Marxists: We must seize the wealth of the bourgeoisie and redistribute it to all "workers".

Nazis: We must seize the wealth of the Jewish bourgeoisie and redistribute it to all "German workers".

In so many ways Nazism was simply a modification of Marxism with the generic wealthy swapped out for "wealthy Jews" (they also went after wealthy Germans who didn't comply); the generic proletariat swapped in for the "German proletariat".

Hence why Hitler said: "we National Socialists wish precisely to attract all socialists, even the Communists; we wish to win them over from their international camp to the national one."

In other words, a small modification of Marxist doctrine from generic and international to German and national. Beefsteak Nazism.

My issue with the Jewish establishment is not that they're "wealthy" (they're not all wealthy, not all wealthy people are Jews, nor do I envy wealthy people); my issue is that their leaders have imbibed a rancid progressive ideology that is contributing to the collapse of civilization. It's the same beef that I have with the Christian leadership and many non-Jewish Whites who have taken up the same ideology. If their leaders weren't pushing anti-White progressivism, I don't think any of us would even notice they exist.

The problem with the Nazi critique of Jews is it's contradictory ("they're bad for being socialists AND capitalists! Liberals AND conservatives!") and rooted in an envy-jealousy of perceived Jewish societal success, hence the focus on their "over-representation" in various areas. Just pointing to their over-representation in some field is not a valid critique. You can find them over-represented among chess-champions, Nobel prize winners, scientists, lawyers, doctors, economists and all cognitively demanding activities. Are we to criticize them for being doctors and scientists too?

A valid critique is when groups of Jews get together as Jews to promote an agenda that they view as beneficial to them but is not beneficial to the majority, like immigration, social leftism or foreign wars. That's a different thing then just attacking them on "over-representation" grounds which is a weak argument rooted in envy.

"Our cause is based on the truth"

So why does every Natsoc lie his ass off about Hitler's anti-Slavic views and his Lebensraum program to colonize the east?

Natsoc rehabilitation relies heavily on outright lies and lies by omission. But of course, this roidhead doesn't care about the anti-Slavic stuff because he's a Nordicist himself.

It seems that after the defeat of Stalingrad, Rosenberg, and some Army officials wanted to change the way ethnic groups were treated. Rosenberg held a meeting with some Army staff, decided to tone down the harsher treatment, and then sent Hitler a memorandum regarding this. Hitler replied to Rosenberg, saying not to meddle in Army affairs, and Hitler's reply to Army staff who took part in the meeting was to not meddle in political affairs. So Hitler, despite the losses in Stalingrad, did not change his opinion on the treatment of ethnic groups. (pages 152, 153, 154)

Rosenberg's subordinates, realizing that Ukrainian nationalists were not going to support the Nazis anymore, shifted their attention to caucuses and MOSLEMS as allies (page 155)

Koch, instead of toning down the harsher treatment, doubles down (page 156, image).

In June 1941 the Nazi regime began planning the removal and/or destruction of all Poles from Poland entirely (annexed territories and the general government).

Source: Wages of Destruction, pg. 466

@redideologies

The General Plan OST envisioned the homicidal removal or murder of the majority of Poles and Ukrainians.

Source: Wages of Destruction, pg. 467

@redideologies

Hitler used the example of American expansion westward to frame his Eastern expansion.

"A superior settler population would displace an inferior native population opening the way towards a new era of economic possibility"

Source: Wages of Destruction, pg. 469

@redideologies

When Barbarossa started, the German leadership believed the Soviets were "weak and incompetent". A far-cry from the narrative that the Germans truly feared a Soviet invasion was coming.

Source: Wages of Destruction, pg. 487

@redideologies

Barbarossa was about acquiring the resources and landmass necessary to make Germany a "world power" as stated in Mein Kampf many times. Then Hitler in a delusional manner compares Bolshevism to Capitalism despite his own system being much more similar to Bolshevism.

Source: Wages of Destruction, pg. 491

@redideologies

Hitler:

> ordered the complete destruction of Moscow and St. Petersburg
> called for colonizing the East with German settlements even "beyond the Urals"
> Russians are "fit for nothing but hard work under coercion"
> Ukrainians were "every bit as idle, disorganized, and nihilistically Asiatic as Greater Russians"
> Slavs only understood "the whip"
> praised Stalin as "one of the greatest living human beings"
> British colonial rule in India was the model for German occupation of Russia
> Wanted to keep Slavs uneducated so they would function as little more than donkeys for work
> Crimea to be fully colonized by Germans

All of this confirms what Hitler wrote in Mein Kampf and what was revealed in Table Talks.

Follow @redideologies

Even Rosenberg rebuked his fellow Nazis' overt anti-Slavicism, but only as an optical measure to further dupe the Ukrainians into thinking they had an ally against Stalin, when in fact their goal was the colonization of Ukraine for German exploitation.

