Forwarded from Martinez Politics
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
There was no "genocide" or even "ethnic cleansing" of Germans in Poland before World War II.
There were however ethnic cleansing of Poles perpetrated by the Nazis when they invaded Poland.
@MartinezPolitix
There were however ethnic cleansing of Poles perpetrated by the Nazis when they invaded Poland.
@MartinezPolitix
๐9
Forwarded from ใ
ค
โIn Poland we already have our first casualty,โ Goebbels reported gleefully in mid-May 1939. โEverything is taking its preordained path.โ
~ Volker Ullrich.
"Everything is taking its preordained path"
It is abundantly clear that the Nazis welcome these kinds of events because they provide them with a pretext and rationale for invading. However, there were no massacres before the invasion of Poland, as Goebbels himself makes no record of them in his Diaries; instead, he speaks gleefully and welcomingly about the "first casualty" in this entry. Furthermore, Hitler makes no mention of the persecution of the German people in his secret addresses as the only reason they had to invade.
"The Poles are stirring things up against us. The Fรผhrer welcomes this."
~ Joseph Goebbels, Diary entry on 2 May 1939.
"stirring things" had nothing to do with the atrocities; rather, Goebbels used it to describe Poland's unwillingness to cede territory to the Nazis and their cooperation with Britain.
~ Volker Ullrich.
"Everything is taking its preordained path"
It is abundantly clear that the Nazis welcome these kinds of events because they provide them with a pretext and rationale for invading. However, there were no massacres before the invasion of Poland, as Goebbels himself makes no record of them in his Diaries; instead, he speaks gleefully and welcomingly about the "first casualty" in this entry. Furthermore, Hitler makes no mention of the persecution of the German people in his secret addresses as the only reason they had to invade.
"The Poles are stirring things up against us. The Fรผhrer welcomes this."
~ Joseph Goebbels, Diary entry on 2 May 1939.
"stirring things" had nothing to do with the atrocities; rather, Goebbels used it to describe Poland's unwillingness to cede territory to the Nazis and their cooperation with Britain.
๐9
Forwarded from ใ
ค
> But from May [1939] onwards, Goebbelsโs daily press instructions unfolded a hate campaign against Poland that made it seem as if the ethnic German inhabitants of the country, and above all of Danzig, were in constant, mortal and growing danger from violence meted out to them by Poles. โEthnic Germans flee from Polish terrorโ, screamed the headlines. โGerman houses broken into with axes - Terrorized by Poles for weeks - Hundreds of refugees are arrested by the Polesโ. Poles were allegedly murdering ethnic Germans, shooting at German passers-by in Danzig, and generally threatening to make their lives unbearable. Although the Polish governmentโs policy towards the ethnic German minority had been considerably less liberal and tolerant than that of its Czech counterpart, these stories were grotesque exaggerations if not pure invention. For their part, the Nazis who dominated the political scene in Danzig kept up the pressure by provoking the Poles and staging incidents for the German press to exploit, such as mounting violent attacks on Polish customs officers and spreading atrocity stories when the officers defended themselves.
Source: Richard Evans, Third Reich in Power.๐8
Magda Goebbels said Joseph was a monstrous criminal in her last letter to a friend:
"We have demanded monstrous things from the German people, treated other nations with pitiless cruelty. For this the victors will exact their full revenge...we can't let them think we are cowards. Everybody else has the right to live. We haven't got this rightโwe have forfeited it. I make myself responsible. I belonged. I believed in Hitler and for long enough in Joseph Goebbels...Suppose I remain alive, I should immediately be arrested and interrogated about Joseph. If I tell the truth I must reveal what sort of man he wasโmust describe all that happened behind the scenes. Then any respectable person would turn from me in disgust. It would be equally impossible to do the oppositeโthat is to defend what he has done, to justify him to his enemies, to speak up for him out of true conviction...That would go against my conscience. So you see, Ello, it would be quite impossible for me to go on living. We will take the children with us, they are too good, too lovely for the world which lies ahead. In the days to come Joseph will be regarded as one of the greatest criminals that Germany has ever produced. His children would hear that said daily, people would torment them, despise and humiliate them. They would have to bear the burden of his sins and vengeance would be wreaked on them."
