Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Mussolini was a social justice warrior.
His screeds sound like something you'd hear at a Bernie Bro rally or Democratic Socialists of America convention.
His program was effectively free gibs infinity for all, the state is your nanny who wipes your bottom for you, no individual merit or responsibility.
Credit: PraxBen
@redideologies
His screeds sound like something you'd hear at a Bernie Bro rally or Democratic Socialists of America convention.
His program was effectively free gibs infinity for all, the state is your nanny who wipes your bottom for you, no individual merit or responsibility.
Credit: PraxBen
@redideologies
π8
Israel and the USSR got into at least one incident of direct combat.
> "Rimon 20 was the code name of an aerial battle in 1970 which pitted the Israeli Air Force directly against Soviet fighter pilots stationed in Egypt during the War of Attrition. Israel planned the dogfight in order to send a message that it would no longer tolerate direct Soviet military involvement in its conflict with Egypt."
> "In the afternoon of July 30, 1970, four Israeli Mirage IIIs crossed into Egyptian airspace, flying in tight formation so as to appear as a single aircraft. As expected, four Soviet-flown MiG-21s were scrambled to intercept what they believed to be a routine Israeli reconnaissance flight. They were soon joined by an additional eight MiGs. As the Soviet fighters closed in on the Mirages, they were ambushed by four Israeli F-4 Phantoms and eight Mirage IIIs that had been lurking undetected at low altitude. An additional 12 MiG-21 reinforcements soon arrived. By the end of the close-quarters dogfight, five Soviet MiG-21s had been downed with no Israeli losses."
This demonstrates that the wignat "Jews ran the USSR" claim is a myth. They never had full control of the USSR as evidenced by the fact that the USSR became the leading backer of Arab states against Israel and led the global anti-Zionist campaigns. Any Jews still involved in the Soviet government by this time were also anti-Zionists.
The USSR was evil not because it was "Jewish-controlled" (it wasn't), but because it was a communist imperialist force hell-bent on forcing Marxism on the whole world.
@redideologies
> "Rimon 20 was the code name of an aerial battle in 1970 which pitted the Israeli Air Force directly against Soviet fighter pilots stationed in Egypt during the War of Attrition. Israel planned the dogfight in order to send a message that it would no longer tolerate direct Soviet military involvement in its conflict with Egypt."
> "In the afternoon of July 30, 1970, four Israeli Mirage IIIs crossed into Egyptian airspace, flying in tight formation so as to appear as a single aircraft. As expected, four Soviet-flown MiG-21s were scrambled to intercept what they believed to be a routine Israeli reconnaissance flight. They were soon joined by an additional eight MiGs. As the Soviet fighters closed in on the Mirages, they were ambushed by four Israeli F-4 Phantoms and eight Mirage IIIs that had been lurking undetected at low altitude. An additional 12 MiG-21 reinforcements soon arrived. By the end of the close-quarters dogfight, five Soviet MiG-21s had been downed with no Israeli losses."
This demonstrates that the wignat "Jews ran the USSR" claim is a myth. They never had full control of the USSR as evidenced by the fact that the USSR became the leading backer of Arab states against Israel and led the global anti-Zionist campaigns. Any Jews still involved in the Soviet government by this time were also anti-Zionists.
The USSR was evil not because it was "Jewish-controlled" (it wasn't), but because it was a communist imperialist force hell-bent on forcing Marxism on the whole world.
@redideologies
π12π₯1
Jewish revolutionary Fanny Kaplan tried to assassinate Lenin.
Another Jew Leonid Kannegisser, who was a Russian Imperial Army officer, assassinated Jewish Bolshevik revolutionary Moisei Uritsky.
This is proof that the Russian revolution was a very complex affair and you could find Jews on all sides of the conflict. They were not all pulling in the same direction, but got caught up in the intense factionalism that existed among the revolutionary parties.
@redideologies
Another Jew Leonid Kannegisser, who was a Russian Imperial Army officer, assassinated Jewish Bolshevik revolutionary Moisei Uritsky.
This is proof that the Russian revolution was a very complex affair and you could find Jews on all sides of the conflict. They were not all pulling in the same direction, but got caught up in the intense factionalism that existed among the revolutionary parties.
@redideologies
π₯13π5
Forwarded from Martinez Politics
Warren Balogh, crypto-Bolshevik, pro-Islamist and Eurasianist traitor, admits most of my points in this article that Hitler was a radical anti-capitalist.
"Revolutionary anti-capitalism" aka Marxist Communism.
