Red Ideologies
1.37K subscribers
607 photos
144 videos
2 files
443 links
Documenting the extensive links between Red and Brown ideologies
Download Telegram
Forwarded from Martinez Politics
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
El fascismo y el comunismo son ideologías hermanas

@MartinezPolitix
1👍1
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
"Mr. Hunka was not a Nazi because no Ukrainians could be Nazis since the Nazis considered all Slavs untermenschen"

True statement. Hitler and the Nazis despised Ukrainians, Russians, Poles, Czechs and all Slavs.

@redideologies
👍11😇3
Hitler was a socialist radical who blended together his left-wing egalitarian economic beliefs with his schizoid Nordicist racial theories that only civilization can come from a "Nordic" source despite him and many of his top brass not being Nordic themselves.

@Redideologies
👍18👌31
Forwarded from Red Ideologies
Hitler always wanted to annex  Czechoslovakia.
He talks about annexing Czechoslovakia in the Hossbach memorandum.
https://ghdi.ghi-dc.org/docpage.cfm?docpage_id=2322
It is important to note the reason that Hitler gave in the Hossbach memorandum is not the discrimination against Germans but: "the annexation of Czechoslovakia and Austria would mean an acquisition of foodstuffs for 5 to 6 million people"

Even 8 months before the Hossbach memorandum Hitler confided to Goebbels about annexation of Czechoslovakia.

> Late one night in mid-March 1937... Hitler told his propaganda minister that he intended to incorporate Austria and Czechoslovakia into the Reich. “We need both to round off our territory,” Goebbels reported Hitler saying. “And we’ll get them…When their citizens come to Germany, they’ll be crushed by the greatness and power of the Reich…Hence the Führer’s gigantic construction plans. He’ll never give them up.”

Source: Volker Ullrich, Hitler Ascent. (Goebbels, Tagebücher, part 1, vol. 4, p. 52 (entry for 15 March 1937)

Also note that neither in the Hossbach memorandum nor in Goebbels Diaries is Hitler talking about Sudetenland, where the German minority was present; instead, Hitler is talking about annexing all of Czechoslovakia.

Follow @redideologies
👍6
Forwarded from Red Ideologies
Hitler, Stalin and Mussolini all agreed that they wanted to destroy the "capitalist democracies" despite both Mussolini and Hitler previously praising FDR as a fellow socialist.

> "That wasn’t quite right. As German negotiator Karl Schnurre had observed the month before, “despite all the differences in their respective worldviews, there is one common element in the ideologies of Germany, Italy and the Soviet Union: opposition to the capitalist democracies. Neither we nor Italy have anything in common with the capitalist West. Therefore it seems to us rather unnatural that a socialist state would stand on the side of the Western democracies.” Since capitalist democracy was their common enemy, why not pool resources?"

> "Hitler and Stalin had demonized each other over several years, but they also had interlocking interests. Hitler wanted to invade Poland without fear of war on two fronts, so he had to neutralize the Soviets. He also needed access to Russia’s natural resources. Stalin coveted German industrial and weapons technology. To his cadre, he explained that he could destroy Germany later, after Hitler had assisted him in destroying the most “reactionary” imperialist capitalist countries, England and France. Though some balked, most communists world-wide acquiesced. Even the Marxist historian Eric Hobsbawm later acknowledged he’d had “no reservations” about it at the time."

Follow @redideologies
👍9
Red Ideologies pinned «Hitler, Stalin and Mussolini all agreed that they wanted to destroy the "capitalist democracies" despite both Mussolini and Hitler previously praising FDR as a fellow socialist. > "That wasn’t quite right. As German negotiator Karl Schnurre had observed the…»
Forwarded from Red Ideologies
"In 1940 Hitler agreed that around half of the Czech population were suitable for Germanization, while the "mongoloid types" and the Czech intelligentsia were not to be Germanized and were to be “deprived of [their] power, eliminated, and shipped out of the country by all sorts of methods.
Under Generalplan Ost, the Nazis had intended to displace the un-Germanizable population [in Czechosolvakia] to Siberia. However, due to the war effort's need for labor, this plan was never implemented."

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Final_Solution_of_the_Czech_Question
👍9
All Nazis are beefsteak Nazis. Nazism is a beefsteak ideology so it can't be another way.
💯148😇2
Jewish militant group Lehi tried to align itself with Nazi Germany and Fascist Italy and embraced fascism.

Then when that failed to gain traction it turned towards Stalin and the Soviet Union, embracing "National Bolshevism".

Further proof of how easy one can slip in between fascism and bolshevism, being ideologies cut from the same cloth who even Mussolini said had only "minor differences".

@redideologies
👍10
Apparently Hitler also admired Trotsky and enthusiastically touted his auto-biography among his inner circle, calling it "brilliant".

Source

@redideologies
👍13
Forwarded from Red Ideologies
"In 1940 Hitler agreed that around half of the Czech population were suitable for Germanization, while the "mongoloid types" and the Czech intelligentsia were not to be Germanized and were to be “deprived of [their] power, eliminated, and shipped out of the country by all sorts of methods.
Under Generalplan Ost, the Nazis had intended to displace the un-Germanizable population [in Czechosolvakia] to Siberia. However, due to the war effort's need for labor, this plan was never implemented."

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Final_Solution_of_the_Czech_Question
4😇3
So if Stalin banned homosexuality then what exactly is the difference between a fascist and a Soviet communist?

They're both totalitarian socialists who didn't like gays.

@redideologies
👍13🔥3👌2👏1🏆1
Hitler's opposition to Jews was mainly motivated by his hatred of capitalism, which he identified with "materialism and mammonism".

Hitler flaunted his poverty as a badge of honor and stated that he was one of the "have nots" before taking power and using governmental power to make himself into a "Somebody" thus satisfying his egotistical urges to be the center of attention.

@redideologies
👏10🫡4🔥2
Forwarded from ‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‎ㅤ
“In fact, many National Socialists were swapping back and forth between the Communists, the Social Democrats, and the National Socialists, which is where the terms “Beefsteaks” or “Beefsteak Nazis” came from - Brown on the outside, Red on the inside. Rudolf Diels, head of the Gestapo in 1933 and 1934 estimated that 70% of SA recruits were former communists, and another political scientist estimated it was actually 77%, and that 63% of the SS were former communists as well. Interestingly, Marxist author Paul Carradice then says the SS were predominantly members of the middle-class, which begs the question: is Communism a middle-class movement? “Since Nazi and communist ideology and tactics appeared similar to so many, especially the working class, side-switching between Nazis and communists became increasingly popular, especially inside SA ranks… The Nazis encouraged German communists to join them, regarding them as excellent new recruits. Of course, the communists did the same, since their ideological makeup was so interchangeable.”

https://youtu.be/Gh7v0DU9UWA
8💯6
Fascists employed modern artists to "usher in anti-capitalist new world".

Tell me again these aren't communists. 💩

@redideologies
👍92🫡1
Red Ideologies pinned «Hitler aimed for world domination. > "We National Socialists must go still further: The right to land and soil becomes a duty when a great nation seems destined to go under, unless its land is extended. Germany will either be a world power, or not at all.…»
Red Ideologies pinned «Rosenberg admits at Nuremberg the plan for Ukraine and the East in general: acquisition of their land for German settlement/expansion and exploitation of their labor. He says that while in Germany top officials publicly declared their contempt of the "inferior"…»