> In mid-March Rosenberg sent Hitler a brief memorandum which, without mentioning names, was a sharp indictment of Koch’s policy. ‘ Certain personalities’ , he wrote,

have drawn the conclusion from [official policy] that they must drastically and publicly give vent wherever possible to such expressions as ‘ colonial people, who must be handled with the whip like the Negroes’ [or] ‘ Slavic peoples who must be kept as dumb as can be . . .’ It is precisely this attitude of disdain, repeatedly shown in public which has often had worse repercussions on the [population’s] willingness to co-operate than all other measures.

Finally, Rosenberg expressed concern about the loyalty of the Ukrainian population, which, he had claimed only recently, was Germany’s natural ally. Germany could think and plan whatever it wanted, his report to Hitler continued, ‘ but it is not the task of the German political representatives [on the spot] to proclaim measures which in the last analysis might drive the conquered population to despair’.

Source: German rule in Russia, 1941-1945: a study of occupation policies, Alexander Dallin

Not only did Benito Mussolini praise Joseph Stalin for becoming a fascist, but he explicitly expressed gratitude to Stalin for “rendering a commendable service to Fascism.”

Mussolini believed that Stalin was the main pillar of destroying “internationalism” within Communism. (Internationalism is the main problem that Hitler had with Marxism/Communism, which is well written in Mein Kampf: “𝘞𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘱𝘭𝘢𝘤𝘦𝘴 𝘔𝘶𝘴𝘴𝘰𝘭𝘪𝘯𝘪 𝘪𝘯 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘳𝘢𝘯𝘬𝘴 𝘰𝘧 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘸𝘰𝘳𝘭𝘥'𝘴 𝘨𝘳𝘦𝘢𝘵 𝘮𝘦𝘯 𝘪𝘴 𝘩𝘪𝘴 𝘥𝘦𝘤𝘪𝘴𝘪𝘰𝘯 𝘯𝘰𝘵 𝘵𝘰 𝘴𝘩𝘢𝘳𝘦 𝘐𝘵𝘢𝘭𝘺 𝘸𝘪𝘵𝘩 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘔𝘢𝘳𝘹𝘪𝘴𝘵𝘴 𝘣𝘶𝘵 𝘵𝘰 𝘳𝘦𝘥𝘦𝘦𝘮 𝘩𝘪𝘴 𝘤𝘰𝘶𝘯𝘵𝘳𝘺 𝘧𝘳𝘰𝘮 𝘔𝘢𝘳𝘹𝘪𝘴𝘮 𝘣𝘺 𝘥𝘦𝘴𝘵𝘳𝘰𝘺𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘪𝘯𝘵𝘦𝘳𝘯𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯𝘢𝘭𝘪𝘴𝘮.”)

Here is what Mussolini had to say about Stalin

"𝘚𝘵𝘢𝘭𝘪𝘯 𝘥𝘰𝘦𝘴 𝘯𝘰𝘵 𝘳𝘦𝘴𝘰𝘳𝘵 𝘵𝘰 𝘤𝘢𝘴𝘵𝘰𝘳 𝘰𝘪𝘭 𝘵𝘰 𝘱𝘶𝘯𝘪𝘴𝘩 𝘊𝘰𝘮𝘮𝘶𝘯𝘪𝘴𝘵 𝘭𝘦𝘢𝘥𝘦𝘳𝘴 𝘸𝘩𝘰 𝘢𝘳𝘦 𝘴𝘰 𝘴𝘵𝘶𝘱𝘪𝘥 𝘰𝘳 𝘤𝘳𝘪𝘮𝘪𝘯𝘢𝘭 𝘢𝘴 𝘴𝘵𝘪𝘭𝘭 𝘵𝘰 𝘣𝘦𝘭𝘪𝘦𝘷𝘦 𝘪𝘯 𝘊𝘰𝘮𝘮𝘶𝘯𝘪𝘴𝘮, 𝘚𝘵𝘢𝘭𝘪𝘯 𝘪𝘴 𝘶𝘯𝘢𝘣𝘭𝘦 𝘵𝘰 𝘶𝘯𝘥𝘦𝘳𝘴𝘵𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘴𝘶𝘣𝘵𝘭𝘦 𝘪𝘳𝘰𝘯𝘺 𝘪𝘯𝘷𝘰𝘭𝘷𝘦𝘥 𝘪𝘯 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘭𝘢𝘹𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘷𝘦 𝘴𝘺𝘴𝘵𝘦𝘮 𝘰𝘧 𝘤𝘢𝘴𝘵𝘰𝘳 𝘰𝘪𝘭. 𝘏𝘦 𝘮𝘢𝘬𝘦𝘴 𝘢 𝘤𝘭𝘦𝘢𝘯 𝘴𝘸𝘦𝘦𝘱 𝘣𝘺 𝘮𝘦𝘢𝘯𝘴 𝘰𝘧 𝘴𝘺𝘴𝘵𝘦𝘮𝘴 𝘸𝘩𝘪𝘤𝘩 𝘸𝘦𝘳𝘦 𝘣𝘰𝘳𝘯 𝘪𝘯 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘴𝘵𝘦𝘱𝘱𝘦𝘴 𝘰𝘧 𝘎𝘦𝘯𝘨𝘩𝘪𝘴 𝘒𝘩𝘢𝘯 ... 𝘚𝘵𝘢𝘭𝘪𝘯 𝘳𝘦𝘯𝘥𝘦𝘳𝘴 𝘢 𝘤𝘰𝘮𝘮𝘦𝘯𝘥𝘢𝘣𝘭𝘦 𝘴𝘦𝘳𝘷𝘪𝘤𝘦 𝘵𝘰 𝘍𝘢𝘴𝘤𝘪𝘴𝘮.”

