KILLING BABIES: Death of infant linked to Pfizer Covid vaccine that mother took while breastfeeding
Chemical Violence Com | Chemical Violence โ Chemical Violence Coverage (RSS)
By Franz Walker
Chemical Violence Com | Chemical Violence โ Chemical Violence Coverage (RSS)
By Franz Walker
Methodist Health System in Texas faces lawsuits for illegally denying covid vaccine exemptions
Chemical Violence Com | Chemical Violence โ Chemical Violence Coverage (RSS)
By Ethan Huff
Chemical Violence Com | Chemical Violence โ Chemical Violence Coverage (RSS)
By Ethan Huff
Arsenio Toledo
Chemical Violence Com | Chemical Violence โ Chemical Violence Coverage (RSS)
Fauci: COVID-19 vaccine โboosterโ doses to become available on Sept. 20 โฆ the propaganda push will immediately commence
Chemical Violence Com | Chemical Violence โ Chemical Violence Coverage (RSS)
Fauci: COVID-19 vaccine โboosterโ doses to become available on Sept. 20 โฆ the propaganda push will immediately commence
Arsenio Toledo
Chemical Violence Com | Chemical Violence โ Chemical Violence Coverage (RSS)
Cuba first country in the world to administer COVID-19 vaccines to toddlers
Chemical Violence Com | Chemical Violence โ Chemical Violence Coverage (RSS)
Cuba first country in the world to administer COVID-19 vaccines to toddlers
News Editors
Chemical Violence Com | Chemical Violence โ Chemical Violence Coverage (RSS)
The Orwellian vaccine passport agenda relies on the lie of the โsocial contractโ
Chemical Violence Com | Chemical Violence โ Chemical Violence Coverage (RSS)
The Orwellian vaccine passport agenda relies on the lie of the โsocial contractโ
The Irish Git (Telegram)
I know a woman that cant wear a mask because she was abused as a child her mouth was covered by the adult man everytime, so if she wears one she gets bad panic attacks and flashbacks if she doesn't she has employees, owners and fools bullying her which gives her panic attacks, its a lose lose for her,you dont know peoples situation or how bad it maybe, and if your mask and vaccine are so effective why worry at all??
I know a woman that cant wear a mask because she was abused as a child her mouth was covered by the adult man everytime, so if she wears one she gets bad panic attacks and flashbacks if she doesn't she has employees, owners and fools bullying her which gives her panic attacks, its a lose lose for her,you dont know peoples situation or how bad it maybe, and if your mask and vaccine are so effective why worry at all??
The Irish Git (Telegram)
Since the beginning of the pandemic government departments have spent over โฌ7 million on laptops, mobiles phones, and office furniture for civil servants working from home.
The Department of Transport spent over โฌ13,500 on desks and office chairs.
https://gript.ie/over-e7-million-spent-on-laptops-and-phones-for-civil-servants-working-from-home/
Since the beginning of the pandemic government departments have spent over โฌ7 million on laptops, mobiles phones, and office furniture for civil servants working from home.
The Department of Transport spent over โฌ13,500 on desks and office chairs.
https://gript.ie/over-e7-million-spent-on-laptops-and-phones-for-civil-servants-working-from-home/
The Irish Git (Telegram)
Scotland
Covid Deaths of vaccinated dominate.
And lets not forget as of WHO and CDC guidelines the vaccinated pcr tests are ran between 20-25 cycles and the unvaccinated between 40-45 cycles
Trust the science and all that jazz
Scotland
Covid Deaths of vaccinated dominate.
And lets not forget as of WHO and CDC guidelines the vaccinated pcr tests are ran between 20-25 cycles and the unvaccinated between 40-45 cycles
Trust the science and all that jazz
โThe Irish Git (Telegram)
Charges struck out...
An Garda Siochana have been wasting my time since February with this rubbish. In saying that, I'm a little disappointed that they've decided now to drop the charges as I was looking forward to making a show of them when it went to trial.
