Hammer and sickle mixed in with the eagle and swazi.

"We're not communists we just worship the "working class" as god, want to abolish private property and socialize the means of production!"

Doesn't sound like a guy on the brink of invading Germany here.

"Stalin refused to believe that Germany would invade in 1941. He dismissed more than a hundred intelligence warnings of the coming invasion as British propaganda, and was caught completely off guard. In the decades that followed the war, the Soviet Union wanted to present itself as a power that stood for peace. It therefore had to deny that it was one of the powers that began the war."

https://www.eurozine.com/when-stalin-was-hitlers-ally/

Fascism and National Socialism emerged from the same milieu as Marxism and Communism. All variations and slight revisions of each other.

> The concept of a “far left” that is opposed to a “far right” is false. The systems placed on the two ends of that spectrum, including socialism, fascism, and Nazism, are all rooted in communism. And all of them share beliefs in core communist concepts, including state collectivism, planned economies, and class struggle.

> After Lenin, the next communist revisionist to take the world stage was Benito Mussolini, who took from World War I the lesson that nationalism was more uniting than the idea of a worker’s revolution. He thus revised Marxism into his new system of fascism, using the collectivist principle of “fasci,” which refers to a bundle of sticks reinforcing the handle of an ax.

> Mussolini explained his concept in his 1928 autobiography, in which he states, “The citizen in the Fascist State is no longer a selfish individual who has the anti-social right of rebelling against any law of the Collectivity.”

> According to “Russia Under the Bolshevik Regime” by Richard Pipes, “No prominent European socialist before World War I resembled Lenin more closely than Benito Mussolini. Like Lenin, he headed the antirevisionist wing of the country’s Socialist Party; like him, he believed that the worker was not by nature a revolutionary and had to be prodded to radical action by an intellectual elite.”

> Then soon after, Adolph Hitler emerged with his re-branded socialist system under the banner of “national socialism.”

> The policies of the Nazi Party followed the communist model, D’Souza notes, and the 25-point program included universal free health care and education, nationalization of large corporations and trusts, government control of banking and credit, the splitting of large landholdings into smaller units, and similar policies.

> In addition, D’Souza states, “Mussolini and Hitler both identified socialism as the core of the fascist and Nazi Weltanschauung [way of life]. Mussolini was the leading figure of Italian revolutionary socialism and never relinquished his allegiance to it. Hitler’s party defined itself as championing ‘national socialism.'”

FULL ARTICLE

Follow @redideologies

> Mussolini explained his concept in his 1928 autobiography, in which he states, “The citizen in the Fascist State is no longer a selfish individual who has the anti-social right of rebelling against any law of the Collectivity.”

By Mussolini's logic, you have no right to rebel against any government policy, no matter what it is, because to do so is being "selfish".

So vax mandates, mask mandates, state subsidized gender confusion is all above board if the State is the one imposing it on the citizenry.

What a retard.

@redideologies

Mussolini went full-commie by the end of World War II declaring he would socialize what was left of the economy (already 75% socialized), including all companies over 100 employees.

> "On February 12, 1944, Mussolini's cabinet approved a bill of "socialization" that spoke about the "Mussolinian conception on subjects such as; much higher social justice, a more equitable distribution of wealth and the participation of labor in the state life." Mussolini claimed that Italian capitalists had betrayed him after they had gained immensely from fascism, and that he now regretted his alliance with them and rediscovered his old socialist influences. He claimed that he had intended to carry out a large-scale nationalization of property in 1939–1940 but that the outbreak of war had forced him to postpone it, and promised that in the future, all industrial firms with over 100 employees would be nationalized. Mussolini even reached out to ex-communist Nicola Bombacci, a former student of Vladimir Lenin, to help him in spreading the image that Fascism was a progressive movement."

Source

Follow @redideologies

"The scheme by which workers, under the influence of a massive advertising campaign, parted with a portion of their wages each week to put towards buying a ‘Strength Through Joy car’ turned out to be no more than a means of getting them to put in more overtime so that they could contribute to the financing of rearmament. By the end of 1939, 270,000 people had lent 110 million Reichsmarks to the state in this way. In the end, no fewer than 340,000 people invested their money in the scheme. Not one of them ever got a Volkswagen in return. The factory was converted to war production in September 1939."
~ Richard J. Evans, The Third Reich in Power

Fascism is a retarded ideology that says "states have rights over individuals" always and that disagreeing with the government on anything makes you a nasty "liberal individualist". The fascist definition of "liberal" is so vague that all it means when they use it is "a civilian who disagrees with the government" on any point.

