More proof of Hitler's communist sympathies.

> That evening [13 August 1929, Hitler's speech in Hofbräuhaus], Hitler essentially held out his hands to former Spartacists. Whether doing so was a reflection of his own activities on the left during the revolution in Munich seems likely but is impossible to prove (or disprove, for that matter). He argued that even the “fiercest Spartacists” were, in reality, good-natured and had merely been misled by internationalist Jews. This is a view that he expressed publicly not only for tactical purposes. He would state much the same in private for the rest of his life. For instance, on August 2, 1941, he would tell his inner entourage in military HQ: “I won’t reproach any simple folks for having been communists. It is a matter of reproach only for an intellectualist.” He would also say that “on the whole I find our communists a thousand fold more agreeable” than some of the aristocrats who would collaborate with him for a while.
In his entire speech of August 13, Hitler did not mention the term “Bolshevism” a single time.

Source: Becoming Hitler: The Making of a Nazi by Thomas Weber

@redideologies

Hitler claimed that Chinese people were also Nordic.
It is certain that Nazis, who originated "we wuzing" at least fifty years before Black people did, are the ones who started it.

Thuletide writes: "Hitler was democratically elected, unlike Stalin and the Bolsheviks"

https://t.me/thuletide

The truth is not so clear cut. Hitler was elected and appointed chancellor, but his party did not win a full majority and so he had to form a coalition with a national conservative party to form a government.

"In spite of massive violence and voter intimidation, the Nazis won only 43.9% of the vote, rather than the majority that he had expected. Therefore, Hitler was forced to maintain his coalition with the DNVP to control the majority of seats."

Then after the suspiciously timed Reichstag Fire, Hitler used the incident to ban all political parties and took dictatorial control of everything. He obviously did not tell voters he was going to do this when he was campaigning although he clearly had the intention to do so all along.

So that statement is misleading.

He also says: "the USSR was certainly more totalitarian than Nazi Germany"

No, they were broadly similar in their totalitarianism ("nothing outside the state" is the motto of fascism, which means the state rules all) and Hitler privately praised Stalin and recognized the strong similarities with himself.

The rest of that post is a big whataboutism.

The unique wrong done by Germany in WW2 was their attempt to racially/ethnically cleanse Slavs from their lands to make way for Germanic Lebensraum. Thus, Hitler was most certainly not a "White nationalist" otherwise Lebensraum would have been unnecessary since the people he's moving out of the way were White anyway.

Thule also conveniently leaves out Nazi-Soviet collaboration (Molotov-Ribbentrop) and the strong similarities (especially economically) between the two systems. He's basically just enamored with Hitler's racialism which swerved into kooky Nordicist race theories in which he even asserted (with no proof) that the civilizational achievements of the Chinese were due to some "Nordic element".

"The Führer preferred the ‘policies’ of Erich Koch, who wanted to RULE WITH THE WHIP - and did so."

Citation: With Hitler to the End: The Memoirs of Adolf Hitler's Valet p.161

"At the beginning of the war in the east, Hitler, captive to his theory that the SLAVS WERE SUBHUMAN, had called the war against them child's play."

— Albert Speer

Source: Inside the Third Reich p.306

Great channel here debunking the dishonest clown Zoomer Historian https://t.me/DebunkingZoomerHistorian

We really request that all of our subscribers view the video and hit the "like" button since it does an excellent job dispelling ZH's falsehoods.

https://t.me/NSHeathenry/916

An explicit audio speech by Himmler in which he speaks harshly about Christianity must have been a devastating blow to all those so-called Christian e-Nazis who claimed Himmler was a Christian.
It is general knowledge among ordinary people that Himmler had a deep disdain for Christianity, as evidenced by a variety of his speeches, his writings, his memos, and so on.
The e-nazis continued to play the low-IQ game of
>"show me audio!",
>"all those anti-Christian quotes are forged by daa jooz after the war"
Now that there is explicit audio, it's likely that the e-nazis will claim that this speech was also a forgery by "daa jooz" after the war.
Because these Christian Nazis are completely retarded.
Their idiocy knows no boundaries.
It would be quite true to state that Christian e-Nazis are the personification of stupidity.

