Forwarded from Martinez Politics
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
World War II had nothing to do with "economics" or imposing some econ system on Germany.
Britain's socialist labour party supported the war against Hitler and promptly nationalized 20% of British industry after the war, nationalized the central bank and implemented a welfare state. The Soviets got the eastern half of Germany and turned it fully socialist.
Roosevelt was no "capitalist" he was a closeted commie who was praised by the fascists as a fellow socialist before he became their enemy.
@MartinezPolitix
Britain's socialist labour party supported the war against Hitler and promptly nationalized 20% of British industry after the war, nationalized the central bank and implemented a welfare state. The Soviets got the eastern half of Germany and turned it fully socialist.
Roosevelt was no "capitalist" he was a closeted commie who was praised by the fascists as a fellow socialist before he became their enemy.
@MartinezPolitix
💯6👍3😇1
The South Tyrol Option Agreement shows the duplicity of Hitler on the question of German diaspora. He used the Danzig question as a beating stick against Poland and offered no deal to have those Germans move back to Germany peacefully, but he accepted such an agreement with the Italians who had been attempting to Italianize the German speakers in South Tyrol. Nor did he accuse the Italians of "genocide" like he did the Poles despite the Italians putting similar pressures on them to assimilate.
The reason was that Hitler wanted the Danzig Germans as a Trojan Horse inside Poland that he could use to make more territorial demands against Poland.
He could have easily invited them to move back to Germany like he did with those in South Tyrol but he did not because they were more useful as a hedge against Poland to kickstart the Lebensraum process.
@redideologies
The reason was that Hitler wanted the Danzig Germans as a Trojan Horse inside Poland that he could use to make more territorial demands against Poland.
He could have easily invited them to move back to Germany like he did with those in South Tyrol but he did not because they were more useful as a hedge against Poland to kickstart the Lebensraum process.
@redideologies
👍8😇1
In 1920 German dock workers in the free city of Danzig (under League of Nations control) went on strike to prevent Western aid in the form of weapons from getting to the Polish army fighting the Soviets in the east.
That's why Poland decided to build up the port of Gdynia so that these ethnic Germans with minimal loyalty to the Polish state couldn't sabotage them anymore.
@redideologies
That's why Poland decided to build up the port of Gdynia so that these ethnic Germans with minimal loyalty to the Polish state couldn't sabotage them anymore.
@redideologies
👍7
Forwarded from Martinez Politics
- He says the Americans were "hoodwinked" into the war, deceptively omits how the Japanese attacked Pearl Harbour & Hitler declared war on the US which made them enter
- Repeats the lie that the Poles were "ethnically cleansing" Germans before the war; if that were the case there would have been no Germans in Poland by this time, they would have been pushed back into Germany (but they weren't)
- Danzig was a "free city" already controlled by the Nazi Party by the mid-1930s, Poles had little influence there, let alone the means to commit a "genocide"
- Goebbels diaries & David Irving's book prove Hitler planned to invade Poland as the first step in his Lebensraum war of expansion; persecution claims were fake propaganda
- Goebbels makes no mention of these "massacres" in his dairies; in fact he says the opposite, that the Poles were "reserved"
- The South Tyrol Option Agreement between Germany & Italy proves the duplicity of Hitler in the matter of diaspora Germans; the Italians were also aggressively Italianizing the German speakers in South Tyrol which Hitler didn't complain about or accuse Italy of a "genocide," he instead invited them back to Germany
- Hitler didn't make a similar deal with Poland over the Danzig Germans because he wanted to keep them there as a fifth column & hedge against Poland to justify territorial expansion
