Forwarded from Russian MFA 🇷🇺
🇷🇺🇴🇲📞 On March 3, Foreign Minister of Russia Sergey Lavrov and Foreign Minister of Oman Badr bin Hamad Al Busaidi had a telephone conversation.
The Ministers discussed the situation around Iran.
The Russian Side emphasized the need for the earliest possible cessation of any military action and a return to a political and diplomatic settlement.
The importance of taking into account the legitimate interests of all Arab states of the Persian Gulf was underscored.
They confirmed Russia’s and Oman’s readiness – including within the framework of the #UN – to facilitate the search for compromise-based peaceful solutions grounded in respect for the fundamental norms of international law.
Sergey Lavrov expressed appreciation to the authorities of Oman for their assistance in organizing the return to Russia of Russian citizens who had been in the UAE via Omani territory.
#RussiaOman
The Ministers discussed the situation around Iran.
The Russian Side emphasized the need for the earliest possible cessation of any military action and a return to a political and diplomatic settlement.
The importance of taking into account the legitimate interests of all Arab states of the Persian Gulf was underscored.
They confirmed Russia’s and Oman’s readiness – including within the framework of the #UN – to facilitate the search for compromise-based peaceful solutions grounded in respect for the fundamental norms of international law.
Sergey Lavrov expressed appreciation to the authorities of Oman for their assistance in organizing the return to Russia of Russian citizens who had been in the UAE via Omani territory.
#RussiaOman
Forwarded from Russian MFA 🇷🇺
🇷🇺🇮🇷📞 On March 3, Foreign Minister of Russia Sergey Lavrov and Foreign Minister of Iran Abbas Araghchi spoke over the phone.
The Ministers discussed developments in the region following the unprovoked armed aggression by the US and Israel against Iran.
They emphasized that such actions undermine the fundamental norms of international law and entail extremely grave consequences for the entire Middle East.
This position was clearly reaffirmed by the Russian representative at a meeting of the UN Security Council.
Sergey Lavrov reiterated Russia’s principled stance in favour of de-escalation, the rejection of the use of force and a return to a political and diplomatic settlement of the conflict, confirming Russia’s readiness to facilitate this by all available means.
The priority of ensuring the safety of civilians and civilian infrastructure in all countries of the region was also underscored.
#RussiaIran
The Ministers discussed developments in the region following the unprovoked armed aggression by the US and Israel against Iran.
They emphasized that such actions undermine the fundamental norms of international law and entail extremely grave consequences for the entire Middle East.
This position was clearly reaffirmed by the Russian representative at a meeting of the UN Security Council.
Sergey Lavrov reiterated Russia’s principled stance in favour of de-escalation, the rejection of the use of force and a return to a political and diplomatic settlement of the conflict, confirming Russia’s readiness to facilitate this by all available means.
The priority of ensuring the safety of civilians and civilian infrastructure in all countries of the region was also underscored.
#RussiaIran
Forwarded from Russian MFA 🇷🇺
📜On March 3, 1878, the Treaty of San Stefano was signed in a suburb of Constantinople, recording our country’s victory in the Russo-Turkish War of 1877-1878.
Under the terms of the Treaty, Romania, Serbia and Montenegro gained full independence, while Bulgaria, which had been under Ottoman rule for nearly 500 years (!), was granted broad autonomy.
The date of the signing of the Treaty of San Stefano became a national holiday in Bulgaria – the Day of Liberation from Ottoman Rule.
The victory of the Russian forces in the war against the Ottoman Empire and the conclusion of the Treaty laid the foundation for future constructive cooperation between Russia and Bulgaria. For a long time, relations between our countries developed steadily and progressively.
#HistoryOfDiplomacy: A key role in the conclusion of the Treaty of San Stefano was played by the distinguished Russian diplomat and statesman Nikolai Ignatyev, who for more than ten years served as Ambassador Extraordinary and Plenipotentiary of the Russian Empire to the Ottoman Empire, and signed the Treaty on behalf of Russia.
* * *
🇷🇺🇧🇬 Today, Russian-Bulgarian relations have been virtually reduced to zero. The current government is pursuing an openly Russophobic policy, continuing to dismantle the foundations of bilateral cooperation. Unfortunately, this also affects the way historical events are presented in the local media landscape.
💬 Ambassador of Russia to Bulgaria Eleonora Mitrofanova:
☝️ We recall that 100,000 Russian soldiers gave their lives for the freedom of the peoples of the Balkans, including Bulgaria.
#RussiaBulgaria
Under the terms of the Treaty, Romania, Serbia and Montenegro gained full independence, while Bulgaria, which had been under Ottoman rule for nearly 500 years (!), was granted broad autonomy.
The date of the signing of the Treaty of San Stefano became a national holiday in Bulgaria – the Day of Liberation from Ottoman Rule.
The victory of the Russian forces in the war against the Ottoman Empire and the conclusion of the Treaty laid the foundation for future constructive cooperation between Russia and Bulgaria. For a long time, relations between our countries developed steadily and progressively.
#HistoryOfDiplomacy: A key role in the conclusion of the Treaty of San Stefano was played by the distinguished Russian diplomat and statesman Nikolai Ignatyev, who for more than ten years served as Ambassador Extraordinary and Plenipotentiary of the Russian Empire to the Ottoman Empire, and signed the Treaty on behalf of Russia.
