Red Ideologies
1.37K subscribers
607 photos
144 videos
2 files
443 links
Documenting the extensive links between Red and Brown ideologies
Download Telegram
Historian says that national and internationalism socialism is "a distinction without a difference."

> "As Bullock shuttles between his two subjects, he continues to refute commentators who have treated Stalinism and Nazism as diametrically opposed ideologies by labeling the first internationalist and the second nationalist. In fact, those terms were, in this pairing, a distinction without a difference. Both regimes were chauvinistic and expansionist, and both were police states with one-man rule and a reliance on terror, concentration camps and the Big Lie. Hitler believed that the Third Reich would endure a thousand years. It lasted a dozen. For the first eight, he and Stalin, while geopolitical rivals, sometimes found common ground. Hitler’s minions admired and copied some of Stalin’s techniques of spying and liquidating enemies."

Article

Follow @redideologies
👌6👍5
Forwarded from Martinez Politics
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
👌8🔥2
A passage from Brendan Simms book on Hitler tells us that Hitler was intending to continue waging war on England after they defeated Russia:

> "[In mid August 1942] the Lebensraum and resource objectives of the Russian campaign appeared on the verge of realization…. Yet even at the pinnacle of his power, as autumn loomed, and the decisive blow eluded him, the Fuhrer was beginning to draw back. His strategy, he explained to Raeder on 26 August 1942, was to crush Russia and thereby secure a 'blockade-proof and defensible Lebensraum from which the war could be waged [against the Anglo-Americans] for many more years'. This would enable the Führer to determine the 'outcome and length' of the broader war, which he defined as the 'battle against the Anglo-Saxon seapowers', in order to make them 'ready for peace'. In other words, victory in Russia would pave the way not for world domination but for a negotiated peace with Anglo-America."

Follow @redideologies
🫡7
Hitler outlined his struggle in explicitly Marxist terms, identifying Germans as the poor, oppressed Whites and the "propertied classes" as its enemies:

> "In his 1940 New Year’s Day address Hitler asserted that the aim of the “Jewish-capitalist world enemy” was to “destroy Germany” and “the German people”. This was because the Third Reich represented a youthful, dynamic and popular challenge to the international ruling elite, which he understood in national and generational rather than class terms. The Germans, Hitler claimed in late January 1940, were one of the “young peoples” of the world. They were challenging the “so-called propertied classes among the people” who had “robbed” Germany and were simply sitting on their ill-gotten gains. On this reading, the Germans were, so to speak, at best the poor whites of the international system. In this spirit, Hitler professed sympathy with the other wretched of the earth who groaned under the weight of imperialism and capitalism, particularly that of the British Empire. His empathy extended to not merely the Nordic Boers, but also the decidedly non-Aryan Arabs. Hitler reminded his listeners again that it was the British who “invented the concentration camp”, and argued that the blockade of Germany was simply the latest version of the age-old method of waging war against women and children."

Source: Brendan Simms, Hitler: A Global Biography

By the 1940s Hitler clearly embraced a form of Maoist Third Worldism. As he was doing an imperialism and colonialism of his own in Eastern Europe and Russia (Lebensraum), he denounced Britain for its colonialism. As he was stealing the land and resources of other nations, he cried about England and France doing this to brown people in the third world.

Follow @redideologies
🫡6👍3
From Brendan Simms again:

> "Conscious that he was asking ever more of his soldiers and the German people, the Fuhrer reminded them of what they were fighting for, and why young men were being sent thousands of miles away from their homes. In February 1942, he already let slip that they might have to fight their way to the Caucasus. Now, as the final touches were being put to the plan, he returned to his primary war aims in two speeches in April and May 1942. The Germans, Hitler argued, were a “subjugated” people who had been put in “chains” by “democracy”, the “Jewish brain trusts” and “stock exchanges and banks”, supported by Bolshevism. In order to secure their “daily bread in order to live” as “have-nots”, they would have to confront the international “propertied” class. This was a global enemy, but Hitler announced it would be beaten in Russia. “The east is the battlefield,” he explained, “in which the outcome will be decided.” It was there, Hitler told another audience of officer cadets in late May 1942, that Germany would find the resources and the living space to prevent itself from disappearing off the face of the earth."

