Hitler opposed virtually all capitalism and preached a variant of racialized Marxism in its stead.
> "Moreover, in Hitler’s view the war was by no means over. Germany was still the victim of international capitalism, whose continuing power he repeatedly attacked. He spoke of “international stock exchange and loan capital” as the main “beneficiaries” of the peace treaty [of Versailles]. Ever since the “collapse of the Reich”, Hitler claimed, the country had fallen under “the rule of international, fatherlandless capital, independent of person, place and Nation”. International conferences – such as Genoa in April 1922 – were simply condemned as “stock exchange conferences”. Hitler saw Jewish international capitalism and western democracy as linked. “International Jewish stock exchange capital”, he believed, “was the driving force of these western-democratic states”. He set up the “equation” of “democracy-capitalism-Jew”. For all these reasons, he argued, National Socialism was a “new force whose aim could always only be anti-capitalist”."
> "Hitler was not completely opposed to all forms of capitalism, though he sometimes gave that impression. He contrasted the blanket hostility of Social Democrats and Marxists to capitalism in general with his own distinction between allegedly pernicious and largely Jewish “international loan capitalism” and nationally oriented “productive industrial capitalism”. “Factories and industrial capital,” he told an audience of SA, are national and “the capital of every country remains national”. For clarity, he stressed that National Socialism “struggled against every form of big capital, irrespective of whether it is German or Jewish, if it is grounded not in productive work, but in the principle of interest, of income without work or toil”. .. In Hitler’s view it was the determination of international capitalism to subjugate independent national economies which had led to the world war and the brutal peace settlement."
So he opposed capitalism in principle, whereas he did not oppose Bolshevism in principle only if it were led by Jews, as revealed by his private statement that Stalin had Russified Bolshevism and thus improved it.
> "The main danger of Germany’s internal weakness was that it made her vulnerable to external attack, especially from the enemies that Hitler feared most: international capitalism, Anglo-America and the associated forces of world Jewry. Hitler critiqued the economics of inequality and exploitation, the “jarring juxtaposition of poor and rich so close to each other”, the “role of money” in which “money [became] God” and “the false God of Mammon was offered incense”. He became increasingly convinced that “the heaviest battle to be fought was no longer against enemy peoples but against international capital”. Here Hitler insisted more than ever on his earlier distinction between national capital, which the state could control, and pernicious international capital, which controlled states or sought to do so. One of its principal instruments of subjugation was revolutionary Marxism, which undermined national economies, societies and governments. Others were economic immiseration and racial contamination, both of which also reduced the capacity of nations to resist international takeover. For Hitler, maintaining an independent national economy was therefore absolutely central to the defense of national identity, sovereignty and racial purity."
His statements are delusional as he tries to pass off Marxism onto capitalism despite the fact that he strongly endorses the main tenets of Marxism here in his own words. Against "inequality" of outcome, wanting more equality in distribution of wealth, national capital must be controlled by the state.... all things communists want too.
> "Moreover, in Hitler’s view the war was by no means over. Germany was still the victim of international capitalism, whose continuing power he repeatedly attacked. He spoke of “international stock exchange and loan capital” as the main “beneficiaries” of the peace treaty [of Versailles]. Ever since the “collapse of the Reich”, Hitler claimed, the country had fallen under “the rule of international, fatherlandless capital, independent of person, place and Nation”. International conferences – such as Genoa in April 1922 – were simply condemned as “stock exchange conferences”. Hitler saw Jewish international capitalism and western democracy as linked. “International Jewish stock exchange capital”, he believed, “was the driving force of these western-democratic states”. He set up the “equation” of “democracy-capitalism-Jew”. For all these reasons, he argued, National Socialism was a “new force whose aim could always only be anti-capitalist”."
> "Hitler was not completely opposed to all forms of capitalism, though he sometimes gave that impression. He contrasted the blanket hostility of Social Democrats and Marxists to capitalism in general with his own distinction between allegedly pernicious and largely Jewish “international loan capitalism” and nationally oriented “productive industrial capitalism”. “Factories and industrial capital,” he told an audience of SA, are national and “the capital of every country remains national”. For clarity, he stressed that National Socialism “struggled against every form of big capital, irrespective of whether it is German or Jewish, if it is grounded not in productive work, but in the principle of interest, of income without work or toil”. .. In Hitler’s view it was the determination of international capitalism to subjugate independent national economies which had led to the world war and the brutal peace settlement."
