This seals the deal. Hitler portrayed Germans as the oppressed underdogs of the White world struggling for status, essentially a rip off of Lenin's phony "proletarian anti-imperialism".
> "In his 1940 New Year’s Day address Hitler asserted that the aim of the “Jewish-capitalist world enemy” was to “destroy Germany” and “the German people”. This was because the Third Reich represented a youthful, dynamic and popular challenge to the international ruling elite, which he understood in national and generational rather than class terms. The Germans, Hitler claimed in late January 1940, were one of the “young peoples” of the world. They were challenging the “so-called propertied classes among the people” who had “robbed” Germany and were simply sitting on their ill-gotten gains. On this reading, the Germans were, so to speak, at best the poor whites of the international system. In this spirit, Hitler professed sympathy with the other wretched of the earth who groaned under the weight of imperialism and capitalism, particularly that of the British Empire. His empathy extended to not merely the Nordic Boers, but also the decidedly non-Aryan Arabs. Hitler reminded his listeners again that it was the British who “invented the concentration camp”, and argued that the blockade of Germany was simply the latest version of the age-old method of waging war against women and children."
Remember that he said this while he was brutally colonizing parts of Poland, Ukraine and Russia.
> "In his 1940 New Year’s Day address Hitler asserted that the aim of the “Jewish-capitalist world enemy” was to “destroy Germany” and “the German people”. This was because the Third Reich represented a youthful, dynamic and popular challenge to the international ruling elite, which he understood in national and generational rather than class terms. The Germans, Hitler claimed in late January 1940, were one of the “young peoples” of the world. They were challenging the “so-called propertied classes among the people” who had “robbed” Germany and were simply sitting on their ill-gotten gains. On this reading, the Germans were, so to speak, at best the poor whites of the international system. In this spirit, Hitler professed sympathy with the other wretched of the earth who groaned under the weight of imperialism and capitalism, particularly that of the British Empire. His empathy extended to not merely the Nordic Boers, but also the decidedly non-Aryan Arabs. Hitler reminded his listeners again that it was the British who “invented the concentration camp”, and argued that the blockade of Germany was simply the latest version of the age-old method of waging war against women and children."
Remember that he said this while he was brutally colonizing parts of Poland, Ukraine and Russia.
🫡8
Brendan Simms recorded Hitler's inferiority complex with Britain and America.
> "Hitler also read independently about American buildings. When Wiedemann visited the US in late 1937, he brought back architectural books for the Führer, whose ambition was to counter the German ‘inferiority complex’. The gigantism of Hitler’s vision for Germany was primarily driven by his preoccupation with the size of the United States and its monuments. The new Berlin, in other words, was being designed to equal and surpass not just its European rivals but Washington, D.C."
> "Sensitive to the (completely justified) charge that he had an inferiority complex towards Britain, Hitler pushed back vigorously. ‘I don’t suffer in the least from a sense of inferiority,’ he protested two weeks later. Anybody familiar with Hitler’s writings and speeches over the previous twenty years, however, would have known that the Führer was protesting too much."
> "Hitler also read independently about American buildings. When Wiedemann visited the US in late 1937, he brought back architectural books for the Führer, whose ambition was to counter the German ‘inferiority complex’. The gigantism of Hitler’s vision for Germany was primarily driven by his preoccupation with the size of the United States and its monuments. The new Berlin, in other words, was being designed to equal and surpass not just its European rivals but Washington, D.C."
> "Sensitive to the (completely justified) charge that he had an inferiority complex towards Britain, Hitler pushed back vigorously. ‘I don’t suffer in the least from a sense of inferiority,’ he protested two weeks later. Anybody familiar with Hitler’s writings and speeches over the previous twenty years, however, would have known that the Führer was protesting too much."
🫡8
Goebbels said in 1939 that they are fighting England because it is capitalist and they are trying to bring about socialism. Very clear statements putting them on the side of Marxism/Communism against any form of capitalism.
> "So when Chamberlain says that England wants to destroy Hitlerism in this war, he is in one sense incorrect. But in another sense, he is speaking the truth. England does want to destroy Hitlerism. It sees Hitlerism as the present internal state of the Reich, which is a thorn in the eye of English plutocracy. England is a capitalist democracy. Germany is a socialist people’s state. And it is not the case that we think England is the richest land on earth. There are lords and City men in England who are in fact the richest men on earth. The broad masses, however, see little of this wealth."
