Magda Goebbels said Joseph was a monstrous criminal in her last letter to a friend:

"We have demanded monstrous things from the German people, treated other nations with pitiless cruelty. For this the victors will exact their full revenge...we can't let them think we are cowards. Everybody else has the right to live. We haven't got this right—we have forfeited it. I make myself responsible. I belonged. I believed in Hitler and for long enough in Joseph Goebbels...Suppose I remain alive, I should immediately be arrested and interrogated about Joseph. If I tell the truth I must reveal what sort of man he was—must describe all that happened behind the scenes. Then any respectable person would turn from me in disgust. It would be equally impossible to do the opposite—that is to defend what he has done, to justify him to his enemies, to speak up for him out of true conviction...That would go against my conscience. So you see, Ello, it would be quite impossible for me to go on living. We will take the children with us, they are too good, too lovely for the world which lies ahead. In the days to come Joseph will be regarded as one of the greatest criminals that Germany has ever produced. His children would hear that said daily, people would torment them, despise and humiliate them. They would have to bear the burden of his sins and vengeance would be wreaked on them."

Source: Monologe im Führerhauptquartier 1941–1944: Die Aufzeichnungen Heinrich Heims, ed. Werner Jochmann

> "We [i.e. Germans] want to settle the south of Ukraine, the Crimea in particular, exclusively German. It is no trouble for me to push the population there [i.e. population in south of Ukraine] elsewhere."

> "The [Eastern] region must lose the character of the Asiatic steppe and become Europeanised! To this end, we are now building the great transport routes to the southern tip of the Crimea, to the Caucasus; the German cities are lined up along these transport routes, like a string of pearls, and around them lies the German settlement. We will have the two or three million people we need for this sooner than we think; WE WILL TAKE THEM FROM GERMANY, THE SCANDINAVIAN COUNTRIES, THE WESTERN COUNTRIES AND AMERICA. I will probably not live to see it, but in twenty years the [Eastern] area [which was previously occupied by Slavs] will already contain 20 million [Germanic] people. In three hundred years it will be a flourishing park landscape of unusual beauty!
The natives [i.e. Ukrainians]? We will proceed to sift them. We'll put the destructive Jew out altogether. The impression I had in the Belorussian region was better than that in the Ukraine. We won't go into the Russian cities, they must die out completely. We don't need to feel any remorse. We don't live ourselves into the role of nanny, we have no obligation to the people at all. Reform the home, catch the lice, German teachers, newspapers? No! We'd rather set up a radio station that depends on us, and for the rest they should only know the road signs so that they don't run into our cars! By freedom these people mean that they only have to wash themselves every festival. If we come with soft soap, we won't get any sympathy. We have to completely retrain ourselves. There is only one task: to carry out a GERMANISATION BY BRINGING IN THE GERMANS AND TO REGARD THE NATIVES AS INDIANS. If these people had triumphed over us, God have mercy! Hatred? No, we don't know that; we only act out of consideration. But they act out of the inferiority complex of the inferior; they smell the superior and connect hatred with the inferiority complex. Intelligence? We have so much of it here that we only have difficulties with it! Anyone from Europe who is of good will can take part in the work of settlement."



> "The German farmer has the urge to get on, he thinks of his children; but a Ukrainian farmer will not act according to the imperative of duty."

> "The Slavic peoples, on the other hand, are not destined for a life of their own. They know that, and we must not persuade them that they can do the same. We created the Baltic countries and Ukraine in 1918. But today we have no interest in the continued existence of the Eastern Baltic states and a free Ukraine [i.e independent Ukraine]. Rechristianisation would be the biggest mistake, because that would be reorganisation. I am also not in favour of a university in Kiev. We better not teach them to read. They don't love us at all if we torture them with schools; it would be wrong even to put them on a locomotive. We also have no reason to start redistributing the land. But the natives will live far better in the future than they do now. We will find in them the people to work the soil that we are lacking today."

The nazis sought to hide the inflationary side effects of their high spending fiscal policy with price stops. They also fudged the numbers on unemployment to suit propaganda needs.

