The Boxheim documents revealed that in 1931 the NSDAP had a counter-revolution contingency plan that included abolishing private property.

Source: Killing History

Follow @redideologies

D'Souza & Molyneux on Leftist Fascism

Follow @redideologies

The Natsoc Germans said Greeks were inferior "half-breeds" mixed with Turks and glorified the invasion and subjugation of Greece.

> "From 22 to 25 April 1941, the Wehrmacht and the Waff en-SS stormed the pass at Thermopylae, forcing the British aside and opening the road to Attica and Athens. The event was hailed by the Völkischer Beobachter, which dedicated a significant amount of space in its daily editions to the success of the blitzkrieg. On 28 April 1941, the party daily celebrated “Der Siegeslauf nach Athen: Der Deutsche Sturm über die Thermopylen” (The triumphant race to Athens: The German assault on Thermopylae) with a long article that filled the second page: “The circle of world history has been closed today, at Thermopylae. Some 2,500 years ago, the Greek people under Leonidas held out against a numerically superior foe. They were later forced to surrender to the English. Today, with our powerful blows, we have chased the English out of Greece and out of Europe.”

> "The closing of a circle: German soldiers were the worthy descendants in a line of Nordic-Germanic heroes that began with Leonidas. Whereas the three hundred Spartan heroes had only delayed the Persian advance, German divisions had expelled their distant English successors. It was thus entirely racially and historically legitimate that the soldiers of the Reich should take possession of those distant, unredeemed Indo-Germanic lands THAT THE UNWORTHY AND RACIALLY DEGENERATE MODERN-DAY GREEKS HAD ABANDONED TO THEIR ENEMIES. Once again, a wave of Nordic heroes had brought an influx of fresh blood to civilize and save a Greece threatened by INFERIOR ASIATIC PEOPLES, INCLUDING ITS OWN CITIZENS, BASTARDS OF MIXED GREEK AND TURKISH BLOOD."

> "... In 1941, the invasion initially prompted some disillusionment and confusion, until the Nazis’ awareness of their Nordic superiority swept it away and cleared their consciences. THE CONTEMPORARY GREEK PEOPLE WERE A POPULATION OF HALF-BREEDS THAT HAD DEGENERATED THROUGH LONG CENTURIES OF PROMISCUITY AND RACIAL MIXING WITH THEIR ASIATIC AND TURKISH NEIGHBORS; ACCORDINGLY, ALL SEXUAL RELATIONS BETWEEN GERMAN SOLDIERS AND GREEK WOMEN WERE STRICTLY FORBIDDEN. Little by little, such haughty disdain would nourish and legitimate the Nazis’ practice of almost genocidal terror upon the Greek civilian population, beginning in 1942, as Mark Mazower has shown. THE GREEK PEOPLE WERE THUS LESS NATIVE TO THEIR OWN COUNTRY THAN THE GERMANS THEMSELVES, WHO WERE THE LEGITIMATE, PURE DESCENDANTS OF THE INDO-GERMANIC RACE THAT HAD COME FROM THE NORTH IN THE FIRST PLACE TO BRING CIVILIZATION TO THE GREEK PENINSULA. While the official communiqué of the Wehrmacht’s High Command (Oberkommando Wehrmacht, or OKW) proudly and insistently repeated that “the flag bearing the swastika has been raised over the Acropolis,” this declaration of possession was, in the end, nothing more than a return to racial and historical normality"

Source: Johann Chapoutot, Greeks, Romans, Germans How the Nazis Usurped Europe’s Classical Past

Follow @redideologies

The Doctrine of Fascism says that you have no civil rights and that you're a slave of the state, you must obey.