He tries to maintain the spoof/lie that Hitler genuinely opposed Bolshevism on ideological grounds, but as I've noted the only thing about Bolshevism Hitler opposed was its emphasis on a global class struggle instead of a national class struggle. That's it. The rest, Hitler liked and privately heaped praise on Stalin. He said that Stalin was making Bolshevism more "national" and said he could co-exist with that.
Hitler was not simply against what he calls "loan capitalism," he was against all capitalism. Hitler had typical envy viewpoints towards the rich. He believed in the decidedly Marxist economic theory of "shrinking markets". Loans can and are also made by States (to citizens, to other states, to itself), often at interest, which would be called what.... loan socialism? States are also economic actors. The Third Reich did plenty of this loan socialism or just simply stole what it wanted from what was left of the private sector (with spontaneous new "taxes") or looted it from a foreign country. From Brendan Simms:
> "For clarity, he stressed that National Socialism βstruggled against every form of big capital, irrespective of whether it is German or Jewish, if it is grounded not in productive work, but in the principle of interest, of income without work or toil ... Hitler critiqued the economics of inequality and exploitation, the βjarring juxtaposition of poor and rich so close to each other... Hitler violently objected to international capitalism even when it was not Jewishβ
Against all "big capital," Jewish or not. Against income inequality aka a Marxist. In economic matters Hitler was a raging egalitarian and progressive social justice warrior (if you were to isolate Nazi economic rhetoric alone they'd sound identical to the Young Turks, Bernie Sanders or AOC today), but wanted to reverse that formula in racial matters. Of course, this was hypocritical because Hitler also made use of "big capital" when it served his ends, like IG Farben or his collaboration with IBM corporation. He was also a champagne socialist who lived lavishly on state funds (he had access to yachts, a luxury holiday home, etc.) and shirked paying taxes on royalties to his book.
Hitler was against most private enterprise and private affairs entirely, everything was to be subordinated to his grand plan. Which is why he not only nationalized most of the economy or controlled it through regulations, but he socialized all charities, cultural groups, sports clubs, schools and even labour unions into the State. "Nothing outside the state," is the motto of fascism. It is the most radical form of socialism there is. As some fascists themselves have admitted, it is a form of indentured servitude to a permanent political class.
National Bolshevism and National Socialism are twins. And both come from Germany.
"Revolutionary anti-capitalism" aka Marxist Communism.
He tries to maintain the spoof/lie that Hitler genuinely opposed Bolshevism on ideological grounds, but as I've noted the only thing about Bolshevism Hitler opposed was its emphasis on a global class struggle instead of a national class struggle. That's it. The rest, Hitler liked and privately heaped praise on Stalin. He said that Stalin was making Bolshevism more "national" and said he could co-exist with that.
Hitler was not simply against what he calls "loan capitalism," he was against all capitalism. Hitler had typical envy viewpoints towards the rich. He believed in the decidedly Marxist economic theory of "shrinking markets". Loans can and are also made by States (to citizens, to other states, to itself), often at interest, which would be called what.... loan socialism? States are also economic actors. The Third Reich did plenty of this loan socialism or just simply stole what it wanted from what was left of the private sector (with spontaneous new "taxes") or looted it from a foreign country. From Brendan Simms:
> "For clarity, he stressed that National Socialism βstruggled against every form of big capital, irrespective of whether it is German or Jewish, if it is grounded not in productive work, but in the principle of interest, of income without work or toil ... Hitler critiqued the economics of inequality and exploitation, the βjarring juxtaposition of poor and rich so close to each other... Hitler violently objected to international capitalism even when it was not Jewishβ
Against all "big capital," Jewish or not. Against income inequality aka a Marxist. In economic matters Hitler was a raging egalitarian and progressive social justice warrior (if you were to isolate Nazi economic rhetoric alone they'd sound identical to the Young Turks, Bernie Sanders or AOC today), but wanted to reverse that formula in racial matters. Of course, this was hypocritical because Hitler also made use of "big capital" when it served his ends, like IG Farben or his collaboration with IBM corporation. He was also a champagne socialist who lived lavishly on state funds (he had access to yachts, a luxury holiday home, etc.) and shirked paying taxes on royalties to his book.
Hitler was against most private enterprise and private affairs entirely, everything was to be subordinated to his grand plan. Which is why he not only nationalized most of the economy or controlled it through regulations, but he socialized all charities, cultural groups, sports clubs, schools and even labour unions into the State. "Nothing outside the state," is the motto of fascism. It is the most radical form of socialism there is. As some fascists themselves have admitted, it is a form of indentured servitude to a permanent political class.
National Bolshevism and National Socialism are twins. And both come from Germany.
π―11π2
Jewish assimilationist Max Naumann set up a group of National Jews to support Adolf Hitler and the Nazi regime.