By the way, we're on the verge of being kicked off Facebook for violating their 'Community Standards' (not Terms of Service as I said in the video), so please consider signing up to our newsletter so that we can stay in touch after the culling...
https://theirishinquiry.com/contact/
Charges struck out...
An Garda Siochana have been wasting my time since February with this rubbish. In saying that, I'm a little disappointed that they've decided now to drop the charges as I was looking forward to making a show of them when it went to trial.
By the way, we're on the verge of being kicked off Facebook for violating their 'Community Standards' (not Terms of Service as I said in the video), so please consider signing up to our newsletter so that we can stay in touch after the culling...
https://theirishinquiry.com/contact/
The Irish Inquiry
CONTACT - The Irish Inquiry
Send us a message Do you have any suggestions or important information for future episodes of our shows? Use this form to get in touch. Stay up to date If you would like to be kept up date with our latest videos, shows and campaigns, please subscribe hereโฆ
The Irish Git (Telegram)
Prince Andrew served at his home in Windsor
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9978529/Prince-Andrew-served-notice-sexual-assault-suit-brought-Virginia-Giuffre.html?ito=social-facebook
Prince Andrew served at his home in Windsor
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9978529/Prince-Andrew-served-notice-sexual-assault-suit-brought-Virginia-Giuffre.html?ito=social-facebook
The Irish Git (Telegram)
From Anna Kavanagh on Facebook
THE TELEGRAPH HAS DISCOVERED THAT 26 OF THE 27 SCIENTISTS WHO WROTE A LETTER PUBLISHED IN THE LANCET MARCH 2020 LABELLING PEOPLE WHO SUGGESTED THE VIRUS COULD HAVE ORIGINATED IN WUHAN LAB AS CONSPIRACY THEORISTS, EFFECTIVELY SHUTTING DOWN SCIENTIFIC DEBATE, HAD CLOSE LINKS TO THE LABORATORY DESPITE DECLARING OTHERWISE. ONE OF THE SCIENTISTS, ROIZMAN NOW BELIEVES THAT THE VIRUS WAS ACCIDENTALLY LEAKED BY A โSLOPPY SCIENTISTโ
Tonight, Sarah Knapton reports in the Telegraph:
โAll but one scientist who penned a letter in The Lancet dismissing the possibility that coronavirus could have come from a lab in Wuhan were linked to its Chinese researchers, their colleagues or funders, a Telegraph investigation can reveal.
The influential journal published a letter on March 7 last year from 27 scientists in which they stated that they โstrongly condemned conspiracy theoriesโ surrounding Covid-19.
It effectively shut down scientific debate into whether coronavirus was manipulated or leaked from a lab in Wuhan.
On Friday, researchers who tried to investigate a link but were stonewalled and branded conspiracy theorists called it an โextreme cover-upโ.
Despite declaring no conflicts of interest at the time, it has since emerged that the letter was orchestrated by British zoologist Peter Daszak, president of the US-based EcoHealth Alliance, which funded research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology, where the leak was suspected.
However, The Telegraph can disclose that 26 of the 27 scientists listed in the letter had connections to the Chinese lab, through researchers and funders closely linked to Wuhan.
While Mr Daszak eventually declared his involvement in the EcoHealth Alliance, he failed to mention that five other signatories also worked for the organisation.
A further three of the signatories were from Britainโs Wellcome Trust, which has funded work at the Wuhan Institute of Virology in the past.
Sir Jeremy Farrar, a member of Sage and the director of the Trust, who signed the letter, has also published work with George Gao, the head of the Chinese Centre for Disease Control and Prevention, whom he describes as an โold friendโ.
Oxford-educated Dr Gao is a former Wellcome research assistant, and Mr Daszak has previously claimed Dr Gao had supported his nomination to the National Academy of Sciences.
Dr Gao also has close connections with Shi Zhengli, the scientist known as โbatwomanโ who was leading research into bat coronaviruses in Wuhan, and whose team discovered a virus in 2013 in a cave in Yunnan which is the closest ever found to Sars-Cov-2.