"We have demanded monstrous things from the German people, treated other nations with pitiless cruelty. For this the victors will exact their full revenge...we can't let them think we are cowards. Everybody else has the right to live. We haven't got this rightโwe have forfeited it. I make myself responsible. I belonged. I believed in Hitler and for long enough in Joseph Goebbels...Suppose I remain alive, I should immediately be arrested and interrogated about Joseph. If I tell the truth I must reveal what sort of man he wasโmust describe all that happened behind the scenes. Then any respectable person would turn from me in disgust. It would be equally impossible to do the oppositeโthat is to defend what he has done, to justify him to his enemies, to speak up for him out of true conviction...That would go against my conscience. So you see, Ello, it would be quite impossible for me to go on living. We will take the children with us, they are too good, too lovely for the world which lies ahead. In the days to come Joseph will be regarded as one of the greatest criminals that Germany has ever produced. His children would hear that said daily, people would torment them, despise and humiliate them. They would have to bear the burden of his sins and vengeance would be wreaked on them."
๐10
Forwarded from ใ
ค
Screenshot_20240916-123007-760.png
433.4 KB
Nazi intended to establish a socialist state to replace the socialist Bolshevik regime.
Source: Source: THE ORGINS OF THE FINAL SOLUTION, Christopher Browning
Source: Source: THE ORGINS OF THE FINAL SOLUTION, Christopher Browning
๐6
Forwarded from ใ
ค
Source: Monologe im Fรผhrerhauptquartier 1941โ1944: Die Aufzeichnungen Heinrich Heims, ed. Werner Jochmann
> "We [i.e. Germans] want to settle the south of Ukraine, the Crimea in particular, exclusively German. It is no trouble for me to push the population there [i.e. population in south of Ukraine] elsewhere."
> "The [Eastern] region must lose the character of the Asiatic steppe and become Europeanised! To this end, we are now building the great transport routes to the southern tip of the Crimea, to the Caucasus; the German cities are lined up along these transport routes, like a string of pearls, and around them lies the German settlement. We will have the two or three million people we need for this sooner than we think; WE WILL TAKE THEM FROM GERMANY, THE SCANDINAVIAN COUNTRIES, THE WESTERN COUNTRIES AND AMERICA. I will probably not live to see it, but in twenty years the [Eastern] area [which was previously occupied by Slavs] will already contain 20 million [Germanic] people. In three hundred years it will be a flourishing park landscape of unusual beauty!
The natives [i.e. Ukrainians]? We will proceed to sift them. We'll put the destructive Jew out altogether. The impression I had in the Belorussian region was better than that in the Ukraine. We won't go into the Russian cities, they must die out completely. We don't need to feel any remorse. We don't live ourselves into the role of nanny, we have no obligation to the people at all. Reform the home, catch the lice, German teachers, newspapers? No! We'd rather set up a radio station that depends on us, and for the rest they should only know the road signs so that they don't run into our cars! By freedom these people mean that they only have to wash themselves every festival. If we come with soft soap, we won't get any sympathy. We have to completely retrain ourselves. There is only one task: to carry out a GERMANISATION BY BRINGING IN THE GERMANS AND TO REGARD THE NATIVES AS INDIANS. If these people had triumphed over us, God have mercy! Hatred? No, we don't know that; we only act out of consideration. But they act out of the inferiority complex of the inferior; they smell the superior and connect hatred with the inferiority complex. Intelligence? We have so much of it here that we only have difficulties with it! Anyone from Europe who is of good will can take part in the work of settlement."
> "The German farmer has the urge to get on, he thinks of his children; but a Ukrainian farmer will not act according to the imperative of duty."
> "The Slavic peoples, on the other hand, are not destined for a life of their own. They know that, and we must not persuade them that they can do the same. We created the Baltic countries and Ukraine in 1918. But today we have no interest in the continued existence of the Eastern Baltic states and a free Ukraine [i.e independent Ukraine]. Rechristianisation would be the biggest mistake, because that would be reorganisation. I am also not in favour of a university in Kiev. We better not teach them to read. They don't love us at all if we torture them with schools; it would be wrong even to put them on a locomotive. We also have no reason to start redistributing the land. But the natives will live far better in the future than they do now. We will find in them the people to work the soil that we are lacking today."
