"In 1940 Hitler agreed that around half of the Czech population were suitable for Germanization, while the "mongoloid types" and the Czech intelligentsia were not to be Germanized and were to be “deprived of [their] power, eliminated, and shipped out of the country by all sorts of methods.
Under Generalplan Ost, the Nazis had intended to displace the un-Germanizable population [in Czechosolvakia] to Siberia. However, due to the war effort's need for labor, this plan was never implemented."

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Final_Solution_of_the_Czech_Question

So if Stalin banned homosexuality then what exactly is the difference between a fascist and a Soviet communist?

They're both totalitarian socialists who didn't like gays.

@redideologies

Hitler's opposition to Jews was mainly motivated by his hatred of capitalism, which he identified with "materialism and mammonism".

Hitler flaunted his poverty as a badge of honor and stated that he was one of the "have nots" before taking power and using governmental power to make himself into a "Somebody" thus satisfying his egotistical urges to be the center of attention.

@redideologies

“In fact, many National Socialists were swapping back and forth between the Communists, the Social Democrats, and the National Socialists, which is where the terms “Beefsteaks” or “Beefsteak Nazis” came from - Brown on the outside, Red on the inside. Rudolf Diels, head of the Gestapo in 1933 and 1934 estimated that 70% of SA recruits were former communists, and another political scientist estimated it was actually 77%, and that 63% of the SS were former communists as well. Interestingly, Marxist author Paul Carradice then says the SS were predominantly members of the middle-class, which begs the question: is Communism a middle-class movement? “Since Nazi and communist ideology and tactics appeared similar to so many, especially the working class, side-switching between Nazis and communists became increasingly popular, especially inside SA ranks… The Nazis encouraged German communists to join them, regarding them as excellent new recruits. Of course, the communists did the same, since their ideological makeup was so interchangeable.”

https://youtu.be/Gh7v0DU9UWA

Both Mark Weber and David Irving admit the Goebbels diaries are authentic

More proof of their authenticity here

@redideologies

Debunking "National Socialism and Race by Dr. A. James Gregor"

Gregor makes the following assertion:
"The earliest period of National Socialist racism was characterized by the writings and speeches of Hitler himself. In many of his utterances Hitler's contentions with respect to race were no more and no less shocking, interesting or spectacular than similar statements made by any number of Anglo-Saxon eugenicists of the period. More significantly, in his specific references to race Hitler was content to employ the exceedingly vague term "Aryan" to denote his select race, founders of the State, society and culture in Europe. Under the rubric "Aryan" Hitler included all the European peoples..."

Gregor is utterly incorrect in what he says above.
"Humanity owes everything great to struggle and to one race which has triumphed. Take away the NORDIC German and all that remains is APE DANCES''
~ Adolf Hitler, speech 2. April 1927

George makes the following assertion: "Nowhere in Mein Kampf does he specifically stipulate the physical type of his superior race. "

Again he is wrong, here is a passage from Mein Kampf that disproves him.
"Today in our German national body we still possess great unmixed stocks of NORDIC Germanic people whom we may consider the MOST PRECIOUS treasure for our future."
~ Adolf Hitler, Mein Kampf

Gregor continues by claiming that Hitler had altered his mind, but this is a flat-out lie because, according to the table talks that took place between 1941 and 1944, Hitler was still a supporter of Nordicism.

"The scheme by which workers, under the influence of a massive advertising campaign, parted with a portion of their wages each week to put towards buying a ‘Strength Through Joy car’ turned out to be no more than a means of getting them to put in more overtime so that they could contribute to the financing of rearmament. By the end of 1939, 270,000 people had lent 110 million Reichsmarks to the state in this way. In the end, no fewer than 340,000 people invested their money in the scheme. Not one of them ever got a Volkswagen in return. The factory was converted to war production in September 1939."
~ Richard J. Evans, The Third Reich in Power