> "The German people were once victims of lying English war propaganda. Now it understands the situation. It has long understood the background of this war. It knows that behind all English plutocratic capitalism’s fine words, its aim is to destroy Germany’s social achievements. We are defending the socialism we have build in Germany since 1933 with every military, economic and spiritual means at our disposal. The bald English lies have no impact on the German people. English plutocracy is finally being forced to defend itself. In the past, it always found other nations to fight for it. This time, the English people must themselves risk their necks for the lords and City men. They will meet a unified German people of workers, farmers, and soldiers who are prepared to defend their nation with every means at their disposal. We did not want war. England inflicted it on us. English plutocracy forced it on us. England is responsible for the war, and it will have to pay for it. The whole world is waking up today. It can no longer be ruled by the capitalist methods of the 19th century. The peoples have matured. They will one day deal a terrible blow to the capitalist plutocrats who are the cause of their misery."
Germany started the war by invading Poland and then Goebbels blames England for not letting them invade Poland, then spergs endlessly about capitalism, bankers and city men. Goebbels was always a raging Marxist who hated capitalism most of all. He said he'd "rather go down with Bolshevism than capitalism" and said "the difference between Communism and the Hitler faith was very slight".
Follow @redideologies
> "So when Chamberlain says that England wants to destroy Hitlerism in this war, he is in one sense incorrect. But in another sense, he is speaking the truth. England does want to destroy Hitlerism. It sees Hitlerism as the present internal state of the Reich, which is a thorn in the eye of English plutocracy. England is a capitalist democracy. Germany is a socialist people’s state. And it is not the case that we think England is the richest land on earth. There are lords and City men in England who are in fact the richest men on earth. The broad masses, however, see little of this wealth."
> "The German people were once victims of lying English war propaganda. Now it understands the situation. It has long understood the background of this war. It knows that behind all English plutocratic capitalism’s fine words, its aim is to destroy Germany’s social achievements. We are defending the socialism we have build in Germany since 1933 with every military, economic and spiritual means at our disposal. The bald English lies have no impact on the German people. English plutocracy is finally being forced to defend itself. In the past, it always found other nations to fight for it. This time, the English people must themselves risk their necks for the lords and City men. They will meet a unified German people of workers, farmers, and soldiers who are prepared to defend their nation with every means at their disposal. We did not want war. England inflicted it on us. English plutocracy forced it on us. England is responsible for the war, and it will have to pay for it. The whole world is waking up today. It can no longer be ruled by the capitalist methods of the 19th century. The peoples have matured. They will one day deal a terrible blow to the capitalist plutocrats who are the cause of their misery."
Germany started the war by invading Poland and then Goebbels blames England for not letting them invade Poland, then spergs endlessly about capitalism, bankers and city men. Goebbels was always a raging Marxist who hated capitalism most of all. He said he'd "rather go down with Bolshevism than capitalism" and said "the difference between Communism and the Hitler faith was very slight".
Follow @redideologies
🫡7🔥3👍1
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Natsoc approves of the Night of the Long Knives for getting rid of the "beefsteak faction".
Problem is, all Nazis are beefsteaks (red on inside brown on outside aka communists with a swastika). It is a beefsteak ideology. Hitler kept Goebbels and Eichmann around, both of whom were "beefsteaks" part of that Strasser faction until Hitler quelled it for reasons of rivalry and nothing more. As time passed Hitler became more and more amenable to the Soviet planned economy model.
Hitler also knew Rohm was a homosexual for years and did not care, even defended him.
Why are these people so self-deluded into thinking they're different from beefsteaks when they promote the exact same economic ideas of the beefsteaks (command economy)?
@redideologies
Problem is, all Nazis are beefsteaks (red on inside brown on outside aka communists with a swastika). It is a beefsteak ideology. Hitler kept Goebbels and Eichmann around, both of whom were "beefsteaks" part of that Strasser faction until Hitler quelled it for reasons of rivalry and nothing more. As time passed Hitler became more and more amenable to the Soviet planned economy model.
Hitler also knew Rohm was a homosexual for years and did not care, even defended him.