- Davis makes no mention of Hitler's Lebensraum plans; claims he just wanted to "take back German lands"; debunked by Chapter 14 of MK where Hitler says the 1914 borders were "insufficient living space" & demanded a violent conquest of Ukrainian & Russian lands
- Claims that we'd all be based chads if Hitler had won the war; refuted by the fact that degeneracy had been present in Weimar Germany BEFORE the war so it was not a unique post-war thing; Western countries didn't adopt any serious immigration until the 70s & 80s; all the participants in WW2 including USSR had banned homosexuality; wokeism is a recent phenomenon
- Even if the US, Aus, etc. had stayed out of the war, they'd still be "liberal democracies" & have leftists there pushing their degeneracy
- I show a clip of Davis & Sewell calling Meds "wogs" & advocating for the ethnic cleansing of Meds & Slavs from Australia & Europe to make way for "Germanic empires"
- Proof their Hitler meme bullshit is just the first stage of their Scientology-style cult to draw in clueless new paypigs who don't fact-check & then hit them with the Nordicism & esoteric retardism later
- These people are an equivalent enemy to Antifa (just from the opposite angle) who advocate the murderous expulsion of non-NW Europeans from Europe; they don't want to replace Slavs & Meds with browns but with other "more pure" Whites
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
👍16
Red Ideologies pinned «How can we be sure that the alleged crimes against the German ethnic community that Poles are accused of committing are nothing more than Nazi propaganda that is spread by neo-Nazis over and over again? 1) Hitler makes no mention of massacres in any of his…»
Forwarded from Martinez Politics
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
There was no "genocide" or even "ethnic cleansing" of Germans in Poland before World War II.
There were however ethnic cleansing of Poles perpetrated by the Nazis when they invaded Poland.
@MartinezPolitix
There were however ethnic cleansing of Poles perpetrated by the Nazis when they invaded Poland.
@MartinezPolitix
👍9
The Nazi Party was in complete control of the Free City of Danzig by 1933. Albert Forster was running the city on behalf of the NSDAP. This is where the morons are claiming the Poles were "genociding" Germans. A city controlled by the Nazis.
"After the Nazi seizure of power, Forster spearheaded the Nazi take-over of Danzig in the spring of 1933, attaining an absolute majority for the Nazi Party in the Danzig Senate"
@redideologies
"After the Nazi seizure of power, Forster spearheaded the Nazi take-over of Danzig in the spring of 1933, attaining an absolute majority for the Nazi Party in the Danzig Senate"
@redideologies
👍5
Danzig was a Nazi-run city pretty much since 1933. It was a "free city" supervised by the League of Nations. The Poles were not running it.
This debunks the "genocide" meme.
@redideologies
This debunks the "genocide" meme.
@redideologies
👍6
The local Danzig police was NSDAP-aligned and they collaborated during the 1939 invasion. They were a fifth column acting on behalf of Hitler in Poland. This is precisely why countries aim to assimilate ethnic minorities so that they don't act in this way.
@redideologies
@redideologies
👍10
Hitlertard logic:
"Stalin was bad for invading Poland and the Baltics and attacking Finland... but Hitler was good for attacking Poland, Greece, Czechoslovakia, Russia, etc."
"Stalin was bad for having Gulags... Hitler was good for having slave labor camps"
"Stalin was bad for being a communist (aka a socialist)... Hitler was good for being a socialist (aka a communist)"
"Stalin was bad for being a brutal dictator who took away people's rights, jailed/killed opponents, critics and anti-communists.... Hitler was good for being a dictator who took away people's rights, killing opponents, silencing criticism, etc... rights are fake and gay anyway"
"Stalin was bad for being an imperialist trying to spread his system and ideology... Hitler was good for being an imperialist trying to spread his system and ideology"
Are these people on crack or meth?
@redideologies
"Stalin was bad for invading Poland and the Baltics and attacking Finland... but Hitler was good for attacking Poland, Greece, Czechoslovakia, Russia, etc."
