Red Ideologies
1.37K subscribers
608 photos
145 videos
2 files
443 links
Documenting the extensive links between Red and Brown ideologies
Download Telegram
The South Tyrol situation demonstrated Hitler's duplicity on the ethnic diaspora question.

> "During the first years of South Tyrolean integration into Italy, both Italian authorities and South Tyrolean representatives tried to find an appropriate solution for the German-speaking minority. Yet, a movement called the irredenta, or the unredeemed (as in unredeemed territories), insisted that this area should have always belonged to Italy. The leaders of this movement were determined to crush any sense of Tyrolean culture. When Benito Mussolini and his Fascist party took over in 1922, the South Tyroleans faced a different treatment by the Italian authorities. Fascism threatened not only to suppress the language of the German-speaking minority in the north, but also to uproot the cultural identity of that area."

> "The first and major aim was to Italianize the public language of the area, to Italianize all public inscriptions, town names, street names, and eventually family names and even inscriptions on tombstones. For those who did not comply, they faced major harassment, despotic laws that even regulated their pets and personal belongings. For those who did, they were rewarded with free textbooks, jobs for those who joined the workers’ associations, or who generally collaborated with the Fascists’ economic societies."

> "And then the government injected the local society with transplanted Italians. “Majoritarianism” was the attempt by the Italian government to generate an Italian majority in South Tyrol. In Bolzano, the government built a new industrial complex and apartment buildings for Italian factory workers. In other cities the government financed the construction of hydroelectric power plants which flooded lands and villages. The government started purchasing land from South Tyrolean bankrupted farmers and provided minor compensation for land destroyed by the flooding. The South Tyroleans had little chance to resist the dictatorial measures."

> "Although open confrontation with the Italian regime was rare, the South Tyroleans managed to withstand most of the Italianization efforts. To counteract Fascist attempts, Germans outside of Italy established a secret relief fund during the economic crisis to prevent further South Tyroleans from having to declare bankruptcy and lose their lands. As Hitler rose to power, so did the South Tyroleans’ hopes that they might have found the leader who would finally bring them back to their rightful place: Austria. Hitler had different intentions. He claimed that Germany’s only possible option was to assure Italy that the South Tyrolean problem did not exist. Despite Hitler’s public renunciation of South Tyrol and despite the development of the German-Italian friendship."

> "During Hitler’s visit in Rome in May 1938, Mussolini confessed, “The past developments have shown, that this tribe cannot be assimilated.” Therefore he promised that he would make some concessions to the German-speaking minority in the north as long as Hitler guaranteed the pacification of the area. By now, both Germany and Italy were interested in settling this question once and for all."

"On June 23, 1939, the two dictatorial regimes decided to move the German-speaking South Tyroleans to German territory in the north and leave South Tyrol with Italy. The two governments gave the South Tyroleans the option either to emigrate to Germany or to remain in South Tyrol and become “good Italians.” At first, the South Tyroleans’ reactions were a fierce rejection of Hitler’s offer to “come home into the Reich.” But soon the Nazi-oriented VKS (Völkisher Kampfring Südtirols, or the South Tyrolean People’s Freedom Party) succeeded in convincing their fellow countrymen that the South Tyroleans’ resettlement in Germany was a necessary “sacrifice.”"
👍6
> "The propaganda that evolved on both sides during the months following the June discussions, eventually divided the German-speaking South Tyroleans population into two hostile camps, those remaining and those who opted for Germany. Almost ninety percent of the population opted for emigration. Those who voted to stay were condemned as traitors while those who chose to leave were defamed as Nazis. The Option destroyed many families and the development of the economy of the province was set back for many years. The first families left their homeland in 1939, and by 1943 a total of around 75,000 South Tyroleans had emigrated, of which approximately 50,000 returned after the war."

So Hitler did not accuse Italy of "genocide" for aggressive Italianization efforts in South Tyrol. Instead, he agreed to solve the issue by inviting them into the Reich, an option he never gave the Germans in Poland because he wanted to justify the theft of Polish territory.

@redideologies
👍9
Forwarded from Aaron Clarke
Lebensraum is the Germanic dream of the restoration of the Gothic empire of Germanarich from the Rhine to the Urals or the Gottorp Russian Empire, where most of the landlords were Ostsee Germans and owned millions of Baltic (in the Baltic Governorate) and Russian (in Ukraine, Belarus and Russia) slaves.