> "We [i.e. Germans] want to settle the south of Ukraine, the Crimea in particular, exclusively German. It is no trouble for me to push the population there [i.e. population in south of Ukraine] elsewhere."
> "The [Eastern] region must lose the character of the Asiatic steppe and become Europeanised! To this end, we are now building the great transport routes to the southern tip of the Crimea, to the Caucasus; the German cities are lined up along these transport routes, like a string of pearls, and around them lies the German settlement. We will have the two or three million people we need for this sooner than we think; WE WILL TAKE THEM FROM GERMANY, THE SCANDINAVIAN COUNTRIES, THE WESTERN COUNTRIES AND AMERICA. I will probably not live to see it, but in twenty years the [Eastern] area [which was previously occupied by Slavs] will already contain 20 million [Germanic] people. In three hundred years it will be a flourishing park landscape of unusual beauty!
The natives [i.e. Ukrainians]? We will proceed to sift them. We'll put the destructive Jew out altogether. The impression I had in the Belorussian region was better than that in the Ukraine. We won't go into the Russian cities, they must die out completely. We don't need to feel any remorse. We don't live ourselves into the role of nanny, we have no obligation to the people at all. Reform the home, catch the lice, German teachers, newspapers? No! We'd rather set up a radio station that depends on us, and for the rest they should only know the road signs so that they don't run into our cars! By freedom these people mean that they only have to wash themselves every festival. If we come with soft soap, we won't get any sympathy. We have to completely retrain ourselves. There is only one task: to carry out a GERMANISATION BY BRINGING IN THE GERMANS AND TO REGARD THE NATIVES AS INDIANS. If these people had triumphed over us, God have mercy! Hatred? No, we don't know that; we only act out of consideration. But they act out of the inferiority complex of the inferior; they smell the superior and connect hatred with the inferiority complex. Intelligence? We have so much of it here that we only have difficulties with it! Anyone from Europe who is of good will can take part in the work of settlement."
> "The German farmer has the urge to get on, he thinks of his children; but a Ukrainian farmer will not act according to the imperative of duty."
> "The Slavic peoples, on the other hand, are not destined for a life of their own. They know that, and we must not persuade them that they can do the same. We created the Baltic countries and Ukraine in 1918. But today we have no interest in the continued existence of the Eastern Baltic states and a free Ukraine [i.e independent Ukraine]. Rechristianisation would be the biggest mistake, because that would be reorganisation. I am also not in favour of a university in Kiev. We better not teach them to read. They don't love us at all if we torture them with schools; it would be wrong even to put them on a locomotive. We also have no reason to start redistributing the land. But the natives will live far better in the future than they do now. We will find in them the people to work the soil that we are lacking today."
๐5
Forwarded from Red Ideologies
The nazis sought to hide the inflationary side effects of their high spending fiscal policy with price stops. They also fudged the numbers on unemployment to suit propaganda needs.
> "Other economic policies included the self-sufficiency policies of "autarky" which levied high tariffs on agricultural goods and other imports, central planning and the nationalization of key industries, which included banking, steel production, shipbuilding, transportation, education, and more. The results were mixed. Unemployment was enormously reduced through government stimulation policies and fudging on the official numbers-failing to count Jews, opponents, refugees, women who got marriage allowances, and other minorities, while upping the amount of jobs by counting those in labor-service camps, army recruits, and Nazi party apparatchiks. According to Dan P. Silverman in Hitler's Economy, "Unemployment was reduced in Germany from 34 percent or about 6 million people, in January 1933, to 14 percent, or 2.5 million people, in January 1936." This is a good drop in joblessness, but nothing close to what some have argued was full employment. Additionally, real wages had declined by approximately 25% between 1933 and 1938."
