Red Ideologies pinned «Businessmen grouped the NSDAP with the Reds and Social Democrats as radical socialist revolutionaries looking to abolish most market principles. > "Even before the seizure of power there had been worries among industrialists that if the National Socialists…»
Stalin recieved close to 100 intel reports of the coming German invasion yet did nothing. This also suggests he may have been duped by German disinformation as he received a few reports suggesting Germany would attack England before the USSR, which is the deception Hitler employed in his 1941 letters to Stalin.
@redideologies
@redideologies
👍8
Red Ideologies pinned «This seals the deal. Hitler portrayed Germans as the oppressed underdogs of the White world struggling for status, essentially a rip off of Lenin's phony "proletarian anti-imperialism". > "In his 1940 New Year’s Day address Hitler asserted that the aim of…»
Red Ideologies pinned «As the war continued and England did not give up, Hitler moved deeper into a racialized form of Marxist ideology, declaring the struggle "proletarian nations" vs the "plutocratic" ones. > "Now that he had given up all hopes of a British alliance, and of accommodation…»
Red Ideologies pinned «> "Hitler violently objected to international capitalism even when it was not Jewish, but he assigned the Jews a particularly malevolent role within the global capitalist system. In Mein Kampf, as in his earlier rhetoric, Jews were inseparably linked with…»
Red Ideologies pinned «Hitler opposed virtually all capitalism and preached a variant of racialized Marxism in its stead. > "Moreover, in Hitler’s view the war was by no means over. Germany was still the victim of international capitalism, whose continuing power he repeatedly attacked.…»
National Socialism is a religion designed to remove and replace all other traditional religions.
"What is Christianity to us today? National Socialism is religion.The only thing missing is the religious genius that blows up old surviving formulas and forms new ones. We lack the rite. National Socialism must one day become the state religion of the Germans. My party is my church, and I believe I will serve the Lord best if I fulfill his will and free my oppressed people from the chains of scavenging. That is my gospel. And where I encounter resistance, no matter when or how, I try to break it." ~ Joseph Goebbels, diary entry of October 16, 1928
This is why you see today neo-nazis worship Hitler like a deity and view all criticism as heresy that must be stamped and blotted out. They view critics of NS and Hitler of any stripe as the medieval Christians viewed Pagans and "witches". They advocate violent reprisals against this cult's critics on the path to the cleansing of the entire world of any ideology but this one.
@redideologies
"What is Christianity to us today? National Socialism is religion.The only thing missing is the religious genius that blows up old surviving formulas and forms new ones. We lack the rite. National Socialism must one day become the state religion of the Germans. My party is my church, and I believe I will serve the Lord best if I fulfill his will and free my oppressed people from the chains of scavenging. That is my gospel. And where I encounter resistance, no matter when or how, I try to break it." ~ Joseph Goebbels, diary entry of October 16, 1928
This is why you see today neo-nazis worship Hitler like a deity and view all criticism as heresy that must be stamped and blotted out. They view critics of NS and Hitler of any stripe as the medieval Christians viewed Pagans and "witches". They advocate violent reprisals against this cult's critics on the path to the cleansing of the entire world of any ideology but this one.
@redideologies
⚡8👍4🔥2
Forwarded from Debunking Zoomer Historian
2) On page 232, Steigmann Gall writes, "Goebbels, too, exhibited little change in his religious attitudes..." and then cites a speech that Goebbels gave in public in October 1937. His diary notes provide a clearer picture of Goebbels' views on Christianity than his October 1937 public pleading did.
In his Diaries Goebbels writes:
Remember that the entry above is from 1937—that is, seven months before the October Speech that Steigmann Gall quotes, which Steigmann Gall considers to be the accurate statement of Goebbel's views.
We're not quite done yet, since the following entry further demonstrates what a wonderful and devoted Christian Goebbels was to write or even consider things like the following.
The aforementioned entry occurs around nine years prior to the October 1937 public address that Steigmann Gall cites and takes to be the authentic embodiment of Goebbels's viewpoint.
Apart from these two examples, there are tonnes of other misrepresentations in "The Holy Reich," which have already been pointed out by other serious historians. This is why it is pretty clear that ZH never read any other book other than this one, and due to his innate biases, despite not having read any other book other than The "Holy Reich," he goes on to declare it one of the "least biassed books I've ever read."
??
ZH! You haven't read any literature on the topic.