* * *
🇷🇺🇧🇬 Today, Russian-Bulgarian relations have been virtually reduced to zero. The current government is pursuing an openly Russophobic policy, continuing to dismantle the foundations of bilateral cooperation. Unfortunately, this also affects the way historical events are presented in the local media landscape.
💬 Ambassador of Russia to Bulgaria Eleonora Mitrofanova:
“In recent years, the chronicle of the Liberation has been ruthlessly rewritten. Alleged ‘imperial ambitions’ of Russia are brought to the forefront, while nothing is said about the truly nationwide movement in defence of our enslaved Bulgarian brothers, which played a decisive role in the decision of Emperor Alexander II to declare war on the Ottoman Empire.”
Excerpts from the congratulatory message by Russian Ambassador to Bulgaria Eleonora Mitrofanova on the occasion of Bulgaria’s national holiday, the Day of Liberation from Ottoman Rule, March 3, 2026.
☝️ We recall that 100,000 Russian soldiers gave their lives for the freedom of the peoples of the Balkans, including Bulgaria.
#RussiaBulgaria
Forwarded from Russian MFA 🇷🇺
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🇷🇺 Russia's EMERCOM:
⚡️ An Il-76 aircraft of Russia's EMERCOM has returned home Russian citizens.
The evacuation of Russian citizens was organised on the instruction of the President of the Russia Vladimir Putin and by order of EMERCOM Head Alexander Kurenkov.
🛬 On the morning of March 4, a special flight from Azerbaijan has landed at Zhukovsky Airport near Moscow. On board were Russian citizens who had left Iran through land border crossing points.
⚡️ An Il-76 aircraft of Russia's EMERCOM has returned home Russian citizens.
The evacuation of Russian citizens was organised on the instruction of the President of the Russia Vladimir Putin and by order of EMERCOM Head Alexander Kurenkov.
🛬 On the morning of March 4, a special flight from Azerbaijan has landed at Zhukovsky Airport near Moscow. On board were Russian citizens who had left Iran through land border crossing points.
Forwarded from Russian MFA 🇷🇺
🇷🇺🇮🇶📞 On March 4, Foreign Minister of Russia Sergey Lavrov and Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Foreign Affairs of Iraq Fuad Hussein had a telephone conversation.
An exchange of views took place regarding developments around Iran.
They emphasised the need for an early cessation of hostilities and for returning the situation to the track of a political and diplomatic settlement.
Sergey Lavrov and Fuad Hussein called on all parties to the conflict to refrain from attacks on civilian infrastructure, which result in suffering among the civilian population.
🤝 The Sides also discussed a number of current issues on the bilateral agenda.
#RussiaIraq
An exchange of views took place regarding developments around Iran.
They emphasised the need for an early cessation of hostilities and for returning the situation to the track of a political and diplomatic settlement.
Sergey Lavrov and Fuad Hussein called on all parties to the conflict to refrain from attacks on civilian infrastructure, which result in suffering among the civilian population.
🤝 The Sides also discussed a number of current issues on the bilateral agenda.
#RussiaIraq
Forwarded from Russian MFA 🇷🇺
🎙 Russian Minister of Foreign Affairs Sergey Lavrov's remarks and answers to media questions during a joint press conference with the Second Minister of Foreign Affairs of Brunei Darussalam Erywan Yusof (March 3, 2026, Moscow)
Key points:
• Brunei is our reliable long-standing partner in the Asia-Pacific region. This year marks the 35th anniversary of diplomatic relations between our countries.
• We substantively reviewed the state and prospects of our cooperation. We agreed to take additional practical steps to advance political contacts. We also noted the importance of maintaining the high pace of growth in our trade turnover. Last year it reached a record level of nearly $900 million.
• We agreed to deepen coordination within the #UN, the #OIC, and the #RussiaASEAN Dialogue Partnership. This dialogue also marks its 35th anniversary this year. Corresponding events will take place.
• Undoubtedly, the conflict of today – essentially a war – is the aggression against the Islamic Republic of Iran. Its consequences are already being felt across the entire region, including Arab states, which are also bearing the costs – both economic and human.
• We believe it is necessary to speak categorically and resolutely in favour of the immediate cessation of hostilities. Everything must be done to stop these actions – as well as the war itself. We regularly hear about its stated objectives, yet we still see no evidence that Iran was developing nuclear weapons – which was presented as the main, if not the only, justification for the war.
***
From the Q&A session:
❓ Question: Russia has called for ending the war in Iran. You also said sanctions are absolutely unacceptable as a method of resolving issues and that international law is not working. What mechanisms – diplomatic or otherwise – could help prevent escalation and expansion of the conflict? In other words, how can what Israel and the United States are currently doing be stopped, and how dangerous do you see the situation in the Middle East?
💬 Sergey Lavrov: I am convinced that the mechanisms can only be political and diplomatic.
As for the mechanisms that could be used now, one may recall our initiative to establish a collective security system in the Persian Gulf, which envisaged full normalization of relations between Iran, its neighbours and the Arab monarchies.
This initiative is more than 25 years old. We have consistently promoted relevant efforts that a couple of years ago helped Saudi Arabia and Iran agree to restore relations. Iran also maintains relations with several other states of the Gulf Cooperation Council.