> "A host of economic side effects surfaced. After suspending what remain of the gold standard, Nazi Germany pressured its central bank to keep interest rates low and government budget deficits high, causing the economy to overheat and triggering higher prices. By November 1936, the Nazi regime issued a price stop decree that prohibited increases in prices and wages. Despite the fact that more waves of inflation continued to occur, prices were still kept artificially low."
Source: Killing History
Follow @redideologies
> "Other economic policies included the self-sufficiency policies of "autarky" which levied high tariffs on agricultural goods and other imports, central planning and the nationalization of key industries, which included banking, steel production, shipbuilding, transportation, education, and more. The results were mixed. Unemployment was enormously reduced through government stimulation policies and fudging on the official numbers-failing to count Jews, opponents, refugees, women who got marriage allowances, and other minorities, while upping the amount of jobs by counting those in labor-service camps, army recruits, and Nazi party apparatchiks. According to Dan P. Silverman in Hitler's Economy, "Unemployment was reduced in Germany from 34 percent or about 6 million people, in January 1933, to 14 percent, or 2.5 million people, in January 1936." This is a good drop in joblessness, but nothing close to what some have argued was full employment. Additionally, real wages had declined by approximately 25% between 1933 and 1938."
> "A host of economic side effects surfaced. After suspending what remain of the gold standard, Nazi Germany pressured its central bank to keep interest rates low and government budget deficits high, causing the economy to overheat and triggering higher prices. By November 1936, the Nazi regime issued a price stop decree that prohibited increases in prices and wages. Despite the fact that more waves of inflation continued to occur, prices were still kept artificially low."
Source: Killing History
Follow @redideologies
๐7
This source makes it clear that the Germans did not plan to replace the Soviet state with a "nationalist" one, in fact they explicitly state here that they wanted to avoid that because a nationalist resurgent Russia could threaten German hegemony in the future. They said their aim was to install a socialist puppet state dependent on them, in other words the same damn thing as before.
"In late February 1941 General Georg Thomas, head of the War Economy and Armaments Office (Wehrwirtschafts- und Rรผstungsamt) submitted plans for the economic utilization of the conquered territories. Gรถring relayed Hitler's response on February 26. The Fรผhrer was in full agreement on the economic issues; Thomas was in fact appointed Gรถring's coordinator for a unified economic policy on conquered Soviet territory. Gรถring also passed on Hitler's view that in order to pacify and secure these territories for maximum exploitation, one would have to destroy communism, and that required "taking care of the Bolshevik leadership as soon as possible" (zunรคchst schnell die bolschemisti- schen Fรผhrer zu erledigen)."
"Alfred Jodl, chief of staff of the OKW, met with Hitler on March 3 to discuss the military's initial draft plan for the occupation of the Soviet Union. Hitler emphatically set out the principles upon which the plan had to be revised. This imminent campaign is more than just a battle of weapons; it also entails a conflict between two worldviews.... The Jewish-Bolshevik intelligentsia, the "suppressor" of these peoples until now, must be removed.... Moreover, we must avoid under all circumstances that in place of a Bolshevik now a nationalist Russia is allowed to emerge, which as history proves will in the end again be hostile to Germany. It is our task to construct as quickly as possible with a minimum of German military power socialist state forms that are dependent upon us. These tasks are so difficult that one can not burden the army with them."
"On March 30, 1941, Hitler addressed a gathering of some 200 military officers for two and a half hours. The signals Hitler had given to Jodl, Wagner, and Halder about the nature of the Russian campaign were now made clear to a much wider circle. Halder took extensive notes on the fateful speech: Clash of two ideologies. Crushing denunciation of Bolshevism, identified with asocial criminality. Communism is an enormous danger for our future. A communist is no comrade before or after the battle. This is a war of destruction. If we do not grasp this, we shall still beat the enemy, but 30 years later we shall again have to fight the communist foe. We do not wage war to preserve the enemy. . . .