> "Anti-individualistic, the Fascist conception of life stresses the importance of the State and accepts the individual only in so far as his interests coincide with those of the State... It is opposed to classical liberalism which arose as a reaction to absolutism and exhausted its historical function when the State became the expression of the conscience and will of the people. Liberalism denied the State in the name of the individual; Fascism reasserts the rights of the State as expressing the real essence of the individual" (Translation: you obey the state)

> "And if liberty is to he the attribute of living men and not of abstract dummies invented by individualistic liberalism, then Fascism stands for liberty, and for the only liberty worth having, the liberty of the State and of the individual within the State (13). The Fascist conception of the State is all embracing; outside of it no human or spiritual values can exist, much less have value. Thus understood, Fascism, is totalitarian, and the Fascist State - a synthesis and a unit inclusive of all values - interprets, develops, and potentates the whole life of a people" (Translation: you obey the state)

> "We were the first to state, in the face of demo liberal individualism, that the individual exists only in so far as he is within the State and subjected to the requirements of the state and that, as civilization assumes aspects which grow more and more complicated, individual freedom becomes more and more restricted." (Translation: you obey the state)

> "No individuals or groups (political parties, cultural associations, economic unions, social classes) outside the State"

So if you disobey the Supreme State on any issue, you are Gulag'd. Your body is state property and you have no will of your own. The state has the right to impose any which thing it wishes upon you because only states have rights to do what they wish, not "individuals" (citizens).

Follow @redideologies

This is why you see fascists constantly sperging about "liberals" and "libertarians" because their ideology is little more than a negation of all civil liberties (gun ownership, property ownership, speech, political organizing, etc.) So their protest against modern states taking away their political civil rights or their speech rights as fascists is disingenuous because they would take away everyone else's political and speech rights as non-fascists.

Thule has been duped, like I was previously, by the Marxist framing of this issue. Hitler was indeed a diehard economic socialist who called for abolishing economic classes and created a heavily bureaucratized, regimented planned war economy. He did not "kill off the socialists" in the party in the Night of the Long Knives, he kept Goebbels, a Strasserite, as his right-hand man as well as many others like Eichmann who said his political feelings "inclined toward the left and emphasized socialist aspects every bit as much as nationalist ones".

Thule needs to read The Vampire Economy to sort himself out on this.

Natsocs claim that Hitler was "saving" everyone from Jewish power by invading them. Yet Hitler himself said that Stalin had already removed Jews from positions of power in the USSR before he invaded, but that he still hated Russia anyway.

> 'Alluding to Mussolini’s letter in January, and to his own reply a few days before the meeting, Hitler emphasized how British intransigence had forced him to conclude an alliance with Russia. But, although Stalin had deprived Bolshevism of its Jewish and international character and turned it into a ‘slavic Moscowitism’, Russia remained for Germany an ‘absolutely foreign world’. ‘For Germany only one partner came into question: Italy. Russia was only insurance cover.’

Source: Ian Kershaw, Hitler: 1936-1945 Nemesis

So that is yet another bogus justification that Natsocs use to justify Hitler's aggressions but Hitler undermines the pretext with his own words.

Follow @redideologies

> But from May [1939] onwards, Goebbels’s daily press instructions unfolded a hate campaign against Poland that made it seem as if the ethnic German inhabitants of the country, and above all of Danzig, were in constant, mortal and growing danger from violence meted out to them by Poles. ‘Ethnic Germans flee from Polish terror’, screamed the headlines. ‘German houses broken into with axes - Terrorized by Poles for weeks - Hundreds of refugees are arrested by the Poles’. Poles were allegedly murdering ethnic Germans, shooting at German passers-by in Danzig, and generally threatening to make their lives unbearable. Although the Polish government’s policy towards the ethnic German minority had been considerably less liberal and tolerant than that of its Czech counterpart, these stories were grotesque exaggerations if not pure invention. For their part, the Nazis who dominated the political scene in Danzig kept up the pressure by provoking the Poles and staging incidents for the German press to exploit, such as mounting violent attacks on Polish customs officers and spreading atrocity stories when the officers defended themselves.

Source: Richard Evans, Third Reich in Power.

A. James Gregor, a leading scholar of fascism, tells us that fascism and Marxism are very much alike:

> "What should be recognized at this point is the fact that Mussolini, whatever else he was, was a collectivist, who conceived human beings as social animals. He had learned that man was a communal being from Marx."