"Personally, I believe that in the long run — and this brings me back to the Slavs — that in the long run, the Slavic peoples will not be able to create a culture, a culture that leads further forward. There will always be individual great dictators and great leaders, military leaders, as we know them in history; whether they were called Attila — whose real name we do not know at all — or whether they were called Genghis Khan, or Tamerlan (Timur), or whether they were Magyar kings, or whether it was once a Mr. Lenin or a Mr. Stalin; These are isolated occurrences where, through a happy pairing, a happy encounter — unfortunate for us Europeans, of course — components came together that made it possible to lead. But the moment such a phenomenon is over, the Slav instantly becomes what he always was: a people who cannot control themselves, eternally scheming."
— Heinrich Himmler.

El fascismo y el comunismo son ideologías hermanas

@MartinezPolitix

"Mr. Hunka was not a Nazi because no Ukrainians could be Nazis since the Nazis considered all Slavs untermenschen"

True statement. Hitler and the Nazis despised Ukrainians, Russians, Poles, Czechs and all Slavs.

@redideologies

Hitler was a socialist radical who blended together his left-wing egalitarian economic beliefs with his schizoid Nordicist racial theories that only civilization can come from a "Nordic" source despite him and many of his top brass not being Nordic themselves.

@Redideologies

Hitler always wanted to annex  Czechoslovakia.
He talks about annexing Czechoslovakia in the Hossbach memorandum.
https://ghdi.ghi-dc.org/docpage.cfm?docpage_id=2322
It is important to note the reason that Hitler gave in the Hossbach memorandum is not the discrimination against Germans but: "the annexation of Czechoslovakia and Austria would mean an acquisition of foodstuffs for 5 to 6 million people"

Even 8 months before the Hossbach memorandum Hitler confided to Goebbels about annexation of Czechoslovakia.

> Late one night in mid-March 1937... Hitler told his propaganda minister that he intended to incorporate Austria and Czechoslovakia into the Reich. “We need both to round off our territory,” Goebbels reported Hitler saying. “And we’ll get them…When their citizens come to Germany, they’ll be crushed by the greatness and power of the Reich…Hence the Führer’s gigantic construction plans. He’ll never give them up.”

Source: Volker Ullrich, Hitler Ascent. (Goebbels, Tagebücher, part 1, vol. 4, p. 52 (entry for 15 March 1937)

Also note that neither in the Hossbach memorandum nor in Goebbels Diaries is Hitler talking about Sudetenland, where the German minority was present; instead, Hitler is talking about annexing all of Czechoslovakia.

Follow @redideologies

Hitler, Stalin and Mussolini all agreed that they wanted to destroy the "capitalist democracies" despite both Mussolini and Hitler previously praising FDR as a fellow socialist.

> "That wasn’t quite right. As German negotiator Karl Schnurre had observed the month before, “despite all the differences in their respective worldviews, there is one common element in the ideologies of Germany, Italy and the Soviet Union: opposition to the capitalist democracies. Neither we nor Italy have anything in common with the capitalist West. Therefore it seems to us rather unnatural that a socialist state would stand on the side of the Western democracies.” Since capitalist democracy was their common enemy, why not pool resources?"

> "Hitler and Stalin had demonized each other over several years, but they also had interlocking interests. Hitler wanted to invade Poland without fear of war on two fronts, so he had to neutralize the Soviets. He also needed access to Russia’s natural resources. Stalin coveted German industrial and weapons technology. To his cadre, he explained that he could destroy Germany later, after Hitler had assisted him in destroying the most “reactionary” imperialist capitalist countries, England and France. Though some balked, most communists world-wide acquiesced. Even the Marxist historian Eric Hobsbawm later acknowledged he’d had “no reservations” about it at the time."

Follow @redideologies

"In 1940 Hitler agreed that around half of the Czech population were suitable for Germanization, while the "mongoloid types" and the Czech intelligentsia were not to be Germanized and were to be “deprived of [their] power, eliminated, and shipped out of the country by all sorts of methods.
Under Generalplan Ost, the Nazis had intended to displace the un-Germanizable population [in Czechosolvakia] to Siberia. However, due to the war effort's need for labor, this plan was never implemented."

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Final_Solution_of_the_Czech_Question

All Nazis are beefsteak Nazis. Nazism is a beefsteak ideology so it can't be another way.