There is no doubt that after enslaving the Slavs, the Germans would have turned south and started conquering the sunny Mediterranean lands, paying homage to the Germanic barbarians invading the Roman Empire.

I don't see how the European right can be in favor of Hitler, who was a German socialist who put the Hindu swastika on the German banner, who respected Islam and even reasoned that if the Germans embraced Islam, they would oust the Arabs from ruling positions in the Caliphate and conquer the world by the right of the strong with this “heroic religion”.
👍9
Forwarded from Martinez Politics
Marxists: We must seize the wealth of the bourgeoisie and redistribute it to all "workers".

Nazis: We must seize the wealth of the Jewish bourgeoisie and redistribute it to all "German workers".

In so many ways Nazism was simply a modification of Marxism with the generic wealthy swapped out for "wealthy Jews" (they also went after wealthy Germans who didn't comply); the generic proletariat swapped in for the "German proletariat".

Hence why Hitler said: "we National Socialists wish precisely to attract all socialists, even the Communists; we wish to win them over from their international camp to the national one."

In other words, a small modification of Marxist doctrine from generic and international to German and national. Beefsteak Nazism.

My issue with the Jewish establishment is not that they're "wealthy" (they're not all wealthy, not all wealthy people are Jews, nor do I envy wealthy people); my issue is that their leaders have imbibed a rancid progressive ideology that is contributing to the collapse of civilization. It's the same beef that I have with the Christian leadership and many non-Jewish Whites who have taken up the same ideology. If their leaders weren't pushing anti-White progressivism, I don't think any of us would even notice they exist.

The problem with the Nazi critique of Jews is it's contradictory ("they're bad for being socialists AND capitalists! Liberals AND conservatives!") and rooted in an envy-jealousy of perceived Jewish societal success, hence the focus on their "over-representation" in various areas. Just pointing to their over-representation in some field is not a valid critique. You can find them over-represented among chess-champions, Nobel prize winners, scientists, lawyers, doctors, economists and all cognitively demanding activities. Are we to criticize them for being doctors and scientists too?

A valid critique is when groups of Jews get together as Jews to promote an agenda that they view as beneficial to them but is not beneficial to the majority, like immigration, social leftism or foreign wars. That's a different thing then just attacking them on "over-representation" grounds which is a weak argument rooted in envy.
👍7💯1
Forwarded from Martinez Politics
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
The South Tyrol situation with Italy proves Hitler's duplicity

@MartinezPolitix
👍9
“Our programs are decidedly revolutionary, our ideas belong to those that in a democratic regime would be called "left"; our institutions are a direct consequence of our programs; our ideal is the State of Work. There can be no doubt about this: we are the proletarians fighting, for life and death, against capitalism. We are revolutionaries in search of a new order. If this is true, addressing the bourgeoisie by waving the red danger is absurd. The real scarecrow, the authentic danger, the threat against which we fight tirelessly, comes from the right. We are therefore not interested in having the capitalist bourgeoisie as an ally against the threat of the red danger: even in the best of hypotheses it would be nothing but an untrustworthy ally, which would try to make us serve its purposes, as it has already done more than once with a certain success. Wasting words on it is perfectly superfluous. Indeed, it is harmful, in that it causes us to be confused, from authentic revolutionaries of any color, with the men of reaction whose language we sometimes use."

-Enzo Pezzato, The Fascist Republic (22 April 1945)
👍10
Forwarded from Martinez Politics
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
"Our cause is based on the truth"

So why does every Natsoc lie his ass off about Hitler's anti-Slavic views and his Lebensraum program to colonize the east?

Natsoc rehabilitation relies heavily on outright lies and lies by omission. But of course, this roidhead doesn't care about the anti-Slavic stuff because he's a Nordicist himself.
👍6💯1
Forwarded from Content
It seems that after the defeat of Stalingrad, Rosenberg, and some Army officials wanted to change the way ethnic groups were treated. Rosenberg held a meeting with some Army staff, decided to tone down the harsher treatment, and then sent Hitler a memorandum regarding this. Hitler replied to Rosenberg, saying not to meddle in Army affairs, and Hitler's reply to Army staff who took part in the meeting was to not meddle in political affairs. So Hitler, despite the losses in Stalingrad, did not change his opinion on the treatment of ethnic groups. (pages 152, 153, 154)

Rosenberg's subordinates, realizing that Ukrainian nationalists were not going to support the Nazis anymore, shifted their attention to caucuses and MOSLEMS as allies (page 155)

Koch, instead of toning down the harsher treatment, doubles down (page 156, image).
👍7
Forwarded from Red Ideologies
In June 1941 the Nazi regime began planning the removal and/or destruction of all Poles from Poland entirely (annexed territories and the general government).