War Against Russia. Extermination of the Bolshevist Commissars and the communist intelligentsia. The new states must be socialist, but without a new intellectual class of their own. A primitive socialist intelligentsia is all that is needed. We must fight against the poison of disintegration. This is no job for the military courts. The individual troop commanders must know the issues at stake. They must be leaders in this fight. The troops must fight back with the methods with which they are attacked. Commissars and GPU [Soviet political police] men are criminals and must be dealt with as such. This need not mean that the troops shall get out of hand. Rather, the commander must give orders that express the common feelings of his men. This will be very different from the war in the west. In the east, harshness today means lenience in the future. Commanders must make the sacrifice of overcoming their personal scruples."
Source: THE ORGINS OF THE FINAL SOLUTION, Christopher Browning
@redideologies
"In late February 1941 General Georg Thomas, head of the War Economy and Armaments Office (Wehrwirtschafts- und Rรผstungsamt) submitted plans for the economic utilization of the conquered territories. Gรถring relayed Hitler's response on February 26. The Fรผhrer was in full agreement on the economic issues; Thomas was in fact appointed Gรถring's coordinator for a unified economic policy on conquered Soviet territory. Gรถring also passed on Hitler's view that in order to pacify and secure these territories for maximum exploitation, one would have to destroy communism, and that required "taking care of the Bolshevik leadership as soon as possible" (zunรคchst schnell die bolschemisti- schen Fรผhrer zu erledigen)."
"Alfred Jodl, chief of staff of the OKW, met with Hitler on March 3 to discuss the military's initial draft plan for the occupation of the Soviet Union. Hitler emphatically set out the principles upon which the plan had to be revised. This imminent campaign is more than just a battle of weapons; it also entails a conflict between two worldviews.... The Jewish-Bolshevik intelligentsia, the "suppressor" of these peoples until now, must be removed.... Moreover, we must avoid under all circumstances that in place of a Bolshevik now a nationalist Russia is allowed to emerge, which as history proves will in the end again be hostile to Germany. It is our task to construct as quickly as possible with a minimum of German military power socialist state forms that are dependent upon us. These tasks are so difficult that one can not burden the army with them."
"On March 30, 1941, Hitler addressed a gathering of some 200 military officers for two and a half hours. The signals Hitler had given to Jodl, Wagner, and Halder about the nature of the Russian campaign were now made clear to a much wider circle. Halder took extensive notes on the fateful speech: Clash of two ideologies. Crushing denunciation of Bolshevism, identified with asocial criminality. Communism is an enormous danger for our future. A communist is no comrade before or after the battle. This is a war of destruction. If we do not grasp this, we shall still beat the enemy, but 30 years later we shall again have to fight the communist foe. We do not wage war to preserve the enemy. . . .
War Against Russia. Extermination of the Bolshevist Commissars and the communist intelligentsia. The new states must be socialist, but without a new intellectual class of their own. A primitive socialist intelligentsia is all that is needed. We must fight against the poison of disintegration. This is no job for the military courts. The individual troop commanders must know the issues at stake. They must be leaders in this fight. The troops must fight back with the methods with which they are attacked. Commissars and GPU [Soviet political police] men are criminals and must be dealt with as such. This need not mean that the troops shall get out of hand. Rather, the commander must give orders that express the common feelings of his men. This will be very different from the war in the west. In the east, harshness today means lenience in the future. Commanders must make the sacrifice of overcoming their personal scruples."
Source: THE ORGINS OF THE FINAL SOLUTION, Christopher Browning
@redideologies
๐7
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
"So it is perhaps no surprise to us that the leaders who shouted the loudest about marriage, family and women's roles failed to uphold their own rules. Almost all of the Nazi leaders chased women, cheated on their wives, and engaged in illicit relationships, including producing illegitimate children."
@redideologies
@redideologies
๐11
Forwarded from Red Ideologies
"In the days that followed, much to the surprise of his lunch guests, Hitler continued to express his regard for Stalin. The Soviet dictatorโs life resembled his own, he told them: the Georgian, too, had worked his way up from โan unknown man to the leader of a stateโ."
Source: Volker Ullrich, Hitler Downfall ( Hans Baur, Ich flog Mรคchtige dieser Erde, Kempten (Allgรคu), 1956, pp. 178f.)