❓ Question: Israel yesterday announced the mobilisation of 100,000 reservists and declared preparations for a ground operation in Lebanon. This morning the Israeli army reported that it had taken positions in southern Lebanon. How does Russia assess these statements and the risks of escalation on the Lebanese track?
💬 Sergey Lavrov: Of course, this is an escalation and a departure from the existing agreements regarding Lebanon, the status of southern Lebanon, Hezbollah, and the positions the sides should occupy on both banks of the Litani River. There are many arrangements there – and they are now being violated.
Israel says that Hezbollah has begun defending Iran, therefore it is carrying out numerous strikes against Lebanon.
❗️ This is a vicious circle, and it will never be broken unless all these issues are addressed comprehensively.
A Middle East conference, which we have proposed for many years, would now be particularly timely.
In the absence of such a forum – where all parties are represented and each can defend, explain and argue their position and seek a balance of interests – individual powers end up deciding the region’s problems. This is what we see happening in Gaza, in the West Bank, in Lebanon, and now with the Islamic Republic of Iran.
Read in full
Key points:
• Brunei is our reliable long-standing partner in the Asia-Pacific region. This year marks the 35th anniversary of diplomatic relations between our countries.
• We substantively reviewed the state and prospects of our cooperation. We agreed to take additional practical steps to advance political contacts. We also noted the importance of maintaining the high pace of growth in our trade turnover. Last year it reached a record level of nearly $900 million.
• We agreed to deepen coordination within the #UN, the #OIC, and the #RussiaASEAN Dialogue Partnership. This dialogue also marks its 35th anniversary this year. Corresponding events will take place.
• Undoubtedly, the conflict of today – essentially a war – is the aggression against the Islamic Republic of Iran. Its consequences are already being felt across the entire region, including Arab states, which are also bearing the costs – both economic and human.
• We believe it is necessary to speak categorically and resolutely in favour of the immediate cessation of hostilities. Everything must be done to stop these actions – as well as the war itself. We regularly hear about its stated objectives, yet we still see no evidence that Iran was developing nuclear weapons – which was presented as the main, if not the only, justification for the war.
***
From the Q&A session:
❓ Question: Russia has called for ending the war in Iran. You also said sanctions are absolutely unacceptable as a method of resolving issues and that international law is not working. What mechanisms – diplomatic or otherwise – could help prevent escalation and expansion of the conflict? In other words, how can what Israel and the United States are currently doing be stopped, and how dangerous do you see the situation in the Middle East?
💬 Sergey Lavrov: I am convinced that the mechanisms can only be political and diplomatic.
As for the mechanisms that could be used now, one may recall our initiative to establish a collective security system in the Persian Gulf, which envisaged full normalization of relations between Iran, its neighbours and the Arab monarchies.
This initiative is more than 25 years old. We have consistently promoted relevant efforts that a couple of years ago helped Saudi Arabia and Iran agree to restore relations. Iran also maintains relations with several other states of the Gulf Cooperation Council.
❓ Question: Israel yesterday announced the mobilisation of 100,000 reservists and declared preparations for a ground operation in Lebanon. This morning the Israeli army reported that it had taken positions in southern Lebanon. How does Russia assess these statements and the risks of escalation on the Lebanese track?
💬 Sergey Lavrov: Of course, this is an escalation and a departure from the existing agreements regarding Lebanon, the status of southern Lebanon, Hezbollah, and the positions the sides should occupy on both banks of the Litani River. There are many arrangements there – and they are now being violated.
Israel says that Hezbollah has begun defending Iran, therefore it is carrying out numerous strikes against Lebanon.
❗️ This is a vicious circle, and it will never be broken unless all these issues are addressed comprehensively.
A Middle East conference, which we have proposed for many years, would now be particularly timely.
In the absence of such a forum – where all parties are represented and each can defend, explain and argue their position and seek a balance of interests – individual powers end up deciding the region’s problems. This is what we see happening in Gaza, in the West Bank, in Lebanon, and now with the Islamic Republic of Iran.
Read in full
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🎙Интервью Посла России в Канаде О.В.Степанова «Соловьев Live» («Генри Шоу»)
🔹Иран
Канада без промедления поддержала силовую акцию США против Ирана, прибегнув в своём заявлении к сомнительным обоснованиям, обходящим нормы международного права и призванным лишь создать видимость легитимности действий против Тегерана.
🔹Канада - США
Около 80% канадской экономики тесно связано с Соединёнными Штатами, а безопасность страны во многом обеспечивается за счёт предоставления её территории и инфраструктуры для американского военного присутствия и проецирования силы. Прежде всего в северном и арктическом направлениях, но также и в более широком глобальном контексте.
🔹Россия-Канада
Россия никогда не рассматривала Канаду как противника или источник угрозы.
Двусторонних отношений в их классическом смысле между Россией и Канадой не существует. Они в глубокой заморозке с2014 г. и особенно после 24 февраля 2022 г. Оттава сама пошла на их разрушение.
🔹Арктика
В Арктическом совете именно Канада выступает одним из ведущих голосов за то, чтобы решать арктвопросы в формате «семёрки», без России. Это трудно представить на практике, учитывая, что около половины Арктики относится к российской зоне ответственности.
🔹Канада-Великобритания
Между Лондоном и Оттавой осуществляется тесная координация по вопросам внешней политики.
🔹Канада-Украина
Русофобский курс Канады вырабатывается во многом под нажимом влиятельной здесь укробандеровской диаспоры.