Source: Wages of Destruction, pg. 466

@redideologies
👍6
Forwarded from Red Ideologies
The General Plan OST envisioned the homicidal removal or murder of the majority of Poles and Ukrainians.

Source: Wages of Destruction, pg. 467

@redideologies
👍4🔥1
Forwarded from Red Ideologies
Hitler used the example of American expansion westward to frame his Eastern expansion.

"A superior settler population would displace an inferior native population opening the way towards a new era of economic possibility"

Source: Wages of Destruction, pg. 469

@redideologies
👍4
Forwarded from Red Ideologies
When Barbarossa started, the German leadership believed the Soviets were "weak and incompetent". A far-cry from the narrative that the Germans truly feared a Soviet invasion was coming.

Source: Wages of Destruction, pg. 487

@redideologies
👍4
Forwarded from Red Ideologies
Barbarossa was about acquiring the resources and landmass necessary to make Germany a "world power" as stated in Mein Kampf many times. Then Hitler in a delusional manner compares Bolshevism to Capitalism despite his own system being much more similar to Bolshevism.

Source: Wages of Destruction, pg. 491

@redideologies
👍6
Forwarded from Red Ideologies
Hitler:

> ordered the complete destruction of Moscow and St. Petersburg
> called for colonizing the East with German settlements even "beyond the Urals"
> Russians are "fit for nothing but hard work under coercion"
> Ukrainians were "every bit as idle, disorganized, and nihilistically Asiatic as Greater Russians"
> Slavs only understood "the whip"
> praised Stalin as "one of the greatest living human beings"
> British colonial rule in India was the model for German occupation of Russia
> Wanted to keep Slavs uneducated so they would function as little more than donkeys for work
> Crimea to be fully colonized by Germans

All of this confirms what Hitler wrote in Mein Kampf and what was revealed in Table Talks.

Follow @redideologies
👍15😇1
Forwarded from Red Ideologies
Even Rosenberg rebuked his fellow Nazis' overt anti-Slavicism, but only as an optical measure to further dupe the Ukrainians into thinking they had an ally against Stalin, when in fact their goal was the colonization of Ukraine for German exploitation.

> In mid-March Rosenberg sent Hitler a brief memorandum which, without mentioning names, was a sharp indictment of Koch’s policy. ‘ Certain personalities’ , he wrote,

have drawn the conclusion from [official policy] that they must drastically and publicly give vent wherever possible to such expressions as ‘ colonial people, who must be handled with the whip like the Negroes’ [or] ‘ Slavic peoples who must be kept as dumb as can be . . .’ It is precisely this attitude of disdain, repeatedly shown in public which has often had worse repercussions on the [population’s] willingness to co-operate than all other measures.

Finally, Rosenberg expressed concern about the loyalty of the Ukrainian population, which, he had claimed only recently, was Germany’s natural ally. Germany could think and plan whatever it wanted, his report to Hitler continued, ‘ but it is not the task of the German political representatives [on the spot] to proclaim measures which in the last analysis might drive the conquered population to despair’.

Source: German rule in Russia, 1941-1945: a study of occupation policies, Alexander Dallin
👍4
Forwarded from Martinez Politics
How do the "Judeo-Bolshevism" proponents explain this guy: Vasily Blokhin.

"Blokhin was hand-picked for the position by Joseph Stalin in 1926 and led a company of executioners that performed and supervised numerous mass killings in the Soviet Union during Stalin's reign, mostly during the Great Purge and Eastern Front of World War II.[1] Blokhin is recorded as having executed tens of thousands of prisoners by his own hand, including his killing of about 7,000 Polish prisoners of war during the Katyn massacre in spring 1940, making him the most prolific official executioner in recorded world history."

Among the victims at Katyn were nearly a thousand Jews. A CIA report says this:

"Recent historical research shows that 700-900 of the victims were Polish Jews. 8 Ironically, the Germans knew this, and it complicated Goebbels' effort to portray the atrocity as a "Jewish-Bolshevik conspiracy"--a mainstay of the Nazi regime's anti-Semitic propaganda."

