Goebbels diaries undermine that fake Hitlerian propaganda of "genocide and ethnic cleansing of Germans" in Poland narrative.
All of Goebbels diary entries before the invasion make no mention of massacres of Germans. It was trumped up propaganda to increase tensions with Poland to justify the pre-planned invasion for Lebensraum.
@redideologies
All of Goebbels diary entries before the invasion make no mention of massacres of Germans. It was trumped up propaganda to increase tensions with Poland to justify the pre-planned invasion for Lebensraum.
@redideologies
👍20
The Imperial Japanese proposed adding a "racial equality" statute in the Treaty of Versailles.
@redideologies
@redideologies
⚡17
Forwarded from ㅤ
https://t.me/redideologies/798
HITLER ORDERED THE ANTI-POLISH CAMPAIGN TO BE RATCHETED UP TO ‘80 PER CENT VOLUME:
"On 11 August, Hitler had one of his private aeroplanes fly the high commissioner of the League of Nations in Danzig, Carl Jacob Burckhardt, to Salzburg. He received the Swiss diplomat and historian in the Adlershorst, a large teahouse above the Berghof, and with no further ado revealed that at ‘the slightest incident’ he would ‘destroy Poland without warning’. When Burckhardt objected that this would bring a ‘general war’, Hitler exclaimed: ‘Then so be it!’ If he had to wage war, the Führer added, then ‘better today than tomorrow’. At the end of the conversation, as the high commissioner recalled in his memoirs twenty years later, Hitler reiterated: ‘I am not bluffing. If anything at all happens in Danzig or happens to our minorities, I will strike a hard blow.’
~ Volker Ullrich, Hitler: Volume II: Downfall 1939-45
HITLER ORDERED THE ANTI-POLISH CAMPAIGN TO BE RATCHETED UP TO ‘80 PER CENT VOLUME:
"On 11 August, Hitler had one of his private aeroplanes fly the high commissioner of the League of Nations in Danzig, Carl Jacob Burckhardt, to Salzburg. He received the Swiss diplomat and historian in the Adlershorst, a large teahouse above the Berghof, and with no further ado revealed that at ‘the slightest incident’ he would ‘destroy Poland without warning’. When Burckhardt objected that this would bring a ‘general war’, Hitler exclaimed: ‘Then so be it!’ If he had to wage war, the Führer added, then ‘better today than tomorrow’. At the end of the conversation, as the high commissioner recalled in his memoirs twenty years later, Hitler reiterated: ‘I am not bluffing. If anything at all happens in Danzig or happens to our minorities, I will strike a hard blow.’
[1] Again Hitler showed how good he was at fooling his conversation partners, since no matter how things developed in Danzig, he was determined to go to war against Poland in any case. The same day he received Burckhardt, he ordered the anti-Polish campaign to be ratcheted up to ‘80 per cent volume’, causing Goebbels to note, correctly: ‘It is coming down to the final sprint.’ [2] " ~ Volker Ullrich, Hitler: Volume II: Downfall 1939-45
[1] Burckhardt, Meine Danziger Mission, pp. 341, 345. On the authenticity of Burckhardt’s account, see Ian Kershaw, Hitler 1936–1945: Nemesis, London, 2001, pp. 898-9n118.
[2] Goebbels, Tagebücher, part I, vol. 7, p. 64 (entry for 12 Aug. 1939)."Telegram
Red Ideologies
Goebbels diaries undermine that fake Hitlerian propaganda of "genocide and ethnic cleansing of Germans" in Poland narrative.
All of Goebbels diary entries before the invasion make no mention of massacres of Germans and admit it was trumped up propaganda…
All of Goebbels diary entries before the invasion make no mention of massacres of Germans and admit it was trumped up propaganda…
👍8
Mussolini supported Italy's entry to World War I to speed up the overthrow of the monarchies and implement socialism quicker.
@redideologies
@redideologies
⚡11👍8
Here's some very interesting polling data from England before and during World War II demonstrating that the British public by and large supported the war and Churchill.