🔹Иран
Канада без промедления поддержала силовую акцию США против Ирана, прибегнув в своём заявлении к сомнительным обоснованиям, обходящим нормы международного права и призванным лишь создать видимость легитимности действий против Тегерана.
🔹Канада - США
Около 80% канадской экономики тесно связано с Соединёнными Штатами, а безопасность страны во многом обеспечивается за счёт предоставления её территории и инфраструктуры для американского военного присутствия и проецирования силы. Прежде всего в северном и арктическом направлениях, но также и в более широком глобальном контексте.
🔹Россия-Канада
Россия никогда не рассматривала Канаду как противника или источник угрозы.
Двусторонних отношений в их классическом смысле между Россией и Канадой не существует. Они в глубокой заморозке с2014 г. и особенно после 24 февраля 2022 г. Оттава сама пошла на их разрушение.
🔹Арктика
В Арктическом совете именно Канада выступает одним из ведущих голосов за то, чтобы решать арктвопросы в формате «семёрки», без России. Это трудно представить на практике, учитывая, что около половины Арктики относится к российской зоне ответственности.
🔹Канада-Великобритания
Между Лондоном и Оттавой осуществляется тесная координация по вопросам внешней политики.
🔹Канада-Украина
Русофобский курс Канады вырабатывается во многом под нажимом влиятельной здесь укробандеровской диаспоры.
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🎙Interview of the Ambassador of Russia to Canada, Oleg Stepanov, with "Solovev Live" (“Henry Show”)
🔹Iran
Canada immediately supported the U.S. use of force against Iran, resorting in its statement to questionable justifications that circumvent international law and merely create the appearance of legitimacy for actions directed against Tehran.
🔹Canada–United States
Around 80% of the Canadian economy is closely tied to the United States, while the country’s security is largely ensured through the use of its territory and infrastructure for the American military presence and power projection. This applies first and foremost to the northern and Arctic directions, but also in a broader global context.
🔹Russia–Canada
Russia has never regarded Canada as an adversary or a source of threat.
Bilateral relations between Russia and Canada, in the classical sense, do not exist. They have been in a deep freeze since 2014 and especially after February 24, 2022. Ottawa itself chose to dismantle them.
🔹Arctic
Within the Arctic Council, Canada has been one of the leading voices advocating that Arctic issues be addressed in a “Group of Seven” format, without Russia. This is difficult to imagine in practice, given that roughly half of the Arctic falls within Russia’s zone of responsibility.
🔹Canada–United Kingdom
There is close coordination between London and Ottawa on foreign policy matters.
🔹Canada–Ukraine
Canada’s Russophobic course is shaped to a considerable extent under pressure from the influential Ukrainian Banderite diaspora in the country.
🔹Iran
Canada immediately supported the U.S. use of force against Iran, resorting in its statement to questionable justifications that circumvent international law and merely create the appearance of legitimacy for actions directed against Tehran.
🔹Canada–United States
Around 80% of the Canadian economy is closely tied to the United States, while the country’s security is largely ensured through the use of its territory and infrastructure for the American military presence and power projection. This applies first and foremost to the northern and Arctic directions, but also in a broader global context.
🔹Russia–Canada
Russia has never regarded Canada as an adversary or a source of threat.
Bilateral relations between Russia and Canada, in the classical sense, do not exist. They have been in a deep freeze since 2014 and especially after February 24, 2022. Ottawa itself chose to dismantle them.
🔹Arctic
Within the Arctic Council, Canada has been one of the leading voices advocating that Arctic issues be addressed in a “Group of Seven” format, without Russia. This is difficult to imagine in practice, given that roughly half of the Arctic falls within Russia’s zone of responsibility.
🔹Canada–United Kingdom
There is close coordination between London and Ottawa on foreign policy matters.
🔹Canada–Ukraine
Canada’s Russophobic course is shaped to a considerable extent under pressure from the influential Ukrainian Banderite diaspora in the country.
Forwarded from Russian MFA 🇷🇺
🎙 Russia's Foreign Ministry Spokeswoman Maria Zakharova’s answer to a media question regarding the attack on the Russian gas tanker Arctic Metagaz (March 4, 2026)
❓ Question: On March 3, a Russian vessel, the gas carrier Arctic Metagaz, was attacked in the Mediterranean Sea. What is the fate of its crew, and what measures is the Russian side taking in this situation?
💬 Maria Zakharova: The Russian Foreign Ministry and its overseas missions, in coordination with the relevant authorities, have joined the operation to rescue the crew members of the Russian gas carrier Arctic Metagaz, which was attacked in the Mediterranean Sea.
According to the information available to us, all 30 crew members have been rescued and are safe. Two individuals who sustained burns are receiving medical assistance in cooperation with the coastal state.
Russian diplomatic missions in the region continue to monitor the situation and stand ready to provide the necessary support to Russian citizens.
As stated by the Russian Ministry of Transport, the attack on the tanker was carried out by Ukrainian unmanned boats.
Such actions – if confirmed – constitute an act of terrorism, a blatant violation of international law, and pose a direct threat to maritime security.
Given that the vessel in question was a gas carrier transporting cargo, the consequences of this attack also entail colossal environmental damage.
❗️ We reserve the right to take political and diplomatic measures in response to this incident, including in light of the threat to international peace and security posed by such actions.
