Red Ideologies
1.37K subscribers
607 photos
144 videos
2 files
443 links
Documenting the extensive links between Red and Brown ideologies
Download Telegram
Forwarded from Martinez Politics
But but they're different maaaan!
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🚨 Natsoc-to-Communist Pipeline

Former Neo-Nazi Matt Heimbach explains his conversion to Marxist-Leninism.

Really, there was no major change here because he already had most of these points down as a beefsteak nazi. As a natsoc he was also "international" insofar as he preached solidarity with other movements and countries that he thought aligned with his views (Palestine, Hamas, Hezbollah, North Korea, Iran, Russia, China, etc.) He even offered to be an emissary of North Korea at one point.

All he's done here is deemphasized some of the race politics issues while keeping all of the same economic and social views as before.

The easy transition from fascist to communist and vice versa is because they're cut from the same cloth and share about 80%-90% of the same source material. They're sister ideologies with immense overlap, that's why it's easy traffic from one to the other.

A historian says that 55% of new SA recruits came from the communist party (KPD). Hitler said this:

"We National Socialists wish precisely to attract all socialists, even the Communists; we wish to win them over from their international camp to the national one."

@redideologies
👍14
Forwarded from Martinez Politics
Putin's Nazi Ukraine narrative is twisted disinformation for multiple reasons.

1) The Nazis put Stepan Bandera in Sachsenhausen concentration camp and shot and imprisoned other Ukrainian nationalist leaders. They rejected Ukrainian statehood because they were colonizing Ukraine for Lebensraum.

2) The Soviets themselves collaborated extensively with the Nazis in the Molotov-Ribbentrop pact celebrating together their joint conquest of Poland in victory marches. Stalin and Hitler mutually admired each other.

Only 250 thousand Ukrainians fought with the Germans while seven million fought in the Red Army against them.

Putin himself defended Soviet collaboration with the Nazis while he condemns the small segment of Ukrainians who fought with the Germans (who were later doubled-crossed by them) thinking they were a lesser evil to the Soviet butchers who were responsible for the Holodomor.

So Putin is not against collaboration with Nazism when it's done by the Russian state, only when it's done by perceived enemies of the Russian state (Ukrainian nationalists, Western countries, etc.)

@MartinezPolitix
👍18💯2👌1
Forwarded from Martinez Politics
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Spaniard explains the NSDAP were left-wing socialists. Fascists, Nazis and Marxists are all fundamentally anti-private property. They despise money, business and anything related to wealth. They worship poverty and low-status. They all want a collectivized/equalized economy, the only difference is the former want a racially exclusive socialism and the latter a racially inclusive version.

@MartinezPolitix
👍9
Even David Irving (Hitler's War) admits that Hitler and Goebbels ordered the embellishing of "anti-German persecution" propaganda to frame Poland and justify their pre-planned aggression.

@redideologies
👍10
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Zoomer Historian debunked: Yes Hitler planned to invade the British Isles after he conquered Russia.

Goebbels dairies also confirms this.

Hitler's attitude toward England changed after it became apparent they weren't going to allow him to take Lebensraum and dominate continental Europe. How could the English trust Hitler to not attack England at a later date even after signing an armistice? He broke every other agreement before that time and invaded country after country.

Operation Sea Lion was Nazi Germany's plan to invade the UK. They simply didn't get around to it before losing the war on the Eastern Front.

Full video

@redideologies
👍4
Forwarded from Martinez Politics
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Hitler and Stalin cults can't stomach these facts

@MartinezPolitix
💯7
Forwarded from Martinez Politics
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
The Germans faked support for Ukrainian independence then betrayed them

@MartinezPolitix
👍3
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Debunking the Greatest Story Never Told

Source: HistorySpeaks

@redideologies
👏1
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
The diabolical crimes of Mussolini

@redideologies
👌3
Forwarded from Martinez Politics
Stew Peters is meme-tier.

Lenin was 1/4 at best, and even that is not certain.

Obviously anyone can be a communist and it was not only Jews who created or promoted it (Engels, Stalin, Hoxha, Che Guevarra, Castro, Ho Chi Minh, Mao, etc.) And there are Jews who are anti-communist pro-capitalists (Rothbard, Mises, etc.).

"Communism is Jewish" and "Capitalism is Jewish" are both natsoc memes to promote their own crypto-communist system as the only "non-Jewish" one despite Mussolini having both a Jewish mistress who helped "shape the ideology" and Jews in his government.

It's stupid that natsocs push this meme when Hitler himself was enamored with Stalin and admired his system privately. All the early fascists were heavily inspired by Marxism and came out of Marxist-socialist movements. Fascism is thus a modified version of Communism that wraps up economic leftism in a national flag.

So if "Communism is Jewish" than Hitler and Mussolini were Jewish because both were diehard left-wing socialists committed to most of Marx's economic ideas.
10🏆6😇2👍1💯1
Some Russian women under Soviet rule preferred abortions because of lack of space in the Soviet-assigned housing.

Article on Soviet housing

@redideologies
👍14
Soviet housing quality was so rushed and poor that tenants had to spend their own time on repairs and even doing the plastering.

Article on Soviet housing

@redideologies
👍11💯3
Waiting five years to get a decent flat. The wonders of Soviet housing policy.

Article on Soviet housing

@redideologies
👍11😇3
The "pre-emptive strike" hypothesis for Barbarossa was Hitler's public-facing propaganda that neo-nazis have been memeing ever since.

"One way in which prior revisionists have tried to demonstrate that the Second World War was Stalin’s war is by arguing that the Soviets were imminently planning an invasion of Germany at the time of Barbarossa, and that therefore Barbarossa was a preemptive war of defense by the Germans. McMeekin is agnostic on this so-called “Icebreaker” hypothesis, calling Soviet deployments of troops to the West in June 1941 “positively breathtaking,” yet acknowledging that there is no proof “that Stalin had already resolved on war” at this time, and accepting that these Soviet deployments were probably in response to “galloping reports of an impending German-led invasion of European Russia.” (In suggesting that Stalin might have been planning to attack Germany, McMeekin cites two supposed speeches from the Soviet dictator. As Professor Mark Edele observes, one of these is a patent forgery, and the other misrepresented and embellished by McMeekin.) McMeekin’s timidity regarding the Icebreaker hypothesis is prudent, given that there is exactly zero evidence in the Soviet or German archives indicating that the Germans regarded Barbarossa as a preemptive strike."

Article

@redideologies
🏆9
Red Ideologies pinned «The "pre-emptive strike" hypothesis for Barbarossa was Hitler's public-facing propaganda that neo-nazis have been memeing ever since. "One way in which prior revisionists have tried to demonstrate that the Second World War was Stalin’s war is by arguing that…»