Despite supporting Hitler, his group was shut down and he was put in a concentration camp in 1935.
@redideologies
Despite supporting Hitler, his group was shut down and he was put in a concentration camp in 1935.
@redideologies
π17β‘4π3
"But but da Third Reich had no debt maaan!"
Fake.
By 39 they were 38 billion in the hole. Nearly 70% of government expenditures went to military production by this time. Bills were piling up. When this happened they usually resorted to levying more taxes on wealthier people or forcing the nominally private firms to invest in more government bonds. Or just straight up confiscating 10 years worth of taxes up front.
"In mid-1941, the standard rate of corporation tax was raised from 40 to 50 per cent and then, as of January 1942, to 55 per cent. Revenue from this source rose by 1.5 billion Reichsmarks in 1941-2 and by a further 1.8 billion Reichs- marks in 1942-3.6 More important was the mortgaging of future revenues from the Hauszinssteuer, a measure first proposed by the Reich Finance Ministry in December 1941. As we have seen, this tax had been introduced by the Weimar Republic in the 1920s to finance public housing construction. It generally brought in about 850 million Reichsmarks per annum. To combat the wartime fiscal emergency, the Finance Ministry originally proposed a prepayment of four years' worth of tax. But on the insistence of the Prussian Finance Ministry and others this was raised to a one-off prepayment of ten years of tax.47 At least 4.5 billion Reichsmarks came out of liquid bank accounts and cash reserves of property owners; the rest was raised in the form of new mortgages. In total in 1942, this one-off measure brought in 8 billion Reichsmarks. Together with an increase in contributions from the occupied territories, it was enough to raise the share of Reich expenditure covered by tax revenues in 1942 to more than 54 per cent, despite a sharp increase in spending. The inflationary spiral was halted, at least for the time being." - Wages of Destruction, Adam Tooze
Then once the war started, they financed it all through looting foreign countries' reserves, forcing them to give loans they didn't pay back (like with Greece), seizing their land and other resources and slave labour in the camps. Not paying these millions of workers saved them quite a lot of money.
"Muh debt free miracle system" is silly propaganda.
@redideologies
Fake.
By 39 they were 38 billion in the hole. Nearly 70% of government expenditures went to military production by this time. Bills were piling up. When this happened they usually resorted to levying more taxes on wealthier people or forcing the nominally private firms to invest in more government bonds. Or just straight up confiscating 10 years worth of taxes up front.
"In mid-1941, the standard rate of corporation tax was raised from 40 to 50 per cent and then, as of January 1942, to 55 per cent. Revenue from this source rose by 1.5 billion Reichsmarks in 1941-2 and by a further 1.8 billion Reichs- marks in 1942-3.6 More important was the mortgaging of future revenues from the Hauszinssteuer, a measure first proposed by the Reich Finance Ministry in December 1941. As we have seen, this tax had been introduced by the Weimar Republic in the 1920s to finance public housing construction. It generally brought in about 850 million Reichsmarks per annum. To combat the wartime fiscal emergency, the Finance Ministry originally proposed a prepayment of four years' worth of tax. But on the insistence of the Prussian Finance Ministry and others this was raised to a one-off prepayment of ten years of tax.47 At least 4.5 billion Reichsmarks came out of liquid bank accounts and cash reserves of property owners; the rest was raised in the form of new mortgages. In total in 1942, this one-off measure brought in 8 billion Reichsmarks. Together with an increase in contributions from the occupied territories, it was enough to raise the share of Reich expenditure covered by tax revenues in 1942 to more than 54 per cent, despite a sharp increase in spending. The inflationary spiral was halted, at least for the time being." - Wages of Destruction, Adam Tooze
Then once the war started, they financed it all through looting foreign countries' reserves, forcing them to give loans they didn't pay back (like with Greece), seizing their land and other resources and slave labour in the camps. Not paying these millions of workers saved them quite a lot of money.
"Muh debt free miracle system" is silly propaganda.
@redideologies
π19π₯2
Forwarded from μ₯μμ π½
On June 18 1940, Stalinβs USSR Officially Congratulated Hitlerβs Germany for Successfully Conquering France
π9π₯3
Farmers were mere managers of state-run farms.
250 new regulations passed in the first two years of Nazi rule with strict quotas on production and price controls on their products.
Source: Wages of Destruction
@redideologies
250 new regulations passed in the first two years of Nazi rule with strict quotas on production and price controls on their products.