Why are these people so self-deluded into thinking they're different from beefsteaks when they promote the exact same economic ideas of the beefsteaks (command economy)?
@redideologies
👌9👏7
Hitler aimed for a classless society and volkisch equality.
Source: Killing History
Follow @redideologies
Source: Killing History
Follow @redideologies
🫡9👍2
Profit principle virtually abolished in Italy and Germany under fascism.
Source: Killing History
Follow @redideologies
Source: Killing History
Follow @redideologies
🫡10👍4👏2
Hitler's involvement with the Bavarian Soviet Republic. He held an elected position in the Raterepublik government under the complete control of the Communist Party of Germany.
Source: Killing History
Follow @redideologies
Source: Killing History
Follow @redideologies
🫡7👍2
Hitler says clearly that he wanted a movement made up mostly of not intelligent lower class people because they are "easier to discipline" (i.e., they're lemmings).
He wanted manual labourers not doctors or lawyers who would be amenable to simple messaging and propaganda.
Hitler regarded it the main task of the party to "gain the lower masses."
He didn't want to draw too heavily from the intelligentsia because they were more likely to rebel against his plans.
Follow @redideologies
He wanted manual labourers not doctors or lawyers who would be amenable to simple messaging and propaganda.
Hitler regarded it the main task of the party to "gain the lower masses."
He didn't want to draw too heavily from the intelligentsia because they were more likely to rebel against his plans.
Follow @redideologies
🫡7👏1💯1
Red Ideologies
Hitler says clearly that he wanted a movement made up mostly of not intelligent lower class people because they are "easier to discipline" (i.e., they're lemmings). He wanted manual labourers not doctors or lawyers who would be amenable to simple messaging…
This is consistent with what we see from the Natsoc movements today. They recruit almost exclusively from the lower classes of manual laborers and not educated people. They also recruit heavily from prisons as criminals make for good cannon fodder on the front lines.
👌9💯1
Part of Hitler's reasoning to invade the USSR was his belief in the Marxist-inspired "shrinking markets" idea... that as countries industrialized, they would cease to function as export markets for German goods.... so Hitler decided he needed to conquer the territory and resources required to fuel his economy.
> "Hitler adhered to a theory that was also advocated by Marxist theorists such as Rosa Luxemburg and Nicholai Bukharin, the “shrinking markets” theory. Hitler considered the path that German companies had adopted, which had made them dependent on exports, to be a major mistake. In Hitler’s opinion, sales markets would continue to shrink as a result of the industrialization of former agrarian countries. Therefore, focusing on exports would lead to a dead end; only Lebensraum in the East could solve Germany’s problems."
> "Is this not proof that World War II was waged in the interests of capitalism? On the contrary. Hitler, after all, firmly rejected what he called the strategy of the “economically peaceful conquest of the world.” In his opinion, the German economy’s strong dependence on exports was a dangerous misjudgment. Hitler wanted to make Germany autarky, independent of the world economy by conquering new “Lebensraum in the East.”"
Article
Follow @redideologies
> "Hitler adhered to a theory that was also advocated by Marxist theorists such as Rosa Luxemburg and Nicholai Bukharin, the “shrinking markets” theory. Hitler considered the path that German companies had adopted, which had made them dependent on exports, to be a major mistake. In Hitler’s opinion, sales markets would continue to shrink as a result of the industrialization of former agrarian countries. Therefore, focusing on exports would lead to a dead end; only Lebensraum in the East could solve Germany’s problems."
> "Is this not proof that World War II was waged in the interests of capitalism? On the contrary. Hitler, after all, firmly rejected what he called the strategy of the “economically peaceful conquest of the world.” In his opinion, the German economy’s strong dependence on exports was a dangerous misjudgment. Hitler wanted to make Germany autarky, independent of the world economy by conquering new “Lebensraum in the East.”"
Article
Follow @redideologies
🫡8👍4
Goebbels said "our struggle against Bolshevism is not a struggle against socialism, but for it".
Hitler's socialism was "of the same character as that of Lenin".
Follow @redideologies
Hitler's socialism was "of the same character as that of Lenin".
Follow @redideologies
🫡10👍3
Fascism is a sister ideology of Communism, born of the same mother: Marxism.
👌9⚡4💯4🏆1