NYT:

"Because the 4,443 officers executed included many academicians, doctors, lawyers, etc., there were among them a disproportionate number of Jewish professionals."

So this Russian Gentile Blokhin carried out the murders at Katyn under the orders of Stalin and NKVD chief Lavrentiy Beria, neither Jewish.

The memorandum was signed by these names:

"Memorandum on NKVD letterhead from L. Beria to "Comrade Stalin" proposing to execute captured Polish officers, soldiers, and other prisoners by shooting. Stalin's handwritten signature appears on top, followed by signatures of Politburo members K. Voroshilov, V. Molotov, and A. Mikoyan. Signatures in left margin are M. Kalinin and L. Kaganovich, both favoring execution."

The only Jew on that list was Kaganovich, who said he didn't identify as Jewish, denounced Jews as "rebellious" and prone to anarchy and approved of Stalin's purges of specifically Jewish members of the regime during the battle with Trotsky.

That's not to say that many Jews weren't also involved in Soviet atrocities themselves (they formed a large segment of Soviet leadership in the earlier years of the regime), but it does show that this was not an exclusively Jewish affair and that the Jews involved in Bolshevism were not acting exclusively as Jews because they were willing to kill other Jews in the service of Stalin and Communism.

Christians often try to depict Bolshevism as "Jewish revenge on Christians" or something, but considering that the two most deadly protagonists of the Soviet Bolshevik killing machine were Stalin and Beria, both Georgian Gentiles with Orthodox Christian backgrounds, that thesis is severely flawed. The Jews involved in Bolshevism were evil, as were the Gentiles involved. It's too simplistic to blame this on one group of people.
🏆10👍31😇1
Forwarded from 옥수수 🌽
Not only did Benito Mussolini praise Joseph Stalin for becoming a fascist, but he explicitly expressed gratitude to Stalin for “rendering a commendable service to Fascism.”

Mussolini believed that Stalin was the main pillar of destroying “internationalism” within Communism. (Internationalism is the main problem that Hitler had with Marxism/Communism, which is well written in Mein Kampf: “𝘞𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘱𝘭𝘢𝘤𝘦𝘴 𝘔𝘶𝘴𝘴𝘰𝘭𝘪𝘯𝘪 𝘪𝘯 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘳𝘢𝘯𝘬𝘴 𝘰𝘧 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘸𝘰𝘳𝘭𝘥'𝘴 𝘨𝘳𝘦𝘢𝘵 𝘮𝘦𝘯 𝘪𝘴 𝘩𝘪𝘴 𝘥𝘦𝘤𝘪𝘴𝘪𝘰𝘯 𝘯𝘰𝘵 𝘵𝘰 𝘴𝘩𝘢𝘳𝘦 𝘐𝘵𝘢𝘭𝘺 𝘸𝘪𝘵𝘩 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘔𝘢𝘳𝘹𝘪𝘴𝘵𝘴 𝘣𝘶𝘵 𝘵𝘰 𝘳𝘦𝘥𝘦𝘦𝘮 𝘩𝘪𝘴 𝘤𝘰𝘶𝘯𝘵𝘳𝘺 𝘧𝘳𝘰𝘮 𝘔𝘢𝘳𝘹𝘪𝘴𝘮 𝘣𝘺 𝘥𝘦𝘴𝘵𝘳𝘰𝘺𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘪𝘯𝘵𝘦𝘳𝘯𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯𝘢𝘭𝘪𝘴𝘮.”)