So he opposed capitalism in principle, whereas he did not oppose Bolshevism in principle only if it were led by Jews, as revealed by his private statement that Stalin had Russified Bolshevism and thus improved it.
> "The main danger of Germany’s internal weakness was that it made her vulnerable to external attack, especially from the enemies that Hitler feared most: international capitalism, Anglo-America and the associated forces of world Jewry. Hitler critiqued the economics of inequality and exploitation, the “jarring juxtaposition of poor and rich so close to each other”, the “role of money” in which “money [became] God” and “the false God of Mammon was offered incense”. He became increasingly convinced that “the heaviest battle to be fought was no longer against enemy peoples but against international capital”. Here Hitler insisted more than ever on his earlier distinction between national capital, which the state could control, and pernicious international capital, which controlled states or sought to do so. One of its principal instruments of subjugation was revolutionary Marxism, which undermined national economies, societies and governments. Others were economic immiseration and racial contamination, both of which also reduced the capacity of nations to resist international takeover. For Hitler, maintaining an independent national economy was therefore absolutely central to the defense of national identity, sovereignty and racial purity."
His statements are delusional as he tries to pass off Marxism onto capitalism despite the fact that he strongly endorses the main tenets of Marxism here in his own words. Against "inequality" of outcome, wanting more equality in distribution of wealth, national capital must be controlled by the state.... all things communists want too.
🫡6
> "Hitler violently objected to international capitalism even when it was not Jewish, but he assigned the Jews a particularly malevolent role within the global capitalist system. In Mein Kampf, as in his earlier rhetoric, Jews were inseparably linked with money and the whole capitalist system as “traders”, as “middlemen”, who levied an “extortionate rate of interest” for their “financial deals”. Jewry, he claimed, aimed at nothing less than the “financial domination of the entire economy”. Yet because “a Bolshevized world can only survive if it encompasses everything,” a “single independent state” – such as a revived Germany – could bring the whole juggernaut to a standstill."
Follow @redideologies
Follow @redideologies
🫡7
As the war continued and England did not give up, Hitler moved deeper into a racialized form of Marxist ideology, declaring the struggle "proletarian nations" vs the "plutocratic" ones.
> "Now that he had given up all hopes of a British alliance, and of accommodation with Anglo-America, his language shifted from that of Nordic solidarity to that of a global class conflict in which he substituted nations for the classic Marxist social categories. The United States and the British Empire, on this reading, were the “haves”, the lords of all they surveyed. The Germans, by contrast, were firmly among the “have-nots”, ground down by the forces of “plutocracy”, which were determined to extirpate the contagious social model of the Nazi Volksstaat."
He then tried to pass off the idea that the reason Britain fought on was because it was afraid of Nazi welfarism being exported to their own country.
> "He inveighed against the “money magnates”, the “Jewish and non-Jewish international bank barons” who were trying to destroy the Germany of the “welfare laws for workers” which had “removed class distinctions” in the Reich and eliminated unemployment. So fearful were Germany’s enemies of this model of “welfare and social compromise”, he claimed, that they fear “that their own people might be infected by it”. In this respect, apparently, Nazism was for export after all. The regime attached such importance to this passage in Hitler’s speech that it was reprinted in the official journal of the Reich Labor Ministry shortly afterwards."
Goebbels and Robert Ley repeated the same themes:
> "Nazi propaganda and officials such as Robert Ley describe Germany as a 'proletarian nation' as opposed to plutocratic England, a political divide that Goebbels described as "England is a capitalist democracy" and "Germany is a socialist people's state.'"
> "Now that he had given up all hopes of a British alliance, and of accommodation with Anglo-America, his language shifted from that of Nordic solidarity to that of a global class conflict in which he substituted nations for the classic Marxist social categories. The United States and the British Empire, on this reading, were the “haves”, the lords of all they surveyed. The Germans, by contrast, were firmly among the “have-nots”, ground down by the forces of “plutocracy”, which were determined to extirpate the contagious social model of the Nazi Volksstaat."
He then tried to pass off the idea that the reason Britain fought on was because it was afraid of Nazi welfarism being exported to their own country.