"Stalin was bad for having Gulags... Hitler was good for having slave labor camps"
"Stalin was bad for being a communist (aka a socialist)... Hitler was good for being a socialist (aka a communist)"
"Stalin was bad for being a brutal dictator who took away people's rights, jailed/killed opponents, critics and anti-communists.... Hitler was good for being a dictator who took away people's rights, killing opponents, silencing criticism, etc... rights are fake and gay anyway"
"Stalin was bad for being an imperialist trying to spread his system and ideology... Hitler was good for being an imperialist trying to spread his system and ideology"
Are these people on crack or meth?
@redideologies
💯23⚡4👍1
Forwarded from Martinez Politics
Stalin banned homosexuality. So are people going to tell me he wasn't a communist simply for being anti-gay?
Communism is the process of communalization of land and property. That can come with any manner of views on social topics.
Communism is the process of communalization of land and property. That can come with any manner of views on social topics.
👍14💯9😇4
Goebbels diaries undermine that fake Hitlerian propaganda of "genocide and ethnic cleansing of Germans" in Poland narrative.
All of Goebbels diary entries before the invasion make no mention of massacres of Germans. It was trumped up propaganda to increase tensions with Poland to justify the pre-planned invasion for Lebensraum.
@redideologies
All of Goebbels diary entries before the invasion make no mention of massacres of Germans. It was trumped up propaganda to increase tensions with Poland to justify the pre-planned invasion for Lebensraum.
@redideologies
👍20
The Imperial Japanese proposed adding a "racial equality" statute in the Treaty of Versailles.
@redideologies
@redideologies
⚡17
Forwarded from ㅤ
https://t.me/redideologies/798
HITLER ORDERED THE ANTI-POLISH CAMPAIGN TO BE RATCHETED UP TO ‘80 PER CENT VOLUME:
"On 11 August, Hitler had one of his private aeroplanes fly the high commissioner of the League of Nations in Danzig, Carl Jacob Burckhardt, to Salzburg. He received the Swiss diplomat and historian in the Adlershorst, a large teahouse above the Berghof, and with no further ado revealed that at ‘the slightest incident’ he would ‘destroy Poland without warning’. When Burckhardt objected that this would bring a ‘general war’, Hitler exclaimed: ‘Then so be it!’ If he had to wage war, the Führer added, then ‘better today than tomorrow’. At the end of the conversation, as the high commissioner recalled in his memoirs twenty years later, Hitler reiterated: ‘I am not bluffing. If anything at all happens in Danzig or happens to our minorities, I will strike a hard blow.’
~ Volker Ullrich, Hitler: Volume II: Downfall 1939-45
HITLER ORDERED THE ANTI-POLISH CAMPAIGN TO BE RATCHETED UP TO ‘80 PER CENT VOLUME:
"On 11 August, Hitler had one of his private aeroplanes fly the high commissioner of the League of Nations in Danzig, Carl Jacob Burckhardt, to Salzburg. He received the Swiss diplomat and historian in the Adlershorst, a large teahouse above the Berghof, and with no further ado revealed that at ‘the slightest incident’ he would ‘destroy Poland without warning’. When Burckhardt objected that this would bring a ‘general war’, Hitler exclaimed: ‘Then so be it!’ If he had to wage war, the Führer added, then ‘better today than tomorrow’. At the end of the conversation, as the high commissioner recalled in his memoirs twenty years later, Hitler reiterated: ‘I am not bluffing. If anything at all happens in Danzig or happens to our minorities, I will strike a hard blow.’
[1] Again Hitler showed how good he was at fooling his conversation partners, since no matter how things developed in Danzig, he was determined to go to war against Poland in any case. The same day he received Burckhardt, he ordered the anti-Polish campaign to be ratcheted up to ‘80 per cent volume’, causing Goebbels to note, correctly: ‘It is coming down to the final sprint.’ [2] " ~ Volker Ullrich, Hitler: Volume II: Downfall 1939-45
[1] Burckhardt, Meine Danziger Mission, pp. 341, 345. On the authenticity of Burckhardt’s account, see Ian Kershaw, Hitler 1936–1945: Nemesis, London, 2001, pp. 898-9n118.