Another signatory, Prof Linda Saif, of Ohio State University, spoke at a workshop in Wuhan in May 2017 alongside Dr Shi and Dr Gao, organised partly by the Wuhan Institute of Virology. Topics discussed at the meeting included the level of security in Chinese labs. Prof Saifโs talk dealt with animal coronaviruses.
Similarly, two other signatories are in the leadership team of the Global Virome Project, of which Mr Daszak is treasurer. Dr Gao helped launch the project and EcoHealth Alliance is a partner.
The Global Virome Projectโs goal is to detect and identify at least 99 per cent of potential zoonotic viral threats to human health and food security. It took over from the Predict project, which uncovered more than 1,000 unique viruses in animals and humans.
However, it has since emerged that Predict part-funded controversial work by Wuhan researchers on bat coronaviruses which were altered to see if they could infect humans. The funds came via EcoHealth Alliance.
In an email on Feb 8, released under Freedom of Information requests, Mr Daszak revealed he had composed the letter after being asked by โour collaboratorsโ in China for a โshow of supportโ.
Angus Dalgleish, professor of oncology at St Georges, University of London, and Norwegian scientist Birger Sorensen, who struggled to have work published sh...
View original post
From Anna Kavanagh on Facebook
THE TELEGRAPH HAS DISCOVERED THAT 26 OF THE 27 SCIENTISTS WHO WROTE A LETTER PUBLISHED IN THE LANCET MARCH 2020 LABELLING PEOPLE WHO SUGGESTED THE VIRUS COULD HAVE ORIGINATED IN WUHAN LAB AS CONSPIRACY THEORISTS, EFFECTIVELY SHUTTING DOWN SCIENTIFIC DEBATE, HAD CLOSE LINKS TO THE LABORATORY DESPITE DECLARING OTHERWISE. ONE OF THE SCIENTISTS, ROIZMAN NOW BELIEVES THAT THE VIRUS WAS ACCIDENTALLY LEAKED BY A โSLOPPY SCIENTISTโ
Tonight, Sarah Knapton reports in the Telegraph:
โAll but one scientist who penned a letter in The Lancet dismissing the possibility that coronavirus could have come from a lab in Wuhan were linked to its Chinese researchers, their colleagues or funders, a Telegraph investigation can reveal.
The influential journal published a letter on March 7 last year from 27 scientists in which they stated that they โstrongly condemned conspiracy theoriesโ surrounding Covid-19.
It effectively shut down scientific debate into whether coronavirus was manipulated or leaked from a lab in Wuhan.
On Friday, researchers who tried to investigate a link but were stonewalled and branded conspiracy theorists called it an โextreme cover-upโ.
Despite declaring no conflicts of interest at the time, it has since emerged that the letter was orchestrated by British zoologist Peter Daszak, president of the US-based EcoHealth Alliance, which funded research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology, where the leak was suspected.
However, The Telegraph can disclose that 26 of the 27 scientists listed in the letter had connections to the Chinese lab, through researchers and funders closely linked to Wuhan.
While Mr Daszak eventually declared his involvement in the EcoHealth Alliance, he failed to mention that five other signatories also worked for the organisation.
A further three of the signatories were from Britainโs Wellcome Trust, which has funded work at the Wuhan Institute of Virology in the past.
Sir Jeremy Farrar, a member of Sage and the director of the Trust, who signed the letter, has also published work with George Gao, the head of the Chinese Centre for Disease Control and Prevention, whom he describes as an โold friendโ.
Oxford-educated Dr Gao is a former Wellcome research assistant, and Mr Daszak has previously claimed Dr Gao had supported his nomination to the National Academy of Sciences.
Dr Gao also has close connections with Shi Zhengli, the scientist known as โbatwomanโ who was leading research into bat coronaviruses in Wuhan, and whose team discovered a virus in 2013 in a cave in Yunnan which is the closest ever found to Sars-Cov-2.