> "Other economic policies included the self-sufficiency policies of "autarky" which levied high tariffs on agricultural goods and other imports, central planning and the nationalization of key industries, which included banking, steel production, shipbuilding, transportation, education, and more. The results were mixed. Unemployment was enormously reduced through government stimulation policies and fudging on the official numbers-failing to count Jews, opponents, refugees, women who got marriage allowances, and other minorities, while upping the amount of jobs by counting those in labor-service camps, army recruits, and Nazi party apparatchiks. According to Dan P. Silverman in Hitler's Economy, "Unemployment was reduced in Germany from 34 percent or about 6 million people, in January 1933, to 14 percent, or 2.5 million people, in January 1936." This is a good drop in joblessness, but nothing close to what some have argued was full employment. Additionally, real wages had declined by approximately 25% between 1933 and 1938."

> "A host of economic side effects surfaced. After suspending what remain of the gold standard, Nazi Germany pressured its central bank to keep interest rates low and government budget deficits high, causing the economy to overheat and triggering higher prices. By November 1936, the Nazi regime issued a price stop decree that prohibited increases in prices and wages. Despite the fact that more waves of inflation continued to occur, prices were still kept artificially low."

Source: Killing History

Follow @redideologies

"In the days that followed, much to the surprise of his lunch guests, Hitler continued to express his regard for Stalin. The Soviet dictator’s life resembled his own, he told them: the Georgian, too, had worked his way up from ‘an unknown man to the leader of a state’."
Source: Volker Ullrich, Hitler Downfall ( Hans Baur, Ich flog Mächtige dieser Erde, Kempten (Allgäu), 1956, pp. 178f.)

PraxBen on that "economic miracle" bit we always hear about.

"By 1936 the German recovery was no more advanced than that of Britain or the United States"

"Deficit spending was dominated by war preparation"

"Full scale rearmament had begun by 1934 and 70% of government expenditures had gone toward it by 1939"

"The economy recovery of the 1930s was like a balloon. The Nazis tried to fill the balloon with air but they could never tie the knot to keep it stable. The massive short term gain with equally massive long term consequences"

From the booklet "Deficit Spending in the Nazi Recovery"

Follow @redideologies

By 1940 Hitler was fully convinced that he wanted a fully planned and regimented economy modeled on the Soviet Union.

> Hitler attributed the success of National Socialist economic policy primarily to state control of the economy. From 1940 at the latest, Hitler increasingly became a proponent of the state planned economy – partly because he was convinced of the superiority of the Soviet Union and its economic system. In his monologs to his inner circle (known as “table talks”) on July 27-28, 1941 Hitler said that “A sensible employment of the powers of a nation can only be achieved with a planned economy from above.”

> About two weeks later he said: “As far as the planning of the economy is concerned, we are still very much at the beginning and I imagine it will be something wonderfully nice to build up an encompassing German and European economic order.” The statement that as far as the planning of the economy was concerned one was still at the very beginning is important because it shows that Hitler was not thinking at all of a reduction of state intervention – not even for the time after the war – but, on the contrary, intended to expand the instruments of state control of the economy even further.

Source

Follow @redideologies

What most normie-Jews do not realize is that Nazism was the cattle prod used to valet the the Jews of Europe overseas to establish Israel and colonize Palestine. It's also used as the bogeyman to scare the Westernized Jews into becoming Zionists, or simply not assimilating to the host culture.

Gunther even accuses some British / Irish people for being “swarthy” as he classifies the population of the British Isles into 3 main racial categories: Nordic, Mediterranean, and Alpine based on physical traits. He argues that racial traits vary geographically, with northern Scotland being mostly "pure Nordic" (fair-skinned), while southern England, Wales, and Ireland are darker due to Mediterranean and Alpine influences. Gunther further claims that some regions, like Cornwall and Ireland, show "Semitic" traits from ancient Phoenician contact. He highlights a strong Mediterranean influence in western Ireland, linking the Irish to the Spanish.

Reference: 𝚃𝙷𝙴 𝚁𝙰𝙲𝙸𝙰𝙻 𝙴𝙻𝙴𝙼𝙴𝙽𝚃𝚂 𝙾𝙵 𝙴𝚄𝚁𝙾𝙿𝙴𝙰𝙽 𝙷𝙸𝚂𝚃𝙾𝚁𝚈 𝚋𝚢 𝙷𝙰𝙽𝚂 𝙶𝚄𝙽𝚃𝙷𝙴𝚁

(2)

Franco was absolutely based for keeping Spain out of Hitler's wars of aggression.

As you can see with that article, Franco knew about the Nazis' extreme Nordicist predilections and that they thus viewed Spaniards as inferiors to be used and discarded like cattle.