March 1939
- 78% of Brits against giving Germany former colonies back
- 70% would rather fight than give them back
- 86% of public in favour of friendlier ties with USSR
April 1939
- 73% in favour of Britain giving security guarantees to smaller European nations
- 87% in favour of a military alliance between Great Britain, France and Russia
May 1939
- 56% in favour of Mr. Churchill joining the cabinet
August 1939
- 76% in favour of going to war with Germany over Polish-German dispute on Danzig
September 1939 (war begins)
- 88% in favour of fighting Hitlerism until it is gone
- 77% disapprove of peace proposals with Germany at this time
November 1939
- 62% satisfied with government's conduct during war
- 54% in favour of bombing German military targets even if it meant reprisals
December 1939
- 56% believe Nazi Germany is a greater threat than USSR
February 1940
- 60% against discussion of peace proposals with Germany
March 1940
- 69% against peace talks with the Germans
May 1940
- 60% disapprove of Chamberlain
- 65% believe treatment of Germans in Britain has been "too lenient"
- 66% in favour of bombing German military targets even if it meant reprisals
July 1940
- 87% approve of Mr. Churchill as Prime Minister
October 1940
- 89% approve of Churchill
- 46% approve of bombing German civilians in response to Germany bombing of British civilians
November 1940
- 88% approve of Churchill
- 68% in favour of imposing harsher terms than Versailles if they win the war
- 60% say they would "contradict" someone suggesting a negotiated peace with Germany at this stage
Source
@redideologies
March 1939
- 78% of Brits against giving Germany former colonies back
- 70% would rather fight than give them back
- 86% of public in favour of friendlier ties with USSR
April 1939
- 73% in favour of Britain giving security guarantees to smaller European nations
- 87% in favour of a military alliance between Great Britain, France and Russia
May 1939
- 56% in favour of Mr. Churchill joining the cabinet
August 1939
- 76% in favour of going to war with Germany over Polish-German dispute on Danzig
September 1939 (war begins)
- 88% in favour of fighting Hitlerism until it is gone
- 77% disapprove of peace proposals with Germany at this time
November 1939
- 62% satisfied with government's conduct during war
- 54% in favour of bombing German military targets even if it meant reprisals
December 1939
- 56% believe Nazi Germany is a greater threat than USSR
February 1940
- 60% against discussion of peace proposals with Germany
March 1940
- 69% against peace talks with the Germans
May 1940
- 60% disapprove of Chamberlain
- 65% believe treatment of Germans in Britain has been "too lenient"
- 66% in favour of bombing German military targets even if it meant reprisals
July 1940
- 87% approve of Mr. Churchill as Prime Minister
October 1940
- 89% approve of Churchill
- 46% approve of bombing German civilians in response to Germany bombing of British civilians
November 1940
- 88% approve of Churchill
- 68% in favour of imposing harsher terms than Versailles if they win the war
- 60% say they would "contradict" someone suggesting a negotiated peace with Germany at this stage
Source
@redideologies
👍9
Forwarded from Race Realism Channel
Map of Germanic settlements throughout history. Some regions are missing but it's pretty accurate.
⚡8
Race Realism Channel
Map of Germanic settlements throughout history. Some regions are missing but it's pretty accurate.
Preeminent colonists WITHIN Europe. Attacking mostly other White countries.
🔥14
Forwarded from Martinez Politics
World War II had nothing to do with the "Treaty of Versailles" which Hitler promptly tore up in 1933, refused to pay the reparations, immediately commenced rearmament, reoccupied and militarized the Rhineland, annexed the Sudetenland in the Munich Agreement (British appeasement), annexed the rest of Czechia five months later, annexed Austria, and controlled Danzig via proxy forces by mid-1930s. Despite adhering to NONE of Versailles' dictates the big powers appeased Hitler all the way until 1939. Not being held to a single line written in the Versailles Treaty, Hitler still invades Poland, then sneak attacks the USSR, declares war on the USA after Japan attacks Pearl Harbour, etc. WWII truly was "Hitler's war" for the purposes of Germanic ethnic expansion and domination of Europe.
👍11
Forwarded from Martinez Politics
Notice that the natsocs have essentially the same narrative as the Marxists but just attach a more specific cultural or ethnic identity to the oppressed vs oppressor groups.
Traditional Marxists say the "workers" (of any race, creed, etc.) are the oppressed and the "capitalists" (business owners) are the oppressors.
NS/fascists simply add more detail to this concept: "white workers" are the oppressed and "Jewish capitalists" are the oppressors... although you will find that they also oppose non-Jewish capitalists and view them the same way, so this conforms pretty closely to the Marxist line, but the "workers" they defend have to be White.
So really, it's the same narrative that comes from Marx with more specific groups emphasized as the oppressor vs oppressed.