Confirmation that the war was about "resources and living space," that Hitler was primarily anti-capitalist and that his anti-Bolshevism was a false ruse to justify a pre-meditated land-grab in Russia. It's hilarious that lunatic imperialist Hitler tries to justify his own theft of land and resources from other people as he decries the "propertied classes" as thieves for simply owning land or resources that he wants. So his entire foreign policy is based on theft and conquest while decrying voluntary exchange in markets (capitalism) as theft. Classic Marxist talking points.

Follow @redideologies
🫡6👍2
Hitler aimed for world domination.

> "We National Socialists must go still further: The right to land and soil becomes a duty when a great nation seems destined to go under, unless its land is extended. Germany will either be a world power, or not at all. But in order to become a world power, it needs that size which gives it the necessary importance today, and gives life to its citizens." - Mein Kampf

> "there will be but two possibilities either the world will be governed according to the ideas of our modern democracy, and then the weight of any decision will result in favor of the numerically stronger races, or the world will be dominated in accordance with the laws of the natural order of force, and then it is the peoples of brutal will who will conquer, and consequently once again not the nation of self-restriction." - Mein Kampf

> "you know the Anglo-Saxons have the mission to govern the people they have subdued, precisely in the name of their superiority. The Nordic race is called to dominate the world, and this right must guide our foreign policy. It’s why we cannot envision any rapprochement with Russia" - Hitler in discussion with Otto Strasser, 1930

> "Mister Hitler agreed with me on the primacy of Germany’s interests in the matter of foreign policy. In his eyes, an entente with England corresponded with this imperative, the goal was the Nordic domination of Europe, and through America Nordic-Germanic domination of the world." - Hitler in discussion with Otto Strasser, 1930

Follow @redideologies
🫡6👍2
Hitler opposed virtually all capitalism and preached a variant of racialized Marxism in its stead.

> "Moreover, in Hitler’s view the war was by no means over. Germany was still the victim of international capitalism, whose continuing power he repeatedly attacked. He spoke of “international stock exchange and loan capital” as the main “beneficiaries” of the peace treaty [of Versailles]. Ever since the “collapse of the Reich”, Hitler claimed, the country had fallen under “the rule of international, fatherlandless capital, independent of person, place and Nation”. International conferences – such as Genoa in April 1922 – were simply condemned as “stock exchange conferences”. Hitler saw Jewish international capitalism and western democracy as linked. “International Jewish stock exchange capital”, he believed, “was the driving force of these western-democratic states”. He set up the “equation” of “democracy-capitalism-Jew”. For all these reasons, he argued, National Socialism was a “new force whose aim could always only be anti-capitalist”."

> "Hitler was not completely opposed to all forms of capitalism, though he sometimes gave that impression. He contrasted the blanket hostility of Social Democrats and Marxists to capitalism in general with his own distinction between allegedly pernicious and largely Jewish “international loan capitalism” and nationally oriented “productive industrial capitalism”. “Factories and industrial capital,” he told an audience of SA, are national and “the capital of every country remains national”. For clarity, he stressed that National Socialism “struggled against every form of big capital, irrespective of whether it is German or Jewish, if it is grounded not in productive work, but in the principle of interest, of income without work or toil”. .. In Hitler’s view it was the determination of international capitalism to subjugate independent national economies which had led to the world war and the brutal peace settlement."

So he opposed capitalism in principle, whereas he did not oppose Bolshevism in principle only if it were led by Jews, as revealed by his private statement that Stalin had Russified Bolshevism and thus improved it.