The Blue Division - who were brave and capable soldiers - got duped into fighting in a war they thought was against Soviet Communism, but was in reality nothing more than Germanic territorial expansionism to implement a competing version of Communism with Germans at the helm of it.

Mussolini the buffoon put himself completely at the mercy of a man who viewed him and his people as inferior servants of the "Nordic master race".

Hitler sent weapons to the Ethiopian resistance armies fighting against Mussolini's Italy.

"Nazi Germany sent arms and munitions to Ethiopia because it was frustrated over Italian objections to its attempts to integrate Austria. This prolonged the war and sapped Italian resources."

Hitler was a true Third Worldist. He would support black African and Indian struggles against European countries if those countries wouldn't let Hitler do what he wanted in Europe.

@redideologies

"Karl Marx described the causes of capitalist development reasonably correctly. But we [Marxists and National Socialists] are both always and forever right about capitalism. The will to freedom rises up from the collapsing system. It finds its form in fundamentally new ideas: in Bolshevism and National Socialism. Both emerge with the ultimate belief that they will bring freedom to an entire world by overthrowing it. Bolshevism and National Socialism are embodied in two people who lead a purposeful minority in the will to the future: Lenin and Hitler." - Goebbels

"The difference between Communism and the Hitler faith is slight" - Goebbels

Karl Marx was raised Protestant and professed belief in Christ as a youth.

Marx wrote "On the Jewish Question" and said this:

"Let us consider the actual, worldly Jew – not the Sabbath Jew, as Bauer does, but the everyday Jew.Let us not look for the secret of the Jew in his religion, but let us look for the secret of his religion in the real Jew. What is the secular basis of Judaism? Practical need, self-interest. What is the worldly religion of the Jew? Huckstering. What is his worldly God? Money.Very well then! Emancipation from huckstering and money, consequently from practical, real Judaism, would be the self-emancipation of our time. An organization of society which would abolish the preconditions for huckstering, and therefore the possibility of huckstering, would make the Jew impossible. His religious consciousness would be dissipated like a thin haze in the real, vital air of society. On the other hand, if the Jew recognizes that this practical nature of his is futile and works to abolish it, he extricates himself from his previous development and works for human emancipation as such and turns against the supreme practical expression of human self-estrangement. We recognize in Judaism, therefore, a general anti-social element of the present time, an element which through historical development – to which in this harmful respect the Jews have zealously contributed – has been brought to its present high level, at which it must necessarily begin to disintegrate. In the final analysis, the emancipation of the Jews is the emancipation of mankind from Judaism."

And this:

"Once society has succeeded in abolishing the empirical essence of Judaism – huckstering and its preconditions – the Jew will have become impossible, because his consciousness no longer has an object, because the subjective basis of Judaism, practical need, has been humanized, and because the conflict between man’s individual-sensuous existence and his species-existence has been abolished. The social emancipation of the Jew is the emancipation of society from Judaism."

So Marx called for the abolition of Judaism and Jews as a unique group, so it's very hard for me to believe he was pursuing some tribalist agenda when he despised them. Don't attach the name Marx to these statements and your average Neo-Nazi would be shouting in agreement.

Fredrich Engels, Marx's closest collaborator and co-author of many communist texts, was a non-Jew. Ironically, Engels was notably less anti-Jewish in comparison with Marx and denounced the phenomenon publicly, although he made some private anti-Jewish remarks. How do the J-communism theorists explain that? The non-Jew Engels opposed anti-Semitism publicly, while the Jew Marx supported and contributed to it.

More from Marx:

"In 1845 in The Holy Family Marx claimed that in his articles in the Deutsch-Französische Jahrbücher he had "proved that the task of abolishing the essence of Jewry is in truth the task of abolishing Jewry in civil society, abolishing the inhumanity of today's practice of life, the summit of which is the money system". In 1849 an article in the Neue Rheinische Zeitung, of which Marx was the editor, criticised the notion that Jews living in Prussia's Polish provinces should be regarded as Germans. The article declared that these Jews were "the filthiest of all races". "Neither by speech nor by descent- but only by their greed for profit - can they be looked upon as relatives of the Germans in Frankfurt." Robert Payne has remarked that "this solution of the Jewish question was not very different from Adolf Hitler's, for it involved the liquidation of Judaism"."