Source: Wages of Destruction
@redideologies
π8π₯1
Mussolini explicitly rejects a racial or ethnic basis for nationalism in the Doctrine of Fascism:
"Not a race, nor a geographically defined region, but a people, historically perpetuating itself; a multitude unified by an idea and imbued with the will to live, the will to power, self-consciousness, personality (19).In so far as it is embodied in a State, this higher personality becomes a nation."
@redideologies
"Not a race, nor a geographically defined region, but a people, historically perpetuating itself; a multitude unified by an idea and imbued with the will to live, the will to power, self-consciousness, personality (19).In so far as it is embodied in a State, this higher personality becomes a nation."
@redideologies
π14
π14β‘1π«‘1
Forwarded from Red Ideologies
Hitler says clearly that he wanted a movement made up mostly of not intelligent lower class people because they are "easier to discipline" (i.e., they're lemmings).
He wanted manual labourers not doctors or lawyers who would be amenable to simple messaging and propaganda.
Hitler regarded it the main task of the party to "gain the lower masses."
He didn't want to draw too heavily from the intelligentsia because they were more likely to rebel against his plans.
Follow @redideologies
He wanted manual labourers not doctors or lawyers who would be amenable to simple messaging and propaganda.
Hitler regarded it the main task of the party to "gain the lower masses."
He didn't want to draw too heavily from the intelligentsia because they were more likely to rebel against his plans.
Follow @redideologies
π4π2
Forwarded from Red Ideologies
Stalin liked Hitler too. Moron Stalin ignored warnings of a coming German invasion because he thought his pal Hitler would not go through with it.
> "CONAN: And then there is Stalin. Universally described as shrewd and suspicious, canny, but who could not bring himself to accept overwhelming evidence that an invasion was about to happen."
> "Mr. LUKACS: Now added to this comes a very important element that some people have known, and that's Stalin had a liking for Hitler. Stalin greatly admired Hitler. The odd thing is that his respect and admiration for Hitler appeared in drips and drabs even after the war started, even toward the end of the war, here and there he dropped some quite comfortable remarks about Hitler, or rather he had admired. And another element connected with this is that Stalin had a great liking and respect for Germans and for Germany. And that goes back to pretty early in his career."
Follow @redideologies
> "CONAN: And then there is Stalin. Universally described as shrewd and suspicious, canny, but who could not bring himself to accept overwhelming evidence that an invasion was about to happen."
> "Mr. LUKACS: Now added to this comes a very important element that some people have known, and that's Stalin had a liking for Hitler. Stalin greatly admired Hitler. The odd thing is that his respect and admiration for Hitler appeared in drips and drabs even after the war started, even toward the end of the war, here and there he dropped some quite comfortable remarks about Hitler, or rather he had admired. And another element connected with this is that Stalin had a great liking and respect for Germans and for Germany. And that goes back to pretty early in his career."
Follow @redideologies
π8
Forwarded from Martinez Politics
This is full proof to me that Douglas MacGregor is historically illiterate and unqualified to speak on either geopolitics or history.
He claims here that Hitler didn't start World War II (he blames it on Stalin) and says Hitlerism was "a reaction to Stalin's Bolshevism".
Hitler was the first to invade Poland WITH Stalin who annexed the other half, which they both celebrated together in a victory march (video above). Hitler's Molotov-Ribbentrop pact laid the groundwork for the invasion of Poland by both powers.
But Hitler invaded first, so he is principally responsible for the outbreak of world war. Stalin is a close second and followed up that invasion with invasion of the Baltics and Finland.
The "reaction of Bolshevism" line is refuted by the Molotov-Ribbentrop pact itself and Hitler's private admiration for Stalin. Instead of "reacting to Bolshevism" Hitler COLLABORATED with it to help it spread to the Baltics and Eastern Poland. Not to mention the close similarities between fascism and bolshevism.
When will these liars shut up with this nonsense?
He claims here that Hitler didn't start World War II (he blames it on Stalin) and says Hitlerism was "a reaction to Stalin's Bolshevism".
Hitler was the first to invade Poland WITH Stalin who annexed the other half, which they both celebrated together in a victory march (video above). Hitler's Molotov-Ribbentrop pact laid the groundwork for the invasion of Poland by both powers.
But Hitler invaded first, so he is principally responsible for the outbreak of world war. Stalin is a close second and followed up that invasion with invasion of the Baltics and Finland.
The "reaction of Bolshevism" line is refuted by the Molotov-Ribbentrop pact itself and Hitler's private admiration for Stalin. Instead of "reacting to Bolshevism" Hitler COLLABORATED with it to help it spread to the Baltics and Eastern Poland. Not to mention the close similarities between fascism and bolshevism.
When will these liars shut up with this nonsense?
π―8π6