[2] Goebbels, Tagebücher, part I, vol. 7, p. 64 (entry for 12 Aug. 1939)."Telegram
Red Ideologies
Goebbels diaries undermine that fake Hitlerian propaganda of "genocide and ethnic cleansing of Germans" in Poland narrative.
All of Goebbels diary entries before the invasion make no mention of massacres of Germans and admit it was trumped up propaganda…
All of Goebbels diary entries before the invasion make no mention of massacres of Germans and admit it was trumped up propaganda…
👍8
Mussolini supported Italy's entry to World War I to speed up the overthrow of the monarchies and implement socialism quicker.
@redideologies
@redideologies
⚡11👍8
Here's some very interesting polling data from England before and during World War II demonstrating that the British public by and large supported the war and Churchill.
March 1939
- 78% of Brits against giving Germany former colonies back
- 70% would rather fight than give them back
- 86% of public in favour of friendlier ties with USSR
April 1939
- 73% in favour of Britain giving security guarantees to smaller European nations
- 87% in favour of a military alliance between Great Britain, France and Russia
May 1939
- 56% in favour of Mr. Churchill joining the cabinet
August 1939
- 76% in favour of going to war with Germany over Polish-German dispute on Danzig
September 1939 (war begins)
- 88% in favour of fighting Hitlerism until it is gone
- 77% disapprove of peace proposals with Germany at this time
November 1939
- 62% satisfied with government's conduct during war
- 54% in favour of bombing German military targets even if it meant reprisals
December 1939
- 56% believe Nazi Germany is a greater threat than USSR
February 1940
- 60% against discussion of peace proposals with Germany
March 1940
- 69% against peace talks with the Germans
May 1940
- 60% disapprove of Chamberlain
- 65% believe treatment of Germans in Britain has been "too lenient"
- 66% in favour of bombing German military targets even if it meant reprisals
July 1940
- 87% approve of Mr. Churchill as Prime Minister
October 1940
- 89% approve of Churchill
- 46% approve of bombing German civilians in response to Germany bombing of British civilians
November 1940
- 88% approve of Churchill
- 68% in favour of imposing harsher terms than Versailles if they win the war
- 60% say they would "contradict" someone suggesting a negotiated peace with Germany at this stage
Source
@redideologies
March 1939
- 78% of Brits against giving Germany former colonies back
- 70% would rather fight than give them back
- 86% of public in favour of friendlier ties with USSR
April 1939
- 73% in favour of Britain giving security guarantees to smaller European nations
- 87% in favour of a military alliance between Great Britain, France and Russia
May 1939
- 56% in favour of Mr. Churchill joining the cabinet
August 1939
- 76% in favour of going to war with Germany over Polish-German dispute on Danzig
September 1939 (war begins)
- 88% in favour of fighting Hitlerism until it is gone
- 77% disapprove of peace proposals with Germany at this time
November 1939
- 62% satisfied with government's conduct during war
- 54% in favour of bombing German military targets even if it meant reprisals
December 1939
- 56% believe Nazi Germany is a greater threat than USSR
February 1940
- 60% against discussion of peace proposals with Germany
March 1940
- 69% against peace talks with the Germans
May 1940
- 60% disapprove of Chamberlain
- 65% believe treatment of Germans in Britain has been "too lenient"
- 66% in favour of bombing German military targets even if it meant reprisals
July 1940
- 87% approve of Mr. Churchill as Prime Minister
October 1940
- 89% approve of Churchill
- 46% approve of bombing German civilians in response to Germany bombing of British civilians
November 1940
- 88% approve of Churchill
- 68% in favour of imposing harsher terms than Versailles if they win the war
- 60% say they would "contradict" someone suggesting a negotiated peace with Germany at this stage
Source
@redideologies
👍9
Forwarded from Race Realism Channel
Map of Germanic settlements throughout history. Some regions are missing but it's pretty accurate.
⚡8