> "He inveighed against the “money magnates”, the “Jewish and non-Jewish international bank barons” who were trying to destroy the Germany of the “welfare laws for workers” which had “removed class distinctions” in the Reich and eliminated unemployment. So fearful were Germany’s enemies of this model of “welfare and social compromise”, he claimed, that they fear “that their own people might be infected by it”. In this respect, apparently, Nazism was for export after all. The regime attached such importance to this passage in Hitler’s speech that it was reprinted in the official journal of the Reich Labor Ministry shortly afterwards."
Goebbels and Robert Ley repeated the same themes:
> "Nazi propaganda and officials such as Robert Ley describe Germany as a 'proletarian nation' as opposed to plutocratic England, a political divide that Goebbels described as "England is a capitalist democracy" and "Germany is a socialist people's state.'"
🫡7
This seals the deal. Hitler portrayed Germans as the oppressed underdogs of the White world struggling for status, essentially a rip off of Lenin's phony "proletarian anti-imperialism".
> "In his 1940 New Year’s Day address Hitler asserted that the aim of the “Jewish-capitalist world enemy” was to “destroy Germany” and “the German people”. This was because the Third Reich represented a youthful, dynamic and popular challenge to the international ruling elite, which he understood in national and generational rather than class terms. The Germans, Hitler claimed in late January 1940, were one of the “young peoples” of the world. They were challenging the “so-called propertied classes among the people” who had “robbed” Germany and were simply sitting on their ill-gotten gains. On this reading, the Germans were, so to speak, at best the poor whites of the international system. In this spirit, Hitler professed sympathy with the other wretched of the earth who groaned under the weight of imperialism and capitalism, particularly that of the British Empire. His empathy extended to not merely the Nordic Boers, but also the decidedly non-Aryan Arabs. Hitler reminded his listeners again that it was the British who “invented the concentration camp”, and argued that the blockade of Germany was simply the latest version of the age-old method of waging war against women and children."
Remember that he said this while he was brutally colonizing parts of Poland, Ukraine and Russia.
> "In his 1940 New Year’s Day address Hitler asserted that the aim of the “Jewish-capitalist world enemy” was to “destroy Germany” and “the German people”. This was because the Third Reich represented a youthful, dynamic and popular challenge to the international ruling elite, which he understood in national and generational rather than class terms. The Germans, Hitler claimed in late January 1940, were one of the “young peoples” of the world. They were challenging the “so-called propertied classes among the people” who had “robbed” Germany and were simply sitting on their ill-gotten gains. On this reading, the Germans were, so to speak, at best the poor whites of the international system. In this spirit, Hitler professed sympathy with the other wretched of the earth who groaned under the weight of imperialism and capitalism, particularly that of the British Empire. His empathy extended to not merely the Nordic Boers, but also the decidedly non-Aryan Arabs. Hitler reminded his listeners again that it was the British who “invented the concentration camp”, and argued that the blockade of Germany was simply the latest version of the age-old method of waging war against women and children."
Remember that he said this while he was brutally colonizing parts of Poland, Ukraine and Russia.
🫡8
Brendan Simms recorded Hitler's inferiority complex with Britain and America.
> "Hitler also read independently about American buildings. When Wiedemann visited the US in late 1937, he brought back architectural books for the Führer, whose ambition was to counter the German ‘inferiority complex’. The gigantism of Hitler’s vision for Germany was primarily driven by his preoccupation with the size of the United States and its monuments. The new Berlin, in other words, was being designed to equal and surpass not just its European rivals but Washington, D.C."
> "Sensitive to the (completely justified) charge that he had an inferiority complex towards Britain, Hitler pushed back vigorously. ‘I don’t suffer in the least from a sense of inferiority,’ he protested two weeks later. Anybody familiar with Hitler’s writings and speeches over the previous twenty years, however, would have known that the Führer was protesting too much."
> "Hitler also read independently about American buildings. When Wiedemann visited the US in late 1937, he brought back architectural books for the Führer, whose ambition was to counter the German ‘inferiority complex’. The gigantism of Hitler’s vision for Germany was primarily driven by his preoccupation with the size of the United States and its monuments. The new Berlin, in other words, was being designed to equal and surpass not just its European rivals but Washington, D.C."
> "Sensitive to the (completely justified) charge that he had an inferiority complex towards Britain, Hitler pushed back vigorously. ‘I don’t suffer in the least from a sense of inferiority,’ he protested two weeks later. Anybody familiar with Hitler’s writings and speeches over the previous twenty years, however, would have known that the Führer was protesting too much."
🫡8
Goebbels said in 1939 that they are fighting England because it is capitalist and they are trying to bring about socialism. Very clear statements putting them on the side of Marxism/Communism against any form of capitalism.