Source: Volker Ullrich, Hitler Downfall ( Hans Baur, Ich flog Mรคchtige dieser Erde, Kempten (Allgรคu), 1956, pp. 178f.)
๐5
Forwarded from Red Ideologies
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
PraxBen on that "economic miracle" bit we always hear about.
"By 1936 the German recovery was no more advanced than that of Britain or the United States"
"Deficit spending was dominated by war preparation"
"Full scale rearmament had begun by 1934 and 70% of government expenditures had gone toward it by 1939"
"The economy recovery of the 1930s was like a balloon. The Nazis tried to fill the balloon with air but they could never tie the knot to keep it stable. The massive short term gain with equally massive long term consequences"
From the booklet "Deficit Spending in the Nazi Recovery"
Follow @redideologies
"By 1936 the German recovery was no more advanced than that of Britain or the United States"
"Deficit spending was dominated by war preparation"
"Full scale rearmament had begun by 1934 and 70% of government expenditures had gone toward it by 1939"
"The economy recovery of the 1930s was like a balloon. The Nazis tried to fill the balloon with air but they could never tie the knot to keep it stable. The massive short term gain with equally massive long term consequences"
From the booklet "Deficit Spending in the Nazi Recovery"
Follow @redideologies
๐7๐ฅ3
Forwarded from Red Ideologies
By 1940 Hitler was fully convinced that he wanted a fully planned and regimented economy modeled on the Soviet Union.
> Hitler attributed the success of National Socialist economic policy primarily to state control of the economy. From 1940 at the latest, Hitler increasingly became a proponent of the state planned economy โ partly because he was convinced of the superiority of the Soviet Union and its economic system. In his monologs to his inner circle (known as โtable talksโ) on July 27-28, 1941 Hitler said that โA sensible employment of the powers of a nation can only be achieved with a planned economy from above.โ
> About two weeks later he said: โAs far as the planning of the economy is concerned, we are still very much at the beginning and I imagine it will be something wonderfully nice to build up an encompassing German and European economic order.โ The statement that as far as the planning of the economy was concerned one was still at the very beginning is important because it shows that Hitler was not thinking at all of a reduction of state intervention โ not even for the time after the war โ but, on the contrary, intended to expand the instruments of state control of the economy even further.
Source
Follow @redideologies
> Hitler attributed the success of National Socialist economic policy primarily to state control of the economy. From 1940 at the latest, Hitler increasingly became a proponent of the state planned economy โ partly because he was convinced of the superiority of the Soviet Union and its economic system. In his monologs to his inner circle (known as โtable talksโ) on July 27-28, 1941 Hitler said that โA sensible employment of the powers of a nation can only be achieved with a planned economy from above.โ
> About two weeks later he said: โAs far as the planning of the economy is concerned, we are still very much at the beginning and I imagine it will be something wonderfully nice to build up an encompassing German and European economic order.โ The statement that as far as the planning of the economy was concerned one was still at the very beginning is important because it shows that Hitler was not thinking at all of a reduction of state intervention โ not even for the time after the war โ but, on the contrary, intended to expand the instruments of state control of the economy even further.
Source
Follow @redideologies
๐10๐ฅ2
Forwarded from Exposing Hitler as Zionist
What most normie-Jews do not realize is that Nazism was the cattle prod used to valet the the Jews of Europe overseas to establish Israel and colonize Palestine. It's also used as the bogeyman to scare the Westernized Jews into becoming Zionists, or simply not assimilating to the host culture.
๐ฅ12
Forwarded from ์ฅ์์ ๐ฝ
Gunther even accuses some British / Irish people for being โswarthyโ as he classifies the population of the British Isles into 3 main racial categories: Nordic, Mediterranean, and Alpine based on physical traits. He argues that racial traits vary geographically, with northern Scotland being mostly "pure Nordic" (fair-skinned), while southern England, Wales, and Ireland are darker due to Mediterranean and Alpine influences. Gunther further claims that some regions, like Cornwall and Ireland, show "Semitic" traits from ancient Phoenician contact. He highlights a strong Mediterranean influence in western Ireland, linking the Irish to the Spanish.