That's what it is in a nutshell, affirming the "power of the Supreme State" against the will of "individuals" that make up the citizenry, but the logic falls apart quickly.

Citizens are both individuals and they are groups. A family is a group. Citizens can form larger groups that share common beliefs (political, religious, ethnic, associations, charities, fitness clubs, etc.) and can coalesce around their shared ideas to demand things from governments. Governments are also just another group of individuals and governments are not monolithic groups either since there are competing parties, factions, etc. who fight each other. The government and the citizens are just groups of individuals and there are groups within groups among both.

If "states have rights over individuals" always, then you have no business opposing the covid BS (vax mandates, mask mandates, stay at home orders), you have no business opposing hate speech laws, you have no business opposing replacement migration, public schools teaching CRT and gender queer theory to kids, diversity quotas, inflationary money printing, foreign aid, foreign wars, or any other government policy.... because "states have rights over individuals" and opposing the State is invalid, if fascist theory is correct.

These dorks will respond to this by saying "but but when we say states have rights over individuals, we only mean that when the state calls itself Fascist and is the Perfect State". But why? Why would that logic only apply to that state and not other states? Seems like dishonest cherry-picking here. That state doesn't exist, but even in that case, any state could just label itself "fascist" and go on doing whatever it wants, including leftist policies while using that label. So if a "fascist" state imposed all the same covid BS (like China did, which these people claim is a modern fascist state), you would go along with it because you're an obedient drone with no mind of his own?

It's the perfect ideology for politicians because it demands complete obedience and servitude to the State, no questions asked. Politicians know that they'll never get full support for their policies, but if they convince everyone that "States have rights over individuals" then they can get you to support anything.

"Hard for people to grasp that Marxism-Leninism, Fascism and National Socialism are closer to one another than most people want to accept."

Other commenter agrees: "Both want to create a workers state".

And this coming from people who support those ideologies.

Fascism is Communism.

Follow @redideologies

Goebbels had his children poisoned with cyanide capsules then shot his wife and himself.

"The children were knocked out with morphine by an SS doctor and then had cyanide capsules crushed between their teeth. Afterwards Goebbels shot his wife, then himself." - Source

Really someone to idolize.

Follow @redideologies

You can learn more about Dirlewanger Brigade here: https://youtu.be/VHRH-pcFVio

Let me fix this:
https://t.me/exposinghitler/1103

Marxism = Economic Socialism
NatSoc = Germanic In-Group Economic Socialism

@redideologies

Fascism demands total subservience to the State, negates all "individual rights"... which means that you exist to serve the whims of the State bureaucrats and can't disagree with any of their policies... ever.

> One of the most outspoken American fascists was economist Lawrence Dennis. In his 1936 book, The Coming American Fascism, Dennis declared that defenders of “18th-century Americanism” were sure to become “the laughing stock of their own countrymen” and that the adoption of economic fascism would intensify “national spirit” and put it behind “the enterprises of public welfare and social control.” The big stumbling block to the development of economic fascism, Dennis bemoaned, was “liberal norms of law or constitutional guarantees of private rights.”

> Certain British intellectuals were perhaps the most smitten of anyone by fascism. George Bernard Shaw announced in 1927 that his fellow “socialists should be delighted to find at last a socialist [Mussolini] who speaks and thinks as responsible rulers do.” He helped form the British Union of Fascists whose “Outline of the Corporate State,” according to the organization’s founder, Sir Oswald Mosley, was “on the Italian Model.”

> The state comes before the individual. Webster’s New Collegiate Dictionary defines fascism as “a political philosophy, movement, or regime that exalts nation and often race above the individual and that stands for a centralized, autocratic government.” This stands in stark contrast to the classical liberal idea that individuals have natural rights that pre-exist government; that government derives its “just powers” only through the consent of the governed; and that the principal function of government is to protect the lives, liberties, and properties of its citizens, not to aggrandize the state.

> Mussolini viewed these liberal ideas (in the European sense of the word “liberal”) as the antithesis of fascism: “The Fascist conception of life,” Mussolini wrote, “stresses the importance of the State and accepts the individual only in so far as his interests coincide with the State. It is opposed to classical liberalism [which] denied the State in the name of the individual; Fascism reasserts the rights of the State as expressing the real essence of the individual.”

> Mussolini thought it was unnatural for a government to protect individual rights: “The maxim that society exists only for the well-being and freedom of the individuals composing it does not seem to be in conformity with nature’s plans.”[7] “If classical liberalism spells individualism,” Mussolini continued, “Fascism spells government.” The essence of fascism, therefore, is that government should be the master, not the servant, of the people.

Source

Follow @redideologies