In his Diaries Goebbels writes:
"Hitler sees in Christianity a symptom of decay. RIGHTLY SO. IT IS A STRATA DEPOSITED BY THE JEWISH RACE" ~ Jospeh Goebbels, diary entry of December 29, 1939
"Kerrl wants to conserve the Church, we want to liquidate it."
~ Joseph Goebbels, diary entry of 15 February, 1937
Remember that the entry above is from 1937—that is, seven months before the October Speech that Steigmann Gall quotes, which Steigmann Gall considers to be the accurate statement of Goebbel's views.
We're not quite done yet, since the following entry further demonstrates what a wonderful and devoted Christian Goebbels was to write or even consider things like the following.
"What is Christianity to us today? National Socialism is religion.The only thing missing is the religious genius that blows up old surviving formulas and forms new ones. We lack the rite. National Socialism must one day become the state religion of the Germans. My party is my church, and I believe I will serve the Lord best if I fulfill his will and free my oppressed people from the chains of scavenging. That is my gospel. And where I encounter resistance, no matter when or how, I try to break it."
~ Joseph Goebbels, diary entry of October 16, 1928
The aforementioned entry occurs around nine years prior to the October 1937 public address that Steigmann Gall cites and takes to be the authentic embodiment of Goebbels's viewpoint.
Apart from these two examples, there are tonnes of other misrepresentations in "The Holy Reich," which have already been pointed out by other serious historians. This is why it is pretty clear that ZH never read any other book other than this one, and due to his innate biases, despite not having read any other book other than The "Holy Reich," he goes on to declare it one of the "least biassed books I've ever read."
"I've ever read"
??
ZH! You haven't read any literature on the topic.
Mao said that "half of China may have to die" to accomplish his utopian workers state.
@redideologies
@redideologies
💯8👏3⚡1
Forwarded from Martinez Politics
Like all variations of fascism, Peronism had the same economic goals as Marxists: the elimination of classes.
Argentina has had that heavily socialist/interventionist Peronist system for decades and it's not brought them to great heights.
Argentina has had that heavily socialist/interventionist Peronist system for decades and it's not brought them to great heights.
👍9
Hans Gunther was not "pro-Slavic" as some neo-nazis claim. He warned against the influx of "Slavic blood" to Germany.
"Günther believed Slavic people to be of an "Eastern race" separate from Germany and Nordics and warned about mixing "German blood" with Slavic one."
~ Wiki [Wulf D. Hund, Racisms Made in Germany, (2011), p. 19]
@redideologies
"Günther believed Slavic people to be of an "Eastern race" separate from Germany and Nordics and warned about mixing "German blood" with Slavic one."
~ Wiki [Wulf D. Hund, Racisms Made in Germany, (2011), p. 19]
@redideologies
⚡3
Socialism for thee but not for me. Top Nazis lived lavishly on taxpayer dime. Corruption was common.
"Most of Hitler’s paladins followed the lead of their Führer and had themselves declared exempt from taxes, acquired luxurious homes and set up special funds, foundations and secret bank accounts shielded from any public financial scrutiny. Göring—the Third Reich’s “second man”—may have been particularly conspicuous with his grandiose lifestyle, including his feudal estate “Carinhall” in Schorfheide, north of Berlin. But other leading figures in the regime were hardly slouches either when it came to unscrupulously abusing their positions for personal gain. Goebbels, one of the more vitriolic critics of “bigwigs” in the Weimar Republic, lived in splendid fashion in his villa on Schwanenwerder Island in Lake Wannsee and had a second home on Lake Bogensee, north of the capital. And despite bemoaning the corruption among the clique of Nazi leaders while writing his memoirs in Spandau prison, Albert Speer was a more-than-willing beneficiary of the system of patronage, concealing his rocketing income from the tax authorities and acquiring an estate in Oderbruch to go along with his large new house on Berlin’s Lichtensteinallee." - Hitler - A Biography, Volume 1: Ascent 1889-1939, Volker Ullrich
@redideologies
"Most of Hitler’s paladins followed the lead of their Führer and had themselves declared exempt from taxes, acquired luxurious homes and set up special funds, foundations and secret bank accounts shielded from any public financial scrutiny. Göring—the Third Reich’s “second man”—may have been particularly conspicuous with his grandiose lifestyle, including his feudal estate “Carinhall” in Schorfheide, north of Berlin. But other leading figures in the regime were hardly slouches either when it came to unscrupulously abusing their positions for personal gain. Goebbels, one of the more vitriolic critics of “bigwigs” in the Weimar Republic, lived in splendid fashion in his villa on Schwanenwerder Island in Lake Wannsee and had a second home on Lake Bogensee, north of the capital. And despite bemoaning the corruption among the clique of Nazi leaders while writing his memoirs in Spandau prison, Albert Speer was a more-than-willing beneficiary of the system of patronage, concealing his rocketing income from the tax authorities and acquiring an estate in Oderbruch to go along with his large new house on Berlin’s Lichtensteinallee." - Hitler - A Biography, Volume 1: Ascent 1889-1939, Volker Ullrich
@redideologies
🏆5👍1
Forwarded from ㅤ
‘In Poland we already have our first casualty,’ Goebbels reported gleefully in mid-May 1939. ‘Everything is taking its preordained path.’