> "By 1938, Mussolini could confidently assert that 'in the face of the total collapse of the system [bequeathed] by Lenin, Stalin has covertly transformed himself into a Fascist.'"

> "All totalitarianism of the twentieth century were predicated on a systematic, anti-individualistic collectivism. In the case of Marxist-Leninism, the source was classical Marxism. [Giovanni] Gentile had carefully dissected the neo-Hegelian roots of that collectivism. What he found missing in the collectivism of Marx was ethical concern. He sought to provide that concern to the collectivism of Fascism—a collectivism that shared a common intellectual origin with Marxism and Marxism-Leninism."

> "What some of the revolutionary syndicalists proceed to do was to identify the 'communality' of man not will class, but with the nation. The first intimations of a 'revolutionary nationalism' made their appearance among the most radical Marxists."

> "Whether their ideological commitment was to proletarian communism, or the Nordic race, or the restoration of Italy to its proper place in the community of nations, they all chose the hierarchically structured, charismatically led single party state to pursue their ends—a state first fixed in the political doctrine by Fascism."

> "Gentile's rationale was neo-Hegelian in origin, the same source out of which Marxism and Marxism-Leninism were to emerge. In fact, Gentile understood Marxism so well that his essay on the thought of the young Marx has not only withstood the test of time, but was, on the occasion of its publication, recommended as particularly insightful by V.I. Lenin."

> "By the time of the disintegration of the Soviet Union, Marxist theoreticians had begun to evaluate fascism in a totally unanticipated fashion... More than that, as Marxist theorists were compelled to reinterpret fascism in the light of empirical evidence and political circumstances, the fundamental affinities shared by Marxist and fascist regimes became apparent."

> "The first Fascists were almost all Marxists—serious theorists who had long been identified with Italy's intelligentsia of the Left."

> "Fascism... was the socialism of 'proletarian nations.'"

> "Fascism's most direct ideological inspiration came from the collateral influence of Italy's most radical 'subversives' — the Marxists of revolutionary syndicalism."

> "[Italian] Fascism was a variant of classical Marxism, a belief system that pressed some themes argued by both Marx and Engels until they found expression in the form of 'national syndicalism' that was to animate the first Fascism."

> "Thus, by 1925, both Leninism and Fascism, variants of Marxism, had created political and economic systems that shared singular properties… Both sought order and disciple of entire populations in the service of an exclusivistic party and an ideology that found its origins in classical Marxism… Both created a kind of 'state capitalism,' informed by a unitary party, and responsible to a 'charismatics' leader."

> "It can be said, in a qualified sense, that Gentile entertained considerable sympathy for the neo-Hegelian Marxist intellectual tradition."

> "Neither Stalinism nor Fascist totalitarianism would have been possible without the transmogrified Marxism, that infilled both."

> "Fascism never served the interests of Italian business... there is no credible evidence that Fascism controlled the nation's economy for the benefit of the 'possessing classes.'"

Follow @redideologies

Hitler says "we are enemies of capitalism" in 1927 speech. What Marxist wouldn't love this guy?

Source: Killing History

Follow @redideologies

> "They will suppress all but a few friendly private interests, compelling all other individuals to sacrifice everything for their monstrous system. ... The conservative forces will be expropriated and their private property rights wiped out. The totalitarian dictatorship will become more ruthless in its attitude towards businessmen as well as workers and middle classes."

- Vampire Economy, pg. 11

Fascists want war because it gives them the excuse to solidify control over private property and suppress political factions they view as rivals.

- Vampire Economy, pg. 12

> rising dividends

But I thought the Third Reich abolished "usury"? Dividends are interest payments on stocks given to the stock holder.

Interest is not only something banks charge on loans but it is paid out to stock holders by major companies as reward for investment and is given to bank account holders, usually savings accounts, to attract depositors. So banks take in and pay out interest at the same time. Interest is also paid to bond holders. So governments will pay you interest on bonds you buy from them as a reward for investment. Otherwise nobody would buy government bonds if they got nothing in return.