Another signatory, Prof Linda Saif, of Ohio State University, spoke at a workshop in Wuhan in May 2017 alongside Dr Shi and Dr Gao, organised partly by the Wuhan Institute of Virology. Topics discussed at the meeting included the level of security in Chinese labs. Prof Saifโs talk dealt with animal coronaviruses.
Similarly, two other signatories are in the leadership team of the Global Virome Project, of which Mr Daszak is treasurer. Dr Gao helped launch the project and EcoHealth Alliance is a partner.
The Global Virome Projectโs goal is to detect and identify at least 99 per cent of potential zoonotic viral threats to human health and food security. It took over from the Predict project, which uncovered more than 1,000 unique viruses in animals and humans.
However, it has since emerged that Predict part-funded controversial work by Wuhan researchers on bat coronaviruses which were altered to see if they could infect humans. The funds came via EcoHealth Alliance.
In an email on Feb 8, released under Freedom of Information requests, Mr Daszak revealed he had composed the letter after being asked by โour collaboratorsโ in China for a โshow of supportโ.
Angus Dalgleish, professor of oncology at St Georges, University of London, and Norwegian scientist Birger Sorensen, who struggled to have work published sh...
View original post
The Irish Git (Telegram)
Commenting on the discovery that so many of the signatories were linked to China, they said: โThis article is the first to show beyond reasonable doubt that our entire area of virus research has been contaminated politically. We bear the scars to show it.โ
Other signatories with links to the Wuhan team include Prof Kanta Subbarao, who spoke at a conference in Wuhan โ part organised by the Wuhan Institute of Virology โ on emerging disease in 2016, while she was still chief of the NIAIDโs Emerging Respiratory Viruses Section.
Dr John Mackenzie, of Curtin University of Technology in Australia, put his name to the letter, but failed to mention he was still listed as a committee member of the Scientific Advisory Committee of Centre for Emerging Infectious Diseases at the Wuhan Institute of Virology.
Five other signatories had all published articles with Prof Ralph Baric, who was collaborating with Shi Zhengli and the Wuhan Institute of Virology on research about genetically manipulating coronaviruses to see if they could be made to infect humans.
Crucially, Prof Baric was omitted from the list of signatures although he was initially asked to join the group by Mr Daszak. Emails have recently come to light between Mr Daszak and Prof Baric ahead of The Lancet letter showing that the pair decided to blur their association in case it looked โself-servingโ.
Mr Daszak told Prof Baric he would distribute the letter in a way that โdoesnโt link it back to our collaboration so we maximise an independent voiceโ.
Out of 27 signatories, only Prof Ronald Corley, of Boston University, appears to have no links to funders or researchers.
While an addendum was added to The Lancet letter in June this year, pointing out Mr Daszakโs links to Wuhan, no others revealed any conflict of interest at the time.
Molecular biologist Prof Richard Ebright, of Rutgers University, who has fought to uncover the truth behind the Covid pandemic, said: โFor the June addendum, the Lancet invited the 27 authors of the letter to re-evaluate their competing interests.
โIncredibly, only Daszak appears to have done so. Conflicts of interest were not reported for any of the other 26 signers of the letter โ not even those with obviously material undisclosed conflicts such as EcoHealth employees and Predict contractors.
โThe standard remedy for fraudulent statements in scientific publications is retraction. It is unclear why retraction was not pursued.โ
Several of those who signed the letters have since changed their stance, with Prof Peter Palese, of Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, now calling for a full inquiry.
Dr Charles Calisher, of Colorado State University, told The Telegraph that the letter never intended to suggest that Covid might not have a natural origin, rather that there was insufficient data.
Signatory Prof Stanley Perlman, of the University of Iowa, told The Telegraph: โIt is difficult to eliminate a possible lab leak as part of the process, so this still needs to be considered.โ
Prof Bernard Roizman has gone the furthest of all, telling the Wall Street Journal in May that he is now convinced the virus was accidentally released by a โsloppyโ scientist.