Reference: ๐๐ท๐ด ๐๐ฐ๐ฒ๐ธ๐ฐ๐ป ๐ด๐ป๐ด๐ผ๐ด๐ฝ๐๐ ๐พ๐ต ๐ด๐๐๐พ๐ฟ๐ด๐ฐ๐ฝ ๐ท๐ธ๐๐๐พ๐๐ ๐๐ข ๐ท๐ฐ๐ฝ๐ ๐ถ๐๐ฝ๐๐ท๐ด๐
(2)
Reference: ๐๐ท๐ด ๐๐ฐ๐ฒ๐ธ๐ฐ๐ป ๐ด๐ป๐ด๐ผ๐ด๐ฝ๐๐ ๐พ๐ต ๐ด๐๐๐พ๐ฟ๐ด๐ฐ๐ฝ ๐ท๐ธ๐๐๐พ๐๐ ๐๐ข ๐ท๐ฐ๐ฝ๐ ๐ถ๐๐ฝ๐๐ท๐ด๐
(2)
๐ฅ10
Forwarded from Martinez Politics
Franco was absolutely based for keeping Spain out of Hitler's wars of aggression.
As you can see with that article, Franco knew about the Nazis' extreme Nordicist predilections and that they thus viewed Spaniards as inferiors to be used and discarded like cattle.
The Blue Division - who were brave and capable soldiers - got duped into fighting in a war they thought was against Soviet Communism, but was in reality nothing more than Germanic territorial expansionism to implement a competing version of Communism with Germans at the helm of it.
Mussolini the buffoon put himself completely at the mercy of a man who viewed him and his people as inferior servants of the "Nordic master race".
As you can see with that article, Franco knew about the Nazis' extreme Nordicist predilections and that they thus viewed Spaniards as inferiors to be used and discarded like cattle.
The Blue Division - who were brave and capable soldiers - got duped into fighting in a war they thought was against Soviet Communism, but was in reality nothing more than Germanic territorial expansionism to implement a competing version of Communism with Germans at the helm of it.
Mussolini the buffoon put himself completely at the mercy of a man who viewed him and his people as inferior servants of the "Nordic master race".
๐ฏ8๐6
Hitler sent weapons to the Ethiopian resistance armies fighting against Mussolini's Italy.
"Nazi Germany sent arms and munitions to Ethiopia because it was frustrated over Italian objections to its attempts to integrate Austria. This prolonged the war and sapped Italian resources."
Hitler was a true Third Worldist. He would support black African and Indian struggles against European countries if those countries wouldn't let Hitler do what he wanted in Europe.
@redideologies
"Nazi Germany sent arms and munitions to Ethiopia because it was frustrated over Italian objections to its attempts to integrate Austria. This prolonged the war and sapped Italian resources."
Hitler was a true Third Worldist. He would support black African and Indian struggles against European countries if those countries wouldn't let Hitler do what he wanted in Europe.
@redideologies
๐18โก1๐ฏ1
Forwarded from ์ฅ์์ ๐ฝ
Gunther portrays Mediterraneans and other Southern Europeans, particularly in countries like Portugal, Spain, and France, as racially inferior due to what he describes as a significant "Negro strain" in their populations. He suggests that these regions have been heavily influenced by African blood through historical events such as the Moorish domination, the importation of African slaves, and intermarriage with Africans. Gunther contrasts Southern Europeans unfavorably with more "homogeneous" Mediterranean Spaniards and implies that Southern Europeans, especially the Portuguese, are racially diluted by this African influence. He also expresses disdain for French policies that grant civil rights and military rank to Africans, which he sees as exacerbating a "Black Peril" and posing a racial threat to Europe, particularly Germany. His analysis reflects a condescending view of Southern Europeans as racially mixed and thus inferior to the more "pure" Nordic or Alpine populations of Europe.