The vast majority of Mediterranean Europeans online who identify themselves as NS or overly worship The Third Reich just for vibes get baffled when schizo Nordicists claim how they were “le real Ancient Romans and le real Ancient Greeks.” The Nordic “Kanging” was largely done by NS intellectuals including key figures such as Hitler, Darré, Gunther, and Rosenberg. Hitler himself viewed the Ancient Greeks as the descendants of the Dorians who originated from the northern Germanic lands, which is a pseudoscientific myth that lacks credible evidence. Benito Mussolini, who believed that Mediterraneans are the legitimate descendants of the Great Roman Empire, himself called out how hyper Nordicism from NS Germany was overly delusional.

𝚁𝚎𝚏𝚎𝚛𝚎𝚗𝚌𝚎: 𝙸𝚗𝚜𝚒𝚍𝚎 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚃𝚑𝚒𝚛𝚍 𝚁𝚎𝚒𝚌𝚑: 𝙼𝚎𝚖𝚘𝚒𝚛𝚜 𝚋𝚢 𝙰𝚕𝚋𝚎𝚛𝚝 𝚂𝚙𝚎𝚎𝚛

Mussolini had his own version of Lebensraum: Spacio Vitale.

> "​Another element of Mussolini’s fascism was the idea of ‘spazio vitale’ which translates to ‘vital space’. It is the belief that Italy required more space to operate. It further related to fascism as, the territory that Mussolini identified was where the Roman Empire had previously controlled. This concept of ‘vital space’ relates to another important aspect of fascism – racism superiority. While Mussolini did not necessarily support the racial policies and practise of Adolf Hitler and Nazi Germany, he did assert that some people were superior over others. For instance, he argued that it was justified for superior people to rule over inferior people. This is exemplified in a speech from 1920 that he gave, where he said:

​“When dealing with such a race as Slavic—inferior and barbarian—we must not pursue the carrot, but the stick policy... We should not be afraid of new victims... The Italian border should run across the Brenner Pass, Monte Nevoso and the Dinaric Alps... I would say we can easily sacrifice 500,000 barbaric Slavs for 50,000 Italians...”

Source

Follow @redideologies

> But from May onwards, Goebbels’s daily press instructions unfolded a hate campaign against Poland that made it seem as if the ethnic German inhabitants of the country, and above all of Danzig, were in constant, mortal and growing danger from violence meted out to them by Poles. ‘Ethnic Germans flee from Polish terror’, screamed the headlines. ‘German houses broken into with axes - Terrorized by Poles for weeks - Hundreds of refugees are arrested by the Poles’. Poles were allegedly murdering ethnic Germans, shooting at German passers-by in Danzig, and generally threatening to make their lives unbearable. Although the Polish government’s policy towards the ethnic German minority had been considerably less liberal and tolerant than that of its Czech counterpart, these stories were grotesque exaggerations if not pure invention. For their part, the Nazis who dominated the political scene in Danzig kept up the pressure by provoking the Poles and staging incidents for the German press to exploit, such as mounting violent attacks on Polish customs officers and spreading atrocity stories when the officers defended themselves.

Source: Richard Evans, Third Reich in Power.

The Nazis killed between two and three million ethnic Poles during the occupation.

"To take Poland as one example: through mass murder, enslavement, ethnic cleansing, and a systematic attempt to destroy Polish ethnic identity—including the repression of education, literature, cultural life, and even the use of the Polish language—the Nazis made considerable progress in their goal of eliminating Poles as an ethnic group. During the reign of Hans Frank’s General Government, the Nazis murdered between two to three million ethnic Poles (as well as 90 percent of Polish Jewry, or three million Polish Jews), and ethnically cleansed or enslaved millions more."

https://www.theamericanconservative.com/the-second-world-war-was-not-stalins-war/