❓ Question: On March 3, a Russian vessel, the gas carrier Arctic Metagaz, was attacked in the Mediterranean Sea. What is the fate of its crew, and what measures is the Russian side taking in this situation?
💬 Maria Zakharova: The Russian Foreign Ministry and its overseas missions, in coordination with the relevant authorities, have joined the operation to rescue the crew members of the Russian gas carrier Arctic Metagaz, which was attacked in the Mediterranean Sea.
According to the information available to us, all 30 crew members have been rescued and are safe. Two individuals who sustained burns are receiving medical assistance in cooperation with the coastal state.
Russian diplomatic missions in the region continue to monitor the situation and stand ready to provide the necessary support to Russian citizens.
As stated by the Russian Ministry of Transport, the attack on the tanker was carried out by Ukrainian unmanned boats.
Such actions – if confirmed – constitute an act of terrorism, a blatant violation of international law, and pose a direct threat to maritime security.
Given that the vessel in question was a gas carrier transporting cargo, the consequences of this attack also entail colossal environmental damage.
❗️ We reserve the right to take political and diplomatic measures in response to this incident, including in light of the threat to international peace and security posed by such actions.
Forwarded from Russian MFA 🇷🇺
🎙 Comment by Russia's Foreign Ministry Spokeswoman Maria Zakharova on France’s decision to increase its nuclear arsenal (March 4, 2026)
💬 The statement made the other day by French President Emmanuel Macron regarding Paris’s intention to embark upon a non-transparent expansion of its nuclear arsenal, which in itself constitutes an extremely destabilising development, should be viewed in a broader context.
<...>
We note that the United Kingdom earlier announced an approach largely similar to the course now adopted by France, having some time ago also begun a significant expansion of its national nuclear arsenal while reducing its transparency.
Moreover, in accordance with US-UK arrangements, London will, in addition to its existing sea-based component, acquire air delivery systems for nuclear weapons and gain access, with US consent, to US nuclear aerial bombs newly deployed in Britain which will further increase the number of warheads that the country could employ in a potential conflict.
At the same time, NATO’s traditional policy in this sphere excludes disclosure of the quantitative parameters of US nuclear weapons deployed in Europe. Russia is compelled to take into account that, in addition to the United Kingdom, an undeclared number of such weapons is stationed in four other European NATO countries and Türkiye, from where they are capable of striking a broad range of critically important targets on the territory of the Russian Federation. <...>
Beyond strengthening their national military nuclear capabilities, the United Kingdom and France are working with their allies to shape a certain independent or autonomous European nuclear deterrent capability.
Initial, somewhat disingenuous attempts to present this as an alternative to the American nuclear umbrella quickly gave way to recognition of the obvious fact that this concerns the expansion of the European nuclear component within NATO, in addition to the existing practice of nuclear sharing missions based on US nuclear weapons.
Thus, there is a substantial reinforcement and expansion of NATO’s overall nuclear potential, which, in the event of a direct military conflict with Russia, could be coordinated against our country not only in its European segment but in its entirety, including the US arsenal. <...>
We also note that the decisions by London and Paris to expand their nuclear arsenals are intended to be implemented outside international constraints, continuing their long-standing policy of avoiding participation in any nuclear arms control arrangements.
Read in full
💬 The statement made the other day by French President Emmanuel Macron regarding Paris’s intention to embark upon a non-transparent expansion of its nuclear arsenal, which in itself constitutes an extremely destabilising development, should be viewed in a broader context.
<...>
We note that the United Kingdom earlier announced an approach largely similar to the course now adopted by France, having some time ago also begun a significant expansion of its national nuclear arsenal while reducing its transparency.
Moreover, in accordance with US-UK arrangements, London will, in addition to its existing sea-based component, acquire air delivery systems for nuclear weapons and gain access, with US consent, to US nuclear aerial bombs newly deployed in Britain which will further increase the number of warheads that the country could employ in a potential conflict.
At the same time, NATO’s traditional policy in this sphere excludes disclosure of the quantitative parameters of US nuclear weapons deployed in Europe. Russia is compelled to take into account that, in addition to the United Kingdom, an undeclared number of such weapons is stationed in four other European NATO countries and Türkiye, from where they are capable of striking a broad range of critically important targets on the territory of the Russian Federation. <...>
Beyond strengthening their national military nuclear capabilities, the United Kingdom and France are working with their allies to shape a certain independent or autonomous European nuclear deterrent capability.
Initial, somewhat disingenuous attempts to present this as an alternative to the American nuclear umbrella quickly gave way to recognition of the obvious fact that this concerns the expansion of the European nuclear component within NATO, in addition to the existing practice of nuclear sharing missions based on US nuclear weapons.
Thus, there is a substantial reinforcement and expansion of NATO’s overall nuclear potential, which, in the event of a direct military conflict with Russia, could be coordinated against our country not only in its European segment but in its entirety, including the US arsenal. <...>
We also note that the decisions by London and Paris to expand their nuclear arsenals are intended to be implemented outside international constraints, continuing their long-standing policy of avoiding participation in any nuclear arms control arrangements.
Read in full
Forwarded from Russian MFA 🇷🇺
🎙 President of Russia Vladimir Putin held a meeting with Minister of Foreign Affairs and Trade of Hungary Peter Szijjarto (March 4, 2026, Moscow)
From the Russian Side, the meeting was also attended by Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov, First Deputy Prime Minister Denis Manturov, and Presidential Aide Yury Ushakov.