Reference: ๐๐ท๐ด ๐๐ฐ๐ฒ๐ธ๐ฐ๐ป ๐ด๐ป๐ด๐ผ๐ด๐ฝ๐๐ ๐พ๐ต ๐ด๐๐๐พ๐ฟ๐ด๐ฐ๐ฝ ๐ท๐ธ๐๐๐พ๐๐ ๐๐ข ๐ท๐ฐ๐ฝ๐ ๐ถ๐๐ฝ๐๐ท๐ด๐
(3)
Reference: ๐๐ท๐ด ๐๐ฐ๐ฒ๐ธ๐ฐ๐ป ๐ด๐ป๐ด๐ผ๐ด๐ฝ๐๐ ๐พ๐ต ๐ด๐๐๐พ๐ฟ๐ด๐ฐ๐ฝ ๐ท๐ธ๐๐๐พ๐๐ ๐๐ข ๐ท๐ฐ๐ฝ๐ ๐ถ๐๐ฝ๐๐ท๐ด๐
(3)
๐7๐1
Forwarded from Martinez Politics
Fredrich Engels was anti-Slavic, yet also a Third Worldist.
"Engels rejected the view commonly expressed by explorers and missionaries in his day that native peoples were heathen savages who were obviously inferior to white races. Indeed he argued that primitive peoples were superior to modern Europeans because they did not recognise private property or capitalism or the state. Marx and Engels and the English Workers opposed to the exploitation of native peoples by white colonists. He denounced the expansion of the empires of European states in India, Java, Algiers and elsewhere."
Despite rejecting colonialism against non-Europeans by Europeans, he supported subjugating Slavs by other Europeans and even the Turks, saying Slavs couldn't rule themselves:
"In view of Engels' attitude towards the Jews, the Iroquois, and the natives in colonial territories, his attitude towards some of the Slavs is difficult to understand. When a Pan-Slav movement developed with Russian support in central and eastern Europe during the revolution of 1848 Engels rejected the demands of the Czechs, Serbs, Croats, and Ruthenians for independence from Habsburg or Turkish rule. Early in 1849 in two articles in the Neue Rheinische Zeitung35 he argued that these peoples had no natural capacity for self-government and were for ever doomed to be ruled by more advanced nations. They were "peoples without any history". Engels asserted that these peoples would always be subject races and would "never achieve national independence". "They are peoples who were either already under foreign rule when they entered into the first primitive phase of civilisation or who were actually forced into the earliest phase of civilisation by their foreign master."
What a bizarre cocktail of anti-Slavism and Third Worldism.
"he argued that these peoples had no natural capacity for self-government and were for ever doomed to be ruled by more advanced nations"
That's exactly what Hitler said in Mein Kampf. Germanic anti-Slavism was ever-present during those times.
"Engels rejected the view commonly expressed by explorers and missionaries in his day that native peoples were heathen savages who were obviously inferior to white races. Indeed he argued that primitive peoples were superior to modern Europeans because they did not recognise private property or capitalism or the state. Marx and Engels and the English Workers opposed to the exploitation of native peoples by white colonists. He denounced the expansion of the empires of European states in India, Java, Algiers and elsewhere."
Despite rejecting colonialism against non-Europeans by Europeans, he supported subjugating Slavs by other Europeans and even the Turks, saying Slavs couldn't rule themselves:
"In view of Engels' attitude towards the Jews, the Iroquois, and the natives in colonial territories, his attitude towards some of the Slavs is difficult to understand. When a Pan-Slav movement developed with Russian support in central and eastern Europe during the revolution of 1848 Engels rejected the demands of the Czechs, Serbs, Croats, and Ruthenians for independence from Habsburg or Turkish rule. Early in 1849 in two articles in the Neue Rheinische Zeitung35 he argued that these peoples had no natural capacity for self-government and were for ever doomed to be ruled by more advanced nations. They were "peoples without any history". Engels asserted that these peoples would always be subject races and would "never achieve national independence". "They are peoples who were either already under foreign rule when they entered into the first primitive phase of civilisation or who were actually forced into the earliest phase of civilisation by their foreign master."
What a bizarre cocktail of anti-Slavism and Third Worldism.
"he argued that these peoples had no natural capacity for self-government and were for ever doomed to be ruled by more advanced nations"
That's exactly what Hitler said in Mein Kampf. Germanic anti-Slavism was ever-present during those times.
๐13๐4