Here is what Mussolini had to say about Stalin

"𝘚𝘵𝘢𝘭𝘪𝘯 𝘥𝘰𝘦𝘴 𝘯𝘰𝘵 𝘳𝘦𝘴𝘰𝘳𝘵 𝘵𝘰 𝘤𝘢𝘴𝘵𝘰𝘳 𝘰𝘪𝘭 𝘵𝘰 𝘱𝘶𝘯𝘪𝘴𝘩 𝘊𝘰𝘮𝘮𝘶𝘯𝘪𝘴𝘵 𝘭𝘦𝘢𝘥𝘦𝘳𝘴 𝘸𝘩𝘰 𝘢𝘳𝘦 𝘴𝘰 𝘴𝘵𝘶𝘱𝘪𝘥 𝘰𝘳 𝘤𝘳𝘪𝘮𝘪𝘯𝘢𝘭 𝘢𝘴 𝘴𝘵𝘪𝘭𝘭 𝘵𝘰 𝘣𝘦𝘭𝘪𝘦𝘷𝘦 𝘪𝘯 𝘊𝘰𝘮𝘮𝘶𝘯𝘪𝘴𝘮, 𝘚𝘵𝘢𝘭𝘪𝘯 𝘪𝘴 𝘶𝘯𝘢𝘣𝘭𝘦 𝘵𝘰 𝘶𝘯𝘥𝘦𝘳𝘴𝘵𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘴𝘶𝘣𝘵𝘭𝘦 𝘪𝘳𝘰𝘯𝘺 𝘪𝘯𝘷𝘰𝘭𝘷𝘦𝘥 𝘪𝘯 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘭𝘢𝘹𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘷𝘦 𝘴𝘺𝘴𝘵𝘦𝘮 𝘰𝘧 𝘤𝘢𝘴𝘵𝘰𝘳 𝘰𝘪𝘭. 𝘏𝘦 𝘮𝘢𝘬𝘦𝘴 𝘢 𝘤𝘭𝘦𝘢𝘯 𝘴𝘸𝘦𝘦𝘱 𝘣𝘺 𝘮𝘦𝘢𝘯𝘴 𝘰𝘧 𝘴𝘺𝘴𝘵𝘦𝘮𝘴 𝘸𝘩𝘪𝘤𝘩 𝘸𝘦𝘳𝘦 𝘣𝘰𝘳𝘯 𝘪𝘯 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘴𝘵𝘦𝘱𝘱𝘦𝘴 𝘰𝘧 𝘎𝘦𝘯𝘨𝘩𝘪𝘴 𝘒𝘩𝘢𝘯 ... 𝘚𝘵𝘢𝘭𝘪𝘯 𝘳𝘦𝘯𝘥𝘦𝘳𝘴 𝘢 𝘤𝘰𝘮𝘮𝘦𝘯𝘥𝘢𝘣𝘭𝘦 𝘴𝘦𝘳𝘷𝘪𝘤𝘦 𝘵𝘰 𝘍𝘢𝘴𝘤𝘪𝘴𝘮.”
🔥5🏆2
Forwarded from 옥수수 🌽
The vast majority of Mediterranean Europeans online who identify themselves as NS or overly worship The Third Reich just for vibes get baffled when schizo Nordicists claim how they were “le real Ancient Romans and le real Ancient Greeks.” The Nordic “Kanging” was largely done by NS intellectuals including key figures such as Hitler, Darré, Gunther, and Rosenberg. Hitler himself viewed the Ancient Greeks as the descendants of the Dorians who originated from the northern Germanic lands, which is a pseudoscientific myth that lacks credible evidence. Benito Mussolini, who believed that Mediterraneans are the legitimate descendants of the Great Roman Empire, himself called out how hyper Nordicism from NS Germany was overly delusional.

𝚁𝚎𝚏𝚎𝚛𝚎𝚗𝚌𝚎: 𝙸𝚗𝚜𝚒𝚍𝚎 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚃𝚑𝚒𝚛𝚍 𝚁𝚎𝚒𝚌𝚑: 𝙼𝚎𝚖𝚘𝚒𝚛𝚜 𝚋𝚢 𝙰𝚕𝚋𝚎𝚛𝚝 𝚂𝚙𝚎𝚎𝚛
👍12
Forwarded from Red Ideologies
Mussolini had his own version of Lebensraum: Spacio Vitale.

> "​Another element of Mussolini’s fascism was the idea of ‘spazio vitale’ which translates to ‘vital space’. It is the belief that Italy required more space to operate. It further related to fascism as, the territory that Mussolini identified was where the Roman Empire had previously controlled. This concept of ‘vital space’ relates to another important aspect of fascism – racism superiority. While Mussolini did not necessarily support the racial policies and practise of Adolf Hitler and Nazi Germany, he did assert that some people were superior over others. For instance, he argued that it was justified for superior people to rule over inferior people. This is exemplified in a speech from 1920 that he gave, where he said:

​“When dealing with such a race as Slavic—inferior and barbarian—we must not pursue the carrot, but the stick policy... We should not be afraid of new victims... The Italian border should run across the Brenner Pass, Monte Nevoso and the Dinaric Alps... I would say we can easily sacrifice 500,000 barbaric Slavs for 50,000 Italians...”

Source

Follow @redideologies
👍9