~ Volker Ullrich.
"Everything is taking its preordained path"
It is abundantly clear that the Nazis welcome these kinds of events because they provide them with a pretext and rationale for invading. However, there were no massacres before the invasion of Poland, as Goebbels himself makes no record of them in his Diaries; instead, he speaks gleefully and welcomingly about the "first casualty" in this entry. Furthermore, Hitler makes no mention of the persecution of the German people in his secret addresses as the only reason they had to invade.
"The Poles are stirring things up against us. The Führer welcomes this."
~ Joseph Goebbels, Diary entry on 2 May 1939.
"stirring things" had nothing to do with the atrocities; rather, Goebbels used it to describe Poland's unwillingness to cede territory to the Nazis and their cooperation with Britain.
~ Volker Ullrich.
"Everything is taking its preordained path"
It is abundantly clear that the Nazis welcome these kinds of events because they provide them with a pretext and rationale for invading. However, there were no massacres before the invasion of Poland, as Goebbels himself makes no record of them in his Diaries; instead, he speaks gleefully and welcomingly about the "first casualty" in this entry. Furthermore, Hitler makes no mention of the persecution of the German people in his secret addresses as the only reason they had to invade.
"The Poles are stirring things up against us. The Führer welcomes this."
~ Joseph Goebbels, Diary entry on 2 May 1939.
"stirring things" had nothing to do with the atrocities; rather, Goebbels used it to describe Poland's unwillingness to cede territory to the Nazis and their cooperation with Britain.
👍4
Forwarded from ㅤ
Rather than caring about the welfare of Ethnic Germans living in non-German lands, it seems clear that the Nazis intended to worsen their living conditions in order to use this as justification for invading those regions.
https://telegra.ph/Hitler-did-not-care-about-the-Ethnic-Germans-rather-he-only-cared-to-conquer-territories-05-17
https://telegra.ph/Hitler-did-not-care-about-the-Ethnic-Germans-rather-he-only-cared-to-conquer-territories-05-17
Telegraph
Hitler did not care about the Ethnic Germans, rather he only cared to conquer territories.
Whenever the Nazis claimed "the ethnic Germans were persecuted" they were making things up to justify their annexation of territories, sometimes the Nazis fabricated events like the Gleitzwitz incident and Jabłonków incident, and sometimes they provoked massacres…
👍6
Forwarded from ㅤ
How can we be sure that the alleged crimes against the German ethnic community that Poles are accused of committing are nothing more than Nazi propaganda that is spread by neo-Nazis over and over again?
1) Hitler makes no mention of massacres in any of his secret speeches; in fact, in his most well-known secret speech, which was delivered on August 22, 1939, he said nothing about massacres. It should be emphasized that multiple military commanders in attendance took notes during the address, resulting in various transcripts of the speech, none of which included references to the alleged crimes.
2) In his diaries, Goebbels—unquestionably a maestro of propaganda—writes the following instead of reporting any massacres.
"Poland is not important",
"Everything is quiet in Danzig",
"Hitler doesn't take the Poles seriously at all",
"The Poles have become noticeably more reserved"
1) Hitler makes no mention of massacres in any of his secret speeches; in fact, in his most well-known secret speech, which was delivered on August 22, 1939, he said nothing about massacres. It should be emphasized that multiple military commanders in attendance took notes during the address, resulting in various transcripts of the speech, none of which included references to the alleged crimes.
2) In his diaries, Goebbels—unquestionably a maestro of propaganda—writes the following instead of reporting any massacres.