Mr Daszak was removed from the UNโs Covid commission looking at the origins of the pandemic in June over his scientific impartiality. However he is still part of the World Health Organisation Covid investigation team.
Earlier this month, he co-authored an article in Nature with the WHO team claiming there was still little evidence for a lab leak theory and warning that it may soon be too late to get to the bottom of how the pandemic started.
Prof Dalgleish added: โIt may now be too late to get to the bottom of what happened with the pandemic because of this stalling but I think enough evidence is out there. It may be that if they hadnโt been doing this work [a] pandemic might never have happened.โ
When approached, the Lancet and Wellcome Trust...
View original post
Commenting on the discovery that so many of the signatories were linked to China, they said: โThis article is the first to show beyond reasonable doubt that our entire area of virus research has been contaminated politically. We bear the scars to show it.โ
Other signatories with links to the Wuhan team include Prof Kanta Subbarao, who spoke at a conference in Wuhan โ part organised by the Wuhan Institute of Virology โ on emerging disease in 2016, while she was still chief of the NIAIDโs Emerging Respiratory Viruses Section.
Dr John Mackenzie, of Curtin University of Technology in Australia, put his name to the letter, but failed to mention he was still listed as a committee member of the Scientific Advisory Committee of Centre for Emerging Infectious Diseases at the Wuhan Institute of Virology.
Five other signatories had all published articles with Prof Ralph Baric, who was collaborating with Shi Zhengli and the Wuhan Institute of Virology on research about genetically manipulating coronaviruses to see if they could be made to infect humans.
Crucially, Prof Baric was omitted from the list of signatures although he was initially asked to join the group by Mr Daszak. Emails have recently come to light between Mr Daszak and Prof Baric ahead of The Lancet letter showing that the pair decided to blur their association in case it looked โself-servingโ.
Mr Daszak told Prof Baric he would distribute the letter in a way that โdoesnโt link it back to our collaboration so we maximise an independent voiceโ.
Out of 27 signatories, only Prof Ronald Corley, of Boston University, appears to have no links to funders or researchers.
While an addendum was added to The Lancet letter in June this year, pointing out Mr Daszakโs links to Wuhan, no others revealed any conflict of interest at the time.
Molecular biologist Prof Richard Ebright, of Rutgers University, who has fought to uncover the truth behind the Covid pandemic, said: โFor the June addendum, the Lancet invited the 27 authors of the letter to re-evaluate their competing interests.
โIncredibly, only Daszak appears to have done so. Conflicts of interest were not reported for any of the other 26 signers of the letter โ not even those with obviously material undisclosed conflicts such as EcoHealth employees and Predict contractors.
โThe standard remedy for fraudulent statements in scientific publications is retraction. It is unclear why retraction was not pursued.โ
Several of those who signed the letters have since changed their stance, with Prof Peter Palese, of Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, now calling for a full inquiry.
Dr Charles Calisher, of Colorado State University, told The Telegraph that the letter never intended to suggest that Covid might not have a natural origin, rather that there was insufficient data.
Signatory Prof Stanley Perlman, of the University of Iowa, told The Telegraph: โIt is difficult to eliminate a possible lab leak as part of the process, so this still needs to be considered.โ
Prof Bernard Roizman has gone the furthest of all, telling the Wall Street Journal in May that he is now convinced the virus was accidentally released by a โsloppyโ scientist.
Mr Daszak was removed from the UNโs Covid commission looking at the origins of the pandemic in June over his scientific impartiality. However he is still part of the World Health Organisation Covid investigation team.
Earlier this month, he co-authored an article in Nature with the WHO team claiming there was still little evidence for a lab leak theory and warning that it may soon be too late to get to the bottom of how the pandemic started.
Prof Dalgleish added: โIt may now be too late to get to the bottom of what happened with the pandemic because of this stalling but I think enough evidence is out there. It may be that if they hadnโt been doing this work [a] pandemic might never have happened.โ
When approached, the Lancet and Wellcome Trust...
View original post