My view is not that "Jews are bad because they're capitalists" (not all of them are capitalists and that's the peasant envy critique you get from natsocs).... but that there is an issue with them being by and large hyper-leftists politically due to their paranoid reading of history. There can also be an issue of disloyalty to the nation if they're hyper-Zionists as well.
"They're rich so they're bad" is not an argument that holds much weight with anyone but peasants.
Traditional Marxists say the "workers" (of any race, creed, etc.) are the oppressed and the "capitalists" (business owners) are the oppressors.
NS/fascists simply add more detail to this concept: "white workers" are the oppressed and "Jewish capitalists" are the oppressors... although you will find that they also oppose non-Jewish capitalists and view them the same way, so this conforms pretty closely to the Marxist line, but the "workers" they defend have to be White.
So really, it's the same narrative that comes from Marx with more specific groups emphasized as the oppressor vs oppressed.
My view is not that "Jews are bad because they're capitalists" (not all of them are capitalists and that's the peasant envy critique you get from natsocs).... but that there is an issue with them being by and large hyper-leftists politically due to their paranoid reading of history. There can also be an issue of disloyalty to the nation if they're hyper-Zionists as well.
"They're rich so they're bad" is not an argument that holds much weight with anyone but peasants.
👍9💯2
"Hitler stated once again that Danzig was not his ultimate objective - that would be to secure Lebensraum in the east to feed Germany's eighty million inhabitants" - David Irvin, Hitler's War, p. 176
Danzig was a ruse to justify pre-planned territorial expansion reaching deep into Poland, Ukraine and Russia to build a contiguous land empire in Europe.
@RedIdeologies
Danzig was a ruse to justify pre-planned territorial expansion reaching deep into Poland, Ukraine and Russia to build a contiguous land empire in Europe.
@RedIdeologies
👍11
Forwarded from Martinez Politics
The natsoc meme narrative says that England fought Germany on behalf of "banking interests" because Germany had a nationalized central bank (it always did since the start) and a welfare state. This narrative comes from Hitler himself in a 1939 speech. But this makes no sense because in 1946, England nationalized its own central bank, nationalized 20% of its industries and implemented a generous welfare state which it still has today. On top of that, Germany's central bank is STILL state-run and not private, so nothing changed!
@MartinezPolitix
@MartinezPolitix
⚡7💯4
Forwarded from Martinez Politics
This is standard Anglo-Nordicist sentiment. They view other Europeans as slaves/goyim the same way that Jews view Gentiles as slaves/goyim. Two sides of the same coin. Nordicism is Judaism for North-West Euros.
👏15🔥4🏆3
Forwarded from Martinez Politics
Franco rejected the "unsound racialism" (Nordicism) of the Nazis and pledged not to be a "Hitler puppet".
This is why the Nazis hated Franco and called him a "bourgeois coward" for not being a useful goyim for their expansionist plans.
@MartinezPolitix
This is why the Nazis hated Franco and called him a "bourgeois coward" for not being a useful goyim for their expansionist plans.
@MartinezPolitix
💯14👍8
Forwarded from Martinez Politics
Jewish Zionists: If you don't worship jews as faultless living saints you're canceled!
National Socialists: If you don't worship Adolf Hitler and 1930s Germans as faultless living saints you're canceled!
While these two deranged cults oppose each other, they're very similar in nature, especially in their totalitarian pursuit to silence anyone who disagrees with their flawed worldview.
NS/Nordicism is Judaic "chosen people" supremacism for North-West Euros.
National Socialists: If you don't worship Adolf Hitler and 1930s Germans as faultless living saints you're canceled!
While these two deranged cults oppose each other, they're very similar in nature, especially in their totalitarian pursuit to silence anyone who disagrees with their flawed worldview.
NS/Nordicism is Judaic "chosen people" supremacism for North-West Euros.
👍14👌3💯1
Forwarded from Martinez Politics
The Hitlerian meme docs have spread the myth that Poland was "executing" Germans in large numbers before Germany invaded. You hear that repeated verbatim by the bots who only watched those docs. That's refuted by the simple fact that the Nazi Party had seized control of the Danzig Senate shortly after Hitler came to power, it was run by pro-Nazi forces the whole time, Nazi flags draped on every building as you can see in this video below from 1937. Poles had minimal control there so the idea they were marching around "executing" Germans in a city run by Nazis is laughable.
⚡6👍5