> "So when Chamberlain says that England wants to destroy Hitlerism in this war, he is in one sense incorrect. But in another sense, he is speaking the truth. England does want to destroy Hitlerism. It sees Hitlerism as the present internal state of the Reich, which is a thorn in the eye of English plutocracy. England is a capitalist democracy. Germany is a socialist people’s state. And it is not the case that we think England is the richest land on earth. There are lords and City men in England who are in fact the richest men on earth. The broad masses, however, see little of this wealth."
> "The German people were once victims of lying English war propaganda. Now it understands the situation. It has long understood the background of this war. It knows that behind all English plutocratic capitalism’s fine words, its aim is to destroy Germany’s social achievements. We are defending the socialism we have build in Germany since 1933 with every military, economic and spiritual means at our disposal. The bald English lies have no impact on the German people. English plutocracy is finally being forced to defend itself. In the past, it always found other nations to fight for it. This time, the English people must themselves risk their necks for the lords and City men. They will meet a unified German people of workers, farmers, and soldiers who are prepared to defend their nation with every means at their disposal. We did not want war. England inflicted it on us. English plutocracy forced it on us. England is responsible for the war, and it will have to pay for it. The whole world is waking up today. It can no longer be ruled by the capitalist methods of the 19th century. The peoples have matured. They will one day deal a terrible blow to the capitalist plutocrats who are the cause of their misery."
Germany started the war by invading Poland and then Goebbels blames England for not letting them invade Poland, then spergs endlessly about capitalism, bankers and city men. Goebbels was always a raging Marxist who hated capitalism most of all. He said he'd "rather go down with Bolshevism than capitalism" and said "the difference between Communism and the Hitler faith was very slight".
Follow @redideologies
> "So when Chamberlain says that England wants to destroy Hitlerism in this war, he is in one sense incorrect. But in another sense, he is speaking the truth. England does want to destroy Hitlerism. It sees Hitlerism as the present internal state of the Reich, which is a thorn in the eye of English plutocracy. England is a capitalist democracy. Germany is a socialist people’s state. And it is not the case that we think England is the richest land on earth. There are lords and City men in England who are in fact the richest men on earth. The broad masses, however, see little of this wealth."
> "The German people were once victims of lying English war propaganda. Now it understands the situation. It has long understood the background of this war. It knows that behind all English plutocratic capitalism’s fine words, its aim is to destroy Germany’s social achievements. We are defending the socialism we have build in Germany since 1933 with every military, economic and spiritual means at our disposal. The bald English lies have no impact on the German people. English plutocracy is finally being forced to defend itself. In the past, it always found other nations to fight for it. This time, the English people must themselves risk their necks for the lords and City men. They will meet a unified German people of workers, farmers, and soldiers who are prepared to defend their nation with every means at their disposal. We did not want war. England inflicted it on us. English plutocracy forced it on us. England is responsible for the war, and it will have to pay for it. The whole world is waking up today. It can no longer be ruled by the capitalist methods of the 19th century. The peoples have matured. They will one day deal a terrible blow to the capitalist plutocrats who are the cause of their misery."
Germany started the war by invading Poland and then Goebbels blames England for not letting them invade Poland, then spergs endlessly about capitalism, bankers and city men. Goebbels was always a raging Marxist who hated capitalism most of all. He said he'd "rather go down with Bolshevism than capitalism" and said "the difference between Communism and the Hitler faith was very slight".
Follow @redideologies
🫡7🔥3👍1
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Natsoc approves of the Night of the Long Knives for getting rid of the "beefsteak faction".
Problem is, all Nazis are beefsteaks (red on inside brown on outside aka communists with a swastika). It is a beefsteak ideology. Hitler kept Goebbels and Eichmann around, both of whom were "beefsteaks" part of that Strasser faction until Hitler quelled it for reasons of rivalry and nothing more. As time passed Hitler became more and more amenable to the Soviet planned economy model.
Hitler also knew Rohm was a homosexual for years and did not care, even defended him.
Why are these people so self-deluded into thinking they're different from beefsteaks when they promote the exact same economic ideas of the beefsteaks (command economy)?
@redideologies
Problem is, all Nazis are beefsteaks (red on inside brown on outside aka communists with a swastika). It is a beefsteak ideology. Hitler kept Goebbels and Eichmann around, both of whom were "beefsteaks" part of that Strasser faction until Hitler quelled it for reasons of rivalry and nothing more. As time passed Hitler became more and more amenable to the Soviet planned economy model.