💬 Vladimir Putin: You chair the intergovernmental commission on the Hungarian Side, and it is working actively. You visit Russia frequently. I am aware of your efforts to maintain the momentum in our relations, despite the well-known challenges, though we will not dwell on that now.
Our trade turnover has unfortunately declined somewhat – last year, I believe, it fell by about 13%. Nevertheless, overall our relations remain stable and continue to develop in a positive direction. I refer in particular to cooperation in energy policy, including hydrocarbons, as well as our flagship project – the Paks Nuclear Power Plant.
As for hydrocarbons, I understand that oil supplies are of particular concern to you. We see what is happening now on global gas markets and on the European gas market. We will be glad to discuss all these matters. Whatever depends on us – we have always fulfilled all our obligations – and, of course, we intend and are prepared to continue doing so.
I repeat: we have always been reliable suppliers. You know this, and I have noted your public statements on this matter. Only yesterday I spoke with Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban on several issues.
***
💬 Vladimir Putin: Mr Minister, during our telephone conversation yesterday, Prime Minister Viktor Orban also raised this issue and asked me to consider releasing Hungarian citizens held by the Russian army. These individuals hold dual citizenship – Ukrainian and Hungarian – and were forcibly mobilized.
I have decided to release two individuals. As the Prime Minister requested, you will be able to take them with you – directly onto the plane on which you arrived and on which you will return to Budapest.
#RussiaHungary
From the Russian Side, the meeting was also attended by Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov, First Deputy Prime Minister Denis Manturov, and Presidential Aide Yury Ushakov.
💬 Vladimir Putin: You chair the intergovernmental commission on the Hungarian Side, and it is working actively. You visit Russia frequently. I am aware of your efforts to maintain the momentum in our relations, despite the well-known challenges, though we will not dwell on that now.
Our trade turnover has unfortunately declined somewhat – last year, I believe, it fell by about 13%. Nevertheless, overall our relations remain stable and continue to develop in a positive direction. I refer in particular to cooperation in energy policy, including hydrocarbons, as well as our flagship project – the Paks Nuclear Power Plant.
As for hydrocarbons, I understand that oil supplies are of particular concern to you. We see what is happening now on global gas markets and on the European gas market. We will be glad to discuss all these matters. Whatever depends on us – we have always fulfilled all our obligations – and, of course, we intend and are prepared to continue doing so.
I repeat: we have always been reliable suppliers. You know this, and I have noted your public statements on this matter. Only yesterday I spoke with Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban on several issues.
***
💬 Vladimir Putin: Mr Minister, during our telephone conversation yesterday, Prime Minister Viktor Orban also raised this issue and asked me to consider releasing Hungarian citizens held by the Russian army. These individuals hold dual citizenship – Ukrainian and Hungarian – and were forcibly mobilized.
I have decided to release two individuals. As the Prime Minister requested, you will be able to take them with you – directly onto the plane on which you arrived and on which you will return to Budapest.
#RussiaHungary
Forwarded from Russian MFA 🇷🇺
🎙 Russian President Vladimir Putin's answer to a media question following talks with Minister of Foreign Affairs and Trade of Hungary Peter Szijjarto (March 4, 2026, Moscow)
❓ Question: You mentioned the situation on the global gas markets. Many countries are panicking over the current events. Prices have soared, and it is unclear what will happen with prices and deliveries next. This makes one recall that Europe has repeatedly prohibited Russian gas imports. They are saying now that the deadline for the bans should be revised in light of the current global developments.
💬 Vladimir Putin: First of all, Russia has always been – and remains – a reliable supplier of energy resources to all its partners, including those in Europe. We will continue to work in this manner with partners who themselves remain reliable counterparties, such as Slovakia and Hungary in Eastern Europe.
We supply these countries with our energy resources, including oil and gas, and we intend to continue doing so provided that their authorities maintain this policy – in other words, if they remain reliable partners.
☝️ The current developments in European energy markets are primarily the result of the flawed energy policy pursued by European authorities, the misuse of the green agenda, and the instrumentalisation of these tools for internal political purposes – to advance party or group interests. This policy has little to do with the real interests of their citizens.
Oil and gas prices have increased now. With regard to oil, this is understandable and is partly linked to restrictions on imports of Russian oil. At the same time, the situation has been further aggravated by developments in the Middle East resulting from the aggression against Iran, which has produced a complicated and undoubtedly unpleasant outcome for consumers.
As for natural gas, under the current conditions there was no immediate link between the surge in prices on the European market and any reduction in supplies. After all, the main suppliers have not cut their deliveries. Who are these main suppliers? Algeria, the US, Norway, and, to some extent, Russia. None of them reduced their shipments, yet this did not prevent prices from climbing to as high as $700.
Why did this happen? It reflects the overall situation on global markets – including both oil and gas markets. In particular, it is driven by the fact that some buyers are prepared to pay a higher price for natural gas. In this case, the situation has also been influenced by developments in the Middle East, including the closure of the Strait of Hormuz and related factors.
When such premium buyers appear on the market, it naturally means that certain suppliers who have long served the European market – for example the US companies – will redirect their supplies to those offering the highest price. This is entirely natural and has nothing to do with politics. Just business.
👉 For this reason, I repeat: the situation largely stems from the misguided policies pursued by European governments. Moreover, they have been following this course for many years.