> "The main danger of Germany’s internal weakness was that it made her vulnerable to external attack, especially from the enemies that Hitler feared most: international capitalism, Anglo-America and the associated forces of world Jewry. Hitler critiqued the economics of inequality and exploitation, the “jarring juxtaposition of poor and rich so close to each other”, the “role of money” in which “money [became] God” and “the false God of Mammon was offered incense”. He became increasingly convinced that “the heaviest battle to be fought was no longer against enemy peoples but against international capital”. Here Hitler insisted more than ever on his earlier distinction between national capital, which the state could control, and pernicious international capital, which controlled states or sought to do so. One of its principal instruments of subjugation was revolutionary Marxism, which undermined national economies, societies and governments. Others were economic immiseration and racial contamination, both of which also reduced the capacity of nations to resist international takeover. For Hitler, maintaining an independent national economy was therefore absolutely central to the defense of national identity, sovereignty and racial purity."

His statements are delusional as he tries to pass off Marxism onto capitalism despite the fact that he strongly endorses the main tenets of Marxism here in his own words. Against "inequality" of outcome, wanting more equality in distribution of wealth, national capital must be controlled by the state.... all things communists want too.
🫡6
> "Hitler violently objected to international capitalism even when it was not Jewish, but he assigned the Jews a particularly malevolent role within the global capitalist system. In Mein Kampf, as in his earlier rhetoric, Jews were inseparably linked with money and the whole capitalist system as “traders”, as “middlemen”, who levied an “extortionate rate of interest” for their “financial deals”. Jewry, he claimed, aimed at nothing less than the “financial domination of the entire economy”. Yet because “a Bolshevized world can only survive if it encompasses everything,” a “single independent state” – such as a revived Germany – could bring the whole juggernaut to a standstill."

Follow @redideologies
🫡7
As the war continued and England did not give up, Hitler moved deeper into a racialized form of Marxist ideology, declaring the struggle "proletarian nations" vs the "plutocratic" ones.

> "Now that he had given up all hopes of a British alliance, and of accommodation with Anglo-America, his language shifted from that of Nordic solidarity to that of a global class conflict in which he substituted nations for the classic Marxist social categories. The United States and the British Empire, on this reading, were the “haves”, the lords of all they surveyed. The Germans, by contrast, were firmly among the “have-nots”, ground down by the forces of “plutocracy”, which were determined to extirpate the contagious social model of the Nazi Volksstaat."

He then tried to pass off the idea that the reason Britain fought on was because it was afraid of Nazi welfarism being exported to their own country.

> "He inveighed against the “money magnates”, the “Jewish and non-Jewish international bank barons” who were trying to destroy the Germany of the “welfare laws for workers” which had “removed class distinctions” in the Reich and eliminated unemployment. So fearful were Germany’s enemies of this model of “welfare and social compromise”, he claimed, that they fear “that their own people might be infected by it”. In this respect, apparently, Nazism was for export after all. The regime attached such importance to this passage in Hitler’s speech that it was reprinted in the official journal of the Reich Labor Ministry shortly afterwards."

Goebbels and Robert Ley repeated the same themes:

> "Nazi propaganda and officials such as Robert Ley describe Germany as a 'proletarian nation' as opposed to plutocratic England, a political divide that Goebbels described as "England is a capitalist democracy" and "Germany is a socialist people's state.'"
🫡7
This seals the deal. Hitler portrayed Germans as the oppressed underdogs of the White world struggling for status, essentially a rip off of Lenin's phony "proletarian anti-imperialism".

> "In his 1940 New Year’s Day address Hitler asserted that the aim of the “Jewish-capitalist world enemy” was to “destroy Germany” and “the German people”. This was because the Third Reich represented a youthful, dynamic and popular challenge to the international ruling elite, which he understood in national and generational rather than class terms. The Germans, Hitler claimed in late January 1940, were one of the “young peoples” of the world. They were challenging the “so-called propertied classes among the people” who had “robbed” Germany and were simply sitting on their ill-gotten gains. On this reading, the Germans were, so to speak, at best the poor whites of the international system. In this spirit, Hitler professed sympathy with the other wretched of the earth who groaned under the weight of imperialism and capitalism, particularly that of the British Empire. His empathy extended to not merely the Nordic Boers, but also the decidedly non-Aryan Arabs. Hitler reminded his listeners again that it was the British who “invented the concentration camp”, and argued that the blockade of Germany was simply the latest version of the age-old method of waging war against women and children."