Hitler also knew Rohm was a homosexual for years and did not care, even defended him.
Why are these people so self-deluded into thinking they're different from beefsteaks when they promote the exact same economic ideas of the beefsteaks (command economy)?
@redideologies
👌9👏7
Hitler aimed for a classless society and volkisch equality.
Source: Killing History
Follow @redideologies
Source: Killing History
Follow @redideologies
🫡9👍2
Profit principle virtually abolished in Italy and Germany under fascism.
Source: Killing History
Follow @redideologies
Source: Killing History
Follow @redideologies
🫡10👍4👏2
Hitler's involvement with the Bavarian Soviet Republic. He held an elected position in the Raterepublik government under the complete control of the Communist Party of Germany.
Source: Killing History
Follow @redideologies
Source: Killing History
Follow @redideologies
🫡7👍2
Hitler says clearly that he wanted a movement made up mostly of not intelligent lower class people because they are "easier to discipline" (i.e., they're lemmings).
He wanted manual labourers not doctors or lawyers who would be amenable to simple messaging and propaganda.
Hitler regarded it the main task of the party to "gain the lower masses."
He didn't want to draw too heavily from the intelligentsia because they were more likely to rebel against his plans.
Follow @redideologies
He wanted manual labourers not doctors or lawyers who would be amenable to simple messaging and propaganda.
Hitler regarded it the main task of the party to "gain the lower masses."
He didn't want to draw too heavily from the intelligentsia because they were more likely to rebel against his plans.
Follow @redideologies
🫡7👏1💯1
Red Ideologies
Hitler says clearly that he wanted a movement made up mostly of not intelligent lower class people because they are "easier to discipline" (i.e., they're lemmings). He wanted manual labourers not doctors or lawyers who would be amenable to simple messaging…
This is consistent with what we see from the Natsoc movements today. They recruit almost exclusively from the lower classes of manual laborers and not educated people. They also recruit heavily from prisons as criminals make for good cannon fodder on the front lines.
👌9💯1
Part of Hitler's reasoning to invade the USSR was his belief in the Marxist-inspired "shrinking markets" idea... that as countries industrialized, they would cease to function as export markets for German goods.... so Hitler decided he needed to conquer the territory and resources required to fuel his economy.
> "Hitler adhered to a theory that was also advocated by Marxist theorists such as Rosa Luxemburg and Nicholai Bukharin, the “shrinking markets” theory. Hitler considered the path that German companies had adopted, which had made them dependent on exports, to be a major mistake. In Hitler’s opinion, sales markets would continue to shrink as a result of the industrialization of former agrarian countries. Therefore, focusing on exports would lead to a dead end; only Lebensraum in the East could solve Germany’s problems."
> "Is this not proof that World War II was waged in the interests of capitalism? On the contrary. Hitler, after all, firmly rejected what he called the strategy of the “economically peaceful conquest of the world.” In his opinion, the German economy’s strong dependence on exports was a dangerous misjudgment. Hitler wanted to make Germany autarky, independent of the world economy by conquering new “Lebensraum in the East.”"
Article
Follow @redideologies
> "Hitler adhered to a theory that was also advocated by Marxist theorists such as Rosa Luxemburg and Nicholai Bukharin, the “shrinking markets” theory. Hitler considered the path that German companies had adopted, which had made them dependent on exports, to be a major mistake. In Hitler’s opinion, sales markets would continue to shrink as a result of the industrialization of former agrarian countries. Therefore, focusing on exports would lead to a dead end; only Lebensraum in the East could solve Germany’s problems."
> "Is this not proof that World War II was waged in the interests of capitalism? On the contrary. Hitler, after all, firmly rejected what he called the strategy of the “economically peaceful conquest of the world.” In his opinion, the German economy’s strong dependence on exports was a dangerous misjudgment. Hitler wanted to make Germany autarky, independent of the world economy by conquering new “Lebensraum in the East.”"
Article
Follow @redideologies
🫡8👍4
Goebbels said "our struggle against Bolshevism is not a struggle against socialism, but for it".
Hitler's socialism was "of the same character as that of Lenin".
Follow @redideologies
Hitler's socialism was "of the same character as that of Lenin".
Follow @redideologies
🫡10👍3