Recently they announced plans to introduce new restrictions on Russian gas imports in April – meaning that the 24th will effectively be the last day before these measures come into force on the 25th. Further restrictions are planned for 2027, up to a complete ban.
☝️ Meanwhile, other markets are opening up. One may ask whether it would make sense for us to stop supplying the European market earlier and redirect these volumes to emerging markets, thereby strengthening our positions there.
I would like to emphazise that this is not a political matter. If we are likely to lose access to their market in a month or two anyway, it may make sense to cease supplies immediately and turn instead to countries that have been reliable partners for us, securing a stronger presence in their markets.
However, this is not a final decision. I will certainly instruct the Government to work this matter through with our companies.
❓ Question: You mentioned the situation on the global gas markets. Many countries are panicking over the current events. Prices have soared, and it is unclear what will happen with prices and deliveries next. This makes one recall that Europe has repeatedly prohibited Russian gas imports. They are saying now that the deadline for the bans should be revised in light of the current global developments.
💬 Vladimir Putin: First of all, Russia has always been – and remains – a reliable supplier of energy resources to all its partners, including those in Europe. We will continue to work in this manner with partners who themselves remain reliable counterparties, such as Slovakia and Hungary in Eastern Europe.
We supply these countries with our energy resources, including oil and gas, and we intend to continue doing so provided that their authorities maintain this policy – in other words, if they remain reliable partners.
☝️ The current developments in European energy markets are primarily the result of the flawed energy policy pursued by European authorities, the misuse of the green agenda, and the instrumentalisation of these tools for internal political purposes – to advance party or group interests. This policy has little to do with the real interests of their citizens.
Oil and gas prices have increased now. With regard to oil, this is understandable and is partly linked to restrictions on imports of Russian oil. At the same time, the situation has been further aggravated by developments in the Middle East resulting from the aggression against Iran, which has produced a complicated and undoubtedly unpleasant outcome for consumers.
As for natural gas, under the current conditions there was no immediate link between the surge in prices on the European market and any reduction in supplies. After all, the main suppliers have not cut their deliveries. Who are these main suppliers? Algeria, the US, Norway, and, to some extent, Russia. None of them reduced their shipments, yet this did not prevent prices from climbing to as high as $700.
Why did this happen? It reflects the overall situation on global markets – including both oil and gas markets. In particular, it is driven by the fact that some buyers are prepared to pay a higher price for natural gas. In this case, the situation has also been influenced by developments in the Middle East, including the closure of the Strait of Hormuz and related factors.
When such premium buyers appear on the market, it naturally means that certain suppliers who have long served the European market – for example the US companies – will redirect their supplies to those offering the highest price. This is entirely natural and has nothing to do with politics. Just business.
👉 For this reason, I repeat: the situation largely stems from the misguided policies pursued by European governments. Moreover, they have been following this course for many years.
Recently they announced plans to introduce new restrictions on Russian gas imports in April – meaning that the 24th will effectively be the last day before these measures come into force on the 25th. Further restrictions are planned for 2027, up to a complete ban.
☝️ Meanwhile, other markets are opening up. One may ask whether it would make sense for us to stop supplying the European market earlier and redirect these volumes to emerging markets, thereby strengthening our positions there.
I would like to emphazise that this is not a political matter. If we are likely to lose access to their market in a month or two anyway, it may make sense to cease supplies immediately and turn instead to countries that have been reliable partners for us, securing a stronger presence in their markets.
However, this is not a final decision. I will certainly instruct the Government to work this matter through with our companies.
Forwarded from Russian MFA 🇷🇺
⚡️ Russia's Foreign Ministry statement on the situation in the Middle East (March 5, 2026)
💬 Moscow is deeply concerned that the situation in the Middle East continues to deteriorate.
There are no signs that the US and Israel – which launched a military operation under a completely far-fetched pretext aimed at overthrowing the legitimate authorities in Iran – are prepared to show restraint and stop the bloodshed. On the contrary, belligerent statements continue to flow from their capitals, while the Israeli army has carried out a new incursion into Lebanon.
Meanwhile, the aggressors are seeking to sow division within the Islamic world in the midst of the holy month of Ramadan.
They deliberately provoked Iran into retaliatory strikes against facilities in several Arab countries, which resulted in human casualties and material damage – developments that the Russian side deeply regrets.
In doing so, they are attempting to draw Arab states into a war serving someone else’s interests. At the same time, they are trying to divert attention from the catastrophic plight of the Palestinian people.
Russia once again calls on all parties to the current confrontation to immediately cease hostilities, including unacceptable strikes on the territory of the Arab states of the Gulf.
We consider attacks on civilians and strikes against any civilian infrastructure – whether in Iran or in the countries of the Gulf Cooperation Council – to be absolutely unacceptable.
❗️ It is clear that the only way to prevent the region from sliding further into the abyss of destabilization is to stop the aggression of the US and Israel, which triggered this chain reaction of suffering for the Arab peoples.
💬 Moscow is deeply concerned that the situation in the Middle East continues to deteriorate.
There are no signs that the US and Israel – which launched a military operation under a completely far-fetched pretext aimed at overthrowing the legitimate authorities in Iran – are prepared to show restraint and stop the bloodshed. On the contrary, belligerent statements continue to flow from their capitals, while the Israeli army has carried out a new incursion into Lebanon.
