iranian friends.
The humanitarian operation was carried out in accordance with instructions from the President of the Russia Vladimir Putin and on the orders of EMERCOM head Alexander Kurenkov.
The Ministry’s special flight delivered over 13 tonnes of medicines to Azerbaijan, where the cargo was delivered to authorised representatives of the Iranian government and subsequently forwarded to Iran.
📹 Russia's EMERCOM
Forwarded from Russian MFA 🇷🇺
📅 On March 13, Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov met in Moscow with Executive Secretary of the Preparatory Commission for the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty Organization (#CTBTO PrepCom) Robert Floyd.
The Sides discussed issues related to cooperation with the CTBTO PrepCom.
Russia reaffirmed its commitment to the entry into force of the Treaty, as well as to observing the voluntarily declared moratorium on nuclear testing.
Both Parties emphasized their shared intention to steadily advance cooperation.
***
💬 Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov's opening remarks during his talks with Robert Floyd:
It has been 30 years since the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty was signed, yet it has still not entered into force. Much remains to be done to achieve this goal.
We note your personal contribution to creating the conditions necessary for attaining the result that we would all like to see.
In the current international environment, tensions may escalate at any moment – and, in fact, they already are – including on matters related to nuclear testing.
Information circulating in the media is unsettling many countries and creating the impression that the nuclear non-proliferation regime is not merely facing risks but may be approaching the brink of collapse. In this situation, we highly appreciate your commitment to preserving the depoliticized nature of the work of the Provisional Technical Secretariat under your leadership.
Other international executive bodies dealing with issues of non-proliferation of WMDs sometimes succumb to the temptation to play politics and to accommodate those who seek to fuel tensions on the international stage over matters for which these very institutions were originally established.
☝️ I would like to emphasize once again that the Commission you lead has not yielded to such temptations. We see this as your merit and stand ready to work with you towards achieving the objectives set before the CTBTO Preparatory Commission.
Read in full
The Sides discussed issues related to cooperation with the CTBTO PrepCom.
Russia reaffirmed its commitment to the entry into force of the Treaty, as well as to observing the voluntarily declared moratorium on nuclear testing.
Both Parties emphasized their shared intention to steadily advance cooperation.
***
💬 Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov's opening remarks during his talks with Robert Floyd:
It has been 30 years since the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty was signed, yet it has still not entered into force. Much remains to be done to achieve this goal.
We note your personal contribution to creating the conditions necessary for attaining the result that we would all like to see.
In the current international environment, tensions may escalate at any moment – and, in fact, they already are – including on matters related to nuclear testing.
Information circulating in the media is unsettling many countries and creating the impression that the nuclear non-proliferation regime is not merely facing risks but may be approaching the brink of collapse. In this situation, we highly appreciate your commitment to preserving the depoliticized nature of the work of the Provisional Technical Secretariat under your leadership.
Other international executive bodies dealing with issues of non-proliferation of WMDs sometimes succumb to the temptation to play politics and to accommodate those who seek to fuel tensions on the international stage over matters for which these very institutions were originally established.
☝️ I would like to emphasize once again that the Commission you lead has not yielded to such temptations. We see this as your merit and stand ready to work with you towards achieving the objectives set before the CTBTO Preparatory Commission.
Read in full
Forwarded from Russian MFA 🇷🇺
🗓 On March 13, UK Ambassador to Moscow Nigel Casey and French Ambassador to Moscow Nicolas de Rivière were summoned to the Russian Foreign Ministry and issued a strong protest over the March 10 strike on Bryansk by Ukrainian militants using cruise missiles produced by the Franco-British company MBDA.
❗️ It was clearly stated during the démarche that the UK and France bear direct responsibility for this terrorist attack which killed seven people and injured more than 40.
It was emphasized that the missile strike on Bryansk would have been impossible without the participation of British and French specialists in its organisation, as well as the transfer of intelligence data to the neo-Nazi regime in Kiev.
It was underscored that if London and Paris continue to be complicit in the war crimes of the Kiev regime, responsibility for the destructive consequences of the armed conflict and the escalation of tensions will fall on Britain and France.
It was also stated that Moscow regards the shelling of Bryansk as a deliberate provocation aimed at undermining the stepped-up efforts towards peaceful settlement of the Ukrainian crisis.
The British and French were called upon to abandon these inhumane actions undertaken in pursuit of raising their political profile and to bring the “Ukrainian project” they sponsor back into the focus of the international agenda against the backdrop of the ongoing escalation in the Middle and Near East.
The Russian side also demanded that the UK and France issue a public response with a firm and unequivocal condemnation of the terrorist attack by the Ukrainian militants in Bryansk.
👉 Failure to do so will be regarded as solidarity with terrorist methods – something utterly disgraceful for countries that are permanent members of the UN Security Council.