Remember that he said this while he was brutally colonizing parts of Poland, Ukraine and Russia.
🫡8
Brendan Simms recorded Hitler's inferiority complex with Britain and America.

> "Hitler also read independently about American buildings. When Wiedemann visited the US in late 1937, he brought back architectural books for the Führer, whose ambition was to counter the German ‘inferiority complex’. The gigantism of Hitler’s vision for Germany was primarily driven by his preoccupation with the size of the United States and its monuments. The new Berlin, in other words, was being designed to equal and surpass not just its European rivals but Washington, D.C."

> "Sensitive to the (completely justified) charge that he had an inferiority complex towards Britain, Hitler pushed back vigorously. ‘I don’t suffer in the least from a sense of inferiority,’ he protested two weeks later. Anybody familiar with Hitler’s writings and speeches over the previous twenty years, however, would have known that the Führer was protesting too much."
🫡8
Goebbels said in 1939 that they are fighting England because it is capitalist and they are trying to bring about socialism. Very clear statements putting them on the side of Marxism/Communism against any form of capitalism.

> "So when Chamberlain says that England wants to destroy Hitlerism in this war, he is in one sense incorrect. But in another sense, he is speaking the truth. England does want to destroy Hitlerism. It sees Hitlerism as the present internal state of the Reich, which is a thorn in the eye of English plutocracy. England is a capitalist democracy. Germany is a socialist people’s state. And it is not the case that we think England is the richest land on earth. There are lords and City men in England who are in fact the richest men on earth. The broad masses, however, see little of this wealth."

> "The German people were once victims of lying English war propaganda. Now it understands the situation. It has long understood the background of this war. It knows that behind all English plutocratic capitalism’s fine words, its aim is to destroy Germany’s social achievements. We are defending the socialism we have build in Germany since 1933 with every military, economic and spiritual means at our disposal. The bald English lies have no impact on the German people. English plutocracy is finally being forced to defend itself. In the past, it always found other nations to fight for it. This time, the English people must themselves risk their necks for the lords and City men. They will meet a unified German people of workers, farmers, and soldiers who are prepared to defend their nation with every means at their disposal. We did not want war. England inflicted it on us. English plutocracy forced it on us. England is responsible for the war, and it will have to pay for it. The whole world is waking up today. It can no longer be ruled by the capitalist methods of the 19th century. The peoples have matured. They will one day deal a terrible blow to the capitalist plutocrats who are the cause of their misery."

Germany started the war by invading Poland and then Goebbels blames England for not letting them invade Poland, then spergs endlessly about capitalism, bankers and city men. Goebbels was always a raging Marxist who hated capitalism most of all. He said he'd "rather go down with Bolshevism than capitalism" and said "the difference between Communism and the Hitler faith was very slight".

Follow @redideologies
🫡7🔥3👍1
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
David Duke fabricated Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn's "You must understand" quote.

Follow @redideologies
👌13
😇17🫡6👍5
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Natsoc approves of the Night of the Long Knives for getting rid of the "beefsteak faction".

Problem is, all Nazis are beefsteaks (red on inside brown on outside aka communists with a swastika). It is a beefsteak ideology. Hitler kept Goebbels and Eichmann around, both of whom were "beefsteaks" part of that Strasser faction until Hitler quelled it for reasons of rivalry and nothing more. As time passed Hitler became more and more amenable to the Soviet planned economy model.

Hitler also knew Rohm was a homosexual for years and did not care, even defended him.

Why are these people so self-deluded into thinking they're different from beefsteaks when they promote the exact same economic ideas of the beefsteaks (command economy)?

@redideologies
👌9👏7
Hitler aimed for a classless society and volkisch equality.

Source: Killing History

Follow @redideologies
🫡9👍2
Profit principle virtually abolished in Italy and Germany under fascism.

Source: Killing History

Follow @redideologies
🫡10👍4👏2