Meanwhile, the aggressors are seeking to sow division within the Islamic world in the midst of the holy month of Ramadan.
They deliberately provoked Iran into retaliatory strikes against facilities in several Arab countries, which resulted in human casualties and material damage – developments that the Russian side deeply regrets.
In doing so, they are attempting to draw Arab states into a war serving someone else’s interests. At the same time, they are trying to divert attention from the catastrophic plight of the Palestinian people.
Russia once again calls on all parties to the current confrontation to immediately cease hostilities, including unacceptable strikes on the territory of the Arab states of the Gulf.
We consider attacks on civilians and strikes against any civilian infrastructure – whether in Iran or in the countries of the Gulf Cooperation Council – to be absolutely unacceptable.
❗️ It is clear that the only way to prevent the region from sliding further into the abyss of destabilization is to stop the aggression of the US and Israel, which triggered this chain reaction of suffering for the Arab peoples.
Forwarded from Russian MFA 🇷🇺
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
⚡️ As a result of a complex negotiation process, 200 Russian servicemen were returned on March 5 from the territory controlled by the Kiev regime.
Their release became possible thanks to the humanitarian mediation of the UAE and the US.
All Russian servicemen who have returned home are receiving the necessary medical and psychological assistance.
❗️ An exchange under the “300 for 300” formula is scheduled for March 6.
In total, 500 Russian servicemen are expected to return home on March 5-6.
Their release became possible thanks to the humanitarian mediation of the UAE and the US.
All Russian servicemen who have returned home are receiving the necessary medical and psychological assistance.
❗️ An exchange under the “300 for 300” formula is scheduled for March 6.
In total, 500 Russian servicemen are expected to return home on March 5-6.
🎙Ambassador Oleg Stepanov's comment to the Russian media with regard to Foreign Affairs Minister Anand's recent statements on the Arctic (March 5, 2026)
🇷🇺Russia has consistently advocated preserving the Arctic as a region of peace and cooperation, free from confrontation. It is therefore regrettable that official Ottawa seeks to promote, within NATO, an agenda of militarising the northern latitudes.
❗️ Such a course lacks any constructive substance and, above all, undermines Canada’s own security. The history of international relations has long demonstrated that any unilateral increase in military activity inevitably provokes reciprocal steps. Those in Ottawa should be fully mindful of this.
☝️We do not seek confrontation with NATO and have never regarded Canada as an adversary. Attempts by the Carney government to view us through the prism of confrontation are simply irrational.
Russia is the largest Arctic power and a self-sufficient state in the region. We possess all the necessary resources and capabilities to defend our national interests in the North and stand ready to respond to any challenges, wherever they may arise.
🇷🇺Russia has consistently advocated preserving the Arctic as a region of peace and cooperation, free from confrontation. It is therefore regrettable that official Ottawa seeks to promote, within NATO, an agenda of militarising the northern latitudes.
☝️We do not seek confrontation with NATO and have never regarded Canada as an adversary. Attempts by the Carney government to view us through the prism of confrontation are simply irrational.
Russia is the largest Arctic power and a self-sufficient state in the region. We possess all the necessary resources and capabilities to defend our national interests in the North and stand ready to respond to any challenges, wherever they may arise.
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🎙Комментарий Посла России в Канаде О.В.Степанова российским СМИ в связи с заявлениями Министра иностранных дел Канады А.Ананд по Арктике (5 марта 2026 г.)
🇷🇺Россия последовательно выступает за сохранение Арктики территорией мира и сотрудничества, свободной от конфронтации. Именно поэтому вызывают сожаление попытки официальной Оттавы продвигать в рамках НАТО повестку милитаризации северных широт.
❗️ Подобный курс не имеет конструктивного содержания и подрывает прежде всего безопасность самой Канады. История международных отношений давно показала: любое одностороннее усиление военной активности вызывает ответные шаги. В Оттаве должны отдавать себе в этом отчёт.
☝️Мы не ищем конфронтации с НАТО и никогда не воспринимали Канаду как на противника. Попытки кабинета Карни смотреть на нас через оптику противостояния попросту иррациональны.
Россия — крупнейшая арктическая держава и самодостаточное государство в регионе. Мы располагаем всеми необходимыми ресурсами и возможностями для защиты своих национальных интересов на Севере и готовы реагировать на любые вызовы, откуда бы они ни исходили.
🇷🇺Россия последовательно выступает за сохранение Арктики территорией мира и сотрудничества, свободной от конфронтации. Именно поэтому вызывают сожаление попытки официальной Оттавы продвигать в рамках НАТО повестку милитаризации северных широт.
☝️Мы не ищем конфронтации с НАТО и никогда не воспринимали Канаду как на противника. Попытки кабинета Карни смотреть на нас через оптику противостояния попросту иррациональны.
Россия — крупнейшая арктическая держава и самодостаточное государство в регионе. Мы располагаем всеми необходимыми ресурсами и возможностями для защиты своих национальных интересов на Севере и готовы реагировать на любые вызовы, откуда бы они ни исходили.
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Forwarded from Kremlin. News
Ahead of International Women's Day, Vladimir Putin held a meeting at the Kremlin with female military personnel, healthcare staff, war correspondents, creative professionals, and specialists in other trades
See more on the Kremlin’s official website.
See more on the Kremlin’s official website.