"Poland is not important",
"Everything is quiet in Danzig",
"Hitler doesn't take the Poles seriously at all",
"The Poles have become noticeably more reserved"
👍5
Forwarded from Martinez Politics
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
The WW2 topic has memetards on both sides presenting a black and white "good vs evil" narrative. The mainstream says the Allies were the undisputed force for good and the "revisionists" just invert that to present the Axis as the cartoonish pure white hats. The truth is much more complicated and somewhere in the middle.
The "revisionists" are wrong on many major points though. With the full appeasement of the British and French, Hitler tore up Versailles and refused to pay the reparations, reoccupied the Rhineland, got the Sudetenland in the Munich Agreement, annexed Austria, then occupied the rest of Czechoslovakia.
He got back nearly every each of territory Germany lost after WWI with the exception of a city in northern Poland before 1939 and yet he invaded Poland and Russia anyway to fulfill his plans for an expanded land empire. Nothing was forced upon him, he forced his way upon the world and was willing to risk war and escalation with the great powers to achieve his mission of Lebensraum and German global power.
@MartinezPolitix
The "revisionists" are wrong on many major points though. With the full appeasement of the British and French, Hitler tore up Versailles and refused to pay the reparations, reoccupied the Rhineland, got the Sudetenland in the Munich Agreement, annexed Austria, then occupied the rest of Czechoslovakia.
He got back nearly every each of territory Germany lost after WWI with the exception of a city in northern Poland before 1939 and yet he invaded Poland and Russia anyway to fulfill his plans for an expanded land empire. Nothing was forced upon him, he forced his way upon the world and was willing to risk war and escalation with the great powers to achieve his mission of Lebensraum and German global power.
@MartinezPolitix
👍7
Forwarded from Martinez Politics
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Hitler's National Socialism is in essence Nordicism. It preaches the inferiority of the Slavs and Meds and seeks to subjugate them as "second class" Europeans not worthy of governing themselves. It is not "White nationalism" in any sense.
German NS (and Italian fascism) also takes much inspiration from Marxism as it seeks to fuse together race and class struggle (in the German case) or national identity and class struggle (in the Italian case).
If you read the literature it rarely critiques Communism and when it does, they attack it mostly on philosophical grounds and not on economic grounds because they shared most of the same economic premises. Their focus of attack was against "liberalism" (aka any kind of 'civil rights' for citizens), democracy and capitalism as they sought to implement their totalitarian socialism modeled on Marxist-inspired Sorelian syndicalism.
@MartinezPolitix
German NS (and Italian fascism) also takes much inspiration from Marxism as it seeks to fuse together race and class struggle (in the German case) or national identity and class struggle (in the Italian case).
If you read the literature it rarely critiques Communism and when it does, they attack it mostly on philosophical grounds and not on economic grounds because they shared most of the same economic premises. Their focus of attack was against "liberalism" (aka any kind of 'civil rights' for citizens), democracy and capitalism as they sought to implement their totalitarian socialism modeled on Marxist-inspired Sorelian syndicalism.
@MartinezPolitix
👍7
Forwarded from Martinez Politics
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Otro fascista admite que el fascismo y el comunismo son dos caras de la misma moneda.
Lo que está diciendo aquí es que cree que los fascistas son mejores socialistas que los comunistas.
Él dice:
"Las corporaciones estatales supervisaron, dirigieron, controlaron y planificaron todos los aspectos de la economía, convirtiéndose de facto en una economía planificada"
"En la República de Salo Mussolini socializó los medios de producción y los puso en manos del pueblo"
Define el fascismo como lo opuesto al "capitalismo liberal", no al comunismo. Dice que el fascismo es el "socialismo real" y que los comunistas no eran lo suficientemente socialistas (socializaron todo, pero este fascista quiere la medalla de oro de ser el más rojo de los rojos).
Lo que está diciendo aquí es que cree que los fascistas son mejores socialistas que los comunistas.
Él dice:
"Las corporaciones estatales supervisaron, dirigieron, controlaron y planificaron todos los aspectos de la economía, convirtiéndose de facto en una economía planificada"
"En la República de Salo Mussolini socializó los medios de producción y los puso en manos del pueblo"
Define el fascismo como lo opuesto al "capitalismo liberal", no al comunismo. Dice que el fascismo es el "socialismo real" y que los comunistas no eran lo suficientemente socialistas (socializaron todo, pero este fascista quiere la medalla de oro de ser el más rojo de los rojos).
👌8