❗️ It was clearly stated during the démarche that the UK and France bear direct responsibility for this terrorist attack which killed seven people and injured more than 40.
It was emphasized that the missile strike on Bryansk would have been impossible without the participation of British and French specialists in its organisation, as well as the transfer of intelligence data to the neo-Nazi regime in Kiev.
It was underscored that if London and Paris continue to be complicit in the war crimes of the Kiev regime, responsibility for the destructive consequences of the armed conflict and the escalation of tensions will fall on Britain and France.
It was also stated that Moscow regards the shelling of Bryansk as a deliberate provocation aimed at undermining the stepped-up efforts towards peaceful settlement of the Ukrainian crisis.
The British and French were called upon to abandon these inhumane actions undertaken in pursuit of raising their political profile and to bring the “Ukrainian project” they sponsor back into the focus of the international agenda against the backdrop of the ongoing escalation in the Middle and Near East.
The Russian side also demanded that the UK and France issue a public response with a firm and unequivocal condemnation of the terrorist attack by the Ukrainian militants in Bryansk.
👉 Failure to do so will be regarded as solidarity with terrorist methods – something utterly disgraceful for countries that are permanent members of the UN Security Council.
Forwarded from Russian MFA 🇷🇺
📅 On March 13, Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov held a meeting with Director General of the International Atomic Energy Agency (#IAEA) Rafael Mariano Grossi.
During the conversation, the Sides held a constructive exchange of views on key aspects of cooperation between Russia and the IAEA. Russia’s significant contribution to the work of the organisation was noted.
Particular attention was paid to the situation surrounding the attacks by the US and Israel on Iran’s peaceful nuclear facilities placed under IAEA safeguards, as well as to issues related to ensuring the safety and security of the Zaporozhskaya Nuclear Power Plant.
Some other aspects of the international agenda of mutual interest were also touched upon.
***
💬 Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov's opening remarks during his talks with Rafael Grossi:
Russia was among the countries that stood at the origins of the International Atomic Energy Agency and remains convinced that the IAEA deserves the broadest possible support.
In today’s world – particularly over the past couple of years – the Agency, like any other multilateral structure dealing with non-proliferation issues, is being tested as Western colleagues attempt to restore their dominant positions across global politics.
☝️ In this context, it is particularly important to adhere to the statutory principles of the IAEA:
– to maintain impartiality,
– to ensure a depoliticized approach,
– to focus exclusively on fulfilling the tasks that formed the basis of the agreements establishing the Agency, including guaranteeing access for all NPT member states, without exception, to the benefits of peaceful nuclear energy.
I believe this is a very timely opportunity to discuss these developments in detail.
Read in full
During the conversation, the Sides held a constructive exchange of views on key aspects of cooperation between Russia and the IAEA. Russia’s significant contribution to the work of the organisation was noted.
Particular attention was paid to the situation surrounding the attacks by the US and Israel on Iran’s peaceful nuclear facilities placed under IAEA safeguards, as well as to issues related to ensuring the safety and security of the Zaporozhskaya Nuclear Power Plant.
Some other aspects of the international agenda of mutual interest were also touched upon.
***
💬 Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov's opening remarks during his talks with Rafael Grossi:
Russia was among the countries that stood at the origins of the International Atomic Energy Agency and remains convinced that the IAEA deserves the broadest possible support.
In today’s world – particularly over the past couple of years – the Agency, like any other multilateral structure dealing with non-proliferation issues, is being tested as Western colleagues attempt to restore their dominant positions across global politics.
☝️ In this context, it is particularly important to adhere to the statutory principles of the IAEA:
– to maintain impartiality,
– to ensure a depoliticized approach,
– to focus exclusively on fulfilling the tasks that formed the basis of the agreements establishing the Agency, including guaranteeing access for all NPT member states, without exception, to the benefits of peaceful nuclear energy.
I believe this is a very timely opportunity to discuss these developments in detail.
Read in full
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🇷🇺Lake Baikal, the deepest lake on Earth and one of Russia’s greatest natural treasures.
🌞As spring approaches, its crystal-clear waters and vast landscapes remind us of the quiet power and beauty of nature.
🌊A place of wonder, strength, and inspiration.
#Russia
🌞As spring approaches, its crystal-clear waters and vast landscapes remind us of the quiet power and beauty of nature.
🌊A place of wonder, strength, and inspiration.
#Russia
Forwarded from Russian MFA 🇷🇺
🇷🇺🇻🇪✉️ On March 14, Russia's Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov and Minister of Foreign Affairs of the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela Yván Gil exchanged congratulatory messages on the occasion of the 81st anniversary of diplomatic relations between Russia and Venezuela.
Sergey Lavrov expressed Russia’s commitment to working together on the international arena for the sake of building a fair multipolar world with a focus on stepping up bilateral political contacts and multi-thronged cooperation in all areas of mutual interest.
The Venezuelan Foreign Minister gave a positive assessment of the evolution of political dialogue and cooperation mechanisms with Russia reaffirming Venezuela’s readiness to expand the joint working agenda for promoting development, stability and wellbeing for the two countries’ peoples.
🎉 The Foreign Ministry congratulates its Venezuelan friends on this anniversary and wishes them peace, prosperity and success.
#RussiaVenezuela
Sergey Lavrov expressed Russia’s commitment to working together on the international arena for the sake of building a fair multipolar world with a focus on stepping up bilateral political contacts and multi-thronged cooperation in all areas of mutual interest.
The Venezuelan Foreign Minister gave a positive assessment of the evolution of political dialogue and cooperation mechanisms with Russia reaffirming Venezuela’s readiness to expand the joint working agenda for promoting development, stability and wellbeing for the two countries’ peoples.
🎉 The Foreign Ministry congratulates its Venezuelan friends on this anniversary and wishes them peace, prosperity and success.
#RussiaVenezuela
Forwarded from Gateway to Russia
Why do they say, "‘Shchi’ soup & porridge – that’s our food"?
In 1853, Vladimir Dal, a Russian dictionary compiler, published a collection of Russian proverbs. One of them read as follows: "Щи да каша — пища наша" ("Shchi da kasha — pishcha nasha").
According to one version, distinguished military leader Alexander Suvorov used these words to encourage his soldiers during mealtime. However, the proverb most likely arose much earlier, as it describes a typical peasant menu.
Cabbage, potatoes, legumes and grains – these were the typical ingredients used to make soups, stews and porridges. Meat, however, was too expensive for peasants, so it was rarely prepared – only on holidays and between fasts, when they were allowed to eat meat.
Credit: Gateway to Russia: (Hermitage museum, OpenAI, Polozovsky, Кlipartz)
🔔 Gateway to Russia
In 1853, Vladimir Dal, a Russian dictionary compiler, published a collection of Russian proverbs. One of them read as follows: "Щи да каша — пища наша" ("Shchi da kasha — pishcha nasha").
According to one version, distinguished military leader Alexander Suvorov used these words to encourage his soldiers during mealtime. However, the proverb most likely arose much earlier, as it describes a typical peasant menu.
Cabbage, potatoes, legumes and grains – these were the typical ingredients used to make soups, stews and porridges. Meat, however, was too expensive for peasants, so it was rarely prepared – only on holidays and between fasts, when they were allowed to eat meat.
Credit: Gateway to Russia: (Hermitage museum, OpenAI, Polozovsky, Кlipartz)
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Forwarded from Russian MFA 🇷🇺
◼️ Muscovites bring flowers to the Embassy of Iran in Russia, expressing deep condolences, through an improvised tribute, to the numerous victims of the unprovoked aggression by the US & Israel, including the children of the destroyed school in Minab, and in regards to the assassination of Supreme Leader of the Islamic Republic of Iran Grand Ayatollah Seyyed Ali Khamenei along with his family members and the country's military and political leadership.
Forwarded from Russian MFA 🇷🇺
🇷🇺 Russian Paralympic Committee:
#TeamRussia finishes THIRD in the medal standings at the 2026 Paralympic Games!
Despite a team of just six athletes and one guide, our Paralympians delivered a phenomenal performance.
12 MEDALS:
🥇 8 gold
🥈 1 silver
🥉 3 bronze
In the overall standings, Russia finished 3rd, behind only China and the US with many more athletes on the teams.
💬 President of the Russian Paralympic Committee Pavel Rozhkov noted:
👏 Congratulations and massive respect go to our outstanding athletes: Anastasia Bagiyan and her guide Sergey Sinyakin, Varvara Voronchikhina, Ivan Golubkov, Alexei Bugaev, Dmitrii Fadeyev and Monzer Philippe Shebbo.
#TeamRussia finishes THIRD in the medal standings at the 2026 Paralympic Games!
Despite a team of just six athletes and one guide, our Paralympians delivered a phenomenal performance.
12 MEDALS:
🥇 8 gold
🥈 1 silver
🥉 3 bronze
In the overall standings, Russia finished 3rd, behind only China and the US with many more athletes on the teams.
💬 President of the Russian Paralympic Committee Pavel Rozhkov noted:
The results have surpassed all expectations! Even with a small team, Russia made a powerful statement and marked a triumphant return to the international sports arena.
👏 Congratulations and massive respect go to our outstanding athletes: Anastasia Bagiyan and her guide Sergey Sinyakin, Varvara Voronchikhina, Ivan Golubkov, Alexei Bugaev, Dmitrii Fadeyev and Monzer Philippe Shebbo.